The problem is that they're not really models. In fact, many of the girls don't have model potential (unless you count porn modelling).

Generally, the "models" are big breasted teens and all they do on the site is shake their ass and tits.

all I know.. if it was on the oprah show.. she's as guilty as all the rest.. she would of made a nice buck out of it exploiting the same 12 year old as the mother did.. while putting down the mother for doing the same..

thats my :2 cents: worth

You might want to revise your opinion. :)

"14 year old lalana"

Braces, almost without exception, scream 'underage' to me...

I also checked the site KRL referred to and there's even more CP for me. She's 13 now. Do her parent really think she will be a model, or rather a model like Tawnee Stone in future... ?

I think if you do non-nude, you don't want to do porn, too. One or the other. But as people seem to see: the non-nude stuff is pretty questionable even if it is legal. Does MET kind of mix the two? Underage chicks non-nude or in "tasteful" nude spreads mixed with 18+ girls doing naughties? I wouldn't do that, personally. I'll do any 18 year old no matter how young she looks, but I wouldn't touch a 17 year old for any money, even if the non-nudes weren't even sexy. There is this one site out there I run into all the time that puts up underage girls just barely clothed. The poses aren't pornographic, but the clothing is extremely skimpy and the poses appeal to fetishes like leg and butt and panty. That does make me wonder where the girls' parents are.

i saw that Oprah show, i couldnt believe how ignorant her mom and uncle were.

A lot of people including myself wish those sites were shut down, but in reality there is no legal grounds to stop it. Unless there is illegal activity behind them.