![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
However here on GFY there are many consertives whom just run amok so I like to troll them.. It's extremely easy to troll loud mouth consertives, because more often than not, they are factually wrong. This is one of the core problems with the consertive ideology. They say things which they think sounds correct, but is more often than not wrong. As bush used to say "he shoots from the gut"... Look above to the commit by RebelR about how he thinks consertives in rural America think "their taxes" are being used to subsidize liberals in big cities. Meanwhile it's the exact opposite as its big cities and the state's which they are in whom pay the most taxes and subsidize the rural states.. |
Quote:
So we went out of the area with all the skyscrapers and just went into an area that had neighborhoods with small houses, convenience stores, etc. Looked like it could have been any town in the U.S. And the guy who was taking us around told us we couldn't shoot a couple of blocks over because of that kind of racism on the part of the black people there. I'm sure that folks who live in NYC could comment on that better than I can. It was kind of shocking to me at the time because I'm from the South originally. And having lived in Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina...I had never run into that kind of thing before even though the Southern States are thought of as the most racist. Hell, when I lived in Atlanta...I was the minority. :) |
Quote:
I am pro-choice, anti drug-war, anti-war. Yet you've told me that I am a "Republican" over and over. Apparently the word "conservative" must have a different meaning to you. I'm gonna hazard a guess from your posts and say that anybody who doesn't 100% agree with whatever the Democrat Party or any members of it in office are doing...then becomes the target of your admitted trolling. |
Quote:
To Crockett: Quote:
I'm sorry if I've got this wrong and I'm not trying to pick on you I promise. But to me and from my point of view, you have Ronald Reagan photoshopped onto Mount Rushmore in front of a nuclear bomb spewing red white and blue mushroom clouds as your desktop background. Which is ok. I mean sure, why not? Anyway would you mind clarifying your political leanings to a dumb-ass Canadian like myself so I understand where you are coming from? Peace? :) |
Lol. ********** you just did exactly what crockett does. If anyone has a open mind and does not agree 100% with Democrats or heaven forbid agree with a Republican on any issue then they are automatically A Republican
Talk about "group think" You are a great example of it. :pimp |
I'm still shaking my head at why ********** would post something so incredibly dumb.
Mark, you are saying to me: "Robbie you are FOR everything the Republican party is AGAINST...but since you have dared to speak against policies that Democrats have done...you are a Republican" Fucking insane! lol Let's see...using ********** theory of crockettscience....that means: Donald Trump is a Democrat because he is bashing the policies of Republicans (and also has contributed more money to Democrats than Republicans) Barry Sanders is also a Republican because he is bashing the policies of Democrats. And anybody out there who dares to not agree with specific policies...you are all now Republican. You post things that are just plain stupid Mark. I don't even know if you have any adult business left...but man, this kind of thing can't be helping you biz-wise when you make yourself appear ignorant all the time in political threads. I don't mind you coming on here and acting like a jackass. That's kinda what this thread is for. But again...nobody gives a damn what my political leanings are (for the record: I'm leaning to Sanders if he wins the Dem nomination...if not, then third party). And nobody gives a damn about what you think my political leanings are. It would be nice if you and crockett wouldn't mind having an intelligent discussion about the FACT that politics has always been nasty. And many times VERY nasty. And what Trump has done isn't that big a deal in comparison. You don't agree with that? Cool! That's what discussions are about. But that's not what you're doing. You are simply being a troll. Which makes you useless in this forum. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you right weenies stopped posting these topics, you wouldn't ever see a political post from me.. |
I didn't realize this thread has anything to do with Obama...
But apparently it does. So far MP and crockett have name checked Obama, Bush, and Reagan. lol |
Quote:
Quote:
|
So Trump's financials have been released and guess what....
He's not worth anything near the 10 billion dollar lie he told. How is a guy who files for bankruptcy four times going to worth 10 billion? But you know what? It doesn't matter anyway because he's a joke, and he's also the Republican party's foot that goes firmly into it's mouth. They deserve him and won't find a way to get that foot out of their mouth. But its not like they had a shot even without Trump. They can't help but sabotage their chances by just being straight up pricks on the wrong side of every issue. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Earlier in this thread you accused me of not reading your post, and now you are clearly making up "facts" to suit your own beliefs. Anyway, please re-read my message. I told you I didn't understand your political leanings, and that to me you seem to be republican. If I'm wrong, ok I'm wrong, but can you please clarify for me, a dumb-ass liberal tree-hugging salad eating foreigner, who or which party you would vote for, and why? I promise you that I thought I knew, but I don't. Please educate me. Thanks in advance. |
Quote:
This quote from crockett was what I replied to: Quote:
|
Quote:
Last I saw reported was that he is worth over 10 billion according to the papers he filed. Has that been changed or something? |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Have a beer. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
You say something and then a few minutes later deny it. :1orglaugh Can you PLEASE go back on topic? Or do you not have ANYTHING to add intellectually to the discussion? |
I kind of knew when I started this thread it wouldn't stay on track because of Mark and crockett. lol
They could just debate whether what Trump said is even CLOSE to the campaign of 1800 between Pres. Adams and Vice Pres. Jefferson. But they don't have any answer. So...attack everything else without even addressing the original post. Sad... |
Quote:
Yet you want to compare campaign rethrotic from then vs now to prove your pre-determined point. Which no matter what is said, will you change your mind.. |
If you listen to Donald Trump (and look at him) how can you think he's anything but a gaping asshole? It just shows a flaw in your own character.
|
|
Robbie: Clearly I have completely misread your political leanings. Please clarify them for me so we can continue the discussion? If you don't want to answer, then don't I guess.
|
Quote:
yup, i've expressed my views on obama, both praise (obamacare, etc) and disappointment, and that's because i have a right to critique the guy i voted 2x for. I've also stated here to you directly and more than once that Jim Webb is my guy. you're free to troll gfyers who voted for Obama and who try to view him fair and square, but it's weird you need to pigeonhole me just so you can troll us about the politics you claim you don't care about all while being fully brushed up on the liberal blogosphere agenda. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Now how about the topic? Instead of your obsession with me and my political leanings? Yours are already well known and the mention of your name on GFY brings up visions of that side of you instead of your business. |
Quote:
Who knows? I don't, you don't, and the guy who wrote that piece certainly doesn't. One thing is for sure...Trump is pretty damn well off and unlike Mitt Romney, he doesn't try to pretend he's just a "common man". I think that's the whole secret behind his poll showing. People are sick of politicians and their b.s. Whether we think Trump is full of shit or not is inconsequential. We KNOW that the lifelong politicians are definitely lying through their teeth. I think Trump and Sanders are both a breath of fresh air and are exposing the 2 party system and the media for trying to take away our choices of whom to vote for. What are they so scared of? If Trump is so unpopular then let the voters decide. If Sanders has no chance...let the voters decide. I want to be able to make up my own mind. Not have it decided for me by the RNC and DNC and the media that is in their pocket. |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't think you thought about that. Our country has pretty much set the damn world on fire since the end of WW2. Also...this is a contest for the position of the Executive Branch of Govt. Not saying Trump is the guy. Just saying that "yes", an experienced executive would be what you would want. And I keep seeing references made to bankruptcies. In business...bankruptcy is used to restructure. Pres. Bush and now Pres. Obama have technically bankrupted our country many, many times over. Only the Federal Govt. could get away with "deficit spending" No other entity can do that. Think about that just a second. Pres. Bush racked up more debt than all the President's before him. Pres. Obama doubled Bush's debt! They both would have went truly "bankrupt" a long time ago in the real world. :( |
Quote:
In other words, let me continue operating my business, but also allow me to avoid paying what I legally owe to my creditors...ie. I do not want to pay on the contracts that I agreed to. |
One other thing bronco67...how exactly were Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and especially Pres. Obama "qualified" when they took office to handle the "nuances" of domestic and foreign policy?
Pres. Obama had ZERO experience in that. The Presidency isn't something that really has a way to train for. It's an on the job learning experience because it is a one-of-a-kind job. Unless we are gonna elect a former British or Canadian Prime Minister to President of the U.S., nobody is really qualified. lol But it is by definition the EXECUTIVE branch of govt. So an actual person with experience running something is preferable...just makes good common sense, right? |
Quote:
Have you ever run a business? It's a lot harder than it looks. |
Quote:
Quote:
I do not think you understand the GM issue. The Federal government "bailed out" GM. President Obama had nothing to do with GM's bankruotcy. |
[QUOTE=Robbie;20530999]One other thing bronco67...how exactly were Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and especially Pres. Obama "qualified" when they took office to handle the "nuances" of domestic and foreign policy?
QUOTE] The first thing all of those people listed have is the ability to not act like an unfiltered loose cannon that shoots first and asks questions later. Trump is a buffoon. I don't give a shit what he has or what he's done. |
Quote:
Being a CEO or president of a company requires many of the same skills. Sure, there are big differences, but being president is such a unique job is is hard to know for sure just how good someone will be at the job until they are doing the job. That said, if they were governor of a state or Mayor of a major city or CEO of a big company it can give you a glimpse into their management style and how they might do. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123