Interesting how he still has consistant approval rating in the 60-70% range. I guess 70% of the American public are idiots.


Btw. thanks jr. for the new raise I get via the tax package passed today. Better the money be in my hand than the govt. spenders.

ADMINISTRATION RECORDS SET
- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
Number of individuals and businesses associated with the Clinton machine who have been convicted of or pleaded guilty to crimes: 47
- Number of these convictions during Clinton's presidency: 33
- Number of indictments/misdemeanor charges: 61
- Number of imprisonments: 14
- Number of congressional witnesses who have pled the 5th Amendment, fled the country to avoid testifying, or (in the case of foreign witnesses) refused to be interviewed: 124
CRIMES FOR WHICH CONVICTIONS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED
Drug trafficking (3), racketeering, extortion, bribery(4), tax evasion, kickbacks, embezzlement (2), fraud (12), conspiracy (5), fraudulent loans, illegal gifts(1), illegal campaign contributions(5), money laundering (6)
UNEXPLAINED PHENOMENA
- FBI files misappropriated by the White House: c. 900
- Estimated number of witnesses quoted in FBI files misappropriated by the White House: 18,000
- Number of witnesses who developed medical problems at critical points in Clinton scandals investigation (Tucker, Hale, both McDougals, Lindsey): 5
- Problem areas listed in a memo by Clinton's own lawyer in preparation for the president's defense: 40
- Number of witnesses and critics of Clinton subjected to IRS audit: 45
- Number of names placed in a White House secret database without the knowledge of those named: c. 200,000
- Number of persons involved with Clinton who have been beaten up: 2
- Number of women involved with Clinton who claim to have been physically threatened (Sally Perdue, Gennifer Flowers, Kathleen Willey, Linda Tripp, Elizabeth Ward Gracen): 5
- Number of men involved in the Clinton scandals who have been beaten up or claimed to have been intimidated: 10

70% are idiots? I'd say that's a pretty fair assessment. And daddy Bush's approval rating was way up after the Gulf War too, but the economy was in terrible shape and the little boost he gained from the war was lost in the election. George Dubya is a sham steamrolled over the vast majority of the American public.

half of those things were the results of the internet cash grab, not any President, if anything, it was Clinton's fault for not regulating more strictly the billion of dollars thrown around for websites that were worthless.

I did not... :)

I couldn't have said it better myself....

The rest are just completely clueless

The country was in a reccession BEFORE Bush was even sworn into office, genius. :1orglaugh

Are you an idiot? Where did you go for that information, it is all either completely slanted or just plain incorrect. Lemme break it down for you, because I think maybe in PORN terms is all you may be able to understand: if you are about to fuck a hooker, and pay her pimp, do you ask the pimp, who will be quite partial to getting the cash, if she is clean?

Sigh.

I am sure it was him and not a destabalized WORLD economy based on TECH stocks that have been unstable since 98, when alot of .com's were dropping, and weren't reported on because of the interest of broadcasting companies? I am also sure it is because of his big ears and not because Sept. 11th scared the bejesus out of investors and how easy it was to lose money?

ding ding ding, give that man a prize.

:1orglaugh

If Clinton had tried to regulate private investment, you would have screamed socialism.

50 stupid conservatives.

Most people on this board didn't know there was an electoral college, much less people from other countries. **And they dam sure don't know why it's there.** And they dam sure don't know it worked exactly like it was intended. And because it worked like it should have, there should have never been a law suit. Being there was a suit, the vote should have been 100% to up hold the election. So that tells me the High Court of this land plays politics which they have NO fucking business doing. Make's no Diff. who got the most votes *NONE* it's always been that way as far as I know.

I can see our school systems are doing a good job. Fuck I learned this in like the 6th or 7th grade I think.

I don't think you could ever regulate private investment, it's a contradiction of terms in the United States. He could have however dealt with the .com bankruptcy scandals -- CEO's running away with a couple hundred million from a "bankrupt" company that couldn't pay its debts to investors and suppliers, I even had a lower level buddy who was an exec for pets.com when they had the sock... they bounced a couple of his paychecks, granted they were large, but nothing compared to the bank the higher level exec's took home without an issue.

I liked clinton - he understood porn

If Clinton can possibly be blamed for not doing it, its feasible. At least according to some of the kooks here.

And if it involves conservatives blaming liberals for not being socialist and regulatory enough (HAHAHAHAHA), so be it.

the only thing he can be blamed for was all he ever did in 8 years was ride an economy that was a total mirage.

people were too stupid to realize this until it was too late. how is your furniture.com stock doing.

woodman you need to find this book and read it, your list would take all day to read. :Graucho Partners In Power.
Might be hard to find now in book stores (to liberal), I read it and thought my god.

The only thing that was a mirage was part of the tech sector. No more. The entire economy has gone to pot and stayed there for nearly 3 years under Bush.

No amount of "Its all the fault of Clintons tech boom!" whining is going to change the facts.

I find it hard to believe how pathetically desperate some of you people are to blame Clinton for all the bullshit thats happened under Bush. Clinton didn't use his crystal ball and arrest Bin Ladin in '97, Clinton wasn't socialist enough.. hahaha. Keep dreaming.

gutter, that is one of the most laughable things i ever read.



Also, there was this thing called 911 that helped.

aren't you the pornographer who thinks all models are shameful?

:1orglaugh

too dumb to know how to use the quote feature

:1orglaugh

You insult because you can't debate the facts. The entire economy, not just the tech sector, grew under Clinton. And the entire economy, along with the tech sector, has imploded under Bush.

9/11 predictably sank the entire US Economy into the shitter for 3 years?

LOL

More pathetic fantasizing..

Do you really think it was Clinton's tech boom, tell me how Clinton created this tech boom please? Clinton just got on the band wagon and had a nice ride while it lasted, he didn't do shit but follow other people's coat tail's.

Ah, I see! So its Clintons tech boom when it can be blamed on Bush's economic problems, but not his tech boom when it comes time to give him credit for it?

:1orglaugh

C'mon conservatives, which one is it going to be? Time to rub your collective 3 brain cells together and get your lies straight.

to spot bias:


if bush was in office during the tech boom, would you be saying the same thing?

be honest if you can

This should be very easy for you. Please name three (3) things Bill Clinton did for the economy just three (3).

That's not what I ask you. Tell me How Clinton created this tech boom Please. THAT's what I ask. YES or NO are you going to answer the question. Better still CAN you answer the question YES or NO.

This was a nasty deal. Not only did they take the land using Tax Payer money, but never ponied up what they owed the city for doing this for them.

I was living there when this all went down, not to many happy Bush people in Arlington.

you better believe I would.

republicans are such fanatic sheeps, they can't even debate anything against their idiot leader.

i have nothing against your beliefs, but you should be ashamed of having Bush represent you. it just makes you look bad.

Here is the bottom line on this one:

Go ahead and keep chanting (and chanting is an appropriate word.. this is a religious belief, not a rational one) about how its mere coincidence that the economy did so well under Clinton and so badly under Bush. As time goes on, and Bush's "stimulus" packages and tax giveaways keep failing, the stupider the denials sound.

Your excuses might have been believable in the beginning when it looked like Bush was inheriting a normal down business cycle, before he had time to institute his own policies.. but denying it now just makes you look like a moron.

george bush is the best president we've ever had.

so if you're saying he's no better for the economy than clinton, why would you vote for bush?

how would you and the country benefit?

just curious

you're 19

and giving political opinions

:1orglaugh

Defense to what???

I'm the dumbshit. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh Ok Pin Head this dumbshit will ask you the question. Name three (3) things Clinton did for the economy.
Now if that makes me a dumbshit so be it. It's a fucking simple question, just answer the question Pin Head

"its obvious to anyone with a brain that the current administrations economic and foreign policies have alot to do with our misery."


Only in the delusional minds of far left.

People like you who think Bush is one step above a retard, yet also a evil genius at the same time.

<img src="http://www.miiequipment.com/images/Products/Pawling/SpeedBump.jpg">

don't answer my deleted posts fucknuts

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh


so if you're saying he's no better for the economy than clinton, why would you vote for bush?

how would you and the country benefit?

just curious

models are dirty and evil aren't they?