![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
About "everyone gets trial" if they want is irrelevant, as most don't do actually; and every single one should do. Besides; the prosecutor might scare people to deals. The whole thing that you can make a deal is flawed. If you are guilty, you should be sentenced according to law, not based on some deal. And if you are innocent, there shouldn't be any deal offered in the first place. And then there is the whole process defining someone as guilty or not. So many things get bypassed by making deals. What the fucking kind of legal system is the one where people are sentenced without a trial? It is sucky because that is even possible, and it is probable very sucky as people make deals rather than have a trial. So fucking sucky system that innocent people rather take jail time than use the legal system. :) And I am not a woman, and if I were that wouldn't change this thing in a way or another. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
All those charges are each their own charge when it comes to sentencing. It's been like this every since they figured out they could get Capone on income tax evasion rather than racketeering. The DOJ is allowed to stack charges on top of each other and if found guilty each charge gets a min prison term. It's not a system which is meant to serve justice anymore but a system meant to get plea bargains or convictions. It's actually a fucked up way to do it, but the DOJ isn't concerned about guilt or innocence but rather if they can get you on "something". If the DOJ brings a case to trial and they don't get a conviction it's bad on their record and looked at not as justice served but rather a "loss". I'm sure he was guilty but yes I agree it fucking way excessive and ridiculous that rapist can get less time in many cases. |
Quote:
|
Woohoo. Our weekly "How shit works in Russia and should everywhere else" tutor is here. The village idiot with PHD from Siberian Wall Rug IT Tech State is on a roll again.
http://www.filmstreet.pro/static/img...imir-putin.jpg |
Quote:
. |
Quote:
Hogwash. Each count is a separate crime committed at a separate time on a separate victim. He could have stopped after one victim; but the fact that he continued showed he had no remorse. He stacked his own charges all by himself. :2 cents: Bottom line : If we took porn out of the story and just considered the convictions, nobody here would think anything was excessive. People here are really defending porn. But his operation was exactly what all legit producers don't want in porn; free distribution of unlicensed content. |
Quote:
Your legal system sucks, education system sucks, political system sucks, healthcare system sucks, cohesion sucks, and last but not least; your freedom sucks, which is funny regarding all your freedom propaganda (mainly towards own citizens). And what is most funny; even so many things sucks; there is no will to make it better/ current sucking state is just denied. I get the sucking part; no one or no country is perfect, but I don't get this denial shit. And this is not anti-US text, this is anti-sucking text. Why you don't make things better? |
Quote:
:thumbsup He had an ongoing business who's major source of income was felony extortion. He's lucky more counts weren't added. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
person 1: why do you have plea bargaining? person 2: To save time/money person 1: The mafia! person 2: huh? person 1: the mafias! they aren't the tv shows you know! person 2: holy fuck, goodbye. |
Quote:
You have the power to change what you do in your own country, no matter what others do. |
Quote:
:1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
I agree that 18 years is too much. Instead give him one year. But strip him naked at all times and put up multiple webcams so the public can view him while he does everything at all times. Maybe also allow one of his victims to cane him 5 times once a week (So 52 victims, perhaps hold a lottery to decide who gets to do it)...on cam of course. That would be more fitting a punishment. He'd probably agree to it too to get out of prison faster. Of course they would call it cruel and unusual.
|
Quote:
Sorry but 18 years is NOT enough when it ruins lives to the point of some killing themselves. He should get more time, to be honest. The whole business model was wrong, wrong wrong... and he knew what he was doing was wrong. Hopefully he gets all sorts of fucked-up in prison for the next 18 years. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Welcome to America the police state. 18 years is HARSH for what he did. I could see 5-10 MAX
|
Its a non violent crime he most likely will only for 5 or 6 years of those 18.....So yea i guess ti does fit the punishment.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Physical injuries heal pretty quick in the grand scheme of things. Mental turmoil/anguish/etc takes way way longer to get over. One of the few things that truly makes me sad is how lots of people don't understand the longevity and intensity of mental/emotional pain. |
Quote:
The biggest argument most here made about 2257 records was fear a models personal info might get out. This guys whole plan was for the women to be hassled/stalked/embarrassed enough that he could extort money from them. The guy is a special kind of asshole. Fuck him. . |
Quote:
Lets also not forget about the responsibility or lack of it when these girls allowed or even took the nude photos of themselves and shared them with the "boyfriends". Why is it the 'victims have no responsibility nor does the people whom uploaded the pics? |
Quote:
A better argument could be made for giving the bastard life without parole than for shortening his sentence. |
Quote:
Quote:
You should be slung off this board for even thinking posting naked content without the subject's consent is somehow the subject's 'responsibility'. Cocksucker, go get hit by a truck :2 cents: |
Quote:
this is why i troll the fucking trolls. |
Quote:
So you have no problem if I post nude photos of you on your Facebook pages? Your families social media accounts? Contact employer on Linkedin? At the VW dealer where you get your home worked on? . |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The Polaroid's ... who the fuck sends Polaroids in 2015. http://s7.postimg.org/z9594wi5n/2527...55e770fe_m.jpg . |
Quote:
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh dang, i want to say my bulge looks really nice in that pic..........:Oh crap |
Quote:
For the record, those victims did have a right to privacy and a right to the content that was shot in the privacy of their own homes. So your moralizing condescension over the fact that they took the photos in the first place is completely irrelevant. Your comment is akin to the notion that women deserve to be raped because they dress "provocatively". Sad to see that someone in adult in this day and age would think that way. :2 cents: |
Smart business model if executed correctly. Unfortunately, stupidly took precedence.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123