Or not like the citizens in Korea town that protected their stores homes and lives during the LA riots.

I do have PTSD and it's easy to see that I'm more stable than you are.

Like I've said before, the majority of you fucks don't even know what it is. You just hear it on the news and assume everyone associated it is a raving lunatic waiting to be triggered.

but you have a legal weapon at home or not ?

i don't have to study medical encyclopedia to know that every human being on this planet at some point in his life will find himself in a situation where he is no longer predictable.

look at all these mass killers and count on how many days in their lives they DID NOT kill anyone, because that's exactly what your argument refers to.

maybe not a single one of you has ever shot a human being in his life. and your argument is based on this fact. only this argument is valid for every mass shooter until the day it was ONE time different.

i'm not sure if people like you can't think logically or don't want to think logically. but whatever of it - both circumstances would be reason enough not to put weapons in your hands.

If you want to reduce the number of mass killings. Maybe you don't really want a solution that works.

And people intending to go out and shoot lots of people will adhere to all the regulations!!!!

I approve this message.

Maybe the people who scream about an infringement on their freedom would like to explain how their freedom is is worth the deaths of the people killed in 307 mass shootings. That's in 2018 alone.

One incident doesn't counter the cause of 307 mass shootings.

Several. And I'm being modest about it.

The rest of your statement just reinforces how clueless you really are. Please educate yourself at least a little bit so you don't continue posting absolute nonsense on here and making yourself look like an idiot. Thanks.

So you compare a constitutional right to a bunch of other bullshit?

Blah blah blah.... shut the fuck up, thommy.

Gun control is nothing less than an attempt to pass a law that makes it illegal for criminals to break laws. (Which is just fucking moronic)

There are many reasons that people like me collect assault weapons and handguns. In my case I'm a history aficionado and one of my favorite guns is a Colt Army revolver (aka. The Peacemaker) made in the 1870s. It's just as deadly today as it was back then and it's damn easily concealable. Similar can be said about some of my old machine guns which date back to the 1890s.

The facts are:

• No one commits a mass shooting with old guns.

• ALL gun related crimes have their start with illegal drugs or drug addiction or mental illness.

• In domestic abuse cases the guns involved are almost always hunting rifles and the majority of the time the person using the gun isn't the licensed gun owner.
  

So if you want to make a serious dent in gun violence then

(a) Go after the drug dealers
(b) Make society simpler and more bearable so that we have less crazy people
(c) Invest in apprenticeship programs and skilled labor - bring back good paying jobs

you have here to go to the roots and go behind the pharma industry who made most
drug consumers in america addicted to drugs.

all they do is to buy the same stuff they had a prescription for 10 times cheaper
on the street.

that´s a quite good idea - but I think the biggest border for that is the "someone is fist-thinking"

americans unfortunately live in "hollywood reality" - and this hollywood makes them strongest and best always - but THIS is NOT the truth and we all know that.

again you don´t go to the roots.
skilled labor need skilled and educated people.
there is no need for coal workers anymore.

if you want the future jobs you should start to switch budgets from military spendings to education.
actually the opposite is what happens.

Decommission all your guns if you only collect them for historical reasons.

Can you ensure everyone here that a gun owner won't become batshit crazy?

How do you suggest they implement your ideas, A, B and C?

As someone who is in favour of globalisation. How do you suggest we bring jobs back to the West? There's no point in educating people if jobs are sent to countries with a cheap labour force. The EU's policy of open borders makes it easier for companies to employ people for less without training them or taking on people with no experience.

Are you willing to pay more in taxes and in goods made in the EU and not imported from the 3rd world?

I agree US military spending is way too high. Will you advocate Europe trebles it's military spending to help the US who currently fund the lion's share of NATO?

it is funny how people going into insult mode when they do not have arguments anymore.

either you know that you talk BS or you really don´t know how illogical you are.

both of it does not make you to a reliable gun owner.

if i had to decide that, I would not give such a person a weapon.

open your eyes paul to reality.

the EU is lack of skilled workers.

germany is already in a crisis because they can´t find enough of them.

nothing like that is done abroad - what we are using from there is the cheap labor to make high tech affordable for EVERYBODY.

let´s not talk about this topic here - I know that it does not lead to anywhere because you your knowledge about economy is not even to find under a microscope.
but at least in regards of gun owning we both can agree.

and to this question let´s FINALLY agree that this is what the countries actually spend into NATO.

https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2...ts-2018-19.jpg

and if albania is pushing tomorrow 20% of it´s GDP into their own military the rest will do a fuck and do the same. if us is spending more in their OWN military (what is NOT owned by NATO) as in their healthcare and education system it is also THEIR problem and not the problem of other countries.

so if we talk about NATO member fees please refer to this table.

Exactly. Which is why we need common sense laws that says "if you are arrested for a violent crime" or someone who is diagnosed with mental issue or PTSD automatically has their firearms taken away.

This is common sense.

vDumb ass you can't "decommission" a gun. You can only decommission Navy ships, etc.

If you're asking that guns be made "inoperable" then the solution is to collect plastic toys. BUT WAIT... There are also rules preventing toys from looking too much like the real thing

Sorry but I'm not about to start collecting blue plastic water pistols. However I suspect it won't be long before radical Muslims figure out they can be filled with acid.

Can you ensure that the cunt you're putting your dick in won't give you AIDS?

I can't believe you did porn and you actually asked that question. How many broads did you bareback fuck and the only questions that you asked were

Does she have ID?
Will she sign a release?
How much can I get her for?

FYI:
When it comes to guns:

All those background checks, police criminal clearance reports, mandatory gun safety courses and gun owner license requirements are what keep the batshit crazy from getting a gun.


A. Get rid of violent video games and then new assault weapons won't seem cool

B. Triple all prison sentences for recreational drug possession with no possibility of parole. Death penalty for dealers/growers/etc

C. Destroy the socialists and communists that both infest our universities and protect transnational corporations from having to deal with competition from a completely free open market.

I can truly understand nearly all your arguments here from YOUR point of view.

also in EVERY country in the world it have gun collectors who owns guns.

but those people are the exemption and not the rule. AND they get a really really hard check.
I hardly can believe that in US have so many collectors.

As a citizen I HAVE TO BELIEVE also that a policemen who legally owns a gun will never use it for anything else than it is thought for.
I have NO GUARANTEE that this will be the case always and as you see it also happens but MUCH less.

the argument of gun owners is always that something CAN happen even when you take guns away or control them harder.
but THIS risk we have in all and everything - we do not even know if the guy who drives a cars is not drunk.

so it will NEVER gives a guarantee in ALL cases but in the MOST.

If there would be 20.000 less deads (what is a bit more than the half) we talk about 20.000 individuals who have the right to live.
20.000 where all their parents, brothers, sisters and friends (what are millions at the end) wo do not have to suffer.

i think it is worth it.

and here is an additional APPROVED thought:

less guns will produce fewer locked-up people. you would not believe how many are in US jails because they did ONE TIME a mistake and did not even kill but injure someone with a gun.

the costs per inmate to the US taxpayer are between 25 and 60 THOUSAND dollars per year.

now calculate that by 2.3 million (us have the highest number of inmates per 100 k citizen in the world) and you will see that there is even a positive economical effect.

So, avoid the question about comparing a constitutional right with your other bullshit.

You and Paul Markham aren't citizens here and your opinions don't matter because you can do nothing about it anyway.

There, argue that. With yourself. You're too stupid for me to talk to.

The white on white gun homicide rate in the US is of little to no concern to those of us who live here. (and I'm talking the real white on white stats. Not those fake news stats that include the very violent hispanics in with whites)

Ship the blacks and browns of the US to Australia, Finland, Switzerland, Canada and so on and watch the homicide rates there explode using whatever weapons are available to them.

Here I thought the topic was GUNS

not white's black's and brown's

So...
How do you stop the gun massicure's ?
Hearing a lot of talk and no action while it gets even worse.
All talk, no action.
Where is the action !

I have lost 4 friends from them in the last 3 years. At this rate, I will not have many left in 8.
Perhaps they will give me a break and go after Yours next !

This is the list I used. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/03/nato-spending-2017.html

the white man is by faaaaaaaar the most violent species on this planet and nobody out-invades, out-bombs, out-robs the white man or even comes close...you can ship any skin color out/in/up/down it does not matter, the white man will always be the most violent savage, and one country in particular will always be the cradle of violence...the only way to protect yourself is to arm the fuck up :2 cents::2 cents:

But that doesn't go far enough. You can't predict whether their first crime is walking into a public place and shooting people, or when someone will turn mental, etc.

Have you never heard of an STD test?

In the US they need far stricter laws because of the culture of someone committing suicide and deciding to go out in a blaze of publicity. In Canada the laws are proving inadequate.

https://www.macleans.ca/opinion/gun-...a-isnt-immune/

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-07-...erica/10041096

Which you are prepared to accept. So you can keep your fully operating guns.


A. Get rid of violent video games and then new assault weapons won't seem cool

B. Triple all prison sentences for recreational drug possession with no possibility of parole. Death penalty for dealers/growers/etc

C. Destroy the socialists and communists that both infest our universities and protect transnational corporations from having to deal with competition from a completely free open market.

On A. and B. you oppose the free open market. On C. you are in favour of it. Is the defining point of an open market going to be what you like or don't like?

Shouldn't we ban idiots before guns??

Which is only good as of the moment the test is taken. If you're not the very 1st fuck thrown in her right after the blood draw then the test is damn useless.

Or how about the fact that the tests have a margin of error?
Or the fact that most of the girls in this biz escort?

Sure the broad gets an STD test on Monday and by Saturday she ends up on your set and you're the 18th man to stuff his cock in her that week.

Geezzz when you think about it it sounds really dangerous. Perhaps we need stricter controls on cocks and cunts?
Fair enough!!!

Let's ban trucks and cars because in France some lunatic behind the wheel killed 86 people and the injured 458 others.

While we're at it Britain needs to ban knives because there were 1,299 stabbings in London as of the end of April this year according to official statistics from the Met Police.

Tell me Paul are you prepared to have your kitchen knives "decommissioned" and just eat with spoons? Is there anyway you can think of to keep knives from people that might go bat shit crazy?

Tell you what... When knives, vehicles and planes are banned I'll get rid of my guns. I'll go quietly into a retirement home and eat only baby food through a straw.

Stop making sense, you're going to piss everyone off.

So you agree that all your tests aren't fool proof.


And please stop bringing up stupid arguments. We need cars and knives a lot more than you need guns, you want to keep your collection for no real reason at all. Other than it makes you feel good. That's the problem, people collecting operational guns for stupid reasons.

So long as you're able to identify an idiot prior to him doing something bad with a gun. That's a great idea. Do you and notinmybackyard qualify?

Oh for fuck sakes you're the moron in a pack of idiots.

You've probably never even held a gun never mind having to go through the legal requirements to get licensed and own one. But yet here you are spouting off like you're some kind of fucking expert on the subject and all you've done is read a handful of news sites.


Well ain't that something coming from a Chirping Brit.

I guess your mommy and daddy forgot to tell you when you were a little boy but if it wasn't for evil guns you would be talking German today.

Correction: You're a degenerate pornographer with bad teeth so if it hadn't been for good men with guns risking their lives on everyone's behalf... You would been shoved in an oven with all the other low lifes the 3rd Reich would have wanted to get rid of.


Not only do you owe every freedom you have to guns but you also owe your life to them.

Holy shit not only are you way out of line but you sound like the villiage idiot. "If it wasn't for evil guns you'd be speaking German" what a piece of shit thing to say. Stupid on so many levels I don't even know where to begin.

You dumb ass millennials have had someone wipe your asses for you all of your lives and absolutely fucking clueless about how the world works. Your entire concept of the world is at best based on the Power Rangers and Pokeman card. Everything you have is because someone took a violent stand against a greedy belligerent bastard.

Humans are violent and they prey on the weak. If it wasn't for good guys with weapons you would murdered the first time someone bigger than you didn't like something you said. You would be living in a shit hole if it weren't for guns.

Now if you're arguing that only the government should have guns then what will you cry about when discover that it hasn't stopped any gun crimes?

https://media.giphy.com/media/cfbrIflSnVSTK/giphy.gif

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/OpulentIdi...restricted.gif

https://www.9to5animations.com/wp-co...-fire-fail.gif

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/70/62...f5fa1f7465.gif

:thumbsup....but I am sure she got her man ;)

You sound like the kind of disturbed person who shouldn't own a gun.

Plus you sound about as dumb as a brick

:thumbsup :thumbsup

His arguments have earned him a place on my ignore list.

The people who fought in the 2nd world war, were trained soldiers and not any idiot whop owned a gun. In fact it was the idiots who started the Nazi Party, Hitler and WW2.

His comments are moronic on so many levels, I'm sure he must be trolling.

have you been on this alliance with your collection guns?
did all the snipers of the past decades do ?

this argument is poor as we are not talking about unarming an army.

if you would really READ the second amendment carefully you would also know that this right to civil person is NOT given there.

a cilvil person can not be called " axwel regulated" militia. thatwould be called anarchy.
because collective orders or decisions that exist in the case of a militia do not exist.
at the time at which s´der 2. constitutional amendment was written there was also no such militia.

at the latest with the introduction of the homeland security there is this "well regulated militia" on which the 2, constitutional amendment aims.