GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum
Page 3 of 3 < 12 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   U.S. ambassador rebukes Canada for lack of support (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=119528)

CDSmith 03-26-2003 09:28 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Fletch XXX
exactly.
Do you get the feeling you'll be asked to 'splain that in detail cuz they jis don git it?


I do.


:evil-laug

directfiesta 03-26-2003 09:37 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Sly_RJ


The resolution didn't pass simply because of a few countries with veto power, as I understand it, please correct me if I'm wrong.
Wrong: the resolution was never presented by the US at the UN council.

Now I understand your posts.

directfiesta 03-26-2003 09:39 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Sly_RJ
If Canada is worried about the legitimacy of the UN, as the latest article states, then they should definitely be concerned about the veto powers of "interested" nations.
There has been 243 vetos since the creation of the UN. The US is the country to have use it most, mainly when sanction against Israel were on the table.

FlyingIguana 03-26-2003 09:42 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by directfiesta


Wrong: the resolution was never presented by the US at the UN council.

Now I understand your posts.
there was no point to present it because it would have been vetoed anyways.

CDSmith 03-26-2003 09:43 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by directfiesta
There has been 243 vetos since the creation of the UN. The US is the country to have use it most, mainly when sanction against Israel were on the table.
We should obviously close our border, boycott them and eventually invade N. Dakota.

Fletch XXX 03-26-2003 09:49 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Sly_RJ


The resolution didn't pass simply because of a few countries with veto power, as I understand it, please correct me if I'm wrong. So because of these few countries, who coincidentally have large business dealings with Iraq
<a href=http://www.thespectrum.com/news/stories/20030326/opinion/1257048.html>Three opposing nations violate U.N. resolution</a>

Wednesday, March 26, 2003

directfiesta 03-26-2003 09:53 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Fletch XXX


<a href=http://www.thespectrum.com/news/stories/20030326/opinion/1257048.html>Three opposing nations violate U.N. resolution</a>

Wednesday, March 26, 2003
Southern Utah press??/ hahahaha

I have one from the Alabama Klan's paper...

Make your own webpages, then link to it...

Fletch XXX 03-26-2003 09:56 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by directfiesta


Southern Utah press??/ hahahaha

I have one from the Alabama Klan's paper...

Make your own webpages, then link to it...
Thats the #1 Google News result for 'France - Veto - UN'

A news source like any other you guys use to back up your points.

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&q=france+veto+un

spidered 14 hours ago.

i didnt say it was fact, in fact I said NOTHing, hahaha debate all you want.

directfiesta 03-26-2003 10:14 PM
OK.

:thumbsup

CDSmith 03-26-2003 11:57 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Fletch XXX


Thats the #1 Google News result for 'France - Veto - UN'

A news source like any other you guys use to back up your points.

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&q=france+veto+un

spidered 14 hours ago.

i didnt say it was fact, in fact I said NOTHing, hahaha debate all you want.
Most of the points in that article have been included, covered and corroborated in other reports by other news agencies. I see nothing overly slanted there.

rossiya2 03-27-2003 02:57 AM
Onion was crispy today

http://graphics.theonion.com/pics_39...ation_logo.jpg

Seems that a foreign power gets more heat for installing a dictator than removing him. But only if the dictator is removed by the people themselves. With Saddam revising history for the last 40 years the U.S can appear to be a savior to the people of Iraq, even if the world knows who put him there.

ControlThy 03-27-2003 03:41 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by CDSmith
Why? Because I support their cause? Because I disagree with our PM's stance and agree with some of the Opposition in the House of Commons?


Pretty stupid comment to make. Many other Canadians feel as I do, what are you going to suggest half the population leave because they support the UK and US?


Stupid.
What the hell is wrong with you people, so sensitive!

I was just asking you if you would consider moving to the US because you disagree so strongly with the Canadian government.

Damn.

ControlThy 03-27-2003 03:45 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Sly_RJ

Are you saying the French should move to Iraq?
?

Is Iraq located next to France? - NO
Does Iraq have the same kind of political sytem? - NO

Is your comparison accurate? - NO
Is your post irrelevant? - YES

sacX 03-27-2003 04:18 AM
Fletch XXX,

that link is irrelevant and doesn't address the simplest of points I was making.

CDSmith: do you ever say anything that slightly resembles making sense?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:12 PM.
Page 3 of 3 < 12 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123