Google Ranking Factors - GoFuckYourself.com

nexcom28 · 11-16-2013, 06:00 PM

Just seen this and thought I would share. I don't know how accurate it is but it would go along way to explaining why EMD, sites with keywords in the description / H2 or keywords in the URL don't rank as well as they used to.

TumblrPRO · 11-16-2013, 06:09 PM

Where is Time on Site???

Not serious. Come on...

Feng-PD · 11-16-2013, 06:11 PM

nice share, good to know

dragas · 11-16-2013, 06:34 PM

keyword in title 0.00 ? This is bullshit.

oppoten · 11-16-2013, 06:44 PM

What's the source for this?

~Ray · 11-16-2013, 06:49 PM

#3 number of backlinks

see sig

rogueteens · 11-16-2013, 07:42 PM

looks like I need to get a G+ account!

BTW what is a "stopword"?

bdld · 11-16-2013, 08:26 PM

social media rules nowadays.

oppoten · 11-16-2013, 08:36 PM

Found the source, or a source

http://www.searchmetrics.com/en/serv...-factors-2013/

Interesting how facebook is considered an authority and not a competitor. They're in cahoots.

~Ray · 11-16-2013, 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogueteens

looks like I need to get a G+ account!

BTW what is a "stopword"?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_words

Elite Profit · 11-17-2013, 01:35 AM

social sites is the big ass and why google so like them and build search results based on this factor

baggg · 11-17-2013, 01:49 AM

This list is bullshit with.Social signals do not have any effect on your SERP,even Matt Cutts said that.It is good for traffic for sure,but a fb like will NOT boost your ranks.It is a theory that comes from the faggots over at sew who can stop praising article syndication (in late 2013)

"Of course it does not count, at least not as much as those clowns at MOZ and SEW are trying to promote it with every 2nd guest post on their sites. This is one of those rare occasions where you should listen to MaCu"

Cherry7 · 11-17-2013, 03:15 AM

Looking at it from the other point of view is how crap is Google at finding what you really want.

Back in the day it was easy to find freeware, now the pages google sends you to are covered in spyware shit.

Search engines havd failed to develop and are still very stupid

BaliPimp · 11-17-2013, 03:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherry7

Looking at it from the other point of view is how crap is Google at finding what you really want.

Back in the day it was easy to find freeware, now the pages google sends you to are covered in spyware shit.

Search engines havd failed to develop and are still very stupid

This

C4W · 11-17-2013, 03:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dragas

keyword in title 0.00 ? This is bullshit.

100% bullshit

VforVendetta · 11-17-2013, 04:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dragas

keyword in title 0.00 ? This is bullshit.

Emil · 11-17-2013, 05:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherry7

Looking at it from the other point of view is how crap is Google at finding what you really want.

Back in the day it was easy to find freeware, now the pages google sends you to are covered in spyware shit.

Search engines havd failed to develop and are still very stupid

You're fucking right! The SERPs have become crappy as fuck. Google need to launch another major update and get shit done. But I hope they don't because they got too much power already over my income. If Bing and Yahoo could get a larger marketshare I would be happy.

3xmedia · 11-17-2013, 07:50 AM

Pure bullshit

rockeru · 11-17-2013, 01:43 PM

Since time on site or bounce rate is not in that list it's probably bullshit. Those things matter A LOT more than social media if it even matters at all.

bean-aid · 11-17-2013, 01:45 PM

Fairly certain that list was created to kill off your competition. Let me guess... found it on dp?

seolinker · 11-17-2013, 01:50 PM

keyword in url is bullshit as well, maybe not as strong as it was, but 100% bullshit that it's only 0.01, as well as all other "keyword in" factors.

etech · 11-17-2013, 01:51 PM

I recommend to use http://www.accuranker.com to check your rankings, and import keywords from GWT.
It can also tell you how much traffic you are reiceiving to your landing pages as to which keywords as well.

Klen · 11-17-2013, 02:20 PM

That list is correct but it CANNOT be taken as list of rankings factors,just merely a some sort of statistic.I think i read somewhere how Cutts said how they reduced the effect of google plus due abuse,but not sure. The reason why facebook shares and +1 are on top of the list is since once you get rankings,you get traffic,and when you have good traffic,you get facebook shared and +1 automatically as well,after all when i before penguin had tons of se traffic had a tons of facebook shares as well.
And when it comes to keywords in title/url,they probably measured that on sites which had zero or little backlinks.

DutchTrafficService · 11-17-2013, 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rockeru

Since time on site or bounce rate is not in that list it's probably bullshit. Those things matter A LOT more than social media if it even matters at all.

I can guarantee you that those have absolutely zero effect on serps.

~Ray · 11-17-2013, 03:29 PM

avg time on goldprice.org is a few seconds. It doesnt take long to see the price and leave.

Google used it as an example that the time spent on a site doesn't matter

seolinker · 11-17-2013, 03:29 PM

"And when it comes to keywords in title/url,they probably measured that on sites which had zero or little backlinks."

could be, I have such case now, will start link building soon
it was earlier cause that points were stronger and gave ranks in past

11-16-2013, 06:00 PM	#1
nexcom28 So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 3,716	Google Ranking Factors Just seen this and thought I would share. I don't know how accurate it is but it would go along way to explaining why EMD, sites with keywords in the description / H2 or keywords in the URL don't rank as well as they used to.

11-16-2013, 06:49 PM	#6
~Ray visit hardlinks.org Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Las Vegas , Nv >>> [email protected] or icq 94994627 anytime Posts: 18,362	#3 number of backlinks see sig __________________ Adult Backlinks for Adult Websites - Testimonials Available

11-16-2013, 07:42 PM	#7
rogueteens So fucking bland Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: England Posts: 8,005	looks like I need to get a G+ account! BTW what is a "stopword"? __________________ Free traffic and backlinks from one of the fastest growing adult pinsites on the net - SAUCY PICTURES! Easily my best performing webcam sponsor - CLICK HERE!!

11-17-2013, 01:35 AM	#11
Elite Profit Confirmed User Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 134	social sites is the big ass and why google so like them and build search results based on this factor __________________ Elite Profit - affiliate program present: Glamour Flower - nude teens in sexy stockings and lingerie + other sites

11-17-2013, 03:15 AM	#13
Cherry7 Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: UK Posts: 3,564	Looking at it from the other point of view is how crap is Google at finding what you really want. Back in the day it was easy to find freeware, now the pages google sends you to are covered in spyware shit. Search engines havd failed to develop and are still very stupid __________________ My Neighbour Butterfly PORN-The Musical The Long Goodbye Cinema Erotique

11-16-2013, 06:09 PM	#2
TumblrPRO So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: Earth Posts: 296	Where is Time on Site??? Not serious. Come on...

11-16-2013, 06:11 PM	#3
Feng-PD www.PornDeals.com Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Netherlands Posts: 3,964	nice share, good to know __________________ PornDeals.com - WebcamDeals.com - GayDeals.com - PornCoupons.comnew! Skype : fengwu83 Email : feng{atter}porndeals{dotter}com

11-16-2013, 06:34 PM	#4
dragas Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: Toronto Posts: 66	keyword in title 0.00 ? This is bullshit.

11-16-2013, 06:44 PM	#5
oppoten NAME THE JEW Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 4,793	What's the source for this?

11-16-2013, 08:26 PM	#8
bdld $100,000 Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 11,452	social media rules nowadays.

11-16-2013, 08:36 PM	#9
oppoten NAME THE JEW Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 4,793	Found the source, or a source http://www.searchmetrics.com/en/serv...-factors-2013/ Interesting how facebook is considered an authority and not a competitor. They're in cahoots.

11-17-2013, 01:49 AM	#12
baggg So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: EEA Posts: 1,432	This list is bullshit with.Social signals do not have any effect on your SERP,even Matt Cutts said that.It is good for traffic for sure,but a fb like will NOT boost your ranks.It is a theory that comes from the faggots over at sew who can stop praising article syndication (in late 2013) "Of course it does not count, at least not as much as those clowns at MOZ and SEW are trying to promote it with every 2nd guest post on their sites. This is one of those rare occasions where you should listen to MaCu"

11-17-2013, 07:50 AM	#18
3xmedia Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 5,721	Pure bullshit

11-17-2013, 01:43 PM	#19
rockeru Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2013 Location: Out in space Posts: 293	Since time on site or bounce rate is not in that list it's probably bullshit. Those things matter A LOT more than social media if it even matters at all.

11-17-2013, 01:45 PM	#20
bean-aid So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: the land of woke sleuths Posts: 16,493	Fairly certain that list was created to kill off your competition. Let me guess... found it on dp?

11-17-2013, 01:50 PM	#21
seolinker Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 243	keyword in url is bullshit as well, maybe not as strong as it was, but 100% bullshit that it's only 0.01, as well as all other "keyword in" factors.

11-17-2013, 01:51 PM	#22
etech Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Right next to you.... Posts: 1,148	I recommend to use http://www.accuranker.com to check your rankings, and import keywords from GWT. It can also tell you how much traffic you are reiceiving to your landing pages as to which keywords as well.

11-17-2013, 02:20 PM	#23
Klen Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Little Vienna Posts: 32,235	That list is correct but it CANNOT be taken as list of rankings factors,just merely a some sort of statistic.I think i read somewhere how Cutts said how they reduced the effect of google plus due abuse,but not sure. The reason why facebook shares and +1 are on top of the list is since once you get rankings,you get traffic,and when you have good traffic,you get facebook shared and +1 automatically as well,after all when i before penguin had tons of se traffic had a tons of facebook shares as well. And when it comes to keywords in title/url,they probably measured that on sites which had zero or little backlinks.

11-17-2013, 03:29 PM	#25
~Ray visit hardlinks.org Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Las Vegas , Nv >>> [email protected] or icq 94994627 anytime Posts: 18,362	avg time on goldprice.org is a few seconds. It doesnt take long to see the price and leave. Google used it as an example that the time spent on a site doesn't matter __________________ Adult Backlinks for Adult Websites - Testimonials Available