-
-
Performers, producers, porn consumers, voters, HIV non-profits or state health regulators, the question is now...Comment
-
Great. Let the infections, HIV and all the rest rule!
Yay people! Now we can fuck and die!!
Awesome news.My Affiliate Programs:
Porn Nerd Cash | Porn Showcase | Aggressive Gold
Over 90 paysites to promote!
Now on Teams: peabodymediaComment
-
From what I understand from the article is that the Federal Court found that the law was constitutional.
The county has no reason to defend the law's constitutionally.
LA County will not be able to enforce the law with unannounced inspections but only on prior complaint of its violation with notice?
Would you fuck a strange girl without a condom? Sort of common sense and responsibility IMHO.Comment
-
Why have Condoms we have Affordable Health Care now... Geeezzz... Just take your Viral Meds... Right???Comment
-
If LA County stopped defending the law in appeals court doesn't the other side win the case?
Interested in legal perspectives here.email: zmaster (at) earthlink.net
ICQ: 196678616
ZMASTER
One less god!!!
I contend that we are both an atheist. I just belive in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.Comment
-
Are we goddamn there yetComment
-
I don't understand how this law came to be. I can see the need for it, obviously, but requiring porn stars to wear condoms is one step away from requiring the general public to wear condoms. At least in the porn industry there is testing, which the general public does not have at all.Herschel Savage
Brooklyn, NYComment
-
Measure B would even require the general public to wear condoms... even those who are married monogamous couples who cam together and share bodily fluids within Los Angeles County. It does not make a distinction between commercial pornography or amateur camming.Comment
-
Great. Let the infections, HIV and all the rest rule!
Yea cuz HIV is everywhere in the adult industry LOL.. Does AHF send you you're check or do they use direct deposit?
A state and county with no money, why waste it on a non issue???Comment
-
The is another way to look at this: Personal responsibility.
If you don't use a condom, have knowledge of your infected status -- you have committed both a crime and a tort.
The subject you raise in aspect of camming is not a legal issue for us -- we are a Dutch corporation with no production operations in LA County. I'll have to defer any statement of policy of ours for now in this matter.
The real intent of the law should be toward performers in multiple partner settings -- 20 or more? The odds of increased risk are a factor in the propagation of these STDs that are resistant to effective treatment.
Realistically, there was never any real threat to amateur webcam performers -- that was just hype. Same as ยง2257's threat to small time secondary producers. Someone prosecuted is either someone as an example (the fear factor) or some big fish (for many reasons). Of course there are real violations with malice and in violation of the underlying legal reasoning and not the prosecutable threat -- that is what we hope the (responsible) bench can differentiate between.
That being said, county health inspectors gunning to find porn producers to fine (or prosecute) cannot be a good thing -- so this outcome is probably a win.Last edited by Barry-xlovecam; 10-09-2013, 11:42 AM.Comment
-
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about thatComment
-
Comment
-
The porn industry celebrated a rare victory in a summer of bummers.
Comment
Comment