GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   News please excuse the next week on GFY & my corrections & fking nastiness to DiVVY fuckhead Times... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1207942)

Speigelau 07-20-2016 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDA (Post 21047323)
You have no clue what I know about the image or age of the person in the image at the time it was shot.

Of course I don't and how could I, you haven't said any details about the image in question. What I do know is that Eric viewed it and decided to remove it because he didn't want it posted on this forum. I also know that Gary viewed it as questionable, which is why he asked if people thought the model was 18+.

It really doesn't matter at this point if the image was legit or not, Eric felt Gary broke the rules and he was banned. I do think its moronic for DV to continue with this rant that Gary intentionally posted cp.

DVTimes 07-20-2016 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GspotProductions (Post 21047431)
why would you look forward to being banned?

You know you're the worst kind of person, a person that stays somewhere to push hatred & evil, continue to lie when you know the image Gary posted was not underage & still stays. Just to give stress & anger :(

notice not disgust, just a frown, shame on you DV.

Just FYI, Gary's twenty times the man you could ever be, he's willing to just let things go, even if you met. As said earlier, you wouldn't say any of this to his face & not mean't with harm or assault to you, just the point, because you know you lie & he's spent his years getting on with business :2 cents:

I am Gary who pretends to be Nat

Look at my shitty site and crap pics

Please promote me as I get no sales

No, hang on I sell my content to all the big names. I am a big deal

I get lots of sign ups on twitter cos of DVtimes

DVtimes sucks

Dvtimes gets me twitter followers

Lets all talk bollocks

Bollocks and Spam and breaking the rules its all ok as I am Gary who was banned for posting under aged pics. Bollocks and Spam and breaking the rules its all ok as I am Gary who was banned for posting under aged pics. Bollocks and Spam and breaking the rules its all ok as I am Gary who was banned for posting under aged pics. Bollocks and Spam and breaking the rules its all ok as I am Gary who was banned for posting under aged pics.
Bollocks and Spam and breaking the rules its all ok as I am Gary who was banned for posting under aged pics. Bollocks and Spam and breaking the rules its all ok as I am Gary who was banned for posting under aged pics. Bollocks and Spam and breaking the rules its all ok as I am Gary who was banned for posting under aged pics. Bollocks and Spam and breaking the rules its all ok as I am Gary who was banned for posting under aged pics.

Please Ban Me

NatalieK 07-20-2016 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xXXtesy10 (Post 21047476)

this looks similar to my next door neighbor, quite funny, thanks for the share :thumbsup

NatalieK 07-20-2016 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Speigelau (Post 21047500)
Of course I don't and how could I, you haven't said any details about the image in question. What I do know is that Eric viewed it and decided to remove it because he didn't want it posted on this forum. I also know that Gary viewed it as questionable, which is why he asked if people thought the model was 18+.

It really doesn't matter at this point if the image was legit or not, Eric felt Gary broke the rules and he was banned. I do think its moronic for DV to continue with this rant that Gary intentionally posted cp.

In all thought, Eric may not have viewed the image & just banned my partner reading an email & reading the thread title & viewing a young model, I know I would not want to look at a porn image of an underage person & nor would my partner.

The fact is, it's not to do with me, so I should not hear anything to do with it & should be respected as me, an individual & not have DV continue to post or remark on my partners account :2 cents:

DVTimes 07-20-2016 02:48 PM

:helpme :helpme :helpme :helpme :helpme :helpme :helpme :helpme :helpme :helpme

DVTimes 07-20-2016 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GspotProductions (Post 21047527)
In all thought, Eric may not have viewed the image & just banned my partner reading an email & reading the thread title & viewing a young model, I know I would not want to look at a porn image of an underage person & nor would my partner :2 cents:



Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks

DVTimes 07-20-2016 02:52 PM

Gary posted under aged content believing it was underage content.

Gary got the ban.

Gary now pretends to be Nat to get around his ban.

I no longer care.

Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks Bollocks

Speigelau 07-20-2016 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GspotProductions (Post 21047527)
In all thought, Eric may not have viewed the image & just banned my partner reading an email & reading the thread title & viewing a young model, I know I would not want to look at a porn image of an underage person & nor would my partner.

The fact is, it's not to do with me, so I should not hear anything to do with it & should be respected as me, an individual & not have DV continue to post or remark on my partners account :2 cents:

Ugh stop the nonsense, of course Eric viewed your post, he edited it and said not to post that here. https://gfy.com/18800653-post1.html

TheDA 07-20-2016 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Speigelau (Post 21047500)
Of course I don't and how could I, you haven't said any details about the image in question. What I do know is that Eric viewed it and decided to remove it because he didn't want it posted on this forum. I also know that Gary viewed it as questionable, which is why he asked if people thought the model was 18+.

It really doesn't matter at this point if the image was legit or not, Eric felt Gary broke the rules and he was banned. I do think its moronic for DV to continue with this rant that Gary intentionally posted cp.

My argument about the image is that it was not on image of an underage girl. DVTimes is claiming continually that Gary posted underage content - that is not the case.

I fully understand why it is likely that Gary got the ban for it but it was not an underage girl.

The image, at the time, was available in its fuller format in other posts on this very board at the same time this was posted. There were links to galleries of images from what looked like the same set posted here as well. It is possible that these all still exist to this day.

DVTimes 07-20-2016 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDA (Post 21047590)
My argument about the image is that it was not on image of an underage girl. DVTimes is claiming continually that Gary posted underage content - that is not the case.

I fully understand why it is likely that Gary got the ban for it but it was not an underage girl.

The image, at the time, was available in its fuller format in other posts on this very board at the same time this was posted. There were links to galleries of images from what looked like the same set posted here as well. It is possible that these all still exist to this day.

He posted it believing she was underage.

And he got the big ban for doing so. The Big Ban. The Ban that is most BIG.

The Big Ban

NatalieK 07-20-2016 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Speigelau (Post 21047584)
Ugh stop the nonsense, of course Eric viewed your post, he edited it and said not to post that here. https://gfy.com/18800653-post1.html

no, I don't mean actually looked at the post, didn't check the image, waste time, just deleted it & that was that! Maybe he read some email saying, arsewithclass has posted cp, he reads the thread title, see's the girls young & deletes it. I did say he probably saw a young girl on my last post also.

But hey, she was over the legal age so all this is bollocks & as also said, not to do with me :2 cents:

NatalieK 07-20-2016 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 21047605)
He posted it believing she was underage.

And he got the big ban for doing so. The Big Ban. The Ban that is most BIG.

The Big Ban

here above, another lie. No, like earlier I really didn't mean Gary was going to kick the shit out of you if you said it to his face. He merely said to me, I bet he wouldn't say it to my face, because you're a pussy & a liar.

Like wise, he posted it, knowing she was of age but felt 18 is too young for porn, especially as some of the European girls look much younger at the age of 20!

That's it...

believe or not, but the mirror image come up again, you only believe how you act.

If you act like a prat & lie to get out of your shit, you won't believe what others say & only assume the worst.

The big ban should be from someone like you, harassing & twisting those words of others, wars are created by this too :(

NatalieK 07-20-2016 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 21047548)
I no longer care.

then shut up, because none of us do either :2 cents:

DVTimes 07-20-2016 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GspotProductions (Post 21047632)
here above, another lie. No, like earlier I really didn't mean Gary was going to kick the shit out of you if you said it to his face. He merely said to me, I bet he wouldn't say it to my face, because you're a pussy & a liar.

Like wise, he posted it, knowing she was of age but felt 18 is too young for porn, especially as some of the European girls look much younger at the age of 20!

That's it...

believe or not, but the mirror image come up again, you only believe how you act.

If you act like a prat & lie to get out of your shit, you won't believe what others say & only assume the worst.

The big ban should be from someone like you, harassing & twisting those words of others, wars are created by this too :(


bollocks

TheDA 07-20-2016 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 21047605)
He posted it believing she was underage.

And he got the big ban for doing so. The Big Ban. The Ban that is most BIG.

The Big Ban

You are missing my point. You are making claims that someone posted underage content. They did not. I know you say you are not bothered about the rules but that single act is against one of the rules of this board. In my mind maybe the top one.

DVTimes 07-20-2016 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GspotProductions (Post 21047638)
then shut up, because none of us do either :2 cents:

bollocks to you

bollocks to you posting under age pics

bollocks to your lies

bollocks to you pretending to be Nat


DVTimes 07-20-2016 03:23 PM

:pimp :pimp :pimp :pimp :pimp

Gary when you pimp Nat out for unprotected sex, does it make you feel like a real man?

NatalieK 07-20-2016 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 21047665)
:pimp :pimp :pimp :pimp :pimp

Gary when you pimp Nat out for unprotected sex, does it make you feel like a real man?

and here you go again...

next problem...

next harassment...

you never stop do you?

Yes, we pimp each other out & enjoy it, now what you fucking idiot! :1orglaugh

xXXtesy10 07-20-2016 03:29 PM


Speigelau 07-20-2016 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GspotProductions (Post 21047608)
no, I don't mean actually looked at the post, didn't check the image, waste time, just deleted it & that was that! Maybe he read some email saying, arsewithclass has posted cp, he reads the thread title, see's the girls young & deletes it. I did say he probably saw a young girl on my last post also.

But hey, she was over the legal age so all this is bollocks & as also said, not to do with me :2 cents:

Lol, did you think Eric was going to take the time to research the image in question? He simply saw your question asking if the girl was 18, so even you didn't know at the time.

NatalieK 07-20-2016 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Speigelau (Post 21047710)
Lol, did you think Eric was going to take the time to research the image in question? He simply saw your question asking if the girl was 18, so even you didn't know at the time.

omg, really?

Already I have said, Gary had checked the site & model, yes she was above age!

He was trying to ask GFY users if she looked of age, as seen now, they didn't & nor did Eric & therefore he did actually prove by being banned, that an 18 year old European model does not always look 18 and so his aim of his thread was going to ask if the age of acceptable legal age should be raised, and obviously it should :2 cents:

TheDA 07-20-2016 03:58 PM

I'm going to miss all this tomorrow :)

If it wasn't for a postponed meeting this morning and spending the rest of the day in post-production on a clients project I'd have missed it today too :)

jimmycooper 07-20-2016 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDA (Post 21047743)
I'm going to miss all this tomorrow :)

If it wasn't for a postponed meeting this morning and spending the rest of the day in post-production on a clients project I'd have missed it today too :)

It is quite amusing. :)

TheDA 07-20-2016 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmycooper (Post 21047767)
It is quite amusing. :)

Final renders complete and looking good, I'm off. Might have to pop-in for a look later for a laugh.

xXXtesy10 07-20-2016 07:22 PM


Paul Markham 07-20-2016 11:33 PM

What do threads like this do for GFY Ad Sales and SEO?

xXXtesy10 07-21-2016 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21048460)
What do threads like this do for GFY Ad Sales and SEO?

http://38.media.tumblr.com/d74b9a76a...j5ego1_400.gif

j3rkules 07-21-2016 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21048460)
What do threads like this do for GFY Ad Sales and SEO?

Nothing good... I suppose.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123