![]() |
Quote:
but again, you can't achieve that with just a run-of-the-mill sooper hoop ricer crap wing. their aerodynamics aren't built for downforce. |
Quote:
|
Drag racing, can you pick a more boring sport:2 cents:
|
1.5g's at launch is not that boring to me. But to each his own
|
nah, you don't need a 4link to do 8's. ladder bars. 4links take to long to dial in, i'm impatient :). i don't have anything in the 8's right now, but i know some people that do, and they all swear by the ladder bars.
the 409 impala was a BBC. it actually comes from my project car (as lame as that is), my iroc that i'm dropping in a 409 SBC. but, actually it might end up being a 406. or, i've toyed with 415, but i kinda want to keep the revs up. going to go 406, 6-speed trans, 12-bolt rear. and actually, i'm toying with the idea of keeping the 10-bolt. prior to common belief, you CAN make a 10-bolt survive power. my block is actually a 2-bolt, but i think i will leave it that way. the mains aren't as strong themselves with a 2-bolt, but the block is. gm put a lot of extra material in the bottom end of the 2-bolt sbc so it would hold up. worse comes to worse, i'll install splayed caps and have basically the strongest reused block style available. but, gm rates the 2-bolt to 650hp, and they always rate hp #'s low. the car is going to be a driver mainly, with weekend trips to the strip and curvies, so i'm keeping the iroc suspension (but modded), and the motor will be around 500hp n/a. not bad for a driver. it's a slow project, because my car's been sitting in my garage too much. our shop's kinda small, and it's usually full. i think i'm going to just buy some land outside town and build me a big, nice shop for my projects. i've got 1 triumph, 2 old 40-50 trucks, and a 40's delivery van i want to turn into a sweet show van for events. the big shop would be nice. my "racecar" project i've been thinking about doing someday for some real fun... a 97-ish cavalier 2-door with a blown, nitrous 696. yeah. |
Dude you definitely do not want a ladder bar car in the 8's. No way. I been drag racing for 12 years and have seen the ladder bars constantly stuck and locked on launch. Bad move. We run with Jon Kaase if you know him. The absloute finest big inch Ford engine builder in the country. http://www.jonkaaseracingengines.com/ we have been buildin the 800 inch IHRA motors that dominate the Chevys and Dodge boys "fake Hemi" that they have revised. Which is a ford wedge head. But the chevy and dodge boys complained enough and got their rule changes so they have a shot at a championshiip in IHRA this year. The big inch (800") motors have belonged to Ford for ever and dont see that changin anytime soon
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
They don't care about the performance of cars, they care about how rich it makes them look. And FYI, to all you 'haters' ford already has a car competing with a Vette, its called the 03/04/06 Cobra. Z06 > 03 > C5. And don't give me that crap about how they aren't even in the same league, the vettes interior is total garbage for a car of that price. I bet it pisses all these dumbshits off to know that there are people out there that aren't impressed with their 80k 'luxury sedans' -_- |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hey as a cheap muscle car a Mustang is ok, but a Ford supercar, please its still a Ford built by the same hicks, with the same people making the parts no thanks. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Here is mine, that a stock Cobra isn't faster then a stock vette. If you know the weight of both cars, and the HP difference you will understand, if not, you are yet another idiot who probably rides a moped. 350hp stock 2003 Cobra. http://www.mafterburner.com/images/dynoscan006.jpg |
That thing is fucking dog ugly...
|
hrm, never heard of that ladder bar problem. but, i only personally talk much with a handful of people that run 8's. most of the nicer cars are around the 10's. street cars, in other words.
haven't heard about the new ford 800 inchers. but, then again i honestly don't pay a ton of attention to the mopar motors either. we don't get to rebuild a ton of motors around here, since probably 70% of our clientele is ricers. unfortunately we have to compete with the likes of speedway motors. the gearheads in this area are very entrenched in their ways, and there are a lot of good hotrod speed shops around here. but no import shops to speak of, besides a stereo shop that claims they're the shit for speed parts. if, by speed parts you mean a fake cold-air intake and altezza tailights. i'm much more familiar with the chevy builders, like lunati and ligenfelter. if i remember right, lunati was #2 in pro street to hit 200mph in the quarter. i wish he would have been first, he was hitting 198, but not cutting it. he's got that sweet-ass "street legal" green '68 camaro. the first one to hit 200 (201 to be exact) was "the ghost" - a white 95-ish fuel injected camaro. i think that guy (can't %@#$ remember his name now) was one of the few "pioneers" of sorts to use fuel injection in p/s as well. lunati doesn't to this day, i don't think. sad, they should :). i think a ford guy was the first to use the turbo setup though. there were 2 first cars using turbos, a 95-ish stang and a '57 chevy. can't remember which one is first. i've been around computers too damn much lately :( i couldn't imagine driving a 2000 horsepower car though, like a lot of the 696 chevy's are. what a rush. someday, i shall be strapped behind such a monster. maybe the cavalier. the original idea was a metro hatchback, but that was way too gay, and the cavalier i can drive down and meet the ricers. see if they'd be dumb enough to race. believe me, they are. |
Quote:
|
the ls1/ls6 is such an amazing motor, with such amazing capabilities. gm is holding back sooooo much with that car.
did anyone see some of the concept cars and race cars gm has out? besides the incredibly frightening 2.2 ecotech-powered drag cavalier, there was a 500hp n/a firebird ls6 with gm-installed 300hp of nitrous. unfortunately they won't be producing that one :( |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
aah.. yeah, you'd need 800" for that :) mwahah! i love gm! an excerpt from their site about jeg coughlin's monster cavalier. that's right, with the same motor you can get in a brand new cavalier. where's ford's 850+ hp 2.0 zetec? lol. i'm sure it could happen, with a lot of effort, but the thought of a zx2 with 850 hp is for some reason more amusing than a cavalier :) Quote:
|
You have any clue what it cost Jeg and his family to win that championship? Try 3 million.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If I won a Vette I would sell it and buy a real car :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Thx. |
Quote:
|
Number1Thumb, i hate people like u... i mean who gives a shit about ur gay ford which got no style, no look, cheap, fucking unreliable car (go look costumer reports), no comfort, i can go on forever and you THINK u cool in it? lol. Also dont diss imports, cuz they will eat ur little ford alive, ever saw what can be done to supra's on a stock internals ?if not go look... btw they will beat ur stang plus you can ride in it not walk home after urshit breaks
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
At a fordchips dyno day in Denver a bone stock 03 Cobra dynoed 385rwhp, verified bone stock by 3 of the tuners. That is more then enough of a power advantage to nullify the weight difference, don't you think? Car currently ran a best of 12.53, 2 weeks ago, with about $1300 in mods (most of it on stainless exhaust - Magnaflow for life) - and I admit that I am not the best stick driver, I am used to racing autos. How many miles was on yours? Basing from the averages that I have seen (from the Mustang club I am a member of) they seem to be dynoing around 369rwhp on average, some weaker some stronger). I'm sorry but a C5 Vette more then likely dynos around 325rwhp (Basing this off estimation, since LS1, LS6, etc are usually under rated), and it does have a aero dynamic and weight advantage, which makes it pretty damn close. IBoth are stock high 12 second cars. But stock for stock, ON MY EXPERIENCES OBSERVING AT THE TRACK, 03 cobras are beating C5's more often then not. Your mileage may vary. The point is the Ford GT is not meant to compete with vettes, because they are not even remotely in the same class. I know a Z06 vette is faster, but a C5 isn't. |
mods mods mods...fuck you loser!
Post STOCK dyno numbers of the feared 2003 Cobra. STOCK dyno numbers! :1orglaugh |
because, how many unreliable cars you see produced by bmw,acura,mb,audi,etc? now how many by ford,chev,etc ? the ratio becomes huge, now how the fuck will they produce another car when all(most) their products suck ? simple example, you suck at making websites, now you want to make amazing one with complicated java and php scripts, you think you will finish it right /? also i've read about their high end cobra svt to being discontinued due to many problems
|
Quote:
And rofl, CONSUMER REPORTS? You base your opinions on cars from magazines where 90% of the info is contributed by soccer moms? WTF. I remember reading consumer reports regarding a Trans AM WS6 a while back and some of the complaints were that it was too noisy - i mean wtf? I have respect for some imports, as long as they don't try to make their car look like it came straight out of the fast and the furious. But he's right, big ass wings that probably at 25 lbs of weight on FWD cars? Totally retarded. I would rather own a Mustang, Camaro, Trans Am, Cobra, Vette and the likes then some "LANCER EVO" or "WRX STi".. or any luxury car. They are fun, fast and raw. I don't want heated leather seats, I don't want voice activated crap, I don't want a 4,500 pound piece of shit that can go over railroad tracks at 60 and feel like it is floating on clouds. |
Quote:
baahahah... i can respect a well-done import. not the kind with the fake exhaust and the speed-adding apc stickers. as fast as supras are, they are not going to beat a big block ford like he's got. 8.30 on a mostly stock-motored supra? a supra with a stock bottom end, even if by some miracle (or 500hp nitrous) will NOT be reliable, and it will most likely blow something after a few runs. i can get to 10.5 in my mazda truck reliably, and cheaply. maybe even to 10. but getting into the 9's, it's no longer going to stay reliable. and, i can build a big block chevy motor on $2000 and blow the doors off most imports with $10000 invested. oh crap, that motor will be reliable, too. what do you think i could do to that BBC with $10000? about the tune of 800-900 horsepower. there is NO replacement for displacement. i love toyotas, and hate fords, but that was a very ignorant comment. that's the kind of person i see here in town with a fake vtec civic trying to race a vintage stingray, or a muscle car with a 6-71 out the hood. yeah, i've seen a stock neon with one slight modification be put to the 10's. but that one modification was 500hp of nitrous, and it lived for 3 runs, then blew. |
Quote:
But regardless, there is something you need to understand. SVT created a car for tuners and racers, and put it out of the factory with much less power then it is capable of to keep insurance costs and other red tape down. Have you seen the gains simply by removing the air silencer? You have to respect 450rwhp for what little it costs to get there. |
Bottom line is put up or shut up. That is directed to the Ford fanatics.... :Graucho
And I am talking STOCK. Why do all the ford guys have to jump into car threads with what their MODDED cars can do vs. STOCK cars? :1orglaugh |
New GT. Aren't they only building 3? Is it faster than 3.9 seconds 0-60 like this?
http://www.adult.com/lens/newviper.jpg |
Quote:
How is it put up or shut up? I'm assuming that 03 isn't yours and you just found it on the net, how about you search for the rest that are not dynoing unusually low? (Aka, something that was not dynoed at 6000 feet altitude). |
Quote:
Until then, put up or shut up. This thread is getting tedious........and boring. Post a stock Cobra doing 450 rwhp with an air fuddy removed. :1orglaugh |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123