Events Is GFY prepared for the Project 2025 conversation yet?

[King Mark]

Or we waiting until it's too late again?

[wankawonk]

I brought it up here maybe 6 months ago and was told "this belongs in politics&more"

as if its purely a political issue and not relevant to our business interests

so no, I don't think we're ready to have this conversation until its too late. republicans have the blinders on. a guy I work with literally said "it should die down if trump gets elected."

we might be fucked.

[pornlaw]

Project 2025 is the wish list of a conservative think tank.

Its not Trumps policies. He may or may not adopt them if elected.

Same thing happened when Reagan got elected. The gave him a conservative road map of what they would like to see happen. He adopted about 50% of them.

Trump is the closest we've had to a pornographer in the White House. He loves escorts. Cheats on his wife. Appeared in Playboy and distributed porn in his hotels.

I highly doubt a porn ban will happen.

However, AVS has a chance to kill the industry before that happens anyway. And AVS laws have already been passed in 17 states by both Democrats and Republicans.

So if you want to talk about what may take us out... talk about what reality is.

[King Mark]

Originally Posted by pornlaw

However, AVS has a chance to kill the industry before that happens anyway. And AVS laws have already been passed in 17 states by both Democrats and Republicans.

So if you want to talk about what may take us out... talk about what reality is.

I tried this conversation too. Already too late for that one.

[mainstreammix]

Originally Posted by pornlaw

Trump is the closest we've had to a pornographer in the White House. He loves escorts. Cheats on his wife. Appeared in Playboy and distributed porn in his hotels.

Imagine saying this shit knowing that Slick Willy and JFK were there. Just pure dishonesty.

[CaptainHowdy]

Originally Posted by pornlaw

Trump is the closest we've had to a pornographer in the White House. He loves escorts. Cheats on his wife. Appeared in Playboy and distributed porn in his hotels.

I'm convinced . . .

[Brad Mitchell]

Conversations about AV legislation need to stay in this main forum.

It's the most important conversation to be having right now. Besides the business implications, the newly enacted laws in various states all trample over portions of our Constitutional rights. AND, none of them actually protect children, they'll simply switch traffic to sites that are run worse and care less about what content they are purveying, be it copyright, CSAM, or other abusive material.

Brad

[jscott]

Americans & porn survived Trump before and will survive him again.

King Mark, you're just looking desperate.

[mainstreammix]

Let's ask ChatGPT

What does Project 2025 say about porn?

Project 2025, spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, includes a series of conservative policy proposals aimed at reshaping the U.S. federal government. One of the key areas of focus within Project 2025 is the regulation of pornography and obscene materials. The initiative aims to introduce strict regulations to limit access to content broadly categorized as pornography, with a particular emphasis on protecting minors.

The proposed measures include implementing stringent identity and age verification processes to ensure that such content is inaccessible to minors. These verification processes have raised significant concerns over privacy invasion and the potential for misuse of personal information​ (Warning Vote)​​ (Advocate.com)​.

Additionally, the project employs broad and ambiguous definitions of what constitutes "obscene" materials, which could potentially be used to target and censor LGBTQ+ content and discussions on non-traditional relationships. This approach has been criticized for potentially suppressing free expression and marginalizing non-conforming groups​ (The Lexington Line)​​ (HC Woods)​.

Overall, Project 2025's stance on pornography reflects a broader agenda to enforce traditional family values and restrict content deemed morally inappropriate by its proponents. Critics argue that these measures could lead to extensive censorship and a reduction in personal freedoms, particularly impacting LGBTQ+ communities and other marginalized groups.

And why is jscott so retarded?

It wouldn't be appropriate for me to respond directly so to answer this question please refer to the title of this video.