GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Trump's wall orginally 4 billion, now his last estiment is 12 bil, real world says 25 bil. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1189907)

arock10 03-24-2016 07:07 PM

I still think a wall made out of trump condos is the best idea

pimpmaster9000 03-24-2016 07:42 PM

a wall is truly the ultimate solution...shit I hope he builds it :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

http://amsterdammodern.com/image/pro...jpg?1365032464http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u...pplingHook.jpghttp://zprepared.com/zblog/wp-conten...acLauncher.jpg

crockett 03-24-2016 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 20799581)
No, I don't want to watch a 20 minute video from a comedian I don't think is funny.

My comment was about border property and the owners welcoming a wall/security, which they will.

You mean the owners who have half their property taken by govt? It's already happened in Texas..

EonBlue 03-24-2016 07:47 PM

?A nation that cannot control its borders is not a nation.? - Ronald Reagan

He was 100% correct.

Wall or no wall.



.

Rochard 03-24-2016 07:51 PM

Truth be told I am all for building a wall. This is basic common sense - We have a problem with people crossing our border, and the most logical thing to do is build a wall. However, in order for it to be remotely effective - if effective at all - it would have to be a cross between the Great Wall Of China and the Berlin Wall. The cost involved would be astronomical; Building it is one thing but it would also have to be maintained and then fully staffed twenty-four hours a day.

And it would still be completely ineffective. They will go over it, they will go under it, they will go through it, they will go around it.

sarettah 03-24-2016 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20799659)
Anyway, I totally disagree with building a wall. In my opinion it's un-American.

When I was in school we were taught that the Berlin Wall represented everything evil in this world. And for the last few years our govt. has been talking about building one. :(

:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup


.

Atticus 03-24-2016 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20799992)
Truth be told I am all for building a wall. This is basic common sense - We have a problem with people crossing our border, and the most logical thing to do is build a wall. However, in order for it to be remotely effective - if effective at all - it would have to be a cross between the Great Wall Of China and the Berlin Wall. The cost involved would be astronomical; Building it is one thing but it would also have to be maintained and then fully staffed twenty-four hours a day.

And it would still be completely ineffective. They will go over it, they will go under it, they will go through it, they will go around it.


So you're all for building a wall, but also know that said wall would be completely ineffective. You really should go into politics. You'd fit right in.

Atticus 03-24-2016 09:32 PM

The solution that nobody (especially the Republicans) will talk about is simple. Mandatory prison sentences for owners and managers that knowingly hire undocumented workers.

Illegal immigrants come to the US for work and to provide a better life for their family. If the work was unavailable they would no longer come. And the immigrants here illegally would not stay.

However, to make sure the work that needs to be done continues to be done we would also need to start issuing more Visas and make legal immigration an easier process.

crockett 03-24-2016 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atticus (Post 20800055)
The solution that nobody (especially the Republicans) will talk about is simple. Mandatory prison sentences for owners and managers that knowingly hire undocumented workers.

Illegal immigrants come to the US for work and to provide a better life for their family. If the work was unavailable they would no longer come. And the immigrants here illegally would not stay.

However, to make sure the work that needs to be done continues to be done we would also need to start issuing more Visas and make legal immigration an easier process.

Yeah, I've said this every election cycle for the last 20 years.. (yes because like clock work every election year Republicans start whining about illegals then forget about them unless it's a democrat in office) When Clinton was in office illegals were big deal, Bush was elected suddenly no whining about illegals. Obama gets elected then suddenly wee need a wall and illegals are problems again..

If you start dishing out $5k fines for ever illegal to the companies who habitually hire them, then suddenly it would be a non issue.. Of course they don't wanna talk about that!!

Barry-xlovecam 03-24-2016 09:55 PM

$35,200,000,000.00

30 ft tall 19 wide at the base 7 feet wide at the top, reinforced concrete on a 10 foot packed gravel footing.

Obviously no one here knows jack shit about poured in place concrete wall construction -- this is a 300+ year wall

A cheap reinforced concrete tilt up wall 30 ft tall with pile drivings and buttresses
$3,168,000,000 - $5 billion depending on the support.

I am assuming Davis–Bacon Act local prevailing wages.

Machine gun towers not included :2 cents:

Any earthquake repairs might get expensive.

ITraffic 03-24-2016 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atticus (Post 20800055)
The solution that nobody (especially the Republicans) will talk about is simple. Mandatory prison sentences for owners and managers that knowingly hire undocumented workers.

Illegal immigrants come to the US for work and to provide a better life for their family. If the work was unavailable they would no longer come. And the immigrants here illegally would not stay.

However, to make sure the work that needs to be done continues to be done we would also need to start issuing more Visas and make legal immigration an easier process.

the employers of these sweat shop operations hire and filter the illegals through "employment agencies" which are really just human trafficking operations. it gives them an arms length so they can claim ignorance about the legality of their workers.

it is a nice and profitable scam but essentially the workers are treated like slaves.

plaster 03-24-2016 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 20800070)
$35,200,000,000.00

30 ft tall 19 wide at the base 7 feet wide at the top, reinforced concrete on a 10 foot packed gravel footing.

Obviously no one here knows jack shit about poured in place concrete wall construction -- this is a 300+ year wall

A cheap reinforced concrete tilt up wall 30 ft tall with pile drivings and buttresses
$3,168,000,000 - $5 billion depending on the support.

I am assuming Davis?Bacon Act local prevailing wages.

Machine gun towers not included :2 cents:

Any earthquake repairs might get expensive.

Wowsa. .. where you get information?

The base need to be no thicker then 3' and taper up to no bigger then what the forms will accommodate. What in the fuck is going on here... it's like saying a 150k house will cost 1 million dollars based on instructions from the tooth fairy.

baddog 03-24-2016 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20799419)
You are assuming it will stop them.. which is wrong, as 50% of them come here legally and over stay..

So right off the bat your 100 billion just got cut in half.. Now how about those ladders, tunnels and ropes...

Then add in the extra 25 bil every 7 years to upkeep the wall, roads ect.. That's another 4 bil down the drain each year and it will grow more as time goes on and more repairs are needed.

So, by your numbers his wall only saves us $50 billion and apparently results in a lot of jobs for Americans to maintain it.

What exactly is the problem with that?

baddog 03-25-2016 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by plaster (Post 20800142)
Wowsa. .. where you get information?

The base need to be no thicker then 3' and taper up to no bigger then what the forms will accommodate. What in the fuck is going on here... it's like saying a 150k house will cost 1 million dollars based on instructions from the tooth fairy.

Barrylogic

Yanks_Todd 03-25-2016 01:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 20799581)
No, I don't want to watch a 20 minute video from a comedian I don't think is funny.

My comment was about border property and the owners welcoming a wall/security, which they will.


Of course you won't. Because these clips are funny due to the unending, insane irony and hypocrisy that they so deftly highlight. Sad to think that there exists for one half of any conservative/liberal debate enough raw materials to support multi million dollar business. One half though. The other half just doesn't produce enough blatantly ironic statements to make a funny show. :thumbsup

Barry-xlovecam 03-25-2016 05:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by plaster (Post 20800142)
Wowsa. .. where you get information?

The base need to be no thicker then 3' and taper up to no bigger then what the forms will accommodate. What in the fuck is going on here... it's like saying a 150k house will cost 1 million dollars based on instructions from the tooth fairy.


I was a was a state licensed general contractor for 14 years and worked as a masonry subcontractor on some state and federal funded bridge projects as well years of pouring a lot of concrete, being around concrete construction and estimating and bidding jobs. You know what a rod buster is or what he makes on a federally funded job?

Also, I didn't include the site preparation necessary for a job like that. You would have to set up mobile mix plants along the border and deliver all that concrete to the forms. You ever worked around concrete pump trucks -- I have more than once.

If you form the wall as a tilt up you would need cranes and access roads.
If you form the wall standing in place you will need to bring in the form materials, and set the forms.
Either way you are going to need concrete pump trucks.
You cannot pre-cast and bring the wall to the site.

You will need Class A roads to move the heavy equipment on and temporary construction roads for a 2000 mile border length construction site.

This is not a war on immigrants. You cannot just fuck up the roads that exist and argue force majure or act of war.

What is your experience?

The cheaper tilt up wall is one foot thick and would have to be set between pilings and buttressed. A wall that is self supporting 30 feet tall and 3 feet at its base would be unstable and topple over.

And you will be hard pressed to build a new home for $150K, Maybe, a manufactured home that they bring to your site in 2 pieces on a couple of over wide low boy trailers.

At any rate it is a ridiculous proposal to build a border wall because you could just dig tunnels under it. Even that 10 foot packed stone footing would not stop that -- you could tunnel under that.

The whole idea of building a concrete wall is asinine. Just place a land-mine field in the first 200 feet, put warning signs on either side and enclose it in a concertina wire fence. The US-Mexico border is 2000 miles long.

Yanks_Todd 03-25-2016 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 20800391)
I was a was a state licensed general contractor for 14 years and worked as a masonry subcontractor on some state and federal funded bridge projects as well years of pouring a lot of concrete, being around concrete construction and estimating and bidding jobs.

Whatever dude. It was on Trump's mind and he said it loud. I am sure you must be in the media. :thumbsup

Barry-xlovecam 03-25-2016 06:32 AM

That wall proposal is called verbal diarrhoea.

Trump has a really great plan -- you'll see :1orglaugh

L-Pink 03-25-2016 07:08 AM

Well something needs done .....

"The federal government now spends more on border and immigration enforcement than it spends on all other criminal law-enforcement agencies — including the FBI, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Secret Service, the US Marshals Service, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives — combined."


.

Rochard 03-25-2016 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atticus (Post 20800052)
So you're all for building a wall, but also know that said wall would be completely ineffective. You really should go into politics. You'd fit right in.

Right?

My point is we need at least try.

Paul Markham 03-25-2016 07:28 AM

It's clear most of you work from home and don't hire anyone full time. The real cost, unless the wall is built with the latest spy technology will be staffing the operation after it's built. Take the cost of a border guard, x 4 for those on the night shift and 1 for every 500 yards of wall. Then the accommodation for the offices, transport, etc. Just rough figures to start everyone thinking.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atticus (Post 20800055)
The solution that nobody (especially the Republicans) will talk about is simple. Mandatory prison sentences for owners and managers that knowingly hire undocumented workers.

Illegal immigrants come to the US for work and to provide a better life for their family. If the work was unavailable they would no longer come. And the immigrants here illegally would not stay.

However, to make sure the work that needs to be done continues to be done we would also need to start issuing more Visas and make legal immigration an easier process.

This is the obvious solution. The Agency angle can be closed, the person using agency staff is responsible for checking who is or isn't legal. Also, take away all benefits, driving licenses, housing, rights to stay with "anchor" babies. Cost less, stops a lot more illegals and the fines paid by the people giving illegals jobs and housing pays for everything.

Republicans will hate it.

Barry-xlovecam 03-25-2016 07:46 AM

Give 100K Americans jobs as border snipers :helpme

That is just as stupid of an idea as building the southern border wall and trying to man it with super infiltration technology. What are these guys smoking?

How many billions will the enhanced enforcement cost?

-------

This is just another sound byte solution to a complex problem.

2000 miles is just to long for a construction solution. :2 cents:

plaster 03-25-2016 07:56 AM

Oh my... Barry I can't even quote your response.

You do not form up a tilt up wall, tilt up means it was pre-fabricated. It would be ridiculous to create the wall as pre-fabricated. Form up the sections, pour it. Every day stuff. So I think we agree that cast in place construction is the route. Just wanted to clarify... tilt up means it was pre-fabricated already.

The only forces on the wall are wind and whatever seismic concerns, wind would govern. The thickness of the wall does not support the wall, the footing does. You do not put a wall on 10 foot packed gravel, you pour a moment footing to handle those forces.

A retaining wall holding back 30 foot of soil at 110 psf would not even be close to 19' at it's base. Wind, at it's highest, would be designed around 25 psf and that would be near the gulf due to hurricane forces. The rest would be around 18 psf or so, unfactored. Seismic would never govern because seismic forces increase based on the weight of the structure, since this is simply a wall supporting nothing other then the wall, seismic would never govern.

The wall would not even need to be 3 foot, reason for 3 foot is not the forces, it's so they can't core it out and walk through the wall. Also wanted to say that the thickness of a pre-cast section, and cast in place section, is roughly the same. Only time that thickness varies is if pre-tensioning of the reinforcement strands occur, which would be so outlandish to consider since the forces on this wall are so minimal. And the thickness of base of wall would be a judgement call to prevent trying to saw cut through it. 3 foot is more then thick enough to deter that.

Pilings and buttresses... lolol. Nope. Spread footing poured wide enough to handle the moment of the small ass forces applied to the face of wall... wind in worst case 100 year occurrence.

It is simple construction. Where did you get exactly these dimensions (19' base and 7' top and then atop a 10 foot packed gravel)?

Ever drive down the road and see those 25 foot or 30 foot sound walls? You think those are 19' wide at it's base and 7' wide at the top?

Barry-xlovecam 03-25-2016 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by plaster (Post 20800559)
Oh my... Barry I can't even quote your response.


How are you going to deliver 30 foot tall sections of a pre-cast wall to a job site? and how wide are they? -- that is so ludicrous. We are not taking a sound barrier wall along a class A highway roadbed. Close the highway and deliver the wall.

FIRST OF ALL -- IT IS 2,000 MILES LONG.
Logistics are the first real problem.
And I am assuming a continuous wall -- so you need to allow for seismic and wind sheer movement.


We are not talking basement walls on spread footings -- that is underground work.

What you propose a cat excavator or two and a couple of labourers with cutting torches could breach in 30 minutes or less.

Just a another half assed idea

pimpmaster9000 03-25-2016 08:34 AM



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWuM06U0jco

it took like 10 men 30 seconds :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

plaster 03-25-2016 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 20800583)
How are you going to deliver 30 foot tall sections of a pre-cast wall to a job site? and how wide are they? -- that is so ludicrous. We are not taking a sound barrier wall along a class A highway roadbed. Close the highway and deliver the wall.

FIRST OF ALL -- IT IS 2,000 MILES LONG.
Logistics are the first real problem.
And I am assuming a continuous wall -- so you need to allow for seismic and wind sheer movement.


We are not talking basement walls on spread footings -- that is underground work.

What you propose a cat excavator or two and a couple of labourers with cutting torches could breach in 30 minutes or less.

Just a another half assed idea

What's going on here. I said it would be cast in place... formed and poured in its final resting place.

You have no idea what a moment footing is? That is how this very simple wall would be supported so doesn't topple over.

And cast in place, or pre-fabbed, same dimensions. There is not a miracle that occurs in a plant that cannot be accomplished in the field.

Still trying to figure out your source of dimensions. And wall is around 1000 miles... natural barriers make up the rest.

C H R I S 03-25-2016 08:49 AM

John Oliver delivers the truth with a nice dash of comedy.

Barry-xlovecam 03-25-2016 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 20800601)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWuM06U0jco

it took like 10 men 30 seconds :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Well you need to buy the machine gun towers -- optional expense not included in the box. :1orglaugh

That wall is 2 1/2 men high they would need a few more men to build a pyramid to climb over a 30 foot (10 meter) wall.

I think we would need a 50 foot wall and a moat filled with crocodiles on the USA side that is 2000 miles long. Another stupid idea :1orglaugh

Barry-xlovecam 03-25-2016 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by plaster (Post 20800616)
W

Still trying to figure out your source of dimensions. And wall is around 1000 miles... natural barriers make up the rest.

Don't over tax your brain

Quote:

2,000 miles
Southern Barrier, Part 1. The United States' border with Mexico is nearly 2,000 miles long. Over that vast distance the protective barriers between the two countries vary greatly.
Southern US Border Barrier - U.S. Border Patrol
Southern US Border Barrier
So, no one ever crosses a 'Natural Border' LOL
Hannibal marched an entire army over the Alps

pimpmaster9000 03-25-2016 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 20800628)
Well you need to buy the machine gun towers -- optional expense not included in the box. :1orglaugh

That wall is 2 1/2 men high they would need a few more men to build a pyramid to climb over a 30 foot (10 meter) wall.

I think we would need a 50 foot wall and a moat filled with crocodiles on the USA side that is 2000 miles long. Another stupid idea :1orglaugh

a 26 foot ladder costs 299$:

https://www.littlegiantladder.com/

if the wall was 30ft if would leave a whopping 4foot of obstacle :1orglaugh

also if the wall had sections, and its bound to have sections, then you do not even need a ladder:

https://gearjunkie.com/legacy/images/261.jpg

theres cheap shit versions of this for like 10$...

L-Pink 03-25-2016 09:25 AM

For those unfamiliar with "tilt wall" construction ... the wall is poured into forms with re-bar, cured in place, tilted upright by crane.


http://i.imgur.com/SZ1faZZ.jpg


http://i.imgur.com/XZTnplc.jpg


http://i.imgur.com/zhUbz6o.jpg




Simple as that. Of course Trump will probably make it a little more high finish, lol.

http://i.imgur.com/f0mL8LB.jpg



.

HowlingWulf 03-25-2016 09:39 AM

I think the wall will look more like

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-lxEc-PSQKf...ll_v005_SE.jpg

2MuchMark 03-25-2016 09:42 AM

Fence Protecting U.S./Mexico Border Puts Popular Golf Course Out of Business | Golf.com

pimpmaster9000 03-25-2016 09:44 AM

wall mart 30ft rope ladder $34.95

Cheap ass rope ladder

trump wall best case scenario = adds 1minute and $34.95 to the costs of illegal immigration BUT the ladder is re-usable...so 1 minute and a few bucks...

my advice is to invest in cement and re-bar companies stocks, trump probably did :2 cents::2 cents::2 cents:

also telescopic ladder companies and rope ladder outfits...

L-Pink 03-25-2016 09:52 AM


"ANIMAS ? Several hundred ranchers gathered at a small-town high school in the Bootheel on Thursday to rally against what they described as a broken border."


Message from border: ‘We got problems here’ | Albuquerque Journal

.

MaDalton 03-25-2016 09:59 AM

In other news: Drug smugglers buy U.S. land to hide tunnel, feds say - CNN.com

C H R I S 03-25-2016 10:02 AM

It's hard to believe people are actually arguing the merits of this inane idea.

It will never happen. It's all about stirring up peoples hatred to get votes.

Barry-xlovecam 03-25-2016 10:03 AM

Of course I know tilt ups are poured in place -- LOL

So, we will have a tilt up spot every 1000 feet along a 2000 mile long border, and build cranes that can swing 500+ feet? LMAO.

So, now you need billions in site work and temporary roads made to move the erection (no pun intended) cranes for the wall.

Let's just invade Mexico and make a 20 mile DMZ and free fire border zone :1orglaugh

This whole thing is fantasy land.

_Richard_ 03-25-2016 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 20800694)
For those unfamiliar with "tilt wall" construction ... the wall is poured into forms with re-bar, cured in place, tilted upright by crane.


http://i.imgur.com/SZ1faZZ.jpg


http://i.imgur.com/XZTnplc.jpg


http://i.imgur.com/zhUbz6o.jpg




Simple as that. Of course Trump will probably make it a little more high finish, lol.

http://i.imgur.com/f0mL8LB.jpg



.

he covered tiltup walls.. there has yet to be an effective argument on why this is a good and feasible idea.

i mean.. if a tilt up wall would require a bunch of 'grade A roads' with corresponding service roads... wouldn't that just make the life of an illegal immigrant easier? brand new roads built across a 2000 mile area, all leading to population centers?

Bladewire 03-25-2016 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arock10 (Post 20799944)
I still think a wall made out of trump condos is the best idea

So cool! Section 8 condos on the US side, 2 birds 1 stone. :thumbsup


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123