So change the slang. Make up a new word and use it in about 100 TGP galleries and whala.. New term.. New Word to search by..

165# ?? Damn... I passed by that when I was like 15.
I was just noticing that I had bopped up above 265# and was needing to get my ass back in the gym.

John Asshahahahaha doesn't like homos. It is evil and is satans work. Homos are agents of satan. It is proobably his policy to put a stop to such evildoers by pressuring VISA/MASTERCARD. Words like 'twink' homo, gay should all be banned cause they are evil

lol

:thumbsup

lol

Look dumbass, for the last time. I am NOT an employee anywhere. I do not have a job. I have CLIENTS, which number well and beyond ePassporte but do NOT include Epoch.

Ok now that we have that settled, let's look at your funny comments to Backov --

Obviously YOU are the clueless one. Someone that has been improperly acquiring under the Visa US definitions does not just move their clients OR their databases into the US at the drop of a hat. It just doesn't work that way any more. Visa US has, at their discretion, the right to refuse to allow US banks to issue merchant accounts to ANYONE they want to, including IPSPs, if they choose.

I guess you dont know so much about card processing as you claim to.

Twink does not necessarily mean underage, but it can refer to underage cuties any place I have lived. I am no banker or processing expert, so I have no idea if it is a good business decision for Globill to be down on the word when the content is legal. But there is nothing homophobic about knowing the implications. The youthfulness implied does not need to mean underage, but . . .

Example:

Cute high school junior dancing his slender butt off at a nightclub could not be posted nude on your site but could reasonably be referred to as a twink.

Yes, but he could also be referred to as a teen, or a young man or a boy or just plain young. Someone looking for CP is most likely looking for kids, not teenagers. I mean in reality..what's a CP site more likely to use? Check out this hot 8 year old twink? The logic is off the wall. As I said before..it's just going to hurt legitimate businesses who abide by the laws.

-joe

They are a credit card processor who pays, charges a little higher percentage than others, and scrubs the transactions very thoroughly.

It's their way, if you don't like the TOS, then get someone else.

Obviously this policy is theirs to preclude anything which may come down from credit card merchant banks

and it isn't anything new, they've been doing it from the outset...

My point still stands, anyone with half a dozen braincells can see you have an agenda. Just happens to be a freelance one rather than an employee one.

Nevetheless, I apologise for the incorrect information.

*sigh* You make it too easy.
Okay, lets completely ignore the fact that ACPay are currently moving their US webmasters over without, apparently, any problems........

Who has been improperly acquiring under VISA US ? Certainly not US webmasters with Globill, Verotel and other non-VISA US IPSP's.

*Stop* ! *think* ! about what your've just said for a moment.

You really think, say, VISA ASIA (or whereever Globill operate, I'll use VISA ASIA from now on) are aiding and abetting the breaking of VISA US regs ?

Of course fucking not. Ever since this debacle began certain fee paying processors, the ones that just rolled over and shafted their webmasters, have been repeating time after time that any US webmasters who didn't pay the fee *right now* would be fucked. It's a lie. It was a lie then, it's a lie now. It was a scare tactic (along with the 'Globill will close down' lie) to try and stop the bucket loads of webmasters who left these shady processors.


I am truly surprized to find someone like you peddling that crap. VISA ASIA shafting VISA US, heh heh heh.....you certainly have an imagination KimmyKim.




P.S. That's MISTER Dumbass to you.

Right on bruddah!!

:thumbsup

so did you want salt with that foot kimmy?

edit: btw, their use of the word "editorial" is within definition. go earn some english.

The only foot problem I have is the titanium plate they put in one of them today.

My comments stand as I wrote them.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I think we can all agree that someone who wants to see pictures of small children being tortured has a few more screws loose than someone who just really likes Fast Times at Ridgemont High. But an adult site with models under 18 would be a no-no either way and I think that is Globill's concern. A site that was like check out this hot 16 year old twink would still be CP, although I think you are correct that sickos who like 8 year olds would be unlikely to call the objects of their desire twinks.

I absolutely agree with you Amelia. But then this type of situation needs to be taken on a case by case basis. They seem to be instituting a rule which would take out about 50% of the gay sites on the internet if they were processing with GloBill as an easy way of getting rid of that 1 in 100000 who might have underage material, rather doing things the hard way - going through site by site to make sure they are compliant, something I think they are all going to have to start doing eventually. Getting rid of a word does not get rid of the problem. If they are going to start being police officers, then do it right...don't punish the innocent with the guilty.

-joe