Oh, and... 300 :ak47:

Detecting sarcasm isn't your strong point, is it?

Are you idiots still at it? Hell's Christ........ fuck having a war in Iraq, the war is right here.



All the board-bitching in the world isn't going to affect what Bush does, it ain't gonna affect what Saddam Insane does, it ain't gonna affect NOTHING.


Okay, continue the piss.

Daveplays is a good little German, 1930's style

USA UBER ALLES!!!!! :BangBang:

And you are a silly little twit who wouldn't know DavePlays if he was kicking your ass up and down the street.


I don't know who you are and could not possible care less - but keep your stupid hatred and nazi remarks to your fucking self little man.


:321GFY


Some people's children.....

Well you obviously did not fully read my post. You are picking out specific phrases without including the rest of the sentence. lol. You're doing just as the USA does; manipulating intelligence information to try and justify their points. I suggest you go re-read what I wrote.

I simply stated that the Kurds oppose Saddam's regime, I don't see anything in their that says it was okay to gas them. lol. My main point was that no proof exists that Saddam did not gas them. I hope that clarifies things for you since you seem illiterate for that split second.

You're definitely right. But sometimes it's nice to knock some sense into people.

there are quite a few idots here

Someone actually said CNN was a valid news source

hahahah i'm cracking out , an american who says to someone "Stop meddling in the affairs of other countries you arrogant son of a bitch!!!"

the world is upside down hahaha

this was the most stupid phrase someone could ever say
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Bush does not want to be the first Neville Chamberlain of the 21st Century.

Even the French UN ambassador seems to think the US and UK troops on the border are the only reason Iraq is starting to cooperate. Therefore I guess Bush is doing something right?


Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin: Iraq, according to the very terms used by the inspectors, represents less of a danger to the world than it did in 1991. We can achieve our objective of effectively disarming that country. Let us keep the pressure on Baghdad. The adoption of Resolution 1441, the assumption of converging positions by the vast majority of the world's nations, diplomatic actions by the Organization of African Unity , the League of Arab States, the Organization of the Islamic Conference and the Non-Aligned Movement -- all of these common efforts are bearing fruit.

The American and British military presence in the region lends support to our collective resolve. We all recognize the effectiveness of this pressure on the part of the international community, and we must use it.

Pressure is key. War is not.

Once again you silly fucker you have no idea what you are talking about or who you are taking about.

I haven't heard anything Limbaugh has had to say in about a year - but it is funny how much he must scares you liberals.


Try again - but TRY to get at least ONE fact right next time?

You just keep making a bigger ass of yourself everytime you include me in one of your posts.....

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

A decade of "pressure" did nothing to resolve the situation, in fact it made things worse as the people of Iraq suffered under sanctions. The ONLY reason the inspectors are back in Iraq, is because the US has said enough is enough. The real threat of war is the only kind of pressure that seems to work.

Crocodile Bin Laden's ex-wife is an American. Therapists call it "projection."

He would say: "under my plan, all terrorists should be put in a lock box."

:winkwink:

The real threat of war does seem to help, but you have to really sit back and think if Iraq is a threat to America or not. As the CIA & Mi6 have said, Iraq is not a threat, or even anything remotely close. They are barely a threat to Israel as well.