Porn's Condom Law Battle Abandoned by L.A. County - GoFuckYourself.com

xxxjay · 10-08-2013, 11:08 PM

http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/2...ont_defend.php

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude · 10-08-2013, 11:22 PM

ADG

Zeiss · 10-08-2013, 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude

Porn Mickey · 10-09-2013, 01:48 AM

Performers, producers, porn consumers, voters, HIV non-profits or state health regulators, the question is now...

The Porn Nerd · 10-09-2013, 07:12 AM

Great. Let the infections, HIV and all the rest rule!
Yay people! Now we can fuck and die!!

Awesome news.

Barry-xlovecam · 10-09-2013, 07:35 AM

From what I understand from the article is that the Federal Court found that the law was constitutional.

The county has no reason to defend the law's constitutionally.

LA County will not be able to enforce the law with unannounced inspections but only on prior complaint of its violation with notice?

Would you fuck a strange girl without a condom? Sort of common sense and responsibility IMHO.

PornoMonster · 10-09-2013, 07:36 AM

Why have Condoms we have Affordable Health Care now... Geeezzz... Just take your Viral Meds... Right???

DAMNMAN · 10-09-2013, 07:48 AM

If LA County stopped defending the law in appeals court doesn't the other side win the case?

Interested in legal perspectives here.

_Richard_ · 10-09-2013, 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAMNMAN

If LA County stopped defending the law in appeals court doesn't the other side win the case?

Interested in legal perspectives here.

it's kind of a 'win by default'

they probably realize that the big production companies is going to drag them to court again and again

Vapid - BANNED FOR LIFE · 10-09-2013, 08:28 AM

Are we goddamn there yet

Rochard · 10-09-2013, 09:35 AM

I don't understand how this law came to be. I can see the need for it, obviously, but requiring porn stars to wear condoms is one step away from requiring the general public to wear condoms. At least in the porn industry there is testing, which the general public does not have at all.

pornlaw · 10-09-2013, 10:52 AM

Measure B would even require the general public to wear condoms... even those who are married monogamous couples who cam together and share bodily fluids within Los Angeles County. It does not make a distinction between commercial pornography or amateur camming.

_Richard_ · 10-09-2013, 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornlaw

Measure B would even require the general public to wear condoms... even those who are married monogamous couples who cam together and share bodily fluids within Los Angeles County. It does not make a distinction between commercial pornography or amateur camming.

how is that possibly viewed as constitutional?

TRPWL · 10-09-2013, 11:13 AM

Great. Let the infections, HIV and all the rest rule!

Yea cuz HIV is everywhere in the adult industry LOL.. Does AHF send you you're check or do they use direct deposit?

A state and county with no money, why waste it on a non issue???

Barry-xlovecam · 10-09-2013, 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornlaw

Measure B would even require the general public to wear condoms... even those who are married monogamous couples who cam together and share bodily fluids within Los Angeles County. It does not make a distinction between commercial pornography or amateur camming.

The is another way to look at this: Personal responsibility.

If you don't use a condom, have knowledge of your infected status -- you have committed both a crime and a tort.

The subject you raise in aspect of camming is not a legal issue for us -- we are a Dutch corporation with no production operations in LA County. I'll have to defer any statement of policy of ours for now in this matter.

The real intent of the law should be toward performers in multiple partner settings -- 20 or more? The odds of increased risk are a factor in the propagation of these STDs that are resistant to effective treatment.

Realistically, there was never any real threat to amateur webcam performers -- that was just hype. Same as §2257's threat to small time secondary producers. Someone prosecuted is either someone as an example (the fear factor) or some big fish (for many reasons). Of course there are real violations with malice and in violation of the underlying legal reasoning and not the prosecutable threat -- that is what we hope the (responsible) bench can differentiate between.

That being said, county health inspectors gunning to find porn producers to fine (or prosecute) cannot be a good thing -- so this outcome is probably a win.

Vendzilla · 10-09-2013, 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude

ADG

I have to wonder what in the hell has to go thru the mind of a person to even consider doing that?

Alex1776 · 10-09-2013, 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd

Great. Let the infections, HIV and all the rest rule!
Yay people! Now we can fuck and die!!

Awesome news.

What the hell are you talking about?? I'm looking at all of your numerous websites and I don't see a single condom anywhere! Are you a do as I say not as I do type of fellow?

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude · 10-09-2013, 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla

I have to wonder what in the hell has to go thru the mind of a person to even consider doing that?

Resume building?

ADG

LA Crew · 10-10-2013, 08:52 AM

The porn industry celebrated a rare victory in a summer of bummers.

10-08-2013, 11:08 PM	#1
xxxjay Tube groupie. Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: LoScandalous, CA Posts: 13,482	Porn's Condom Law Battle Abandoned by L.A. County http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/2...ont_defend.php __________________ http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/

10-08-2013, 11:22 PM	#2
AsianDivaGirlsWebDude Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: San Francisco Bay Area Posts: 38,323	ADG __________________ Asian Diva Girls - Exclusive Photos and Videos Asian Diva Girls Affiliate Program (50% ccBill Revshare)

10-09-2013, 01:48 AM	#4
Porn Mickey we all love porn Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Nowhere Posts: 2,840	Performers, producers, porn consumers, voters, HIV non-profits or state health regulators, the question is now... __________________ $150 SignUp Bonus

10-09-2013, 07:12 AM	#5
The Porn Nerd Living The Dream Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Inside a Monitor Posts: 19,532	Great. Let the infections, HIV and all the rest rule! Yay people! Now we can fuck and die!! Awesome news. __________________ My Affiliate Programs: Porn Nerd Cash \| Porn Showcase \| Aggressive Gold Over 90 paysites to promote! Now on Teams: peabodymedia

10-09-2013, 07:35 AM	#6
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	From what I understand from the article is that the Federal Court found that the law was constitutional. The county has no reason to defend the law's constitutionally. LA County will not be able to enforce the law with unannounced inspections but only on prior complaint of its violation with notice? Would you fuck a strange girl without a condom? Sort of common sense and responsibility IMHO.

10-09-2013, 07:36 AM	#7
PornoMonster Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 2,257	Why have Condoms we have Affordable Health Care now... Geeezzz... Just take your Viral Meds... Right??? __________________ $6 a Month 4 Blade Razors, 4 Cartridges, Includes shipping! Domains 4 Sale CashForVideos.com - Pussy.biz - FootPorn.com - SoloMovie.com - CollegeGirlCams.com - AmateurCamGirls.com - PR3 4 Letter Domain

10-09-2013, 07:48 AM	#8
DAMNMAN Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 1,440	If LA County stopped defending the law in appeals court doesn't the other side win the case? Interested in legal perspectives here. __________________ email: zmaster (at) earthlink.net ICQ: 196678616 ZMASTER One less god!!! I contend that we are both an atheist. I just belive in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.

10-09-2013, 08:28 AM	#10
Vapid - BANNED FOR LIFE Barterer Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 4,864	Are we goddamn there yet

10-09-2013, 09:35 AM	#11
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 73,226	I don't understand how this law came to be. I can see the need for it, obviously, but requiring porn stars to wear condoms is one step away from requiring the general public to wear condoms. At least in the porn industry there is testing, which the general public does not have at all. __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

10-09-2013, 10:52 AM	#12
pornlaw Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 1,857	Measure B would even require the general public to wear condoms... even those who are married monogamous couples who cam together and share bodily fluids within Los Angeles County. It does not make a distinction between commercial pornography or amateur camming. __________________ Michael www.AdultBizLaw.com

10-09-2013, 11:13 AM	#14
TRPWL Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: Texas Posts: 73	Great. Let the infections, HIV and all the rest rule! Yea cuz HIV is everywhere in the adult industry LOL.. Does AHF send you you're check or do they use direct deposit? A state and county with no money, why waste it on a non issue??? __________________ http://trpwl.com

10-10-2013, 08:52 AM	#19
LA Crew Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: city of angels Posts: 1,356	The porn industry celebrated a rare victory in a summer of bummers. __________________