GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   liberals vrs conservative (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1140960)

Cherry7 05-20-2014 08:04 AM

In "12 Years a Slave"

There is a conservative slave owner who rapes the girl slave and whips the slaves to work

There is a liberal slave owner who reads the slaves bits of the bible while working them to death.

Coca Cola or Pepsi.

Neither want to change the system to distribute wealth fairly.

crockett 05-20-2014 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 20093071)
good point

http://www.wanton.com/pop.jpg

also found this factoid while searching for the numbers above

According to 2008 data from the Centers for Disease Control, “60% of U.S. firearm homicides occurred in [only] 62 cities.” These tend to be isolated to the largely black and poor areas of major cities. -

Yes cities have their own problems as do rural areas. The problem is how do you make rules for one area that don't apply to the next?

Example in Cali when it comes to guns, you can open carry in rural areas but need a permit to carry in cities. I see nothing wrong with that, but usually on the flip side the NRA nuts think it's violating your rights if you can't open carry in a city as well.

Also even though gun supporters love to toss out numbers like you just did about 60% of homicides being done by inner cities (ie code for blacks & hispanics). You can sure as hell bet that soon as any rules or regulations were attempted to be made to take away guns from those people it would be oh "not my 2nd amd".

This is the problem, is the NRA isn't realistic when it comes to how guns should be regulated in this country.

crockett 05-20-2014 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherry7 (Post 20093110)
In "12 Years a Slave"

There is a conservative slave owner who rapes the girl slave and whips the slaves to work

There is a liberal slave owner who reads the slaves bits of the bible while working them to death.

Coca Cola or Pepsi.

Neither want to change the system to distribute wealth fairly.

There should never be equal distribution of wealth, there is no reason someone that works harder or smarter should not make more. However there should be equal opportunity to create wealth, it shouldn't be a system like today, where existing wealth has unfair advantage given to it by govt policies.

Vendzilla 05-20-2014 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo (Post 20093101)
Personally I have a MAJOR problem with a ton of these government agencies. They are running around creating federal laws with NO legislative oversight. They are creating them as "regulations", but these "regulations" involve fines, federal jail time, etc... for violations. We are SUPPOSED to have a system whereby representatives of the people are supposed to VOTE on whether to create a new law or not, but these agencies are creating THOUSANDS of these new laws while answering to no one at all. This is not how a democratic republic is supposed to work and it's very very dangerous. There are so many instances of insane laws being created that it's getting ridiculous and there is basically nothing that can be done about it, since the EPA, FDA, and the other agencies don't answer to congress or the people at all. They are run by only two types of people. Either full on government-type administrators who have NO IDEA of the ramifications on the businesses and lives of the people that they are affecting, or industry reps whose sole motivation is to protect the biggest corporations from small startups and competition.



.:2 cents:

What he said. There is an old saying, too many chiefs, not enough Indians. This applies here as too many regulations running can screw up the machine.
Here in California, many business's have left the state because of over regulation, the cost of business has become too big. What it takes to build anything here is outrageous. I'm hoping to build a house in Northern California, I know I need to find a piece of property that has a POS house on it, so I can use the permits that were used in building it to keep the cost down. Plus all the utilities will also be hooked up already.
They charge a shit load for registering your car, yet the roads are full of pot holes kinda thing.

Grapesoda 05-20-2014 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherry7 (Post 20093110)
In "12 Years a Slave"

There is a conservative slave owner who rapes the girl slave and whips the slaves to work

There is a liberal slave owner who reads the slaves bits of the bible while working them to death.

Coca Cola or Pepsi.

Neither want to change the system to distribute wealth fairly.

reality check: TV show written by liberals

2MuchMark 05-20-2014 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 20091978)
When I'm sitting in Dunkin Donuts and can hear the conversation of a bunch of old white guys(and a few younger ones) -- and I hear Obama ni**ger this and that, and they just complain about taxes, and the usual conservative bitching points, it's not hard to guess what their political affiliation is.

The thing is, Taxes are lower than they have ever been. More immigrants have been deported, and Obama has saved millions of Jobs. The group you're talking about is "taught" just the opposite because of channels like Fox News and slobs like Rush Limbaugh because the Right Wing of the government know they can't beat him with facts. So instead, they just make up endless lies.


Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 20091978)
Why do you think all of these "freedom loving" militia groups have popped up in the last 5 years? Wasn't that when Obama was elected?

This is an offshoot to the endless lies told by republicans. One of their main tactics is fear. A Fox newspaper will say something scary and false, and it will become a talking point on Fox News TV all day for a few days, then republican lawmakers will quote it as if it were fact, all the while stirring up fear in the low-educated. "Militia" types think that Obama really is "coming for their guns" and want to "take back the government" and all that stuff. They're afraid of shit that isn't true, and its all thanks to Ring wing talking heads and the fucking bastards they talk for.

TheSquealer 05-20-2014 12:00 PM

"Tribes, both bind and blind"

Vendzilla 05-20-2014 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 20093399)
The thing is, Taxes are lower than they have ever been. More immigrants have been deported, and Obama has saved millions of Jobs. So instead, endless lies.

Taxes are not lower, the government is taking in record levels of money
http://www.newsmax.com/US/tax-collec.../17/id/526188/
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-...cit-still-377b
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-0...record-1-.html

And the only jobs Obama has saved are lower wage jobs, that's why the Median wage is down 8%

Quote:

"Militia" types think that Obama really is "coming for their guns" and want to "take back the government" and all that stuff. They're afraid of shit that isn't true,
More uninformed bullshit coming from you, the militias are well informed because they know that the government has bought up so much ammo, ammo they can't use over the next 30 years, that it has made ammo hard to find and has driven up the cost to record levels. They just changed their tactic, can't take away their guns, but they can take away their ammo. Why does the DHS need over a billion bullets? That's enough for a 24 year war in Iraq!!

http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybel...ored-vehicles/

mineistaken 05-20-2014 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 20091251)

so when I see this agenda pushed on GFY I think 'broke ass losers' hey I could be wrong... beats me, not my issue, but I do definitely consider that to be the case...

now the conservatives I know are all successful business men

That is because liberals/democrats are usually leechers, minus to society types. And conservatives/republicans think that every person is responsible for their own wealth, they do not favor handouts etc. Naturally they are more successful.

SongRider 05-20-2014 12:05 PM

We got holes in the right side of the boat and we got holes in the left side of the boat... and the people on the right are pointing at the holes on the left and the people on the left are pointing at the holes on the right..

The entire boat is sinking... not just one side or the other...

the left and the right both suck... they are both owned by corporations and big business... Everybody knows this yet continue to argue for their "pretend" side... there is NO sides...

Its a shell game that keeps us busy while they empty our pockets... the LEFT pocket AND the RIGHT pocket... Divided people just continue to argue with each other year after year over the SAME damn issues handed out by the government to the media while they continue to slowly bleed the people of their wealth and property

And it works FLAWLESSLY time and time again... Keywords = Abortion - Gays - social security - race - ECT...

:321GFY

mineistaken 05-20-2014 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherry7 (Post 20093110)

Neither want to change the system to distribute wealth fairly.

WTF is that? How do you distribute "fairly"? Everybody should get what he/she us worth.
Their is no "fair" distribution, it is just robbing the more successful (see how much income tax would 250K guy pay) and gifting that to some lazy fucktard (chronic welfare types).
How much more "fair" do you want to guy?

People like you (losers' apologists) make me sick.

Grapesoda 05-20-2014 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20093188)
Yes cities have their own problems as do rural areas. The problem is how do you make rules for one area that don't apply to the next?

Example in Cali when it comes to guns, you can open carry in rural areas but need a permit to carry in cities. I see nothing wrong with that, but usually on the flip side the NRA nuts think it's violating your rights if you can't open carry in a city as well.

would say that's 'preventive...; give an inch take a mile etc..

Quote:

Also even though gun supporters love to toss out numbers like you just did about 60% of homicides being done by inner cities (ie code for blacks & hispanics). You can sure as hell bet that soon as any rules or regulations were attempted to be made to take away guns from those people it would be oh "not my 2nd amd".

how about take the guns from blacks and Hispanics then? then you'll hear some real crying and cheat beating BUT gun violence will drop

Quote:


This is the problem, is the NRA isn't realistic when it comes to how guns should be regulated in this country.
I would say POLITICIANS aren't realistic when it comes to anything and I would not blames the NRA :2 cents:

Grapesoda 05-20-2014 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 20093445)
That is because liberals/democrats are usually leechers, minus to society types. And conservatives/republicans think that every person is responsible for their own wealth, they do not favor handouts etc. Naturally they are more successful.

wouldn't know... here: small minds think about people, medium minds think about events, quality minds think about ideas.... my friends and I discuss ways to improve our personal and professional lives. and we are all earners so we don't looks for reasons for failure :2 cents:

Grapesoda 05-20-2014 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SongRider (Post 20093446)
We got holes in the right side of the boat and we got holes in the left side of the boat... and the people on the right are pointing at the holes on the left and the people on the left are pointing at the holes on the right..

The entire boat is sinking... not just one side or the other...

the left and the right both suck... they are both owned by corporations and big business... Everybody knows this yet continue to argue for their "pretend" side... there is NO sides...

Its a shell game that keeps us busy while they empty our pockets... the LEFT pocket AND the RIGHT pocket... Divided people just continue to argue with each other year after year over the SAME damn issues handed out by the government to the media while they continue to slowly bleed the people of their wealth and property

And it works FLAWLESSLY time and time again... Keywords = Abortion - Gays - social security - race - ECT...

:321GFY

yeah I love when a state says we'll get the funds from the federal government... like I can't figure out that funding comes from me as well

arock10 05-20-2014 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 20093445)
That is because liberals/democrats are usually leechers, minus to society types. And conservatives/republicans think that every person is responsible for their own wealth, they do not favor handouts etc. Naturally they are more successful.

So this is why red states are primarily taker states and blue states aren't?

GregE 05-20-2014 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slapass (Post 20091502)
So in your world politics is just self interest. Good for you.

In all fairness, most people vote according to what they perceive as being best for themselves and their families.

They're called "pocketbook issues" and they have always defined electoral outcomes.

Or as Bill Clinton famously put it: "It's the economy stupid".

Grapesoda 05-20-2014 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregE (Post 20093593)
In all fairness, most people vote according to what they perceive as being best for themselves and their families.

They're called "pocketbook issues" and they have always defined electoral outcomes.

Or as Bill Clinton famously put it: "It's the economy stupid".

fair enough and the reason for the pork barreling issue .. way to change that?

I always felt that the typical America wishes everyone well, hopes they have food, shelter, clean water and safety. for themselves and their children... and as much as the world wishes to blame whitey for their issues, some of the blame mast be placed squarely on the local governments in those regions at some point.... most world issues are insurmountable do to the 'moral hazard' .. this one area where the left seems to be brain dead for sure... sending 10 million to some world lord in a foreign county is only a feel good action but will in the end only make things worse or extend the current situation at best.

Grapesoda 05-20-2014 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arock10 (Post 20093564)
So this is why red states are primarily taker states and blue states aren't?

in all seriousness I see the left as extending blanket support with out accountability in many cases... I disagree with that policy.. I need to be AND am accountable for my actions so shouldn't others be?

crockett 05-20-2014 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 20093445)
That is because liberals/democrats are usually leechers, minus to society types. And conservatives/republicans think that every person is responsible for their own wealth, they do not favor handouts etc. Naturally they are more successful.

Where do you idiots come up with this horse shit? What is your thoughts on welfare states with in the union? Most red states usually can not collect enough taxes to pay for their own operation. This means they require federal subsidies in return to keep their states from going bankrupt. Guess that's different though am I right?

mineistaken 05-20-2014 02:27 PM

Invalid argument about red states for many many reasons. And on top of that - people in US do not necessary vote republican or democrat based on that particular thing. Many vote because of unrelated issues such as religion, war, gay rights, drug rights and so on and on.
Meaning even welfare person could vote republican because of any of those reasons.

crockett 05-20-2014 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 20093664)
Invalid argument about red states for many many reasons. And on top of that - people in US do not necessary vote republican or democrat based on that particular thing. Many vote because of unrelated issues such as religion, war, gay rights, drug rights and so on and on.
Meaning even welfare person could vote republican because of any of those reasons.

No it's not invalid, you lump together all liberals and democrats to claim they are takers, but when actual facts are brought forward to show that most red states are welfare queens you then claim it's different.. As usual conservatives can't stop telling us how great they are and how bad everyone else is but when they are shown to be wrong there is always some lala land excuse to make themselves feel better.

How typical..

kane 05-20-2014 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 20093664)
Invalid argument about red states for many many reasons. And on top of that - people in US do not necessary vote republican or democrat based on that particular thing. Many vote because of unrelated issues such as religion, war, gay rights, drug rights and so on and on.
Meaning even welfare person could vote republican because of any of those reasons.

I have long said that the biggest move the republican party ever did was getting much of the poor south to vote against its own economic interests.

deltav 05-20-2014 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20093698)
No it's not invalid, you lump together all liberals and democrats to claim they are takers, but when actual facts are brought forward to show that most red states are welfare queens you then claim it's different.. As usual conservatives can't stop telling us how great they are and how bad everyone else is but when they are shown to be wrong there is always some lala land excuse to make themselves feel better.

How typical..

You are never ever ever ever etc going to get through to these guys. For whatever reason their psyches are just not built to handle it. Props for trying though, I guess.

Cherry7 05-20-2014 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 20093448)
WTF is that? How do you distribute "fairly"? Everybody should get what he/she us worth.
Their is no "fair" distribution, it is just robbing the more successful (see how much income tax would 250K guy pay) and gifting that to some lazy fucktard (chronic welfare types).
How much more "fair" do you want to guy?

People like you (losers' apologists) make me sick.

People who know the price of everything but the value of nothing.

People living together produce goods needed to live. How wealth is divided up is artificial and based on the power relations in any society.

You may think that the person who created facebook should receive more wealth than millions of people who work producing food. Or a mother who raises an amazing human being, or a poet who creates a poem which captures an idea of love that lasts for a thousand years.

Look around and you may find that the "losers" are walking along to beach watching the sun go down listening to some beautiful music, living life in a forfiling way...

mineistaken 05-20-2014 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 20093700)
I have long said that the biggest move the republican party ever did was getting much of the poor south to vote against its own economic interests.

Exactly - every US poor person is voting against own economic interest if he voted for republican.
If you are poor - you should vote left (more stealing from rich and more "redistributing to poor).


Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20093698)
No it's not invalid, you lump together all liberals and democrats to claim they are takers, but when actual facts are brought forward to show that most red states are welfare queens you then claim it's different.. As usual conservatives can't stop telling us how great they are and how bad everyone else is but when they are shown to be wrong there is always some lala land excuse to make themselves feel better.

How typical..

Not exactly what I said, I was more on the page of left vs right economic views.
I know that there are some conservatives who are for stealing from rich and "redistributing" to poor, as well as there are some liberals who agree that everyone should get what they deserve.

mineistaken 05-20-2014 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherry7 (Post 20093753)
People who know the price of everything but the value of nothing.

People living together produce goods needed to live. How wealth is divided up is artificial and based on the power relations in any society.

You may think that the person who created facebook should receive more wealth than millions of people who work producing food. Or a mother who raises an amazing human being, or a poet who creates a poem which captures an idea of love that lasts for a thousand years.

Look around and you may find that the "losers" are walking along to beach watching the sun go down listening to some beautiful music, living life in a forfiling way...

How poetic.
Now my example that happens more often than yours:

Doctor making $150K and MCD flipper making $25K.
high tecg ngineer making 250K and burger king flipper making 25K.
Small business owner (job creator) making 450K and burger flipper making 25K.

How many times each one is more valuable than burger flipper and how much are they being punished by theft of their income? I would understand FAIR if they all paid the same percentage in income tax (imagine 10% of 250k and 10% of 25K). It would still be that higher earning person would be punished for being a quality member by paying 10 TIMES more than low quality society member. You hear that - even I admit that 10 TIMES would still be fair. But that is not enough for losers' apologists like you - percentage on higher quality society members are even higher! So that 10 TIMES is actually more like 20 or 30, or 50 TIMES. Yes, one quality society member pays the same amount as 50 low quality members combined... And that is still not enough and not "fair" for leftist scumbags (should I say thievery propagators) like you!

The more you educate yourself, groom yourself, give value to society the more you get punished by income theft. And vica versa - the more you are lazy, uneducated, loser - the more you benefit from society by "redistribution" of wealth.

tony286 05-20-2014 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 20093783)
How poetic.
Now my example that happens more often than yours:

Doctor making $150K and MCD flipper making $25K.
high tecg ngineer making 250K and burger king flipper making 25K.
Small business owner (job creator) making 450K and burger flipper making 25K.

How many times each one is more valuable than burger flipper and how much are they being punished by theft of their income? I would understand FAIR if they all paid the same percentage in income tax (imagine 10% of 250k and 10% of 25K). It would still be that higher earning person would be punished for being a quality member by paying 10 TIMES more than low quality society member. You hear that - even I admit that 10 TIMES would still be fair. But that is not enough for losers' apologists like you - percentage on higher quality society members are even higher! So that 10 TIMES is actually more like 20 or 30, or 50 TIMES. Yes, one quality society member pays the same amount as 50 low quality members combined... And that is still not enough and not "fair" for leftist scumbags (should I say thievery propagators) like you!

The more you educate yourself, groom yourself, give value to society the more you get punished by income theft. And vica versa - the more you are lazy, uneducated, loser - the more you benefit from society by "redistribution" of wealth.

burger flippers wished they made 25 K lol

_Richard_ 05-20-2014 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 20093361)
reality check: TV show written by liberals

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh written by liberals.. against liberals?

yes.. makes sense..

tony286 05-20-2014 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20093698)
No it's not invalid, you lump together all liberals and democrats to claim they are takers, but when actual facts are brought forward to show that most red states are welfare queens you then claim it's different.. As usual conservatives can't stop telling us how great they are and how bad everyone else is but when they are shown to be wrong there is always some lala land excuse to make themselves feel better.

How typical..

Facts dont work for them, dont waste your time.

_Richard_ 05-20-2014 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherry7 (Post 20093753)
People who know the price of everything but the value of nothing.

People living together produce goods needed to live. How wealth is divided up is artificial and based on the power relations in any society.

You may think that the person who created facebook should receive more wealth than millions of people who work producing food. Or a mother who raises an amazing human being, or a poet who creates a poem which captures an idea of love that lasts for a thousand years.

Look around and you may find that the "losers" are walking along to beach watching the sun go down listening to some beautiful music, living life in a forfiling way...

missed this -

http://i.imgur.com/eZDbTDE.gif

mopek1 05-20-2014 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deltav (Post 20093708)
You are never ever ever ever etc going to get through to these guys. For whatever reason their psyches are just not built to handle it. Props for trying though, I guess.

I agree ...

johnny o 05-20-2014 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 20093041)
reality check: corps are not the issue... the issues are the politicians :2 cents:

what planet are you on? politicians are owned by corporations. please don't tell me this is news to you. do i really need to cite examples of how corporations write laws?
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-0...tate-laws.html

johnny o 05-20-2014 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20093061)
Everyone voted for the two wars, only later to say they don't support them, then have a new president come in and go back to the first war to escalate it

EVERYONE? you mean based on the faulty intelligence that the Bush administration was selling.


I have never heard of anyone saying they are for defunding veterans care. Most conservatives are pro veteran.



I think most want the federal government smaller and the state to make the guidlines for these topics like the constitution lays out!

please go buy a clue:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/0...-Help-Veterans
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/0...t-is-dangerous

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/10/us...tion.html?_r=0

johnny o 05-20-2014 05:51 PM

vendzilla has all his faux news talking points down. wanna place a bet that hillary will win in 2016? let's put some money on this. doesn't even matter who's running against her.

420 05-20-2014 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SongRider (Post 20093446)
We got holes in the right side of the boat and we got holes in the left side of the boat... and the people on the right are pointing at the holes on the left and the people on the left are pointing at the holes on the right..

The entire boat is sinking... not just one side or the other...

the left and the right both suck... they are both owned by corporations and big business... Everybody knows this yet continue to argue for their "pretend" side... there is NO sides...

Its a shell game that keeps us busy while they empty our pockets... the LEFT pocket AND the RIGHT pocket... Divided people just continue to argue with each other year after year over the SAME damn issues handed out by the government to the media while they continue to slowly bleed the people of their wealth and property

:321GFY

go team :thumbsup


TCLGirls 05-20-2014 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20093061)
I have never heard of anyone saying they are for defunding veterans care. Most conservatives are pro veteran.

1.
"Much has been said over the past few weeks about the budget proposal in the House of Representatives, offered by Rep. Paul Ryan, and backed by Republican members, but not much has been said about how it will affect our veterans. As you know, the Paul Ryan plan will end Medicare, making it a voucher program, leaving seniors to buy their own insurance in the private system. It will therefore end one of the most popular and successful initiatives ever offered.

This plan will also punish veterans - harshly - and it's important that you spread the word on how it will do so."


http://www.votevets.org/pages/?id=0047

2.
"U.S. Senate Republicans blocked legislation on Thursday that would have expanded federal healthcare and education programs for veterans, saying the $24 billion bill would bust the budget."

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/...A1Q26O20140227


3.
"For those who continue to believe that obstructionism at any cost is not the goal of the Senate Republicans, consider the behavior of the GOP Senators who, on Friday, blocked a bi-partisan effort to pass a bill that would put veterans to work in jobs that look after the nation?s federal land while also giving our fighting men and women a leg up when it comes to getting them hired by local police and fire departments."

http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickunga...-need-of-jobs/

mopek1 05-20-2014 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 20093912)
1.
"Much has been said over the past few weeks about the budget proposal in the House of Representatives, offered by Rep. Paul Ryan, and backed by Republican members, but not much has been said about how it will affect our veterans. As you know, the Paul Ryan plan will end Medicare, making it a voucher program, leaving seniors to buy their own insurance in the private system. It will therefore end one of the most popular and successful initiatives ever offered.

This plan will also punish veterans - harshly - and it's important that you spread the word on how it will do so."


http://www.votevets.org/pages/?id=0047

2.
"U.S. Senate Republicans blocked legislation on Thursday that would have expanded federal healthcare and education programs for veterans, saying the $24 billion bill would bust the budget."

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/...A1Q26O20140227


3.
"For those who continue to believe that obstructionism at any cost is not the goal of the Senate Republicans, consider the behavior of the GOP Senators who, on Friday, blocked a bi-partisan effort to pass a bill that would put veterans to work in jobs that look after the nation?s federal land while also giving our fighting men and women a leg up when it comes to getting them hired by local police and fire departments."

http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickunga...-need-of-jobs/

You can post all the proof possible and even have the whole REP party call Vendzilla and admit it yet he still won't accept what you say.

mopek1 05-20-2014 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnny o (Post 20093899)
what planet are you on? politicians are owned by corporations. please don't tell me this is news to you. do i really need to cite examples of how corporations write laws?
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-0...tate-laws.html

Yes you do. But he still won't admit he was wrong or agree on anything.

If he responds to you he will simply attack your character.

2MuchMark 05-20-2014 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherry7 (Post 20093110)
In "12 Years a Slave"

There is a conservative slave owner who rapes the girl slave and whips the slaves to work

There is a liberal slave owner who reads the slaves bits of the bible while working them to death.

Coca Cola or Pepsi.

Neither want to change the system to distribute wealth fairly.

Not a good analogy. Fortunately both conservatives and liberals have evolved into human beings since those awful days.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20093346)
There is an old saying, too many chiefs, not enough Indians. This applies here as too many regulations running can screw up the machine.
Here in California, many business's have left the state because of over regulation, the cost of business has become too big

But Vendzilla, the regulations are in place to make sure that people don't break the rules. The problem isn't too much regulate - the problem is not enough regulation. Businesses leave a regulated area because they would rather save money by polluting more or hiring child labour, than pay their fare share and do whats right. You can blame your buddy Mittens Romney for that.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20093443)
And the only jobs Obama has saved are lower wage jobs, that's why the Median wage is down 8%

Typical republican bullshit. George W Bush destroyed millions of jobs. Obama has been busy replacing them all. Republicans bitched forever that the unemployment rate was too high (and blamed Obama for it). Now he has this number way down, and idiotic moronic dorks like you shift the argument. Instead of admitting that unemployment is down, you say the jobs suck. Be careful Vendzilla - Sean Hannity's dick will turn blue from all the sucking you give it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20093443)
More uninformed bullshit coming from you, the militias are well informed because they know that the government has bought up so much ammo, ammo they can't use over the next 30 years

LOL!! How. Fucking. Stupid. are you? This lie came about when it was reported that the US bought a ton of ammo because it was CHEAP to buy in BULK. Since then, uneducated hillbillies like you think OBAMA IS STEALING YOUR BULLETS. Let me tell you something: Those assholes in Nevada are nothing more than stupid little kids playing cowboys and Indians. They think and act and feel like big shots because they carry assault rifles and other shit. The truth is though that they are breaking the law, they are defending a WELFARE COWBOY who is also dumb as a post, and they have idiots like you cheering them on.

You are such a sad fucking case.

Grapesoda 05-20-2014 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnny o (Post 20093899)
what planet are you on? politicians are owned by corporations. please don't tell me this is news to you. do i really need to cite examples of how corporations write laws?
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-0...tate-laws.html

so politicians aren't the issue then?

12clicks 05-21-2014 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 20091654)
I don't have anything against people making money, and keeping as much of it as possible, because even as a liberal I think the government wastes most of our tax dollars. It's just a big, bloated, inefficient out of control behemoth.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 20091654)
The bottom line for Republicans is that they want to deny climate change because doing anything about it will mean more of their precious earnings going to taxes for government sanctioned initiatives to curtail the problem. Their entire existence is based on making as much money as possible and they could give a shit if anyone's children(even their own) have to live in a more fucked up world.

odd that...

12clicks 05-21-2014 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherry7 (Post 20093110)
In "12 Years a Slave"

There is a conservative slave owner who rapes the girl slave and whips the slaves to work

There is a liberal slave owner who reads the slaves bits of the bible while working them to death.

Coca Cola or Pepsi.

Neither want to change the system to distribute wealth fairly.

you want wealth distributed fairly I suggest you stop playing webmaster and get a fucking job. You're poor because you refuse to work hard, not because others DO work hard.

12clicks 05-21-2014 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20093192)
There should never be equal distribution of wealth, there is no reason someone that works harder or smarter should not make more. However there should be equal opportunity to create wealth, it shouldn't be a system like today, where existing wealth has unfair advantage given to it by govt policies.

existing wealth has NOTHING to do with your own failure. Someone else's inheritance is simply your excuse to fail.

Grapesoda 05-21-2014 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 20094779)
existing wealth has NOTHING to do with your own failure. Someone else's inheritance is simply your excuse to fail.

whoa! yer killing me :1orglaugh

Vendzilla 05-21-2014 11:30 AM

You know that the DailyKos is a liberal website don't you, they won't tell all the truth behind why they vetoed those bills

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnny o (Post 20093906)
vendzilla has all his faux news talking points down. wanna place a bet that hillary will win in 2016? let's put some money on this. doesn't even matter who's running against her.

Wow, guess you missed where I'm working on the Hillary Super pac, so try to keep top the subject and not rely on the same old it's fox news Bullshit

Vendzilla 05-21-2014 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 20093937)
But Vendzilla, the regulations are in place to make sure that people don't break the rules. The problem isn't too much regulate - the problem is not enough regulation. Businesses leave a regulated area because they would rather save money by polluting more or hiring child labour, than pay their fare share and do whats right. You can blame your buddy Mittens Romney for that.

Hey dip shit, lets say we cap all the air pollution that the US puts out, how will that effect what China puts out? We put a cap on them here, so they move to China. Fucking moron thinks that China will listen to us?

Quote:

Typical republican bullshit. George W Bush destroyed millions of jobs. Obama has been busy replacing them all. Republicans bitched forever that the unemployment rate was too high (and blamed Obama for it). Now he has this number way down, and idiotic moronic dorks like you shift the argument. Instead of admitting that unemployment is down, you say the jobs suck. Be careful Vendzilla - Sean Hannity's dick will turn blue from all the sucking you give it.
If your a burger flipper, you probably owe it to Obama, because he's not doing anything that makes good jobs, just low wage jobs, even Jon Stewart said that on his show!

Median wages are down 8%
Because all the high paying jobs are gone, you blame Bush for that? I blame the asshole that's in charge now! He's the one that spent almost a trillion dollars on shovel ready jobs, Jesus, sometimes you really have shit for brains!

Quote:

LOL!! How. Fucking. Stupid. are you? This lie came about when it was reported that the US bought a ton of ammo because it was CHEAP to buy in BULK. Since then, uneducated hillbillies like you think OBAMA IS STEALING YOUR BULLETS. Let me tell you something: Those assholes in Nevada are nothing more than stupid little kids playing cowboys and Indians. They think and act and feel like big shots because they carry assault rifles and other shit. The truth is though that they are breaking the law, they are defending a WELFARE COWBOY who is also dumb as a post, and they have idiots like you cheering them on.

You are such a sad fucking case.
You're a really fucking idiot,

The Obama Administration says that federal law enforcement agents need the ammunition for “mandatory quarterly firearms qualifications and other training sessions.”

The total the feds have bought for the IRS, DHS and a few others is 2 BILLION rounds.

There are currently more than 70 different federal law enforcement agencies employing over 120,000 officers with arrest and firearms authority.

That's over 16,000 rounds per agent, or more ammo than was used in the Iraq war.

I guess the math classes in Canada are really shitty if you think that's ok!

arock10 05-21-2014 11:53 AM

its not a party till 12clicks shows up

mopek1 05-21-2014 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arock10 (Post 20094869)
its not a party till 12clicks shows up

That got a chuckle out of me ... thanks.

mopek1 05-21-2014 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20094862)
Hey dip shit, lets say we cap all the air pollution that the US puts out, how will that effect what China puts out? We put a cap on them here, so they move to China. Fucking moron thinks that China will listen to us?


Pollution isn't just co2 which I am not in favor of caps btw.

It's also companies who just dump the toxic by products of their day to day production activities into drinking water, land, air etc... without having to pay for a responsible disposing method.

mopek1 05-21-2014 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 20094779)
existing wealth has NOTHING to do with your own failure. Someone else's inheritance is simply your excuse to fail.

You're not really addressing his point. But then again, that's not why you're here.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123