pornmasta

If you are russian, translate this:

http://www.lepoint.fr/editos-du-poin...1806094_71.php

and if you are british too...
and if you are german too...

CurrentlySober

It is time to finish the job started in the early nineteenth century by the French Emperor Napoleon I and the middle of the twentieth century, the German Chancellor Hitler: the conquest and submission by the Europe , the Russian . Much has been said about these two brave companies whose failure was largely due to poor weather. Berezina and Stalingrad are passed, in common parlance as a synonym rout, disorder. Must hunt European consciences this inferiority complex they suffer before Moscow. In other words: take Moscow. Because Moscow is beatable. In the nineteenth century, the United States was still a secondary provincial power, unable to align and transport fresh troops and new weapons which Napoleon would have needed to overthrow the tyrant Alexander I and his treacherous in general Chief Kutuzov. In the twentieth century, by one of these tactics aberrations whose history is too customary, he was even less easy to Hitler to seek military aid from the United States that they were, for a very short period fortunately but alas decisive, allied with the Russians. It is not at all the case. Leaders and the media in the European Union and the powerful North America are now on the same wavelength about Russia: contempt, disgust, hatred. The more fool strategist NATO understand that, in conjunction also miraculously favorable, there is one thing to do: attack. Attack. Attack Russia!

Every war must be undertaken for reasons moral or humanitarian. Hell in literature is paved with good intentions, said André Gide, who had discovered before many other satanic evil nature of the Russian state. In politics, it's the same. Especially in foreign policy.

Moral and humanitarian reasons

The colonization of Africa has not been made to exploit, but to heal and to evangelize them, once they were treated and evangelized, they were asked a small participation in the European economic effort, which has decimated many. Moral and humanitarian reasons to attack Russia abound. First, there is the Ukraine, new Western and American passion. The Ukrainian is the 2010s that the Bosnian and Kosovar were the 90s of last century: a being elite, for the delicate feelings and thoughts. Deprive him of the Crimea, which was Russian three times longer than it was Ukrainian, however, would be an unspeakable contempt mental and physical balance of the Ukrainian, this new model for humanity. But if there was it. Russia multiplies in recent years, the reasons being attacked, invaded and destroyed. In the confusion of the Internet: Femen blondes and Russian billionaires imprisoned asylum offered to the American traitor Edward Snowden, hugs Putin with the tax Depardieu French deserter, etc..

Not renewing the error was fatal to illustrious predecessors Obama and Ashton, namely Napoleon and Hitler must leave now if you do not want, like them, remain mired at Stalingrad or freeze on the Berezina. I even wonder if it is not already too late in the year, it would not be wise to repel the attack 2015. Because no question of being humiliated by the Russians a third time. But not!

__________________

My Dream Gal... XXX