We're doing something about it!

[SteveLightspeed]

Lightspeedcash is actively blocking traffic from any site with the following words anywhere in the domain

lolita
child
preteen
pre-teen
pedo
kiddie
underage
beast
rape

I challenge all other sponsors to step up and do the same. Cut the money off from these sites and they will go away.

Its time for everyone to put their money where their mouth is and do something about CP on the net.


Steve Lightspeed

[SleazyDream]

good first step

just the url?

what about meta tags or words on a site?


more details please

[drunkdollars]

I like the idea.. What kind of script you got to block that shit?

[EscortBiz]

very good move, worth a press release

[MrPopup]

the gauntlet has been thrown the fuck down.

Innovation comes first through commitment to making the industry better.

Congratulations and much respect.

[HungSolo]

You're just now going to do this? Shouldn't you have been doing this?

[dlex]

good stuff

[[Labret]]

guys who make most their money off a girl who looks underage.

what a fucking hoot.

[SteveLightspeed]

Sleazydream

Good question, we also actively police sites that send us traffic, looking for problems, but we haven't been able to find a good automated solution to check every link every time.

Steve Lightspeed

[quiet]

[MrPopup]

Now what you should be doing is releasing a press release with LOTS OF LEGALESE and sending it to AVN ONLINE....and to the FBI...and to SLASHDOT.

[MrPopup]

time for a cheap plug.

http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...hreadid=134391

this seems like it might be a busy thread.

[Rich]

Next step, stop all the sites that focus on girls who look underage.

[stocktrader23]

Originally posted by [Labret]
guys who make most their money off a girl who looks underage.

what a fucking hoot.

haha

[MrPopup]

Originally posted by Rich
Next step, stop all the sites that focus on girls who look underage.

wrong...you are mistaken......there is a reason for a law and the maintainence of records. How do you define LOOKS UNDERAGE. you are skating on thin ice when you start playing Mr. Community Standards

How do you define this? what about boundary-pushing ANIME cartoons? This really is a touchy subject. I am for more discussion....

I feel sorry for anyone shooting content under 30.

[SteveLightspeed]

Originally posted by Rich
Next step, stop all the sites that focus on girls who look underage.

I am all for protecting children and stomping out cp, but I don't think we should get into a witch hunt for legal material that "looks underage"

If a child is not involved, then it cannot be child porn.

[BrettJ]

Originally posted by Lightspeed



I am all for protecting children and stomping out cp, but I don't think we should get into a witch hunt for legal material that "looks underage"

If a child is not involved, then it cannot be child porn.

We've talked about this a number of times .... but take that logic just one step further ....

then if pictures depict a rape fantasy HOWEVER the girl isn't ACTUALLY being raped then the pictures - through their existence - do not condone, promote, or encourage such activity.



As I said - we've shared our thoughts - I think we both are of a similiar mind on this - kinda just playing devils' advocate

[[Labret]]

Originally posted by BrettJ



As I said - we've shared our thoughts - I think we both are of a similiar mind on this - kinda just playing devils' advocate

Its the truth.

If its simulated rape. Its not rape. I see simulated murder every day on tv.

This will do nothing to curb child pornography, bestiality, rape, etc etc etc. Im not quite sure what the point of it is.

[MrPopup]

the argument is mostly about whether it pushes someone overboard to commit such acts...

it is a sensitive subject, thus, the only possible solution is to allow the law to define it.

[EscortBiz]

I would pay to have 20 convicted pedos in jail tell the webmaster community what they think.

I think they can shed light on what is what.

[BrettJ]

Originally posted by MrPopup
the argument is mostly about whether it pushes someone overboard to commit such acts...

it is a sensitive subject, thus, the only possible solution is to allow the law to define it.

i dunno...

the law is written by people like you and me.... if we can't come to a clear resolution.... how do we expect joe shit the rag picker and sally fuck'n congresswoman ... to enact decent legislation?

as is - i would be curious to know - what % of new laws - are repealed by the judicial branch as unconsititutional by whatever state/federal mandate.

[MrPopup]

Originally posted by EscortBiz
I would pay to have 20 convicted pedos in jail tell the webmaster community what they think.

I think they can shed light on what is what.

Is Pete Townsend a pedo?

[4Pics]

[i]
I challenge all other sponsors to step up and do the same. Cut the money off from these sites and they will go away.

Steve Lightspeed [/B]

Good to see someone gives a damn.

Where are you redirecting those hits to?

[EscortBiz]

Originally posted by 4Pics


Good to see someone gives a damn.

Where are you redirecting those hits to?

to a dialer at $9.99 a minute

[stocktrader23]

Originally posted by EscortBiz


to a dialer at $9.99 a minute

lol, should send it to a page that says something to the effect of "The site you were visiting had references to child porn on their website. We do not accept traffic from these sites at any time and for your own protection you should quit visiting them ASAP."

[SteveLightspeed]

Originally posted by 4Pics


Good to see someone gives a damn.

Where are you redirecting those hits to?

The hits are redirected back to the page that sent them -- so it looks like the link went nowhere


here is the .php script
--------------------------------------------------
// Redirect "Lolita" traffic
$refer_full_path = "$HTTP_REFERER"."$PATH_INFO";
if(( preg_match("/lolita/i", $refer_full_path)) ||
( preg_match("/child/i", $refer_full_path)) ||
( preg_match("/preteen/i", $refer_full_path)) ||
( preg_match("/pre-teen/i", $refer_full_path)) ||
( preg_match("/pedo/i", $refer_full_path)) ||
( preg_match("/underage/i", $refer_full_path)) ||
( preg_match("/beast/i", $refer_full_path)) ||
( preg_match("/rape/i", $refer_full_path)) ||
( preg_match("/kiddie/i", $refer_full_path)))
{
header("Location: $refer_full_path");
exit;
}
------------------------------------------------------

[OzKaNoz]

Way to go Lightspeed


Oz

[Gutterboy]

Originally posted by Lightspeed
Lightspeedcash is actively blocking traffic from any site with the following words anywhere in the domain

An entirely pointless gesture.

Better that people who are attracted to younger girls find a site they can get off on where the girls merely appear to be possibly under 18, like Lightspeed, than a site where the girls are actually under 18 and being exploited and abused.

[DyannaDoes]

Originally posted by Lightspeed



I am all for protecting children and stomping out cp, but I don't think we should get into a witch hunt for legal material that "looks underage"

If a child is not involved, then it cannot be child porn.

Please tell the supreme court to permanently adopt this stance.

[MrPopup]

Originally posted by DyannaDoes


Please tell the supreme court to permanently adopt this stance.

and to forget about that "no abortion thingy" too.

[4Pics]

Originally posted by Lightspeed



The hits are redirected back to the page that sent them -- so it looks like the link went nowhere


here is the .php script
--------------------------------------------------
// Redirect "Lolita" traffic
$refer_full_path = "$HTTP_REFERER"."$PATH_INFO";
if(( preg_match("/lolita/i", $refer_full_path)) ||
( preg_match("/child/i", $refer_full_path)) ||
( preg_match("/preteen/i", $refer_full_path)) ||
( preg_match("/pre-teen/i", $refer_full_path)) ||
( preg_match("/pedo/i", $refer_full_path)) ||
( preg_match("/underage/i", $refer_full_path)) ||
( preg_match("/beast/i", $refer_full_path)) ||
( preg_match("/rape/i", $refer_full_path)) ||
( preg_match("/kiddie/i", $refer_full_path)))
{
header("Location: $refer_full_path");
exit;
}
------------------------------------------------------

Great job then!

Now if we could get all the major sponsors to use this php script
it might help.

[European Lee]

Steve..

You may be interested in the ICQ i just sent ya bud

Regards,

Lee

[SteveLightspeed]

Originally posted by Gutterboy


An entirely pointless gesture.

Better that people who are attracted to younger girls find a site they can get off on where the girls merely appear to be possibly under 18, like Lightspeed, than a site where the girls are actually under 18 and being exploited and abused.

Pointless gesture? Hardly!

We've blocked thousands of hits to our sites since this started, which means the potential income of the people running these sites has also dropped significantly. If more sponsors do the same, it will make a difference.

There is a line -- 18 years old -- 18 and over is legal, anything under is illegal. Period. We will not support anything illegal. This may also cost sales to my sites, but I don't want the money that badly.


Steve Lightspeed

[EscortBiz]

whatever way you slice it this is a move in the RIGHT direction and im sure many will follow

[Ross]

Good move Steve.

Hopefully more people will follow and drive out these sick fucks!

[d0se]

uhoh what about bbws-eating-grapes.com ?

But seriously.. nice effort lightspeed - good to see

[Nysus]

That PHP code just checks the filename and path info and not the actual content of pages or of a domain.

Congrats to Lightspeed for taking this step though. I would definitely suggest a press release and also including that you're trying to get other companies to follow.

Perhaps an open-source project would be highly beneficial as well ?

Cheers,
Matt

[beemk]

Originally posted by [Labret]

If its simulated rape. Its not rape. I see simulated murder every day on tv.

so kind of like simulated cp?

[hojo]

Isn't this the same company that has a site called church upskirts? And you wonder why your sites are used to promote "underage looking girls"? You people are all ass-backwards.

[Nysus]

Originally posted by hojo
Isn't this the same company that has a site called church upskirts? And you wonder why your sites are used to promote "underage looking girls"? You people are all ass-backwards.

Everyone that goes to church is under 18 years of age?? I thought it was older folks.... Church upskirts should be a mature upskirt site...

Cheers,
Matt

[Rip]

I think cc processors like ccbill and sponsors like ars have already 'bots' that check this for a long time and many others

[PornoDoggy]

Very good move ...

[nuclei]

Originally posted by drunkdollars
I like the idea.. What kind of script you got to block that shit?

easily done in mod_rewrite

[nuclei]

Originally posted by Lightspeed
Lightspeedcash is actively blocking traffic from any site with the following words anywhere in the domain

lolita
child
preteen
pre-teen
pedo
kiddie
underage
beast
rape

I challenge all other sponsors to step up and do the same. Cut the money off from these sites and they will go away.

Its time for everyone to put their money where their mouth is and do something about CP on the net.


Steve Lightspeed

always a class act

[hojo]

The site is based on looking up the skirts of "innocent little church girls", give me a break.

[nocostporn]

Originally posted by Lightspeed
Lightspeedcash is actively blocking traffic from any site with the following words anywhere in the domain

lolita
child
preteen
pre-teen
pedo
kiddie
underage
beast
rape



Steve Lightspeed

no offense but shouldn't you have been actively blocking domains containing those anyways? I dunno....This thread kinda seems like the rapper getting up on stage and giving praise to God for pity applaud

but yeah,now that you ARE blocking these,good job

[SGS]

Originally posted by MrPopup


Is Pete Townsend a pedo?

He is a registered sex offender now

[FlyingIguana]

Originally posted by [Labret]


Its the truth.

If its simulated rape. Its not rape. I see simulated murder every day on tv.

This will do nothing to curb child pornography, bestiality, rape, etc etc etc. Im not quite sure what the point of it is.

but its telling a story. same with there can be rape scenes in movies but its a no no for the porn industry because its not telling a story.

pretty fine line tho.

[NetRodent]

You might also want to add "kinder" and other common underage words in other languages to your list.

[hojo]

I've seen simulated rape scenes on late night cinemax.