... :thumbsup

Personally, I was really disappointed that the start of a new ice age predicted in the 70's didn't happen. I was really upset when the "hole in the ozone layer" didn't cause us all to fry as predicted. I was certain that all that Aquanet being used by everyone in the 80s was going to end the world as we knew it. I mean.. thats what we were told day in and day out..............

We can't destroy the earth, we are very capable though of making the earth uninhabitable for human life. We are nothing but accidents, there is no intelligent design, the planet won't miss us any more than it misses the millions of other species who've come and gone before.

I don't consider global warming to be one of our biggest problems. So even if I accept the vast majority of scientific opinions that man is warming up the planet I think the hysteria is out of perspective and some of the motivation for the hysteria is there's money to be made from it.

Sure Dyna Mo, whatever you say. Go ahead and keep denying what people are doing to the planet. I'll bet you $100 that within you lifetime, children you know will be sick or dying of lung disease, someone you know will have lost their homes to flooding or fire, and that the world will be a much shittier place thanks to Hummer-driving assholes.


Sorry to burst your bubble, but stupid-ass fucking asshole brain-dead moron republicans will be the ones responsible for choking the shit out of your children and grandchildren's lungs. "Liberals" are the only ones who care about the future and have learned about the long-term profit that the future brings.


The answer is in the article I quoted.

No, that is completely not true at all. You are accepting the crap that is being spoon fed to you.

The incredible lack of basic science knowledge you are displaying here is downright depressing. It doesn't matter what I say. In fact, a credible scientist probably would not even make an impression on you either. Sorry dude nothing personal, but...


Finally, someone who paid attention in science class.


OMG, OMG, OMG...

"Too Much" CO2, *IS* Pollution. If you want instant proof, put a plastic bag over your head and seal it around your neck, then breathe normally. Get it now?



Jel, *WE* are the tiny blip. *WE* are the only industrial mamels who have ever lived on the planet. *WE* are the ones causing the damage. We are pumping greenhouse gasses including CO2 into the air, and at the same time, taking away the planets ability to suck that CO2 back and put it into the ground thanks to deforestation. It's us, us us.

Lol! Just keep sucking the floppy tit of the right wing coal and oil money shriveldicks. When you find yourself choking for air between sucks, maybe you'll realize you were wrong all along.

I was "spoon fed" crap that we are coming out of an ice age? Was I also lied to about the mini ice age of the middle ages... or previous ice ages? I'm ignorant?

Are you on fucking drugs?

Funny how kooks always view themselves as the enlightened ones and everyone else is usually explained as being "brainwashed".... because of course, there can't be more than one theory, idea, hypothesis etc that doesn't perfectly fit the panic narrative or the paranoid narrative. And what ever you do... don't ever make the mistake of questioning the self professed "tolerant" and "open minded" liberal or you'll be labeled racist, hateful, small minded, brainwashed by fox news etc.

So we should not worry because? You raise the sea level 9 feet and we have a lot of issues.so just ignore it as it might have happened before?

dear child, I've been hearing this clap trap since the 70s. Once you mature, you'll have a better understanding of the world around you and the fake hysteria you currently believe.



contrary to the hysteria of uneducated youth like yourself, our air is actually getting cleaner. but prattle on, its entertaining.

http://www.epa.gov/airtrends/aqtrends.html
"""EPA creates air quality trends using measurements from monitors located across the country. The table below shows that air quality based on concentrations of the common pollutants has improved nationally since 1980."""

:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

The hysteria and overwrought knee-jerk reactions to the claimed problem will be more harmful to society than the "problem" itself.


I'll fix it for you - social science class.


Ummmmm, ok. Are you done hyperventilating yet? Unbunched your panties?

1. Define "too much" CO2 as it relates to the atmosphere and not your ridiculous "bag over the head" BS. Keep in mind that CO2 is a trace gas in the atmospehere. It is nowhere near becoming anything but a trace gas.

2. The "bag over the head" analogy is ridiculous at best. If that is your criteria for labeling something a pollutant then you might as well label water a pollutant since people can die from dilutional hyponatremia. Oxygen too must then be labelled a pollutant - Oxygen toxicity. For that matter just about everything would be a pollutant because everything can be toxic at high enough doses.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxide

Oh the horror!

3. By your logic water vapour is also pollution since it is the most powerful and abundant greenhouse gas.

4. Greenhouses utilize CO2 generators to raise the levels of CO2 in their grow-houses up to 1500ppm for the benefit of the plants. Do you ever hear of grow-house workers dropping dead? Didn't think so.


You can worry if you want. But so far all of their predictions have been wrong. What makes you think any of their future apocalyptic ones will be right?

dodge and deflect like a conspiracy nutter. Not sure why you can't admit your opinion on this atoll needs support. try it sometime. perhaps when you're not pointing your finger at hummers whilst driving your v8 camaro muscle car.

http://weknowmemes.com/wp-content/up...fuck-in-it.jpg

Lots of good arguments in this thread... :error :helpme :1orglaugh

:stoned

ADG