Hillary has highly classified emails on her server, Clinton campaign blames who? Obama appointee - GoFuckYourself.com

dyna mo · 01-21-2016, 01:12 PM

WASHINGTON
Hillary Clintonâ??s spokesman accused the Intelligence Community Inspector General Wednesday of working with Republicans to attack the Democratic presidential front-runner.

â??I think this was a very coordinated leak,â? Brian Fallon said on CNN. â??Two months ago there was a...report that directly challenged the finding of this inspector general, and I donâ??t think he liked that very much. So I think that he put two Republican senators up to sending him a letter so that he would have an excuse to resurface the same allegations he made back in the summer that have been discredited.â?

The comments came after Inspector General Charles McCullough III told senators that he believes at least several dozen of emails Clinton sent and received while she was secretary of state contained classified material at the highest levels, according to a letter obtained by McClatchy.

McCullough was nominated by President President Barack Obama in August 2011 to be the first inspector general for the 16 intelligence agencies and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. He was unanimously confirmed by the Senate Intelligence Committee that October. The full Senate agreed by unanimous consent in November.

Read more here: Clinton campaign accuses Obama appointee of trying to smear Clinton | McClatchy DC

Rob · 01-21-2016, 01:23 PM

So she directly blamed Obama?

dyna mo · 01-21-2016, 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob

So she directly blamed Obama?

where did you read that?

2MuchMark · 01-21-2016, 01:29 PM

Dynamo is an idiot! Blames everyone else.

dyna mo · 01-21-2016, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by **********

Dynamo is an idiot! Blames everyone else.

you don't even realize what you just did there.

i don't even have to try with you libtards, you do it to yourself.

Robbie · 01-21-2016, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by **********

Dynamo is an idiot! Blames everyone else.

Mark, dynamo didn't blame anyone about anything. It's a national news story today that Hillary Clinton's spokesman went on CNN and blamed an Obama administration official for making a "coordinated leak" designed to hurt her campaign.

In other words...Hillary Clinton is blaming Pres. Obama for the "drip, drip, drip" of leaking out of the White House regarding her illegal email server use.

Either you are trolling, or you are just ignorant of what is happening.

Rob · 01-21-2016, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

where did you read that?

I was making fun of the libtards saying Palin directly blamed Obama for her son's domestic battery charge in another thread.

dyna mo · 01-21-2016, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob

I was making fun of the libtards saying Palin directly blamed Obama for her son's domestic battery charge in another thread.

i'm with you, was playing along with your post......... this thread is a parody of that thread.

MetaMan · 01-21-2016, 01:59 PM

Why are we talking about Hilary when Trump is the next president?

Helix · 01-21-2016, 02:11 PM

Hillary's desperation is showing. She knows it's slipping away again.

2MuchMark · 01-21-2016, 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie

Mark, dynamo didn't blame anyone about anything. It's a national news story today that Hillary Clinton's spokesman went on CNN and blamed an Obama administration official for making a "coordinated leak" designed to hurt her campaign.

In other words...Hillary Clinton is blaming Pres. Obama for the "drip, drip, drip" of leaking out of the White House regarding her illegal email server use.

Either you are trolling, or you are just ignorant of what is happening.

No I'm not really paying attention to the Clinton Email story. Though if I were her, I would be suspicious too after the endless Bengazzi BS. Hopefully she didn't do anything wrong.

Dynamo's still an idiot tho. Just sayin'. And a douche. A summer's eve douche.

Xoxox Dynamo

Happy Hug day!

National Hugging Day tm - Home

dyna mo · 01-21-2016, 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Helix

Hillary's desperation is showing. She knows it's slipping away again.

it would be absolutely hilarious if she tanks the same time she did in 2008, ~february 9ish and the same way, a scorched earth attack on her democrat opponent.

Rochard · 01-21-2016, 02:19 PM

Here is the problem....

"None of Clintonâ??s emails was marked as classified during her tenure, State Department officials say, but intelligence officials say some material was clearly classified at the time."

Seems the State Department did not consider anything classified then or now. And nothing was comprised anyhow.

I don't like Hillary, but my god this is just dumb already.

dyna mo · 01-21-2016, 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by **********

I'm not really paying attention

we know.

dyna mo · 01-21-2016, 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Here is the problem....

"None of Clintonâ??s emails was marked as classified during her tenure, State Department officials say, but intelligence officials say some material was clearly classified at the time."

Seems the State Department did not consider anything classified then or now. And nothing was comprised anyhow.

I don't like Hillary, but my god this is just dumb already.

you don't realize the classified classification was stripped prior to the communication getting to the server? classified emails like that can't go to just any server. they were sent to HIllary's office, a hillary employee c&p'ed the classified data into another email and sent it to Hills.

thus the State Department's claim that none were "marked" classified.

Rob · 01-21-2016, 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Here is the problem....

"None of Clintonâ??s emails was marked as classified during her tenure, State Department officials say, but intelligence officials say some material was clearly classified at the time."

Seems the State Department did not consider anything classified then or now. And nothing was comprised anyhow.

I don't like Hillary, but my god this is just dumb already.

She's playing ignorant to the entire thing, and that's the problem. You can't plead ignorant when the law is concerned. General Petreaus did something not nearly as bad, with the exact same classified documents, and was criminally indicted. When he went to court he didn't say, "But they're not labelled as classified!". She's playing a game of semantics, which unfortunately, she'll probably win. But I'm glad to see her getting raked over the coals for it. And I truly hope she's criminally indicted. Would serve her elitist ass right.

Helix · 01-21-2016, 02:42 PM

She used an unauthorized insecure private server to store/transfer the government's sensitive materials. Guilty. Unfit for office, any office.

L-Pink · 01-21-2016, 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Helix

She used an unauthorized insecure private server to store/transfer the government's sensitive materials. Guilty. Unfit for office, any office.

These aren't just emails either. These were highly classified, similar breeches in the past have resulted in treason charges being applied.

Dvae · 01-21-2016, 06:49 PM

Oh just shut up already, she did nothing wrong!

dyna mo · 01-21-2016, 07:59 PM

"Some of Hillary Clintonâ??s emails on her private server contained information so secret that senior lawmakers who oversee the State Department cannot read them without fulfilling additional security requirements"

Rochard · 01-21-2016, 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Helix

She used an unauthorized insecure private server to store/transfer the government's sensitive materials. Guilty. Unfit for office, any office.

No. It was not unauthorized or not secure. She was the Secretary of State; She didn't need to get permission from anyone. And in the end it was more secure than the White House severs.

Rochard · 01-21-2016, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob

She's playing ignorant to the entire thing, and that's the problem. You can't plead ignorant when the law is concerned. General Petreaus did something not nearly as bad, with the exact same classified documents, and was criminally indicted. When he went to court he didn't say, "But they're not labelled as classified!". She's playing a game of semantics, which unfortunately, she'll probably win. But I'm glad to see her getting raked over the coals for it. And I truly hope she's criminally indicted. Would serve her elitist ass right.

She was completely ignorant. The Secretary of State doesn't spend their time questioning how their emails are handled.

Do you think Obama walked into office and when he first say down he asked to be walked through the legalities of how his email is sent or stored? It seems a lot of Congressmen run their emails this way too; Why aren't we looking into any of them?

If this was serious attempt at getting at the truth, they would be looking how every Congressman and Senator and high ranking government employee is running their email.

I don't like Hillary; I can't stand her. But this is nothing more than a smear campaign.

onwebcam · 01-21-2016, 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

No. It was not unauthorized or not secure. She was the Secretary of State; She didn't need to get permission from anyone. And in the end it was more secure than the White House severs.

"As the nation’s chief diplomat, Hillary Clinton was responsible for ascertaining whether information in her possession was classified and acknowledged that “negligent handling” of that information could jeopardize national security, according to a copy of an agreement she signed upon taking the job.

A day after assuming office as secretary of state, Clinton signed a Sensitive Compartmented Information Nondisclosure Agreement that laid out criminal penalties for “any unauthorized disclosure” of classified information.

Experts have guessed that Clinton signed such an agreement, but a copy of her specific contract, obtained by the Competitive Enterprise Institute through an open records request and shared with the Washington Free Beacon, reveals for the first time the exact language of the NDA.

“I have been advised that the unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention, or negligent handling of SCI by me could cause irreparable injury to the United States or be used to advantage by a foreign nation,” the agreement states."

Clinton Signed NDA Laying Out Criminal Penalties for Mishandling of Classified Info - Washington Free Beacon

What do you think would happen if you work for lets say Google. Google found out you were not only storing their proprietary algorithm and other company inter office communications and information as well as doing your Google business on your private home server?

dyna mo · 01-21-2016, 09:12 PM

That's the point of this thread, the unbelievability this is a smear campaign orchestrated by an Obama appointed democrat.

sofaking · 01-21-2016, 09:44 PM

Shes going down.

Rob · 01-21-2016, 09:50 PM

It doesn't take a particle physicist to know Hillary ran email through her own server so she could control what the auditors saw. She was using her position to book Slick Willy speaking jobs all over the world in return for U.S. favors. It's been reported numerous times, people just look past the facts for some reason.

bronco67 · 01-21-2016, 10:13 PM

Really...who gives a shit?

She can't be president of the United States because of this? Come up with something better.

dyna mo · 01-21-2016, 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67

Really...who gives a shit?

She can't be president of the United States because of this? Come up with something better.

She certainly shouldn't be. Whats so special about Hillary that she gets a free pass for insecurely handling the absolutely highest classified communications on the planet? Because we didn't investigate someone else? We're talking Potus here, not WH janitor

Rob · 01-21-2016, 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67

Really...who gives a shit?

She can't be president of the United States because of this? Come up with something better.

You're blinded by bias.

JJ Gold · 01-22-2016, 02:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

These aren't just emails either. These were highly classified, similar breeches in the past have resulted in treason charges being applied.

Spot on.

JJ Gold · 01-22-2016, 02:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

She was completely ignorant. The Secretary of State doesn't spend their time questioning how their emails are handled.

Do you think Obama walked into office and when he first say down he asked to be walked through the legalities of how his email is sent or stored? It seems a lot of Congressmen run their emails this way too; Why aren't we looking into any of them?

If this was serious attempt at getting at the truth, they would be looking how every Congressman and Senator and high ranking government employee is running their email.

I don't like Hillary; I can't stand her. But this is nothing more than a smear campaign.

Stick to the sunglass selfies and squid pizzas. Your mental ability to discern the ramifications of this issue is sorely lacking.

Quine · 01-22-2016, 02:59 AM

crockett · 01-22-2016, 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob

She's playing ignorant to the entire thing, and that's the problem. You can't plead ignorant when the law is concerned. General Petreaus did something not nearly as bad, with the exact same classified documents, and was criminally indicted. When he went to court he didn't say, "But they're not labelled as classified!". She's playing a game of semantics, which unfortunately, she'll probably win. But I'm glad to see her getting raked over the coals for it. And I truly hope she's criminally indicted. Would serve her elitist ass right.

Here is the problem.. I'll start by saying I don't like Hillary..

You right wingers have been runing around for the last 7 years like chicken little yelling the sky is falling. You blame Obama for every minuscule little thing and whine constantly. You guys go on a endless rage fest of Benghazi while never muttering a word when Shit loads of embassies were attacked under a Republican president much less a massive attack on American soil..

Everything you guys do is politically modivated.. Your cries and whines have lost any sort of credibility because everyone looks at you right wing retards and just figures more bullshit political agenda attacks, wasting more tax payers money on self serving political grandstanding..

Now let's say Hillary did something wrong.. Will she get away with it? Most likely and the reason is because of people like you. You guys have ran around the last 7 years yelling the sky is falling but now no one cares..

How's it feel to be chicken little?

dyna mo · 01-22-2016, 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

Here is the problem.. I'll start by saying I don't like Hillary..

You right wingers have been runing around for the last 7 years like chicken little yelling the sky is falling. You blame Obama for every minuscule little thing and whine constantly. You guys go on a endless rage fest of Benghazi while never muttering a word when Shit loads of embassies were attacked under a Republican president much less a massive attack on American soil..

Everything you guys do is politically modivated.. Your cries and whines have lost any sort of credibility because everyone looks at you right wing retards and just figures more bullshit political agenda attacks, wasting more tax payers money on self serving political grandstanding..

Now let's say Hillary did something wrong.. Will she get away with it? Most likely and the reason is because of people like you. You guys have ran around the last 7 years yelling the sky is falling but now no one cares..

How's it feel to be chicken little?

this is extra funny because it's in a thread about Hillary blaming Obama for her illegal email communications

crockett · 01-22-2016, 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

this is extra funny because it's in a thread about Hillary blaming Obama for her illegal email communications

Obviously, what I said goes way over your head. The point being, no one gives a shit anymore if Hillary did wrong because the Right has blamed her and Obama for everything under the sun for years now. Hell they have been blaming Hillary even longer than Obama..

Everyone is tired of the same politically modivated BS that no one gives a shit if Hillary blames Obama or did something wrong. Hillary could blame Donnald Trump or fucking Ghandi and no one would give a fuck because it's just some other thing Republicans are crying about..

But go now and make 5 more posts telling me how I know nothing...

dyna mo · 01-22-2016, 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

Obviously, what I said goes way over your head. The point being, no one gives a shit anymore if Hillary did wrong because the Right has blamed her and Obama for everything under the sun for years now. Hell they have been blaming Hillary even longer than Obama..

Everyone is tired of the same politically modivated BS that no one gives a shit if Hillary blames Obama or did something wrong. Hillary could blame Donnald Trump or fucking Ghandi and no one would give a fuck because it's just some other thing Republicans are crying about..

But go now and make 5 more posts telling me how I know nothing...

every time you spew shit you prove yourself wrong. you're a myopic gigantic retard to try and exclaim no one cares and "everyone" blah blah.

i can assure you you do not speak for everyone. you think HIllary is crashing and burning just because.

i realized a long time ago you have no idea what you yap about.

dyna mo · 01-22-2016, 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

Obviously, what I said goes way over your head. The point being, no one gives a shit anymore if Hillary did wrong because the Right has blamed her and Obama for everything under the sun for years now. Hell they have been blaming Hillary even longer than Obama..

Everyone is tired of the same politically modivated BS that no one gives a shit if Hillary blames Obama or did something wrong. Hillary could blame Donnald Trump or fucking Ghandi and no one would give a fuck because it's just some other thing Republicans are crying about..

But go now and make 5 more posts telling me how I know nothing...

you know nothing.

Hillary Clintons email scandal puts presidential aspirations in peril - Washington Times

keep clicking your heels dorothy.

dyna mo · 01-22-2016, 08:56 AM

Corruption: The latest revelations about Hillary Clinton's email problems are big trouble for her.

So she continues to lie about never handling classified emails and has revived the "vast right-wing conspiracy" theory.

The Clinton White House campaign keeps picking up heavy baggage. Earlier this week, we learned that emails from her personal account on her private "unsecured, homebrew server" were on "a level of classification beyond even 'top secret.' "
This in addition to the more than 1,300 other Clinton emails that have classified material on them.

Read More At Investor's Business Daily: Clinton Email Scandal: Hillary Needs A New Bogeyman - Investors.com

2MuchMark · 01-22-2016, 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

every time you spew shit you prove yourself wrong. you're a myopic gigantic retard to try and exclaim no one cares and "everyone" blah blah.

Kettle, Black, again.

dyna mo · 01-22-2016, 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by **********

Kettle, Black, again.

i'm not surprised you're trying to high 5 crockett science claiming no one cares. face it canaduhian, you're girl's a lying cunt undeserving of the WH and my guy Bernie is mopping the floor with her.

eat shit loser.

dyna mo · 01-22-2016, 09:06 AM

you two keep thinking no one cares

Hillary Clintons early-state poll numbers just went from bad to nightmare - The Washington Post

ahahahahahahahahahah

dyna mo · 01-22-2016, 09:07 AM

ahahahahahahah

showing that you two are always wrong is too easy.

Hillary Clinton Favorable Rating - Polls - HuffPost Pollster

dyna mo · 01-22-2016, 09:11 AM

"Hillary Clinton has negative favorability scores in 10 out 10 national polls according to HuffPost Pollster, with seven polls indicating over 50% of Americans possess an "unfavorable" viewpoint of the former Secretary of State."

the latest poll also reveals her negative favorability is the highest it's ever been.

ahhahahah.

crockett science + ********** = always wrong.

dyna mo · 01-22-2016, 09:18 AM

HIllary OTR on NPR yesterday::::::::

The former secretary of state told National Public Radio that the report was a "leak" designed to harm her in the presidential race despite offering no evidence.

"As the State Department has confirmed, I never sent or received any material marked classified, and that hasn't changed in all of these months," she said. "This, seems to me, to be, you know, another effort to inject this into the campaign. It's another leak."

ahahahhhahahahahah. quite the duplicitous politician.

crockett · 01-22-2016, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

crockett science + ********** = always wrong.

Amazing it only takes you eight posts to our two posts for your rebuttals..

Robbie · 01-22-2016, 10:09 AM

dynamo...crockett and ********** asked me to tell you that you are full of shit!

All of the links you posted to the Washington post and Huffington Post are made up and are clearly RACIST.

You are obviously a right wing nutter.

Consider this your final warning. I'm just the guy they send in to warn people.
If you so much as even twitch a finger towards your keyboard to say another bad thing about a DEMOCRAT...then crockett and ********** will strike you down with a great fury!

dyna mo · 01-22-2016, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

Amazing it only takes you eight posts to our two posts for your rebuttals..

i'm not surprised you think the truth is based on the # of posts, as if the overwhelming evidence i just bitchslapped you with is somehow less than the unsubstantiated drivel you spewed

dyna mo · 01-22-2016, 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie

dynamo...crockett and ********** asked me to tell you that you are full of shit!

All of the links you posted to the Washington post and Huffington Post are made up and are clearly RACIST.

You are obviously a right wing nutter.

Consider this your final warning. I'm just the guy they send in to warn people.
If you so much as even twitch a finger towards your keyboard to say another bad thing about a DEMOCRAT...then crockett and ********** will strike you down with a great fury!

those 2 crack my shit up! when i go off on them and speak to them in terms they grasp, dumbfuckwad, libtard, etc, they get butthurt and when i post evidence showing them they're wrong, they get butthurt because i posted too much.

dyna mo · 01-22-2016, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

Amazing it only takes you eight posts to our two posts for your rebuttals..

i'm still hahaing my ass off over this.

overwhelming evidence is poopooed because it's too much evidence.

i'm not surprised. thanks for the Friday lols!

CDSmith · 01-22-2016, 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetaMan

Why are we talking about Hilary when Trump is the next president?

Exactly. Once our new Trump overlord has seized control...I mean been rightfully crowned...no, that's not it... I mean ELECTED... then the proper heads will roll and all this leaking business will be a thing of the past.

01-21-2016, 01:12 PM	#1
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 65,911	Hillary has highly classified emails on her server, Clinton campaign blames who? Obama appointee WASHINGTON Hillary Clintonâ??s spokesman accused the Intelligence Community Inspector General Wednesday of working with Republicans to attack the Democratic presidential front-runner. â??I think this was a very coordinated leak,â? Brian Fallon said on CNN. â??Two months ago there was a...report that directly challenged the finding of this inspector general, and I donâ??t think he liked that very much. So I think that he put two Republican senators up to sending him a letter so that he would have an excuse to resurface the same allegations he made back in the summer that have been discredited.â? The comments came after Inspector General Charles McCullough III told senators that he believes at least several dozen of emails Clinton sent and received while she was secretary of state contained classified material at the highest levels, according to a letter obtained by McClatchy. McCullough was nominated by President President Barack Obama in August 2011 to be the first inspector general for the 16 intelligence agencies and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. He was unanimously confirmed by the Senate Intelligence Committee that October. The full Senate agreed by unanimous consent in November. Read more here: Clinton campaign accuses Obama appointee of trying to smear Clinton \| McClatchy DC

01-21-2016, 01:29 PM	#4
2MuchMark Videochat Solutions Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 49,479	Dynamo is an idiot! Blames everyone else. __________________ Custom Coding \| Videochat Solutions \| Age Verification \| IT Help & Support www.2Much.net

01-21-2016, 02:11 PM	#10
Helix Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Michigan Posts: 5,999	Hillary's desperation is showing. She knows it's slipping away again. __________________ Free jscott !!! Free OneHungLo !!! Free Baddog !!!

01-21-2016, 02:19 PM	#13
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 74,290	Here is the problem.... "None of Clintonâ??s emails was marked as classified during her tenure, State Department officials say, but intelligence officials say some material was clearly classified at the time." Seems the State Department did not consider anything classified then or now. And nothing was comprised anyhow. I don't like Hillary, but my god this is just dumb already. __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

01-21-2016, 02:42 PM	#17
Helix Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Michigan Posts: 5,999	She used an unauthorized insecure private server to store/transfer the government's sensitive materials. Guilty. Unfit for office, any office. __________________ Free jscott !!! Free OneHungLo !!! Free Baddog !!!

01-21-2016, 01:23 PM	#2
Rob I'm a great bowler. Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Right Outside of Normal. Posts: 13,309	So she directly blamed Obama?

01-21-2016, 01:59 PM	#9
MetaMan I AM WEB 2.0 Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 28,682	Why are we talking about Hilary when Trump is the next president?

01-21-2016, 06:49 PM	#19
Dvae Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: US Posts: 5,326	Oh just shut up already, she did nothing wrong! __________________ . . Arguing with a troll is a lot like wrestling in the mud with a pig, after a couple of hours you realize the pig likes it.

01-21-2016, 07:59 PM	#20
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 65,911	"Some of Hillary Clintonâ??s emails on her private server contained information so secret that senior lawmakers who oversee the State Department cannot read them without fulfilling additional security requirements"

01-21-2016, 09:12 PM	#24
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 65,911	That's the point of this thread, the unbelievability this is a smear campaign orchestrated by an Obama appointed democrat.

01-21-2016, 09:44 PM	#25
sofaking Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2015 Posts: 21	Shes going down.

01-21-2016, 09:50 PM	#26
Rob I'm a great bowler. Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Right Outside of Normal. Posts: 13,309	It doesn't take a particle physicist to know Hillary ran email through her own server so she could control what the auditors saw. She was using her position to book Slick Willy speaking jobs all over the world in return for U.S. favors. It's been reported numerous times, people just look past the facts for some reason.

01-21-2016, 10:13 PM	#27
bronco67 Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 29,032	Really...who gives a shit? She can't be president of the United States because of this? Come up with something better. __________________

01-22-2016, 02:59 AM	#32
Quine Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Croatia Posts: 308	__________________ -I can't quantify my hatred of the State. Preferences are ordinal. -The absolute ruler may be a Nero, but he is sometimes Titus or Marcus Aurelius; the people is often Nero, and never Marcus Aurelius.

01-22-2016, 08:56 AM	#38
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 65,911	Corruption: The latest revelations about Hillary Clinton's email problems are big trouble for her. So she continues to lie about never handling classified emails and has revived the "vast right-wing conspiracy" theory. The Clinton White House campaign keeps picking up heavy baggage. Earlier this week, we learned that emails from her personal account on her private "unsecured, homebrew server" were on "a level of classification beyond even 'top secret.' " This in addition to the more than 1,300 other Clinton emails that have classified material on them. Read More At Investor's Business Daily: Clinton Email Scandal: Hillary Needs A New Bogeyman - Investors.com

01-22-2016, 09:06 AM	#41
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 65,911	you two keep thinking no one cares Hillary Clintons early-state poll numbers just went from bad to nightmare - The Washington Post ahahahahahahahahahah

01-22-2016, 09:07 AM	#42
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 65,911	ahahahahahahah showing that you two are always wrong is too easy. Hillary Clinton Favorable Rating - Polls - HuffPost Pollster

01-22-2016, 09:11 AM	#43
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 65,911	"Hillary Clinton has negative favorability scores in 10 out 10 national polls according to HuffPost Pollster, with seven polls indicating over 50% of Americans possess an "unfavorable" viewpoint of the former Secretary of State." the latest poll also reveals her negative favorability is the highest it's ever been. ahhahahah. crockett science + ********** = always wrong.

01-22-2016, 09:18 AM	#44
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 65,911	HIllary OTR on NPR yesterday:::::::: The former secretary of state told National Public Radio that the report was a "leak" designed to harm her in the presidential race despite offering no evidence. "As the State Department has confirmed, I never sent or received any material marked classified, and that hasn't changed in all of these months," she said. "This, seems to me, to be, you know, another effort to inject this into the campaign. It's another leak." ahahahhhahahahahah. quite the duplicitous politician.

01-22-2016, 10:09 AM	#46
Robbie Leaner, Meaner, Faster Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Vegas Posts: 20,959	dynamo...crockett and ******** asked me to tell you that you are full of shit! All of the links you posted to the Washington post and Huffington Post are made up and are clearly RACIST. You are obviously a right wing nutter. Consider this your final warning. I'm just the guy they send in to warn people. If you so much as even twitch a finger towards your keyboard to say another bad thing about a DEMOCRAT...then crockett and ******** will strike you down with a great fury! __________________ -Robbie ClaudiaMarie.Com