Don't expect much of a resistance to Age Verification from the industry - GoFuckYourself.com

DemonitizedPorn · 07-31-2025, 06:04 PM

The people responsible for this problem are Pornhub, Xhamster, Xvideos and the other tube sites. Their business models were based on theft, marketing to children and money laundering. You should expect them to roll over on this issue and throw the creators under the bus. The annoying part will be the hypocrisy of how they did something pointless but it magically protects everyone and makes the industry a better place

CyberHustler · 08-01-2025, 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DemonitizedPorn

The people responsible for this problem are Pornhub, Xhamster, Xvideos and the other tube sites. Their business models were based on theft, marketing to children and money laundering. You should expect them to roll over on this issue and throw the creators under the bus. The annoying part will be the hypocrisy of how they did something pointless but it magically protects everyone and makes the industry a better place

https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-b...-faphouse.html

🍿😎🍿

pornmasta · 08-02-2025, 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DemonitizedPorn

marketing to children

Bandwidth wasters don't have money to spend. This plus the bad image they give, if (god forbids) they find your website. 😒

mainstreammix · 08-02-2025, 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DemonitizedPorn

The people responsible for this problem are Pornhub, Xhamster, Xvideos and the other tube sites. Their business models were based on theft, marketing to children and money laundering. You should expect them to roll over on this issue and throw the creators under the bus. The annoying part will be the hypocrisy of how they did something pointless but it magically protects everyone and makes the industry a better place

1) Still crying about tubes as if YouTube didn't exist is lol.

2) Saying the companies blocking whole states over these laws want them is lol. They already won while you were asleep.

3) There's nothing you can do to stop these laws. Bigger organizations have already tried so lol.

Huggles · 08-02-2025, 08:57 AM

Pornhub was actively deleting any videos with a .com watermark for years... but you could VERY easily find, uhhhh... "suspect material" on Pornhub and when I reported it... it wasn't even taken down!!

Tasty1 · 08-02-2025, 10:09 AM

When they start pushing age verification on all social media, i don't think they stop at erotic sites.

First pushback is needed from organisations in favor of anoymous internet. But for now governments want control over everything. You can fight it, cost you a few years. If AVS is so bad for business, than most will be disappeared already. Germany has AVS for long time, that might be the reason surfers mostly went to international sites instead of german sites., but some german sites survived. And for sure the tubes created a lot of attention. But so does onlyfans.

CaptainHowdy · 08-02-2025, 06:07 PM

Not expecting much is one of my traits so all is great . . .

Major (Tom) · 08-02-2025, 09:35 PM

The industry lost the brain power it once had.

pornlaw · 08-02-2025, 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Major (Tom)

The industry lost the brain power it once had.

The industry lost its desire to fight when it lost the old school pornographers.

CyberHustler · 08-03-2025, 07:40 PM

Meanwhile...

🍿😎🍿

Major (Tom) · 08-03-2025, 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornlaw

The industry lost its desire to fight when it lost the old school pornographers.

Like the people who pushed the envelope? Some still exist I hear.

Major (Tom) · 08-03-2025, 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberHustler

Meanwhile...

🍿😎🍿

It’s not about porn. It’s about control. The first step in brain washing is to get someone to agree with you on 1 thing. Children. Sure, let’s protect children. Next thing the fbi is at your door for criticizing israel. It’s not about porn, dude. It’s about control and censorship.

DemonitizedPorn · 08-04-2025, 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mainstreammix

1) Still crying about tubes as if YouTube didn't exist is lol.

Absolutely! It should be made VERY clear who's responsible for this mess. Not, that anyone will hold them accountable. But it might make a small group of people think twice before sucking them off again for pennies.

Also, I'll make it clear that youtube is NOT my compitition. But again, let's deal with the most probable truth. Youtube is, without a doubt, one of the corporations who have lobbied (paid) the government to impliment the upcoming dystopian censorship.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mainstreammix

2) Saying the companies blocking whole states over these laws want them is lol. They already won while you were asleep.

We're not blocking anyone. Someone wants to block us then they can do it honestly. Install a giant firewall and lock us out of their market. Why would someone want to make it eaiser for them?

Quote:

Originally Posted by mainstreammix

3) There's nothing you can do to stop these laws. Bigger organizations have already tried so lol.

I expect the porn industry to do exactly what it's done for the last 25 years. NOTHING!! I also expect the public to do exactly what it always does. Be cowards and pretend to enjoy the butthurt. In our case, we're just looking to for possible contacts who have a similar approach to business. (After all, you can't trust cowards)

There's also no bigger organization trying to stop these laws. They're playing the tax exempt game and asking billionaires for handouts. Their Chairmen/CEOs live in mansions and rub elbows with the politicians and oligarchs.

INever · 08-04-2025, 07:17 PM

UK Online Safety Act

...political posts, including those from sitting Members of Parliament, have been hidden from the public under the law’s sweeping age verification and content restriction rules.

https://reclaimthenet.org/uk-online-...olitical-posts

It's more than just hiding body parts.

The workaround is hosting location and vpns, many of which are free.

Major (Tom) · 08-05-2025, 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by INever

UK Online Safety Act

...political posts, including those from sitting Members of Parliament, have been hidden from the public under the law’s sweeping age verification and content restriction rules.

https://reclaimthenet.org/uk-online-...olitical-posts

It's more than just hiding body parts.

The workaround is hosting location and vpns, many of which are free.

Project 2025 as a few morons here will say. This is everything they wanted. Every time a politician says something crazy it’s an A/B test.

pornlaw · 08-06-2025, 01:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Major (Tom)

Like the people who pushed the envelope? Some still exist I hear.

None exist. Its not about pushing the envelope. Its about what they do when they are caught pushing the envelope. They put their money and their liberty on the line. I haven't seen anyone personally do that in over a decade. Maybe 15 years.

When was the last obscenity prosecution. John did it. And Max did it. Ira did it.

It will be interesting to see what XVideos does in Florida. They talk a big game in a blog post about AVS but now that they've been sued, lets see if they fold or they fight.

INever · 08-06-2025, 01:49 AM

Max didn't want to get arrested. On paper he had all the interstate distribution liability with his distributor. Gov just fucked him.

r.i.p.

DemonitizedPorn · 08-06-2025, 05:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornlaw

None exist. Its not about pushing the envelope. Its about what they do when they are caught pushing the envelope. They put their money and their liberty on the line. I haven't seen anyone personally do that in over a decade. Maybe 15 years.

What you posted is so dead on that it filled a graveyard.

Look at the conversations on here. There's almost no discussion on how to either fight the bullshit or circumnavigate it. What's going to happen in today's so-called "porn industry" will be a whole lot of people bending over for the ass fucking and then later filling out job applications to be a Walmart greeter.

Huggles · 08-06-2025, 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Major (Tom)

It’s not about porn. It’s about control. The first step in brain washing is to get someone to agree with you on 1 thing. Children. Sure, let’s protect children. Next thing the fbi is at your door for criticizing israel. It’s not about porn, dude. It’s about control and censorship.

pornlaw · 08-06-2025, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DemonitizedPorn

What you posted is so dead on that it filled a graveyard.

Look at the conversations on here. There's almost no discussion on how to either fight the bullshit or circumnavigate it. What's going to happen in today's so-called "porn industry" will be a whole lot of people bending over for the ass fucking and then later filling out job applications to be a Walmart greeter.

To be fair, I wouldnt put that fight on the people who post here. I am talking about the so-called leaders of the industry now.

There's a whole lot of people who do not make enough to fight. But the larger companies in this industry can go toe to toe with the government now.

John, Max, Ira and the others who were prosecuted never made what Pornhub, XVideos, XHamster, Streamate, LiveJasmine... ect now earn - in a month.

They can fund litigation across several states. But they chose not to because they believe being set up offshore somehow protects them.

CyberHustler · 08-06-2025, 11:21 PM

Libz pwnd 🍿😎🥤

Huggles · 08-06-2025, 11:49 PM

Digital ID is the next pandemic. Even if we want to resist it, if governments are going to roll it out, just how does anyone resist? It's basically already guaranteed. The industry just needs to adapt to whatever government wants to make the xxx industry into. There is no resisting, there is only becoming more SFW on the non-paid internet.

INever · Yesterday, 01:29 AM

Only a fucking idiot would share workarounds with bendovers.

AtlantisCash · Yesterday, 02:27 AM

Not exactly right.

I’ve never seen a tube site using children’s content, unless you mean underage youth as children. I’m not saying using underage content is right. Honestly, it’s tough to verify ages with this much user-uploaded content.

Blame the government and NGOs for voicing bigotry. Governments always use kids as an excuse to hide their own bad intentions, and it’s not just the industry—regular people need to speak up louder against this dumb law too. Otherwise, the industry alone won’t be enough to stop it.
Industry is full of obedient little puppies who listen to their government daddy and follow its commands. Instead of speaking out louder, they just comply.

I always thought giving away content for free is a stupid idea. If they simply added a credit card payment procecessor, they’d make more money than they do now. Look at what OnlyFans is doing and prove me wrong. Sure, there’s stolen model content everywhere, but they’re not the ones giving it away for free.

AtlantisCash · Yesterday, 02:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huggles

Digital ID is the next pandemic. Even if we want to resist it, if governments are going to roll it out, just how does anyone resist? It's basically already guaranteed. The industry just needs to adapt to whatever government wants to make the xxx industry into. There is no resisting, there is only becoming more SFW on the non-paid internet.

Governments don’t have a magic wand to impose whatever they want on the masses. Their power comes from people’s ignorance, stupidity, and cowardice. If you want to resist, you can. Just like once we resisted their pandemic scam and the experimental shots they tried to force on us, we can resist this too. But instead of regular folks debating on Twitter about how to skirt around things, they need to just say no. We, the ordinary people, have to say no first. To be blunt, I’m on the blackhat SEO side of things. Like it or not, I can get around any regulation I want if I choose to, but for the sake of our freedoms, we all need to say no together. By the way, my work is already SFW, and what I’m doing right now wouldn’t even be considered porn. Still, we all need to say no together. Even though I don’t live in the UK, I’m saying no, and we should all be able to say no. And we should be saying it not just in this forum but everywhere.

Tasty1 · Yesterday, 03:52 AM

There is more coming. First no more anonymous internet. And than they will start scanning all your email and private messages.

---

The EU could be scanning your chats by October 2025 – here's everything we know
Chat Control is back on the lawmakers' table

Denmark kicked off its EU Presidency on July 1, 2025, and, among its first actions, lawmakers swiftly reintroduced the controversial child sexual abuse (CSAM) scanning bill to the top of the agenda.

Having been deemed by critics as Chat Control, the bill aims to introduce new obligations for all messaging services operating in Europe to scan users' chats, even if they're encrypted.

Denmark is a strong supporter of Chat Control. Now, the new rules could be adopted as early as October 14, 2025, if the Danish Presidency manages to find a middle ground among the countries' members.

Crucially, according to the latest data leaked by the former MEP for the German Pirate Party, Patrick Breyer, many countries that said no to Chat Control in 2024 are now undecided, "even though the 2025 plan is even more extreme," he added.

https://www.techradar.com/computing/...ything-we-know

INever · Yesterday, 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtlantisCash

Governments don’t have a magic wand to impose whatever they want on the masses. Their power comes from people’s ignorance, stupidity, and cowardice. If you want to resist, you can. Just like once we resisted their plandemic scam and the experimental shots they tried to force on us, we can resist this too. But instead of regular folks debating on Twitter about how to skirt around things, they need to just say no. We, the ordinary people, have to say no first. To be blunt, I’m on the blackhat SEO side of things. Like it or not, I can get around any regulation I want if I choose to, but for the sake of our freedoms, we all need to say no together. By the way, my work is already SFW, and what I’m doing right now wouldn’t even be considered porn. Still, we all need to say no together. Even though I don’t live in the UK, I’m saying no, and we should all be able to say no. And we should be saying it not just in this forum but everywhere.

Thumbs up.

Huggles · Yesterday, 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tasty1

There is more coming. First no more anonymous internet. And than they will start scanning all your email and private messages.

Yep, I mean, go ahead and try and fight this... but the system is going to steamroll anyone who opposes it.

CyberHustler · Yesterday, 10:24 AM

Huggles happy as hell he found another updated reason to do what he been doing 🤣

DemonitizedPorn · Yesterday, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornlaw

To be fair, I wouldnt put that fight on the people who post here.

These mopes are never going to do something like organize to take a stand. Because they're playing with 'dirty videos' and that's payment enough to keep them happy. And, if they're swingers, then it's a bonus reward because now they can act like big shots to their morbidly obese friends.

I do blame them because they're what keeps this bullshit going. Maybe I'm wrong, but you appear to be a lawyer. Why don't you try organizing some of these mopes? I have no doubt that you'll be a better Free Speech advocat than the Free Speech Collation.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornlaw

There's a whole lot of people who do not make enough to fight. But the larger companies in this industry can go toe to toe with the government now.

John, Max, Ira and the others who were prosecuted never made what Pornhub, XVideos, XHamster, Streamate, LiveJasmine... ect now earn - in a month.

They can fund litigation across several states. But they chose not to because they believe being set up offshore somehow protects them.

John, Max, Ira and even Rob Black were pornographers. All of these companies are just 'Big Tech'. None of their CEOs have ever stepped foot on a porn set. They're going to make some sort of deal that only benefits them and then they'll go on a marketing blitz saying how they saved the industry.

Huggles · Yesterday, 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberHustler

Huggles happy as hell he found another updated reason to do what he been doing 🤣

Eat shit Kang, I'm living the good life again!

CyberHustler · Yesterday, 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huggles

I'm living the good life again!

Hope so...

mainstreammix · Yesterday, 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DemonitizedPorn

These mopes are never going to do something like organize to take a stand. Because they're playing with 'dirty videos' and that's payment enough to keep them happy. And, if they're swingers, then it's a bonus reward because now they can act like big shots to their morbidly obese friends.

I do blame them because they're what keeps this bullshit going. Maybe I'm wrong, but you appear to be a lawyer. Why don't you try organizing some of these mopes? I have no doubt that you'll be a better Free Speech advocat than the Free Speech Collation.

You're the mope, numbnuts.

07-31-2025, 06:04 PM	#1
DemonitizedPorn Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2025 Posts: 10	Don't expect much of a resistance to Age Verification from the industry The people responsible for this problem are Pornhub, Xhamster, Xvideos and the other tube sites. Their business models were based on theft, marketing to children and money laundering. You should expect them to roll over on this issue and throw the creators under the bus. The annoying part will be the hypocrisy of how they did something pointless but it magically protects everyone and makes the industry a better place

08-02-2025, 08:57 AM	#5
Huggles GFY'S #1 retard Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Kelowna Posts: 10,874	Pornhub was actively deleting any videos with a .com watermark for years... but you could VERY easily find, uhhhh... "suspect material" on Pornhub and when I reported it... it wasn't even taken down!! __________________ I make my money from people jerking off

08-02-2025, 10:09 AM	#6
Tasty1 Judge Jury and Executioner Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: South-America Posts: 9,432	When they start pushing age verification on all social media, i don't think they stop at erotic sites. First pushback is needed from organisations in favor of anoymous internet. But for now governments want control over everything. You can fight it, cost you a few years. If AVS is so bad for business, than most will be disappeared already. Germany has AVS for long time, that might be the reason surfers mostly went to international sites instead of german sites., but some german sites survived. And for sure the tubes created a lot of attention. But so does onlyfans. __________________ everything is fake

08-02-2025, 06:07 PM	#7
CaptainHowdy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Happy in the dark. Posts: 93,395	Not expecting much is one of my traits so all is great . . . __________________ "Tjeezers.cam wishes you a nice day”

08-02-2025, 09:35 PM	#8
Major (Tom) Noticing Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Null Posts: 29,975	The industry lost the brain power it once had. __________________ My mother said, to get things done You'd better not mess with Major Tom

08-03-2025, 07:40 PM	#10
CyberHustler Unregistered Abuser Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 25,945	Meanwhile... 🍿😎🍿

08-04-2025, 07:17 PM	#14
INever Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: .......in a niche, in orbit...... Posts: 3,575	UK Online Safety Act ...political posts, including those from sitting Members of Parliament, have been hidden from the public under the law’s sweeping age verification and content restriction rules. https://reclaimthenet.org/uk-online-...olitical-posts It's more than just hiding body parts. The workaround is hosting location and vpns, many of which are free. __________________ I love Camdough

08-06-2025, 01:49 AM	#17
INever Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: .......in a niche, in orbit...... Posts: 3,575	Max didn't want to get arrested. On paper he had all the interstate distribution liability with his distributor. Gov just fucked him. r.i.p. __________________ I love Camdough

08-06-2025, 11:21 PM	#21
CyberHustler Unregistered Abuser Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 25,945	Libz pwnd 🍿😎🥤

08-06-2025, 11:49 PM	#22
Huggles GFY'S #1 retard Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Kelowna Posts: 10,874	Digital ID is the next pandemic. Even if we want to resist it, if governments are going to roll it out, just how does anyone resist? It's basically already guaranteed. The industry just needs to adapt to whatever government wants to make the xxx industry into. There is no resisting, there is only becoming more SFW on the non-paid internet. __________________ I make my money from people jerking off

Yesterday, 01:29 AM	#23
INever Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: .......in a niche, in orbit...... Posts: 3,575	Only a fucking idiot would share workarounds with bendovers. __________________ I love Camdough

Yesterday, 02:27 AM	#24
AtlantisCash Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Istanbul - Turkiye Posts: 3,179	Not exactly right. I’ve never seen a tube site using children’s content, unless you mean underage youth as children. I’m not saying using underage content is right. Honestly, it’s tough to verify ages with this much user-uploaded content. Blame the government and NGOs for voicing bigotry. Governments always use kids as an excuse to hide their own bad intentions, and it’s not just the industry—regular people need to speak up louder against this dumb law too. Otherwise, the industry alone won’t be enough to stop it. Industry is full of obedient little puppies who listen to their government daddy and follow its commands. Instead of speaking out louder, they just comply. I always thought giving away content for free is a stupid idea. If they simply added a credit card payment procecessor, they’d make more money than they do now. Look at what OnlyFans is doing and prove me wrong. Sure, there’s stolen model content everywhere, but they’re not the ones giving it away for free. __________________ Kız telefonları \| Telefonda seks sohbet

Yesterday, 03:52 AM	#26
Tasty1 Judge Jury and Executioner Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: South-America Posts: 9,432	There is more coming. First no more anonymous internet. And than they will start scanning all your email and private messages. --- The EU could be scanning your chats by October 2025 – here's everything we know Chat Control is back on the lawmakers' table Denmark kicked off its EU Presidency on July 1, 2025, and, among its first actions, lawmakers swiftly reintroduced the controversial child sexual abuse (CSAM) scanning bill to the top of the agenda. Having been deemed by critics as Chat Control, the bill aims to introduce new obligations for all messaging services operating in Europe to scan users' chats, even if they're encrypted. Denmark is a strong supporter of Chat Control. Now, the new rules could be adopted as early as October 14, 2025, if the Danish Presidency manages to find a middle ground among the countries' members. Crucially, according to the latest data leaked by the former MEP for the German Pirate Party, Patrick Breyer, many countries that said no to Chat Control in 2024 are now undecided, "even though the 2025 plan is even more extreme," he added. https://www.techradar.com/computing/...ything-we-know __________________ everything is fake

Yesterday, 10:24 AM	#29
CyberHustler Unregistered Abuser Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 25,945	Huggles happy as hell he found another updated reason to do what he been doing 🤣