:1orglaugh

If Clinton had tried to regulate private investment, you would have screamed socialism.

50 stupid conservatives.

Most people on this board didn't know there was an electoral college, much less people from other countries. **And they dam sure don't know why it's there.** And they dam sure don't know it worked exactly like it was intended. And because it worked like it should have, there should have never been a law suit. Being there was a suit, the vote should have been 100% to up hold the election. So that tells me the High Court of this land plays politics which they have NO fucking business doing. Make's no Diff. who got the most votes *NONE* it's always been that way as far as I know.

I can see our school systems are doing a good job. Fuck I learned this in like the 6th or 7th grade I think.

I don't think you could ever regulate private investment, it's a contradiction of terms in the United States. He could have however dealt with the .com bankruptcy scandals -- CEO's running away with a couple hundred million from a "bankrupt" company that couldn't pay its debts to investors and suppliers, I even had a lower level buddy who was an exec for pets.com when they had the sock... they bounced a couple of his paychecks, granted they were large, but nothing compared to the bank the higher level exec's took home without an issue.

I liked clinton - he understood porn

If Clinton can possibly be blamed for not doing it, its feasible. At least according to some of the kooks here.

And if it involves conservatives blaming liberals for not being socialist and regulatory enough (HAHAHAHAHA), so be it.

the only thing he can be blamed for was all he ever did in 8 years was ride an economy that was a total mirage.

people were too stupid to realize this until it was too late. how is your furniture.com stock doing.

woodman you need to find this book and read it, your list would take all day to read. :Graucho Partners In Power.
Might be hard to find now in book stores (to liberal), I read it and thought my god.

The only thing that was a mirage was part of the tech sector. No more. The entire economy has gone to pot and stayed there for nearly 3 years under Bush.

No amount of "Its all the fault of Clintons tech boom!" whining is going to change the facts.

I find it hard to believe how pathetically desperate some of you people are to blame Clinton for all the bullshit thats happened under Bush. Clinton didn't use his crystal ball and arrest Bin Ladin in '97, Clinton wasn't socialist enough.. hahaha. Keep dreaming.

gutter, that is one of the most laughable things i ever read.



Also, there was this thing called 911 that helped.

aren't you the pornographer who thinks all models are shameful?

:1orglaugh

too dumb to know how to use the quote feature

:1orglaugh

You insult because you can't debate the facts. The entire economy, not just the tech sector, grew under Clinton. And the entire economy, along with the tech sector, has imploded under Bush.

9/11 predictably sank the entire US Economy into the shitter for 3 years?

LOL

More pathetic fantasizing..

Do you really think it was Clinton's tech boom, tell me how Clinton created this tech boom please? Clinton just got on the band wagon and had a nice ride while it lasted, he didn't do shit but follow other people's coat tail's.

Ah, I see! So its Clintons tech boom when it can be blamed on Bush's economic problems, but not his tech boom when it comes time to give him credit for it?

:1orglaugh

C'mon conservatives, which one is it going to be? Time to rub your collective 3 brain cells together and get your lies straight.

to spot bias:


if bush was in office during the tech boom, would you be saying the same thing?

be honest if you can

This should be very easy for you. Please name three (3) things Bill Clinton did for the economy just three (3).

That's not what I ask you. Tell me How Clinton created this tech boom Please. THAT's what I ask. YES or NO are you going to answer the question. Better still CAN you answer the question YES or NO.

This was a nasty deal. Not only did they take the land using Tax Payer money, but never ponied up what they owed the city for doing this for them.

I was living there when this all went down, not to many happy Bush people in Arlington.

you better believe I would.

republicans are such fanatic sheeps, they can't even debate anything against their idiot leader.

i have nothing against your beliefs, but you should be ashamed of having Bush represent you. it just makes you look bad.

Here is the bottom line on this one:

Go ahead and keep chanting (and chanting is an appropriate word.. this is a religious belief, not a rational one) about how its mere coincidence that the economy did so well under Clinton and so badly under Bush. As time goes on, and Bush's "stimulus" packages and tax giveaways keep failing, the stupider the denials sound.

Your excuses might have been believable in the beginning when it looked like Bush was inheriting a normal down business cycle, before he had time to institute his own policies.. but denying it now just makes you look like a moron.

george bush is the best president we've ever had.

so if you're saying he's no better for the economy than clinton, why would you vote for bush?

how would you and the country benefit?

just curious

you're 19

and giving political opinions

:1orglaugh

Defense to what???

I'm the dumbshit. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh Ok Pin Head this dumbshit will ask you the question. Name three (3) things Clinton did for the economy.
Now if that makes me a dumbshit so be it. It's a fucking simple question, just answer the question Pin Head

"its obvious to anyone with a brain that the current administrations economic and foreign policies have alot to do with our misery."


Only in the delusional minds of far left.

People like you who think Bush is one step above a retard, yet also a evil genius at the same time.

<img src="http://www.miiequipment.com/images/Products/Pawling/SpeedBump.jpg">

don't answer my deleted posts fucknuts

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh


so if you're saying he's no better for the economy than clinton, why would you vote for bush?

how would you and the country benefit?

just curious

models are dirty and evil aren't they?

I see. So.. let me make sure I have this straight... driving the economy back into near 80's level deficits, spending billions on a war with Iraq built on lies (found those WMD's yet? I didn't think so.), passing ineffectual tax giveaways and "Look, here is a $300 check!" stimulus packages, and eroding consumer confidence, have absolutely NOTHING to do with the unusual persistence of the recession?

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Do you have some special mind training techniques that help you maintain ridiculous beliefs in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary or what?

don't waste your time talking to someone who works in porn yet votes republican, thinks models are dirty shameful whores, and can't even use the quote feature that even lil2rich4u2 can use successfully


:1orglaugh

If Bush were president during the tech boom and Clinton president now, it's doubtful the economy would be very different. It'd just be the republicans yelling about how wonderful Bush did with the economy and how shitty Clinton is doing .. This is an economic cycle .. it's also a result of 9/11 .. Clinton didn't create the tech boom or have anything to do with it's impact on the economy .. He just resided over the time period in which it occured. Bush is the one who is residing over the current economy.


The economy goes nuts and gets to an unsustainable level .. the economy then must go nuts and get to an unbelievably low level, and then it will come back up to a median and stay there untill something else crazy happens and causes it to go up or down ..

President's can try and spark growth using tax cuts, policies, etc, but the extreme highs of the 90's and the extreme low's of the 00's arent direct results of our presidents .. Deal with it =/

:1orglaugh

you have no ideal how I vote NONE. am asking a question and you say I'm a dumb shit, that sounds very liberal to me. ok 1st time Clinton ran I voted for him
2nd time I did not vote for him, and if you can't figure out why I didn't vote for him the 2nd time you got's your head up
your preverbal ass hole Pin Head.

Yea, I long for the days of having an overvalued economy built on pets.com

I long for a president that has zero foreign policy, and did nothing to retaliate for the first trade center bombing as well as a handful of other terroist attacks.

I long for having the millitary, fbi, cia, budget completely slashed.

I long for a president that gets accused of sexual assault every other week.


Your vision of a socialist utopia just dosen't work.

:throwup

I LOVE it

yes.

pissy


:1orglaugh

OH

MY

GOD


:ugone2far

are you really sexy? or are you just a fat dike whore.

it's *dyke* you child

christ almighty

at least spell your 'insults' right

Its one of those things you do because it feels so good when you stop... and pack a fat bowl.

:smokin :thumbsup

haha, ok. your reluctance to answer is answer enough. keep fooling yourself "Sexy"Sarah.

you wish I wasn't out of your league

Bah, everyone who knows economy knows it wasn't PETS.COM that the economy was built upon but instead the PETS.COM sock puppet.

I do agree with your post though, great use of sarcasm. :thumbsup .

It is kinda cool that GFY'ers can have an intelligent conversation... for a few minutes at least, till people start calling other people "dikes" and can't even spell it correctly. It was fun while it lasted :), thanks to those that contributed.

Haha... We have a genius here!
Now this guy know whats really going on! Probably a world class economist that rigorously studied the economical situation during Clinton's presidency...

or.... just a guy that will believe any Pro-Republican economic analyst on Fox News that will tell you what you want to hear...?!

Everytime the party in power has economical problems... they blame the previous administration! Everytime, in every countries, always the same... Get a clue dimwit!

Its fascinating that those pro-republicans can't even admit 5 things on the list.... finding excuses.... oh Clinton was even worse...



:warning Btw: Why adult webmasters here are republicans?

They are making good money and they dont want to pay too much taxes!?

They like the military & foreign policies/philosophy of the republican party?

They are deeply religious people and they like to be told what is moraly acceptable or not?

and dont tell be its all about economy, smaller governemnt... etc.. We can see how the economical situation is right now!

What the fuck is wrong with voting republican and working in porn?

Do we all have to fit into the same fucking box?

Can't the fact that I hate the democrats taking my hard earned money and giving it to some welfare momma enough not to vote for the fuckers every year?

bush doesn't want porn in his christian america