ill give my 2 cents :) weve got 2 non nude sites and they convert like whoa, then again theyre 200% us legal and 18+. Most sites arent and we get loads of ppl who have underage nnsite and wanna trade banners or even buy traffic.

Most of these sites are european (a lot are german) and they all use verotel or globosale, because ccbill ibill etc wont process (and they shouldnt).

Its a matter of time i think, the EU is preparing law changes for sites like these, but then again theyll find another offshore cc proc and host i guess. Im glad were on good side and only offer 18+ even though its nonnude (and dont say its just a nude series first 25 pics cause its not).

Bingo!

"see sears catalogue underwear section"

anyway:2 cents: there is absolutely nothing that you are going to do about it, unless you have some sort of morality police who inspect every single frame and reject it or approve it.

The police are doing a much better job getting those individuals who go beyond the line (than they did about 4-5 years ago) so if they misstep, they will be charged


If you were respected in any way, which would you rather be found out about;

a) porn webmaster
b) webmaster who runs non nude underage tittilation sites selling memberships to paedophiles

I choose 'a'

What I'm wondering is if they're really legal?
Many of these sites have girls in thongs, see-thru tops, wet t-shirts, etc where nipples/areola are clearly visible. Is that legal? Can they pull the "Well, she's got a shirt over them" defense?

ok after a little digging this is the website that I was referring to being on Oprah. http://www.cindymodel.com/ Check out this site but also click on the other sites on the page like codymodel and the other ones. This is as close to child pornography as you can get without them being totally nude.:mad:

Don't get involved with that shit.

There's plenty of money to be made without walking that line.

For the record, I wasn't interested in doing an underage non-nude site. I was just wondering why these sites are running, despite being so obviously sketchy/borderline.

dchottie:
if you check the site mentioned above, christinamodel.com, you'll see that they come even closer to child porn then cindymodel.com does. it basically a 16/17 year old top-heavy girl wearing plunging necklines and thongs. cindymodel.com is much less offensive then this site. and the same guy runs a whole network of sites with at least half a dozen other girls.

I don't understand why people keep talking as if the models are victim. They make huge bucks there. They could be models when they grow up, which is one of the best jobs in the world.

There are many other things that are dangers for minor. School bully, thief, burglar, kidnappers. Dead penalty are not imposed for those heinous crime and you guys are rambling about some guy helping models earn a living.

50

Fucker.

The problem is that they're not really models. In fact, many of the girls don't have model potential (unless you count porn modelling).

Generally, the "models" are big breasted teens and all they do on the site is shake their ass and tits.

all I know.. if it was on the oprah show.. she's as guilty as all the rest.. she would of made a nice buck out of it exploiting the same 12 year old as the mother did.. while putting down the mother for doing the same..

thats my :2 cents: worth

You might want to revise your opinion. :)

"14 year old lalana"

Braces, almost without exception, scream 'underage' to me...

I also checked the site KRL referred to and there's even more CP for me. She's 13 now. Do her parent really think she will be a model, or rather a model like Tawnee Stone in future... ?

I think if you do non-nude, you don't want to do porn, too. One or the other. But as people seem to see: the non-nude stuff is pretty questionable even if it is legal. Does MET kind of mix the two? Underage chicks non-nude or in "tasteful" nude spreads mixed with 18+ girls doing naughties? I wouldn't do that, personally. I'll do any 18 year old no matter how young she looks, but I wouldn't touch a 17 year old for any money, even if the non-nudes weren't even sexy. There is this one site out there I run into all the time that puts up underage girls just barely clothed. The poses aren't pornographic, but the clothing is extremely skimpy and the poses appeal to fetishes like leg and butt and panty. That does make me wonder where the girls' parents are.

i saw that Oprah show, i couldnt believe how ignorant her mom and uncle were.

A lot of people including myself wish those sites were shut down, but in reality there is no legal grounds to stop it. Unless there is illegal activity behind them.