News Ofcom clarifies what counts as 'pornographic'

[cordoba]

“When deciding what content is suitable to include before an age gate, services should refer to our guidance on pornographic content, considering the wider context of their site and whether the images or videos are accompanied by sexually explicit language in titles, for example ... What matters is whether it is reasonable to assume the content was produced principally for the purpose of sexual arousal,” the statement clarifies.

https://www.xbiz.com/news/295211/ofc...or-adult-sites

I guess there is no way I can make my shemale blog non-pornographic according to this standard.

[DVTimes]

In truth they will cover everything to claim it is porn. Even if you find a way around it, they will no doubt update things to include.

[CaptainHowdy]

Everything is porn according to Freud . . .

[The Porn Nerd]

Isn't just about everything on social media 'produced principally for the purpose of sexual arousal'? LOL

[INever]

colonialist patronizing puritan hypocritical mindset 3.0

am not a brit so they can just get tossed.

[Rochard]

"What matters is whether it is reasonable to assume the content was produced principally for the purpose of sexual arousal."

Mkay.

So now Carls Jr is in the porn business?



Honda too?

[The Porn Nerd]

Originally Posted by Rochard

Mkay.

So now Carls Jr is in the porn business?



Honda too?

Exactly!! So all porn producers have to do now is:

Shoot the porn scene then at the end hold up a Dominoes logo and go 'Buy a pizza!' and we're good, right?

[pornmasta]

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd

Exactly!! So all porn producers have to do now is:

Shoot the porn scene then at the end hold up a Dominoes logo and go 'Buy a pizza!' and we're good, right?

Make anything educative, say the porn part is for users attention

[mechanicvirus]

Aren't OFCOM now being threatened by the US justice department over X?

[The Porn Nerd]

Originally Posted by pornmasta

Make anything educative, say the porn part is for users attention

Hey the 'intended purpose' is not to arouse sexually, it's to sell pizza!

[NatalieK]

Originally Posted by pornmasta

Make anything educative, say the porn part is for users attention

that´s exactly what we just thought...

make a film, naked on the bed, legs wide apart, sliding a big fat toy, fucking the huge toy, but while fucking it, saying very clearly & not provocatively

"First, we insert the length of the tool inside the vagina. Next we continue to pump the vagina with the big fat tool"...


education, this could be seen as "educational", not porn

[pornmasta]

Originally Posted by NatalieK

that´s exactly what we just thought...

make a film, naked on the bed, legs wide apart, sliding a big fat toy, fucking the huge toy, but while fucking it, saying very clearly & not provocatively

"First, we insert the length of the tool inside the vagina. Next we continue to pump the vagina with the big fat tool"...


education, this could be seen as "educational", not porn

or this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenna

They criticize playboy, but when I test their pictures, they rank very high on esthetics models.

[CurrentlySober]

It all goes in circles - Looking back at 1991 in the UK - (Seems like only yesterday) - Porn was 100% illegal - So they decide to make a porn film and dress it up as 'education' - For example they 'Needed' to show an erection, in order to show the correct way to apply a condom... Hence 'Educational'

Needless to say it sold over 200,000 units on video in the first couple of weeks and went on to sell over 1.3 million tapes overall!

Full story here - If anyone's interested - 'The Lovers Guide"

[TheLegacy]

It would suck as a content provider to have your images/videos declared safe for the masses because there is no way that your models could induce sexual arousal.

[NatalieK]

Originally Posted by pornmasta

or this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenna

They criticize playboy, but when I test their pictures, they rank very high on esthetics models.

that´s so crazy

Originally Posted by CurrentlySober

they 'Needed' to show an erection, in order to show the correct way to apply a condom... Hence 'Educational'

there you go...

now considering pushing the barrier & shooting an "educational" video, 20 mins of how a woman & man have sex & another 20 min episode to show how to use toys for the educational fact of stimulation & arousal....

wonder if i would need a PhD & then this would be classed as education, maybe gaining a doctorate would be worthwhile lol

Originally Posted by TheLegacy

It would suck as a content provider to have your images/videos declared safe for the masses because there is no way that your models could induce sexual arousal.

at least I know our blog is seen as porn, was told by one of my subs, the blog was blocked in a club he works in using their wifi...






You know, all this porn blocking & Ofcom clarifying what is "porn". Afternoon & evening TV will have to change, the amount of seductive programs that are just dramas, it´s got to be good for the porn business & maybe shall stop singers like Taylor Swift flaunting all her goods on stage