Business White-Label CAM Aggregator + Mass Embed Tube Platform for Sale

[kikdirty]

We’re currently offering two white-label adult traffic platforms for operators, affiliates, and publishers who want to launch fast with a proven stack instead of building everything from scratch.

XCamsmix – White-Label CAM Aggregator Platform

XCamsmix is a CAM aggregator platform built for adult traffic, branding, SEO, and fast deployment.

It is designed for operators who want to launch their own branded cam portal with a modern frontend, admin/portal access, domain-based licensing, and a production-ready architecture.

Tech stack:

Next.js 16

React 19

TypeScript

Tailwind CSS 4

Fastify 5

PostgreSQL

Redis

JWT authentication

MFA / TOTP

Architecture:

marketing frontend in Next.js

portal/admin in Next.js

backend API in Fastify

main persistence in PostgreSQL

cache and support services in Redis

In short:
XCamsmix = Next.js + Fastify + PostgreSQL + Redis

Live showcase and demo:

https://xcamsmix.com/

https://demo.xcamsmix.com/

https://example-admin.xcamsmix.com/login

Orion – White-Label Mass Embed Tube Platform

Orion is a mass embed tube platform built for adult video traffic, SEO-driven publishing, and quick deployment.

It includes a branded frontend, full admin panel, mass embed workflow, and a backend structure built to support adult publishers who want to launch under their own brand without spending months on development.

Tech stack:

Next.js 16

React 19

TypeScript

Tailwind CSS 4

Fastify 5

PostgreSQL

Redis

JWT authentication

MFA / TOTP

Architecture:

marketing frontend in Next.js

portal/admin in Next.js

backend API in Fastify

main persistence in PostgreSQL

cache and support services in Redis

In short:
Orion = Next.js + Fastify + PostgreSQL + Redis

Live showcase and demo:

https://massembedtube.xcamsmix.com/

https://orion.xcamsmix.com/

https://example-admin.massembedtube.xcamsmix.com/login

Current pricing:

License: $600 per domain

Optional annual renewal/support: $50

If you want a ready-to-launch CAM aggregator or mass embed tube under your own brand, feel free to send me a DM.

[Shoplifter]

Well it's a very nice looking script, but long gone are the days when $600 a domain is cost efficient for me.

If this were a theme for Mechbunny it would be very interesting.

As well the last two scripts I bought on GFY were DOA for me, so I am back to Vibeing up my own, which are getting better and better.

[kikdirty]

Originally Posted by Shoplifter

Well it's a very nice looking script, but long gone are the days when $600 a domain is cost efficient for me.

If this were a theme for Mechbunny it would be very interesting.

As well the last two scripts I bought on GFY were DOA for me, so I am back to Vibeing up my own, which are getting better and better.

A theme like the one you mentioned would be very outdated in PHP. You should try something innovative if you want to rank high on Google low competition and high quality.

[emmasexytime]

Originally Posted by kikdirty

A theme like the one you mentioned would be very outdated in PHP. You should try something innovative if you want to rank high on Google low competition and high quality.

What cam sites in google rank the highest currently and what are they made with/on?

[kikdirty]

Originally Posted by emmasexytime

What cam sites in google rank the highest currently and what are they made with/on?

It’s actually a brand new project, just launched, so it’s normal it hasn’t had time to position yet.

That said, a legacy WordPress plugin or a classic PHP site simply can’t compete with a fully custom platform built on a modern stack. When you’re using a current architecture (like Next.js, TypeScript, proper backend separation, caching layers, etc.), you’re not just improving performance you’re aligning with what Google is actively rewarding today: speed, structure, scalability, and clean rendering.

Most of the existing cam sites ranking now are sitting on legacy stacks mainly because of age and backlinks, not because the tech is better. But that space is also saturated.

A modern build has a real advantage: better Core Web Vitals, cleaner indexing, and more flexibility for SEO at scale. So yes, there are definitely strong chances to rank on Google compared to older, outdated setups that are already hitting their limits.

[Umami]

Your script is not worth $600, keep dreaming bud

At most this shit is worth $50

You can give me essay responses with this blah and blah blah but at the end of the day your script is no different then any of the ones currently out there, even free ones!

Lets take a look at performance score for your so called perfectly stacked tech script





I know a free cam script that gets almost 100 performance

You are very delusional, everything I seen you post is garbage and overpriced, just like all your shit domains you try and sell

[Umami]

Anyone who pays $600 for this shit deserves to get fucked up the ass and scammed to the fullest

[Publisher Bucks]

Another AI written script LOL

[kikdirty]

Originally Posted by Umami

Your script is not worth $600, keep dreaming bud

At most this shit is worth $50

You can give me essay responses with this blah and blah blah but at the end of the day your script is no different then any of the ones currently out there, even free ones!

Lets take a look at performance score for your so called perfectly stacked tech script





I know a free cam script that gets almost 100 performance

You are very delusional, everything I seen you post is garbage and overpriced, just like all your shit domains you try and sell

[kikdirty]

Originally Posted by Publisher Bucks

Another AI written script LOL

Are you the smart one in the family?

[JesseQuinn]

I'm not here to slag you, just hopefully offering some constructive criticism as I am assume 'demo' is that and not ready for market yet (let alone for 6 bills when superior-to-this products are offered for much less)

on chrome, no spiffy ad block

demo.xcamsmix.com really pixelated home page thumbs

on perusing: chaturbate and bonga get that dreaded 'ad removed' thing, camsoda is ok though

xlove super laggy and pixelated. earlier today streamate wouldn't even load (props for fixing that)

imlive gets clicked through to the sign up page. dunno why you'd even have skyprivate when click on your site isn't even to their preview? of course no live cam, but a blank screen? no api to add the preview there? if not just wasted space

so basically on your demo a prospective cam client can view actual webcams from camsoda, sm and xlove (kinda)? and displays 'zero' count on peeps in rooms even when someone actually has a stream full of them? not great for enticement

with respect I do not think this product is ready for market. do wish you the best but this? nuh suh

[Darkhorse]

demo.xcamsmix.com really pixelated home page thumbs

I also have to agree. The homepage in general looks messy.

Nothing screams 600 bucks is worth it here for me.

Just my thoughts

[kikdirty]

Originally Posted by JesseQuinn

I'm not here to slag you, just hopefully offering some constructive criticism as I am assume 'demo' is that and not ready for market yet (let alone for 6 bills when superior-to-this products are offered for much less)

I’ll respond to your statement: if there are products of higher quality, feel free to name them so we can make a real comparison.


on chrome, no spiffy ad block

demo.xcamsmix.com really pixelated home page thumbs



By “miniatures,” do you mean “thumbnails”? They're probably really well done; they have a certain elegance that fits the theme perfectly.



on perusing: chaturbate and bonga get that dreaded 'ad removed' thing, camsoda is ok though


Unfortunately, this isn't up to me. It's a common problem: many browsers block ads, and there's nothing we can do on the programming side because the providers embedding the iframes are the ones actually responsible.



xlove super laggy and pixelated. earlier today streamate wouldn't even load (props for fixing that)

As far as I'm concerned, the xlovecash provider loads incredibly fast, to be honest. As for Streamate, it might depend on external factors, as mentioned earlier mainly loading time and the providers themselves.

imlive gets clicked through to the sign up page. dunno why you'd even have skyprivate when click on your site isn't even to their preview? of course no live cam, but a blank screen? no api to add the preview there? if not just wasted space


SkyPrivate doesn't take you to a blank screen but to the model's page; the same applies to iMlive, which redirects you to the provider's model page

so basically on your demo a prospective cam client can view actual webcams from camsoda, sm and xlove (kinda)? and displays 'zero' count on peeps in rooms even when someone actually has a stream full of them? not great for enticement

The fact that some cams show a count of 0 isn't my fault; it always depends on what data can actually be retrieved from the cam APIs not all providers provide this information.

with respect I do not think this product is ready for market. do wish you the best but this? nuh suh

The product is not only ready for the market but is also underpriced for the work that went into it. I really appreciate your interest in viewing the site. If you have any other constructive criticism, you are welcome.

[kikdirty]

Primary Admin Functions

- Dashboard: The top-level operational overview. It aggregates cam totals,
online/offline counts, new cams, sitemap counts, provider breakdowns, recent
audit entries, system readiness, license status, build/version info, and a
derived engine state such as running, disabled, stopped, or error. Source:
demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/page.tsx.
- Cam Management: A searchable, filterable cam inventory. Admins can search by
display name or username, filter by provider, tag, and online/offline state,
paginate the list, and open per-cam detail pages. Source: demo-agegate-work/
apps/admin/app/cams/page.tsx, demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/cams/cams-
client.tsx.
- Cam Detail: Per-cam control panel. It shows provider, username, profile
metadata, viewers, status, last seen, metrics, and gives direct moderation
controls: Force hide, Force show, Sitemap include, and Sitemap exclude, plus
a link to the public page. Source: demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/cams/
[id]/page.tsx, demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/cams/[id]/cam-detail-
client.tsx.
- Provider Health: Operational ingestion monitor. It tracks provider
freshness, last success time, last error time, error details, runtime
duration, and supports provider refresh/recheck workflows. Source: demo-
agegate-work/apps/admin/app/ingestion/page.tsx, demo-agegate-work/apps/
admin/app/ingestion/ingestion-client.tsx.
- Provider Configuration: Commercial and technical provider setup. This is
where affiliate IDs, whitelabel domains, embed bases, feed parameters,
clickout templates, and provider-specific routing logic are managed. It also
includes provider verification tooling and provider rebuild actions so
operators can test attribution and URL generation after edits. Source: demo-
agegate-work/apps/admin/app/providers/page.tsx, demo-agegate-work/apps/
admin/app/providers/providers-client.tsx.
- Homepage Config: Public homepage merchandising controls. It manages hero/
grid counts, ordering, featured behavior, above-the-fold density, and
homepage section tuning without editing code. Source: demo-agegate-work/
apps/admin/app/homepage/page.tsx.
- Discovery & SEO: Discovery coverage and navigation layer review. It is meant
to expose provider/tag/category coverage and content gaps for discovery
surfaces. Source: demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/discovery/page.tsx.
- SEO Control: Full SEO operations center. It loads and manages SEO pages,
templates, internal links, sitemap snapshots, crawl policy, and SEO
experiments. It is the central route for controlling indexing and route-
level SEO behavior. Source: demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/seo/page.tsx.
- Blog: Editorial CMS. Admins can list articles, create drafts, edit articles,
control slug/title/excerpt/body, metadata, OG/Twitter fields, canonical
URLs, categories, tags, cover images, and embedded ad slots. Draft and
publish state are explicit. Source: demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/blog/
page.tsx, demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/blog/new/page.tsx, demo-agegate-
work/apps/admin/app/blog/[id]/page.tsx.
- Ads & Monetization: Ad operations hub. It manages kill switch state,
placements, nav link extensions, frequency policy, ad experiments, and
revenue/impression/click reporting. Source: demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/
app/ads/page.tsx.
- Ads SEO: SEO-oriented ad/link surface management. This controls SEO-facing
affiliate link blocks rendered into header, strip, promo, footer, and
similar surfaces. Source: demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/ads-seo/page.tsx.
- Analytics: First-party reporting dashboard. It combines page views,
impressions, CTR, provider breakdowns, page-type breakdowns, SEO summary, ad
revenue summary, experiment performance, and analytics/performance risk
views. It is explicitly first-party only, not provider-side conversion
tracking. Source: demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/analytics/page.tsx.
- Security & Access: Admin IAM and hardening area. It loads admin users, role
definitions, security policy, lockout rules, and MFA status. This is where
access posture is governed. Source: demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/
security/page.tsx.
- Incident Response: Operational incident state management. It surfaces safe
mode, incident reason, flags, timestamps, and related operational state.
Source: demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/incident/page.tsx.
- Runbooks: Internal operational playbooks. It stores structured runbooks with
IDs, titles, summaries, steps, tags, and timestamps for incident handling
and standardized procedures. Source: demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/
runbooks/page.tsx.
- Audit & History: Change traceability. It lists audit events with action,
actor, timestamps, mode, and identifiers, giving compliance-grade visibility
into admin actions. Source: demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/audit/page.tsx.
- Updates: Full update workflow manager. It supports update checks, hub
checks, local ZIP upload, manifest preview, preflight, install, rollback,
progress tracking, audit history, and hub-fed release handling. This is one
of the most operationally sensitive sections. Source: demo-agegate-work/
apps/admin/app/updates/page.tsx, demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/updates/
updates-client.tsx.
- Sitemap & Indexing: Indexing-focused admin surface. In the codebase this is
part of the SEO subsystem, but the nav exposes it as a dedicated section for
sitemap rebuild/indexing actions. Source routing ties back into the SEO and
sitemap APIs.
- AI Models: AI control room. It checks model availability and AI reachability
for base, cam SEO, and blog use cases, and supports model alignment/pull/
status flows. Source: demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/ai/page.tsx.
- Legal Content: Structured editor for public legal pages. It covers terms,
privacy, 18+ compliance, 2257, DMCA, GDPR, COPPA, trust and safety, abuse
reporting, consent guidelines, and the legal overview/about text. Saving
blank content restores defaults. Source: demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/
legal-content/page.tsx, demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/legal-content/
legal-content-client.tsx.
- Branding Content: Text/content branding layer. It edits marketing copy such
as header tagline, footer story, discovery text, provider disclaimer, and
similar brand-facing strings used by the public frontend. Source: demo-
agegate-work/apps/admin/app/branding-content/page.tsx, demo-agegate-work/
apps/admin/app/branding-content/branding-content-client.tsx.
- Admin Settings: Platform-level settings and operator settings. It pulls
general settings, license runtime status, primary admin info, and current
admin context. This is where license posture, admin settings, and general
operational configuration are surfaced together. Source: demo-agegate-work/
apps/admin/app/settings/page.tsx.
- FAQ: Built-in operator documentation. It is not just help text; it acts as
an internal knowledge base describing scope, failure modes, and correct
usage of each admin function. Source: demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/faq/
page.tsx.
- Login and Logout: Session entry/exit. Login checks configured credentials,
verifies existing session cookies, supports brand-aware login labeling, and
can incorporate example credentials if enabled. Logout clears the admin
session. Source: demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/login/page.tsx, demo-
agegate-work/apps/admin/app/logout/page.tsx.

Operational/Secondary Routes

- Health & Cache: Conditionally exposed via feature flag. It loads system
health, metrics, readiness, alerts, incident state, Chaturbate diagnostics,
and Redis/cache status. This is the admin’s deep diagnostics page. Source:
demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/health/page.tsx.
- Alerts: Read-only operational alert list sourced from api-core. Source:
demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/alerts/page.tsx.
- Feature Flags: Runtime feature rollout controls. Source: demo-agegate-work/
apps/admin/app/flags/page.tsx.
- Cam SEO Override: Manual per-cam SEO payload override and approval flow. It
lets admins look up a cam, inject a structured SEO JSON payload, save it,
and explicitly approve it. Source: demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/cam-seo/
page.tsx.
- Branding Assets: Asset upload/control for logo and favicon. It supports
direct path update, file upload, and deletion for branding assets served by
the public app. Source: demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/branding-assets/
page.tsx.
- Site Config: Advanced route/page configuration studio. It manages page
definitions, route rules, ad rules, page-type bindings, preview snapshots,
version history, and rollback-oriented site config state. Source: demo-
agegate-work/apps/admin/app/site-config/page.tsx.
- Content and Site: Redirect aliases. Content redirects to branding content;
Site redirects to site config. Source: demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/
content/page.tsx, demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/app/site/page.tsx.
- Admin Root: /admin itself redirects to /admin/overview. Source: demo-
agegate-work/apps/admin/app/admin/page.tsx, demo-agegate-work/apps/admin/
app/admin/overview/page.tsx.

[kikdirty]

What This Means In Practice

- This admin is not a simple CMS. It is a combined control plane for content,
provider monetization, indexing, compliance, operations, incidents, update
delivery, and admin security.
- The most commercially important sections are Providers, Homepage, SEO, Ads,
Blog, Legal Content, and Branding Content.
- The most operationally risky sections are Updates, Security, Incident,
Health & Cache, Site Config, and Cam SEO Override.

This is just the admin description for the cam aggregator.

[kikdirty]

I’m open to criticism, and I welcome feedback when it comes from people who actually understand software, architecture, and the level of work behind a product like this. What I’m less interested in is commentary from those who are used to buying cheap, outdated PHP code and then dismissing modern, complex platforms as “trash” simply because they do not understand what they are looking at.

Honestly, I have better things to do than entertain comments of that level.

What I would expect here is at least some recognition for a new platform that is trying to bring something better to the market. Right now, there is very little truly high-quality software available in this space that is not based on old, legacy code. What I’m offering is a modern, custom-built product at a price that is actually low for what it is.

Just building the cam platform alone took more than 8 months of work and over €80,000 in development costs.

People are free to have opinions, of course. But there is a limit between criticism and pointless insults. At a certain point, comments like these only make the person writing them look ridiculous, because when someone cannot recognize the value of a serious technical product and still feels entitled to judge it aggressively, they are really only exposing their own lack of understanding.

[sarettah]

jfc, I don't know if you are alphasky coming back or tubeace resurrected, either way, you have a lot to learn.

I suggest you get rid of your gfy account and come back with a new, less sensitive and more humble board persona.

just imho of course.

edited in: furthermore, Google doesn't give one fuck what your backend is, they care about speed of load, content and backlinks.

[kikdirty]

Originally Posted by sarettah

jfc, I don't know if you are alphasky coming back or tubeace resurrected, either way, you have a lot to learn.

I suggest you get rid of your gfy account and come back with a new, less sensitive and more humble board persona.

just imho of course.

edited in: furthermore, Google doesn't give one fuck what your backend is, they care about speed of load, content and backlinks.

I’m not attacking anyone here. I’m simply offering two products I’ve built with a lot of work behind them, without disrespecting anyone.

If you’re not interested, that’s totally fine but jumping in just to dismiss everything without real arguments doesn’t really add value to the discussion.

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by kikdirty

I’m not attacking anyone here. I’m simply offering two products I’ve built with a lot of work behind them, without disrespecting anyone.

If you’re not interested, that’s totally fine but jumping in just to dismiss everything without real arguments doesn’t really add value to the discussion.

You have been offered some good feedback on your product in this thread and you have pretty much dismissed everything that was said. Then you claimed that the people making the comments just don't "understand software, architecture, and the level of work behind a product like this."

It does not matter one iota how much effort you put into the product if you can't listen to the people telling you what they see as wrong with the product.

So you can keep on telling people (and yourself) that they just don't understand, or you can shut up and listen to what is being said and perhaps improve your product and your sales.

.

[Shoplifter]

Originally Posted by sarettah

So you can keep on telling people (and yourself) that they just don't understand,

This, there is a great deal of practical knowledge here.

Honestly I would build your brand elsewhere and then let it speak for yourself rather than post here. When or if that value becomes apparent then you will be sought out.

As well GFY has a scammer problem which is not going to help you in any way.

[kikdirty]

Originally Posted by Shoplifter

This, there is a great deal of practical knowledge here.

Honestly I would build your brand elsewhere and then let it speak for yourself rather than post here. When or if that value becomes apparent then you will be sought out.

As well GFY has a scammer problem which is not going to help you in any way.

Saretta, between your account and the other one, you’ve posted over 25,000 replies combined, and both accounts were created in 2022. At this point, it really does look like the same person hiding behind multiple profiles just to insult people, make pointless accusations, and throw around baseless judgments.

Now you’re even calling me a scammer for selling something I actually built myself. That says more about you than it does about me.

You should stop doing this across every thread. While you keep posting nonsense, I’ll keep doing real business and selling licenses for products I created.

If this place had actual moderation, you would’ve been kicked out already. Unfortunately, GFY is still the same mess it’s been for years, with nobody stopping people like you from flooding threads with the same brainless bullshit.

My patience is gone, so this is the last time I’m responding to you. From here on, I’ll ignore any further replies, regardless of which account you decide to use next to spam the same nonsense.

[Shoplifter]

Originally Posted by kikdirty

Saretta and you have over 25,000 replies together. Both your accounts were created in 2022. You're talking the same bullshit.

I gather you have replied to the wrong person. I would never infer you were a scammer, but rather that promotions on GFY are not taken seriously any more because of rampant scamming here.

[JesseQuinn]

Originally Posted by sarettah

...
.

Originally Posted by Shoplifter

...

whelp, I tried, but got hit with a wall of text cuz I can't wrap my head around ish like client experience. as a performer and aff it's an immediate gratification thing. don't grab them and they'll spend elsewhere. I'm not an expert, I'm still (always) learning, but aff-wise I do know how to keep myself in cigs and cat litter without spending $600 on a product that needs a lot of front end work. both of you know this from experience way more than me

notice a bunch of providers have been removed from the home page but still the first two 'aesthically pleasing' cam rooms get the ad removed bane of existence which every other provider has been able to solve

for real OP you spent 80k on this? why? you coulda built water pipelines and provided elec and internet to even the furthest outreaches of the hills in my region for way less than that (we are working on it, a lot accomplished but still much to do) and I bet a bunch of peeps woulda signed up under you to make money in aff with a simple wp lander or wl. both free, both effective in conversions as opposed to a frustrating client-experience mess with a bunch of back end code that in practicality means nothing

that's what it's about right, at the end of the day? money in, money out, how cash allocation is spent. probably don't come off as respectful right now but I'm striving to be. that said think you lost the plot. 80k? selling this for $600? dang


PS just saw you attacking my girl who is not a girl. I have no idea why I'm adding so many question marks in my responses to you but I'll run with it and add another. S a fake nic? really? setting aside his stellar solution-oriented programming skills he's an aff who might make one or two dimes to rub together

and gave you probably the most important advice in this thread

step back. regroup. deep breath. sincerely wish you luck on a path that's not this

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by kikdirty

Saretta, between your account and the other one, you’ve posted over 25,000 replies combined, and both accounts were created in 2022. At this point, it really does look like the same person hiding behind multiple profiles just to insult people, make pointless accusations, and throw around baseless judgments.

blah blah blah wibble wibble more bullshit.

1. It is sarettah, not saretta.

2. My join date is Oct 2002 not 2022.

3. You sound like you are accusing me of using multiple accounts which I am not doing.

4. I have not made any "pointless accusations" or "baseless judgements", I offered sound advice which, as you have done to all other advice you have received, you are rejecting and attacking the messenger.

Now, the accusations that you made could easily get you banned from the board so I expect an apology from you or else it will be gtfo.

edited in: you also said that I called you a scammer. Please point out where I did that.

[kikdirty]

Originally Posted by sarettah

1. It is sarettah, not saretta.

2. My join date is Oct 2002 not 2022.

3. You sound like you are accusing me of using multiple accounts which I am not doing.

4. I have not made any "pointless accusations" or "baseless judgements", I offered sound advice which, as you have done to all other advice you have received, you are rejecting and attacking the messenger.

Now, the accusations that you made could easily get you banned from the board so I expect an apology from you or else it will be gtfo.

edited in: you also said that I called you a scammer. Please point out where I did that.

This thread is open to anyone who is really interested in buying a new mass embed tube and a cam aggregator. I honestly don't have time to waste with fake profiles or useless spammers.

[kikdirty]

Originally Posted by JesseQuinn

whelp, I tried, but got hit with a wall of text cuz I can't wrap my head around ish like client experience. as a performer and aff it's an immediate gratification thing. don't grab them and they'll spend elsewhere. I'm not an expert, I'm still (always) learning, but aff-wise I do know how to keep myself in cigs and cat litter without spending $600 on a product that needs a lot of front end work. both of you know this from experience way more than me

notice a bunch of providers have been removed from the home page but still the first two 'aesthically pleasing' cam rooms get the ad removed bane of existence which every other provider has been able to solve

for real OP you spent 80k on this? why? you coulda built water pipelines and provided elec and internet to even the furthest outreaches of the hills in my region for way less than that (we are working on it, a lot accomplished but still much to do) and I bet a bunch of peeps woulda signed up under you to make money in aff with a simple wp lander or wl. both free, both effective in conversions as opposed to a frustrating client-experience mess with a bunch of back end code that in practicality means nothing

that's what it's about right, at the end of the day? money in, money out, how cash allocation is spent. probably don't come off as respectful right now but I'm striving to be. that said think you lost the plot. 80k? selling this for $600? dang


PS just saw you attacking my girl who is not a girl. I have no idea why I'm adding so many question marks in my responses to you but I'll run with it and add another. S a fake nic? really? setting aside his stellar solution-oriented programming skills he's an aff who might make one or two dimes to rub together

and gave you probably the most important advice in this thread

step back. regroup. deep breath. sincerely wish you luck on a path that's not this

This thread is open to anyone who is really interested in buying a new mass embed tube and a cam aggregator. I honestly don't have time to waste with fake profiles or useless spammers.

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by kikdirty

This thread is open to anyone who is really interested in buying a new mass embed tube and a cam aggregator. I honestly don't have time to waste with fake profiles or useless spammers.

This thread is actually open to any member that wants to post in it.

That is the second time that you have accused me of being a fake nick and now you are accusing me of being a spammer too.

So, you want to play, we can play.

.

[Publisher Bucks]

Originally Posted by sarettah

This thread is actually open to any member that wants to post in it.

That is the second time that you have accused me of being a fake nick and now you are accusing me of being a spammer too.

So, you want to play, we can play.

.

uh oh... This wont end well for the OP

[JesseQuinn]

Originally Posted by Publisher Bucks

uh oh... This wont end well for the OP

attacking S with baseless allegations, spending 80k building the thing (still cannot wrap my head around that), launching a product that doesn't work with cb when the 200 page thread for that platform might indicate that's a significant source of aff revenue around here...I'm not sure which is the poorest element of biz strategy

dealer's choice I guess. wowza. I actually feel bad for the OP, kinda

[Mr Pheer]

It's like SRP is using a chatbot to post for him to hide his identity... but not masking the crazy spending on mediocrity.

[kikdirty]

I’m going to keep this simple and bring the thread back to what actually matters.

There’s been a mix of feedback here some of it useful and specific, and some of it clearly just noise or unnecessarily aggressive. That’s fine, it comes with the territory.

Also, for those just following along: I understand not everyone wants to step into a thread like this, especially when it turns into noise. Just keep in mind that loud opinions don’t always reflect reality the value of a product is better judged by what it actually does, not by who speaks the most.

Just to clarify one important point so there’s no confusion:

a big part of what some people are calling “issues” are actually limitations of the entire cam/affiliate ecosystem, not bugs of the platform itself.

When you are dealing with third-party providers, iframe embeds, and affiliate routing, things like ad blockers, redirects, or missing data are controlled by the providers not by the platform displaying them. This applies to every cam aggregator out there.

From a technical standpoint, the platform is built on real metrics and real optimization work: performance, SEO structure, and architecture are designed for fast rendering, clean indexing, and scalability.

Of course, like any serious project, things are continuously reviewed and refined but the core system is doing exactly what it’s meant to do.

This isn’t a cheap plug-and-play script. It’s a structured platform for operators who understand how this space works and want something scalable under their own brand.

If that’s not your approach, that’s completely fine. If it is, you’ll understand the value behind it.

If anyone is genuinely interested, feel free to reach out via DM.

[NatalieK]

Originally Posted by JesseQuinn

whelp, I tried, but got hit with a wall of text cuz I can't wrap my head around ish like client experience. as a performer and aff it's an immediate gratification thing. don't grab them and they'll spend elsewhere. I'm not an expert, I'm still (always) learning, but aff-wise I do know how to keep myself in cigs and cat litter without spending $600 on a product that needs a lot of front end work. both of you know this from experience way more than me

notice a bunch of providers have been removed from the home page but still the first two 'aesthically pleasing' cam rooms get the ad removed bane of existence which every other provider has been able to solve

for real OP you spent 80k on this? why? you coulda built water pipelines and provided elec and internet to even the furthest outreaches of the hills in my region for way less than that (we are working on it, a lot accomplished but still much to do) and I bet a bunch of peeps woulda signed up under you to make money in aff with a simple wp lander or wl. both free, both effective in conversions as opposed to a frustrating client-experience mess with a bunch of back end code that in practicality means nothing

that's what it's about right, at the end of the day? money in, money out, how cash allocation is spent. probably don't come off as respectful right now but I'm striving to be. that said think you lost the plot. 80k? selling this for $600? dang


PS just saw you attacking my girl who is not a girl. I have no idea why I'm adding so many question marks in my responses to you but I'll run with it and add another. S a fake nic? really? setting aside his stellar solution-oriented programming skills he's an aff who might make one or two dimes to rub together

and gave you probably the most important advice in this thread

step back. regroup. deep breath. sincerely wish you luck on a path that's not this

sadly likewise, the site doesn´t even load for us here in Spain...

The site can´t be reached...

it´s not good, sorry kikdirty, but you have to sort this out

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Mr Pheer

It's like SRP is using a chatbot to post for him to hide his identity... but not masking the crazy spending on mediocrity.

I don't think he is a native english speaker, i believe he is using a translator possibly ai type.

.

[Duced]

Hold the fuck up.

Looking back on the kikdirty.com domain on wayback machine it used to be quite a populated forum for "kik" and "snapchat" usernames with an insane amount of threads/post.

Now you have decided for it to be a cam aggregator script that you want to resell, completely dropping the original content and purpose of that domain/site.

Something doesn't add up here.

Looking at similarweb, you seem to have steady amount of traffic of recent times, probably not as much as your peak period, when this niche was highly popular.

But it seems you ruffled a few feathers from the start of your journey on here:

gfy.com/sell-and-buy-forum/1256350-wts-hardlinks-forum-site.html

[kikdirty]

Originally Posted by Duced

Hold the fuck up.

Looking back on the kikdirty.com domain on wayback machine it used to be quite a populated forum for "kik" and "snapchat" usernames with an insane amount of threads/post.

Now you have decided for it to be a cam aggregator script that you want to resell, completely dropping the original content and purpose of that domain/site.

Something doesn't add up here.

Looking at similarweb, you seem to have steady amount of traffic of recent times, probably not as much as your peak period, when this niche was highly popular.

But it seems you ruffled a few feathers from the start of your journey on here:

gfy.com/sell-and-buy-forum/1256350-wts-hardlinks-forum-site.html

The fact that I actively use the product I’m selling on my own website where I previously ran a forum with over 14 million threads should already say a lot about its value. If it weren’t solid and reliable, I wouldn’t be using it myself.

No problem just someone who completely overreacted over $70.

For clarity, there’s still an active link I’m currently offering for free, and if you reach out to him, he can confirm that directly. This has been the only issue in over 10 years of sales and more than 2,000 customers.

At this point, spreading baseless claims doesn’t add anything useful. If you’re not genuinely interested, it’s better to step aside rather than try to create unnecessary noise around something you clearly don’t understand.

I’m focused on people who actually want to discuss the product seriously.

[kikdirty]

Originally Posted by Duced

Hold the fuck up.

Looking back on the kikdirty.com domain on wayback machine it used to be quite a populated forum for "kik" and "snapchat" usernames with an insane amount of threads/post.

Now you have decided for it to be a cam aggregator script that you want to resell, completely dropping the original content and purpose of that domain/site.

Something doesn't add up here.

Looking at similarweb, you seem to have steady amount of traffic of recent times, probably not as much as your peak period, when this niche was highly popular.

But it seems you ruffled a few feathers from the start of your journey on here:

gfy.com/sell-and-buy-forum/1256350-wts-hardlinks-forum-site.html

For clarity, I want to make a brief summary, especially since a 10-year-old post is being brought up again, so everyone can see the situation more clearly.

Back then, Brian Mike and I had a banner sale agreement. The issue was that his script was not working with XenForo, so I opened a support ticket on the official forum to get help integrating it properly. In the meantime, Brian had already sent the $70.

The problem escalated because I did not reply to him on Skype one morning. I am in Italy, and because of the time difference, if I am asleep, I simply cannot respond. After waiting a few days with no update yet from the ticket, and not seeing an immediate reply from me on Skype, he assumed I was trying to scam him.

As for PayPal, the dispute had been closed. In reality, I had closed it myself because I intended to send the money directly instead of leaving the original transaction history there. That was a mistake on my part, but it was not done with fraudulent intent.

When I woke up, I found a huge number of Skype messages and, on top of that, a thread on GFY publicly calling me a scammer. At that point, seeing how fast the accusations had started without even giving me time to explain, I decided I did not want to give him anything at all and responded on GFY, asking him to apologize and showing people how he had handled the situation.

From there, the matter dragged on for a long time. Obviously, my reaction toward him became offensive, just as his was toward me. The difference is that I defended myself alone, while he opened multiple threads and built a small group of allies whose only purpose seemed to be to keep attacking my name.

Regarding the accusation about the banner I once had on KikDirty, it was a banner with wording that, as an Italian, I honestly did not understand was referring to animals or anything similar. There was nothing explicitly written. It only had “K9” combined with a Skype contact. At the time, I did not know what it meant.

I do not know whether that was intentionally done by someone to continue the drama, but I do know I was actually paid for the banner, and the person who paid me was an Indian customer. The banner was online for a little over two hours before someone contacted the Skype account in question and, after a long conversation, discovered that he was selling videos involving sex with animals.

That said, I am not responsible for what another person does on their own website or in private chats. There was nothing explicit in the banner itself, and as soon as I understood the situation and read the conversation from the person who reported it on GFY, I removed it immediately. I do not consider myself responsible for that.

There were also threads offering payment for my photo, people posting Facebook pictures of completely different individuals, and all kinds of invented stories whose only purpose was to keep the circus going.

To conclude: after around six months of constant attacks between me and Brian Mike, he eventually wrote to me saying that, from his side, everything was fine and settled. To thank him and to show my honesty after all the mud that had been thrown at me, I voluntarily gave him a link on KikDirty.com a link I normally sell for $250 per year. That link is still active today.

On top of that, over the years we have also exchanged favors, so we are on good terms. I consider myself one of the most honest and respectable sellers on GFY. I have made over 2,000 sales without problems with anyone.

I would also like to add that I am currently building a partnership with a hosting company that has a highly authoritative brand. They themselves have seen and recognized that the product I sell has real quality, otherwise they would never have considered doing a bundle with me. Honestly, I would not want them to be dragged into something like this as well, so I would appreciate a bit more respect from all of you.

There are also people on GFY who have written to me privately established programmers with many years of experience to compliment the work I have done. I do not want to name them or involve them, and some of them even advised me not to respond to any of this. But at the same time, I have the right to defend myself from comments clearly designed to damage my image and devalue my product.

At this point, I honestly think those continuing this theater are the ones making themselves look bad. So what I ask is simple: stop this, let this thread return to its original purpose, and allow it to remain what it was meant to be from the beginning a sales thread for two valid, premium products: a cam aggregator and a mass embed video platform.

[Duced]

What made you rug pull the forum though?

That's what baffles me the most...

You're giving me Kevin Rose Digg CEO of 2026 vibes here.

[kikdirty]

Originally Posted by Duced

What made you rug pull the forum though?

That's what baffles me the most...

You're giving me Kevin Rose Digg CEO of 2026 vibes here.

Sure, I can definitely answer that.

The reason that led me to transition the forum into a cam site was the decline in traffic. Platforms like Kik and Snapchat have significantly dropped in search interest, and most of the traffic was originally driven by users looking to exchange contacts through the site.

At the same time, I noticed that one of my subfolders, which was focused on cam content, was experiencing strong growth. Based on that trend, I decided it made more sense to replace the main site with a cam aggregator.

I’ve also attached a Google Analytics history showing the increase in traffic that the subfolder was gaining.

From your perspective, what would you have done in that situation? If you saw a niche clearly growing while the original one was declining in search interest, would you have made the same shift?

I still have the full forum structure available, by the way. If it’s something you’d be interested in, I could also consider selling it.


https://i.ibb.co/d430J8gj/IMG-5717.png

[Duced]

Dang man, I would have funnelled that traffic into a new/existing cam domain, definitely not switching up the whole site where you had historic content.

Big Goog ain't gonna be happy about that I wonder....

And nope not interested, like you mentioned. A dying niche. Must have been a goldmine whilst it lasted....

Didn't Kik turn into live streaming stuff like Kick.com but Kik was licensed by The Meet Group's platform from what I remember a couple years back.

[kikdirty]

Originally Posted by Duced

Dang man, I would have funnelled that traffic into a new/existing cam domain, definitely not switching up the whole site where you had historic content.

Big Goog ain't gonna be happy about that I wonder....

And nope not interested, like you mentioned. A dying niche. Must have been a goldmine whilst it lasted....

Didn't Kik turn into live streaming stuff like Kick.com but Kik was licensed by The Meet Group's platform from what I remember a couple years back.

I get your point, but the decision wasn’t random it was based on actual traffic and search trend data.

The original niche had been declining for a while, while the cam side was showing clear growth, so from a business perspective it made more sense to adapt rather than keep holding onto something losing momentum.

As for the historic content, I understand the argument, but keeping old structure alone doesn’t automatically preserve value if the niche behind it is fading. Sometimes it’s better to evolve around what is actually growing.

And yes, the old niche did very well for a long time, but that’s exactly the point markets change, and you either adapt early or get stuck defending something that already peaked.

Regarding Kik, yes, the space changed a lot over time, which is another reason why I moved in a direction that showed stronger present demand rather than relying on past performance.

[Duced]

Well sir, hats off to you, thats a brave move.

Honestly, you need to refine the admin areas as well. It's just not that intuitive even to a power user. The UI is a vibe coded mess and looks like a UX nightmare after checking out the demo in more depth. It needs more polish. Sure there are "powerful features" under the hood but you have to take the front end seriously here as well, not serve up this kind of slop for commercial use.

[kikdirty]

Originally Posted by Duced

Well sir, hats off to you, thats a brave move.

Honestly, you need to refine the admin areas as well. It's just not that intuitive even to a power user. The UI is a vibe coded mess and looks like a UX nightmare after checking out the demo in more depth. It needs more polish. Sure there are "powerful features" under the hood but you have to take the front end seriously here as well, not serve up this kind of slop for commercial use.

Fair feedback, but I think you’re looking at a technical control layer as if it was supposed to behave like a casual end-user app.

The admin was built that way on purpose because it’s meant to give very deep control over the platform, not just a simplified surface dashboard. A lot of what sits behind it is highly technical, and naturally not every user will immediately understand every function at first glance. That’s exactly why the more advanced parts are documented in the FAQ, and why active support is available for any question or onboarding need.

The simpler areas are already the ones intended for practical day-to-day use, like managing cams, ads, routing and the core discovery flow. The rest exists because the backend is doing far more than a lightweight consumer panel. It handles a large number of moving parts, options and controls across the platform.

Even from the screenshots, the front end is not some random mess. It clearly shows structured discovery paths: provider listings, legal and compliance sections, category and tag grouping, live room surfacing, fast-entry links, and search-oriented navigation. That’s not accidental it’s deliberate architecture built around discovery, compliance and control.

Also, a large part of the platform is written in Rust specifically to handle heavy loads more efficiently and reduce hosting resource consumption. That was a deliberate engineering choice focused on performance, stability and scalability, not just appearance.

Could polish be improved further? Of course. Any serious product can always be refined. But complexity alone doesn’t mean bad design. In this case, a lot of what you’re calling unintuitive is simply the result of the platform offering a high degree of control under the hood.

So I’m fine with specific criticism, but there’s a difference between “this could be polished more” and pretending there’s no structure or logic behind it. There is it’s just more technical than what some people expect at first glance.

[Duced]

I'm more confused now. You never mentioned you implemented Rust in your stack in your original post. Just React + Next + Fastify + Redis + Postgres????

[Darkhorse]

Originally Posted by kikdirty

Even from the screenshots, the front end is not some random mess. It clearly shows structured discovery paths: provider listings, legal and compliance sections, category and tag grouping, live room surfacing, fast-entry links, and search-oriented navigation. That’s not accidental it’s deliberate architecture built around discovery, compliance and control.

More isn’t always better. This front-end dumps everything at once, creating clutter, confusion, and poor usability.

[kikdirty]

https://i.ibb.co/1NxyV9j/IMG-5730.png

That was the public-facing stack summary, not a full internal repo breakdown. I didn’t post every implementation detail needed to run it. Rust is used in part of the system for performance-critical areas, heavy-load handling, and reducing resource usage.

[kikdirty]

Originally Posted by Darkhorse

More isn’t always better. This front-end dumps everything at once, creating clutter, confusion, and poor usability.

That’s a fair opinion, but “showing more” and “dumping everything” are not the same thing. This isn’t a one-page toy frontend it’s a discovery platform with multiple layers: providers, rooms, tags, routing, compliance, ads, and search paths. Naturally it carries more surface area than a minimal UI.

[Darkhorse]

Originally Posted by kikdirty

That’s a fair opinion, but “showing more” and “dumping everything” are not the same thing. This isn’t a one-page toy frontend it’s a discovery platform with multiple layers: providers, rooms, tags, routing, compliance, ads, and search paths. Naturally it carries more surface area than a minimal UI.

I understand it’s a discovery platform, but even with multiple layers, the layout overwhelms rather than guides. More surface area does not replace hierarchy, spacing, or clarity, and with this demo layout users will struggle to find what matters, likely leading to a high bounce rate.

That said, I’m sure for a product you’ve spent over $80K on, you’ve done internal testing and iterations on the front-end, so I may well be wrong.

[kikdirty]

Originally Posted by Darkhorse

I understand it’s a discovery platform, but even with multiple layers, the layout overwhelms rather than guides. More surface area does not replace hierarchy, spacing, or clarity, and with this demo layout users will struggle to find what matters, likely leading to a high bounce rate.

That said, I’m sure for a product you’ve spent over $80K on, you’ve done internal testing and iterations on the front-end, so I may well be wrong.

Given there are over 100k lines of code behind it, $80k is not some absurd number at all. People keep talking about the frontend as if that alone defines the cost, but the spend covers the full product: architecture, backend, licensing, deployment logic, infra, performance work, admin controls, provider handling, compliance, and everything else under the hood.

You can argue about layout choices, sure. But reducing the value of a system like this to a quick visual judgment on the demo front end misses most of what was actually built.

For context, current market rates are nowhere near “cheap rebuild” territory. On Upwork, software developers are commonly listed around $10–$100/hr, with expert rates at $70–$150+/hr, and full-stack developers often around $16–$35/hr on the lower-to-mid marketplace range. Clutch also shows many software agencies charging about $24–$49/hr, while Arc’s vetted freelance software-development rates average around $81–$100/hr.

Just imagine that all of this is being offered to you turnkey, with 1 year of included support, for only $600 per domain license. Do you seriously think rebuilding the same thing from scratch would cost you the same money? If you’re lucky, it would cost far more in both time and budget.

[Darkhorse]

Originally Posted by kikdirty

Given there are over 100k lines of code behind it, $80k is not some absurd number at all. People keep talking about the frontend as if that alone defines the cost, but the spend covers the full product: architecture, backend, licensing, deployment logic, infra, performance work, admin controls, provider handling, compliance, and everything else under the hood.

You can argue about layout choices, sure. But reducing the value of a system like this to a quick visual judgment on the demo front end misses most of what was actually built.

For context, current market rates are nowhere near “cheap rebuild” territory. On Upwork, software developers are commonly listed around $10–$100/hr, with expert rates at $70–$150+/hr, and full-stack developers often around $16–$35/hr on the lower-to-mid marketplace range. Clutch also shows many software agencies charging about $24–$49/hr, while Arc’s vetted freelance software-development rates average around $81–$100/hr.

Just imagine that all of this is being offered to you turnkey, with 1 year of included support, for only $600 per domain license. Do you seriously think rebuilding the same thing from scratch would cost you the same money? If you’re lucky, it would cost far more in both time and budget.

Can the front end be easily edited for a buyer? For example, could I adjust the layout myself if needed?

[kikdirty]

Originally Posted by Darkhorse

Can the front end be easily edited for a buyer? For example, could I adjust the layout myself if needed?

Yes, the front-end is fully editable.

It’s built with a modern stack (Next.js + TypeScript), so any developer with basic experience can easily adjust layouts, components, and styling without needing to touch the core backend logic.

The structure is modular, meaning you can:
modify sections independently
adjust UI/UX without breaking functionality
customize pages based on your needs