Rochard but I see you're not now.. Either way.. Same applies

This thread is pretty tough to follow with so many of the participants blocked, but:

So, that's your defense? It doesn't matter if it is true or not?

Project RAINFALL, XKeyscore, Pine Gap & The Menwith Hill UK

Now a fact? NOW? Rochard, I regret to be the one to have to enlighten you on this. But this was a fact the very first day CNN reported on it. Maybe now you'll believe everything reported on CNN and stop playing it off as so-called "fake news." There is no such thing as fake news, when it comes from CNN.

:thumbsup

how tho lol.. i posted a link showing trump confirm trump jr talked to russians about dirt on clinton

what would you call that? an american cooperating with a foreign government about a political opponent, proven by emails released by that very american in question?

I can't help that I'm a realist and honestly blunt.. you really are fucking dumb matt

At least his defense isnt ignorance like yours...

Assange is only worried about going after those that have trapped him in that embassy.
He is looking for a way out and he had hopes the Trump admin would manufacture a exit.
I don't know why he trusted the Trump folks, but he did. You can see the results for yourself.
He is still in a virtual jail in that embassy.

But seems there are many that do not understand just where Assange is...
Embassy of Ecuador London, England
A embassy is sovereign territory of the country it represents. But Assange is not in Ecuador. He is in London.

This vid if over 1 year old ... Nov 14 '2017'

Yep he is in London and there will be a record of Manaforts visits to London, all airports have video surveillance, all they have to do is correlate his Airport records with when he was supposed to have had meetings with Assange and you have a smoking gun ?

March 8, 2018

Forget collusion.... this is now about conspiracy !

retards.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

But you forgot to include Ivanka and Eric Trump

https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/23/polit...uit/index.html

I am not a Hillary fan by any stretch of imagination, but I never understood how much Republicans hated her. They had a dozen investigations into her, and all of them never had even had a crime attached to them.

With the email server... What crime was committed? There is no law against a public official running their government email through their own personal server. It might seem odd to the general public, but it turns out this was routine.... This was common at the State Department - past Secretaries of State used a similar system - and members of Congress have also used similar systems. It was not a crime to do this, and it still isn't a crime to do this.

With Benghazi.... What crime was she accused of? The State Department isn't in charge of Embassy security - The Department Of Defense is. In fact, the United States Marines are the ones with boots on the ground. I think the world of United States Marines, but two dozen lightly armed Marines cannot fend off hundreds of people for long. The Secretary Of State cannot order the military to invade another country to protect an embassy - that's an act of war. Even if the President wanted to do this, it would have been too little too late. We had a quick reaction force in Italy, but... By the time we learned of the attack, got details of the attack and came up with a plan, and gave them marching orders... The attack was over. So what we would charge Hillary with? Failure to make a decision she cannot legally make?

All of this was hype. And it worked. They are still doing it. They are still investigating Hillary. In fact, I think they are investigating the people who investigated her. Whatever.

Meanwhile, we have a serious investigation where we are accusing a sitting US president of directly colluding with a foreign government into rigging a US election and.... People are going to jail. Dozens of people have been indicted. It took six years to finish Watergate and over sixty people were indicted. This investigation is just two years in and we have dozens indicted. This investigation is just getting started.

But whatever. There is nothing to see here, right?

Mueller has indicated 32 people since May 2017 when his investigation began. It hasn't even been 2 years yet. At this rate if Mueller's investigation were to go on 6 years he would indict over 90 people.

That and he also removed a President from office.

Here is how I see this playing out... Trump's kids are going to get indicted and face jail terms. Everyone is lying, and it's only a matter of time. Eventually this will land in Trump's lap and he will be impeached, and then either removed from office or resigns. (And you know he won't resign.) At the same time the economy is going to crash again - we all see it's coming - and Republicans will blame the entire mess on the Democrats. Again.

We are the retards but our story has remained the same since the start.. Meanwhile your Trump messiah changes his story every other month...

We are the retards but you are the ones who still think Hillary will get locked up. Meanwhile multiple people from Trump's campaign are actually locked up right now with more to come...


Something tells me the retard is you.

They lie about everything. From day one. Every single thing.

"There was no payment to Stormy Daniels" to "Cohen made a payment, but Trump didn't know" to an audio recording of Trump telling him to pay the money. WTF?

Same thing with this secret Trump Russia meeting in Trump Tower.

He's psychologically disturbed, it's part of his mental defect.

psychological erection failure - questions

Who is Matt you dumb cunt? Your absentee father? Is this another one of your "fake nick" things? You are only making yourself look stupid, or, I should say, only revealing yourself for the idiot you are.

"It's on GatewayPundit so it must be all lies!!"

^^ Nice logic there, genius :1orglaugh

So Wikileaks didn't refute the claim and it's all made up?

And there are visitor logs of Manafort at the embassy in London? Try again.

You've never shown me to be wtong on anything. I'm not Russian or dumb, you're just clueless :1orglaugh

How many of you have actually been in an embassy? To engage with a high value guest, or indeed even to enter beyond the VISA processing areas, you have to go through layers of security, provide documentation, and sign logs. The idea that the Ecuadorian embassy abandoned protocol on one guest is ridiculous. Remember that during this time both England and the Obama administration wanted Assange, as did Sweden. No one would have been allowed to visit with him off record, period.

The first step is acceptance, well done! :thumbsup

Look, it's the head retard in charge! Hi bladey :smilie_we

I'm seriously totally fucked up

The average ordinary person has to go through layers of security. However, if the embassy doesn't want anyone to know you were there... There wouldn't be a record of it.

Let's take a look at the bigger picture.... I am going to make some big leaps here but go along with it....

Russia had Trump under their Thumb for over a decade now. Perhaps they have a video tape of him pissing on hookers. We know Donald likes porn stars, so pissing on hookers isn't a stretch. Russia tells Trump to run, and everything thinks it's a long shot. However, Russia has been secretly spending years putting together a network on various social media platforms, going so far as to create entire organizations if only on paper inside of the US. Russia hacks the DNC. Perhaps they even hacked voting machines. Russia spends billions in local ads that we still don't know about in groups and organizations created by Russia inside of the United States - like that little red headed spy chick they arrested. Then ads on social media, sowing discord, releasing the hacked emails through Russia....

Russia tells the Ecuadorian government they want Manafort to speak directly to Julian - off the radar.

You don't think it's possible Ecuador couldn't make that happen?

https://steamusercontent-a.akamaihd....4592B8F745DD2/

Blaidswire :1orglaugh

hm i think my sweat pants stink so much...

So much for "fact",.... eh?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

The libtards can't get enough of their myths and legends..

If I were Trump I would have ended this charade long ago.. You really have to hand it to him for allowing it to go on.. I hope as soon as that kook Pelosi sits down as Speaker he slaps her with it all.

Are you saying that an embassy couldn't get someone through multiple layers of security without "logging them in"..... Of course they can.

That embassy is probably the most surveilled in the World since he walked in the door. If it were so easy why doesn't he just sneak out? Surely he could dress up like Bladewire and sneak by..

I'm saying that you don't know what the word "fact" means, much less how to use it correctly in a sentence (or thread title).

MI5 stopped 24 hour surveillance of the embassy in 2015.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/o...julian-assange

Oh look alt-right hate nics TheSquealer & Onwebcam logged in the same time and are posting in tandem.

So what you're saying is that Assange COULD dress up like you and waltz in and out the door? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

That's incorrect. They stopped having twenty-four hour guards in front of the embassy. It never says they stopped surveillance. In fact, we are positive they have twenty-four hour surveillance on the embassy because of Julian.