Tech Fast-Loading and SEO-Optimized Websites

[kdz]

Anyone needs a Fast-Loading and SEO-Optimized Websites
I can build it for your Business Website, Blog or Network of Blog, Landing Page or any Website just let me know.

For Inquiry, you can DM or Email me

[TheLegacy]

good work on the page speeds - please describe what you mean when you say SEO optimized. To many have different opinions on that.

[natkejs]

Originally Posted by TheLegacy

good work on the page speeds - please describe what you mean when you say SEO optimized. To many have different opinions on that.

If you have a look at the site, it appears to be one static javascript file rendering all of it as a SPA.
Do such setups get love from search engines? I wouldn't know.

I wonder if it's compiled from a database so that the client can maintain the menu and so on, or is it just made as a demonstration of a "fast site" ?

Looks nice enough, though I would make sure to have the cursor change when hovering menu links etc.

[kdz]

Originally Posted by TheLegacy

good work on the page speeds - please describe what you mean when you say SEO optimized. To many have different opinions on that.

Thank you, it load fast even in Shared Hosting but much faster and better in Vercel.

This have a built-in SEO that support for managing metadata, sitemaps, and canonical URLs.

It use SSR (Server-Side Rendering) and SSG (Static-Site Generation) means that search engine crawlers receive full HTML, making the site easier to crawl and index.

[Mr Pheer]

Originally Posted by kdz

It use SSR (Server-Side Rendering) and SSG (Static-Site Generation) means that search engine crawlers receive full HTML, making the site easier to crawl and index.

Are you sure about that?

This is your page code:


I don't think it's working the way you intended.

❌ Claim 1: "Uses SSR and SSG... search engine crawlers receive full HTML"
REALITY: When I fetched the site as a crawler would, I received:

An empty HTML body with zero content
Only a title tag visible
No server-rendered content whatsoever

This is the opposite of SSR/SSG. If SSR/SSG were properly implemented, I would have received the full restaurant content (menu, about, reservations) in the initial HTML response.
❌ Claim 2: "Built-in SEO that support for managing metadata, sitemaps, and canonical URLs"
REALITY: The fetch showed:

No meta descriptions
No Open Graph tags
No structured data
No canonical tags
No evidence of a sitemap

❌ Claim 3: "Loads fast"
REALITY:

Can't properly measure Core Web Vitals when content doesn't load for crawlers
Client-side rendering typically results in slower initial content paint
Google collects Core Web Vitals by observing how real users interact with your website How Core Web Vitals affect application SEO: Understanding Google page experience ranking and Lighthouse scores - Vercel, but without proper SSR, the initial experience is compromised

The Technical Truth
The site owner either:

Doesn't understand that their SSR/SSG isn't working properly
Is being deceptive about the implementation
Has misconfigured their Vercel deployment

What Properly Configured SSR Should Look Like:
When fetching a properly SSR/SSG site, you receive:

Full HTML content in the response
All text content visible without JavaScript
Meta tags, structured data, and SEO elements present
Immediate crawlability

What This Site Actually Does:

Sends empty HTML shell
Requires JavaScript execution to see anything
Provides nothing for search engines to index
Fails basic SEO requirements

Did you check this with anything or ask someone else to review it? Do an SEO assesment of that SEO's guys own website before you decide to listen to him

It looks outstanding and does load extremely fast. Have you had any success in Google with it?

[cerulean]

Originally Posted by natkejs

If you have a look at the site, it appears to be one static javascript file rendering all of it as a SPA.
Do such setups get love from search engines? I wouldn't know.

I wonder if it's compiled from a database so that the client can maintain the menu and so on, or is it just made as a demonstration of a "fast site" ?

Looks nice enough, though I would make sure to have the cursor change when hovering menu links etc.

Search engines can read React, Vue, etc. SPAs just fine these days. I personally prefer static site generation for landing pages though.

[2MuchMark]

*Ahem* :D




See it for yourself! https://2much.net

Thanks for your assistance with this, Legacy!

PS: Sweet work, kdz !