![]() |
Quote:
I would like to know more about the energy output and economics of a setup like this. This one reflects sunlight to a boiler to generate steam, turn generators and provide electricity. But regular electric panels convert sunlight to electricity directly. Are they somehow less efficient? If they could use the direct sunlight-to-electricity panels they would save all those birds. |
solar is great, yet is not so efficient like nuclear. for economic and physics reasons.
good for small houses with low energy consume, not for the rest |
Quote:
I was the Engineering Watch Supv so basically I had to be able to both startup and shutdown the plant |
Quote:
|
it is really amusing how you as a German getting so nervous because you think that you talk with just another arrogant and stupid American. relax man, I'm not a such person (especially not American heheh). so have so mercy for JohnyClips and relax man ! too:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think the best comparison I ever heard made was when Rickover was before Congress testifying on nuclear safety, he made the true statement that he had picked up more radiation flying to Wash DC in one flight, then normal nuclear operators get in a year operating a plant |
lets use your logic: prove that he is wrong
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
sadly science is the last thing that talks to people's common sense and usually they follow emotions like zombies
Quote:
|
Quote:
you need to take a chill pill and work out whatīs going to happen in a few years if you donīt start looking after your world you live :( :Oh crap |
Quote:
|
it currently only accounts for about 3 percent of electricity generation (Spain)
your input was brilliant as always to the topic.... Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's true, but Solar isn't the only renewable energy source for Spain. Found this: Spain Closes In on 50 Percent Renewable Power Generation I *LOVE* How fast renewable energy seems to be growing now. I really hope it keeps going. |
nothing wrong with that...except: bad influence of wind farms to nearest living people and animals...but overall it aint that bad
Quote:
|
if Germany can run on renewable energy only (currently it's up to 80+% on good days), everybody else can too
fuck nuclear and fuck coal, technically we're way past that i always wonder what makes people so keen on destroying the planet, must be a lack of long term vison - or simply a lack of intelligence |
where did you get your data from ?
http://strom-report.de/medien/germany-energy-mix.png post link or its FAKE NEWS ! heheh also: https://static.secure.website/wscfus...ricity-mix.png Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Letīs get this right, any small percent is more than none! Going backwards is just brilliant. Now maybe you can give more input than just pulling negativity on my positive world input as always :thumbsup |
Quote:
Britainīs wind turbines seem to be growing both in the sea & on land, as does Spain, they use a lot of gas :2 cents: |
I suggest Trump takes a jump off the nearest cliff because heīs doing wrong for the US & now creating more environment problems for the world!
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
lol so trump can do no right?
|
noise and some health/ mental issues to more sensitive ppl.
it is also not so reliable as you have to have some energy backup as wind doesnt blow all the time... Quote:
|
Quote:
There are wind turbines not far from here. I'll have to go spend a day around them myself one day and see for myself. Then again if there is a real issue, 1 day may not be enough to notice. Quote:
But still. Woohoo! |
Quote:
:winkwink: |
Gary, I know I'm wasting my breath here, but it's a scam.
To those of you who are jew-wise...think of it as a kosher tax on white development. If whitey explores the stars, they'll come up with some interstellar equivalent of "climate change". |
one day, one Sunday,somewhen back then, my cock was so big that it was 25 cm !
usually it is just 15 cm :-/ but most often less than 10 cm Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Anyways do you think it has changed a whole lot in 3+ years? Probably not by very much. Coal is still 25% or more of world electrical capacity. And thank you for posting a graph from the post-modern nation of Germany. Germany has passed it's peak and is now beginning it's decline back into the dark ages and non-existance. Meanwhile enjoy your power outages and bankruptcy due to fighting against the life giving gas CO2. . |
Quote:
but i never heard that work on a submarine makes people losing their brain. |
Quote:
Anyways, here is a chart to put your fears about radiation into perspective: http://i.imgur.com/dQ6mWdw.png . |
Quote:
that there is still coal in the energy mix has the same reason as in US - coal is subsidized in Germany since 50 years and for nobody else nessecary as the subsidized workers. and as you blind frog can not even read this graphic but want to write something smart I should tell you that it is not 25% it is 25 GW from 190 GW in total. And that number did not change because Germany got rid of more than 50% of the nuclear energy and til 2020 ALL nuclear energy reactors be gone and replaced by green energy. Quote:
while US depts are growing like 15.000 dollar per second. who should think about bancrupcy? a country with 2 trillion DECREASING depts and a healthy economy or a country with far over 20 trillion INCREASING depts with a president who can not count 1+1 together? |
Quote:
i hope my english is good enough to tell you that you are a COMPLETLY IGNORANT IDIOT ! |
Quote:
greetz. |
Quote:
. |
so who has the biggest cock in this thread, just after me ?:winkwink::winkwink:
more discussion please :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:winkwink::winkwink: prove who is the best :1orglaugh:1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
^ hey goody 2 shoes, why ya working in porn??
|
Quote:
Obama's EPA refuses to pay claims from Gold King Mine spill - Washington Times |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123