US Could Strike Syria Within Hours; Russia Warns Against Attack

[CAHEK]

Let the war games begin

[CAHEK]

Originally Posted by CAHEK

Let the war games begin

[EddyTheDog]

Link?..

I haven't seen anyone commit yet.....

[winter_]

Originally Posted by CAHEK

Let the war games begin

i think this really could go either way. on one hand we will witness a war that could be over in a few weeks but no ground assault and on the other hand there will be a military intervention rather than a decent diplomatic one, that will arguably start world war five.

[SuckOnThis]

McCain, the guy who never saw a war he didnt like.

[CAHEK]

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog

Link?..

I haven't seen anyone commit yet.....

[directfiesta]

one day, your wish will be granted :

war and misery on US soil .... and please , do not call 9/11 a war .

[scuba steve]

haha whether this happens or not, and if it does, it can't really be good for anyone in the world

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by directfiesta

one day, your wish will be granted :

war and misery on US soil .... and please , do not call 9/11 a war .

And you don't think Canada won't get sucked in? If a nuclear bomb goes off in Buffalo or Chicago, you don't think Canada would send troops?

[brassmonkey]

Originally Posted by Rochard

And you don't think Canada won't get sucked in? If a nuclear bomb goes off in Buffalo or Chicago, you don't think Canada would send troops?

you guys that dont have access to a bunker will be dead! nuclear winter

could last months even years

[winter_]

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog

Link?..

I haven't seen anyone commit yet.....

seventy thousand people have already died and it takes the use of chemical weapons and three thousand more for the united states to change their minds and consider intervening.

i really don't think this will be going away, the united states will intervene there should be little question now, this is the plan all along.

[baddog]

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis

McCain, the guy who never saw a war he didnt like.

Except this is Obama we are talking about

Originally Posted by Rochard

And you don't think Canada won't get sucked in? If a nuclear bomb goes off in Buffalo or Chicago, you don't think Canada would send troops?

He is just anti-US; nothing else matters. Besides, he is French-Canadian, identity crisis city with them.

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by baddog

He is just anti-US; nothing else matters. Besides, he is French-Canadian, identity crisis city with them.

The only thing worse than being French is... Being French Canadian. I mean, I love Canadians over all, but I don't get the French Canadians.

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by baddog

Except this is Obama we are talking about



He is just anti-US; nothing else matters. Besides, he is French-Canadian, identity crisis city with them.

Obama and Democrats Have Found a Friend: John McCain

Barack Obama, to hear his advisers tell it, has finally found The One he has been looking for: John McCain.

?We have been looking literally for years for someone we can cut deals with, and finally someone has stepped up,? a White House official said. West Wing aides say they now talk with McCain roughly every other day.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepa...ccain-n1647826

[Mutt]

Originally Posted by directfiesta

one day, your wish will be granted :

war and misery on US soil .... and please , do not call 9/11 a war .

lol - if there were to be a war on US soil Canada would get involved to help its closest ally and neighbor, never mind wars tend to spill over into adjacent countries. of course we know that the proud French Canadians would as always defend their country and allies with courage.

you better get down to Florida and board up your ratty condo before the bombs start dropping.

[baddog]

Originally Posted by Rochard

The only thing worse than being French is... Being French Canadian. I mean, I love Canadians over all, but I don't get the French Canadians.

From what I can figure out, it is all about entitlement. "We want to speak French in an English speaking country, so deal with it. Mandate all signs be in both languages."

[pornmasta]

i bet that nobel price obama could do it...

[globofun]

Originally Posted by Rochard

The only thing worse than being French is... Being French Canadian. I mean, I love Canadians over all, but I don't get the French Canadians.

How about finding yourself a bag or Skittles or a fat cock to suck on?

[femdomdestiny]

http://www.syriantube.net/6476.html

[DWB]

Heart breaking situation. One one hand no one wants more war, because you know it will be another long, drawn out one, and countless people will die. On the other hand, if they are really gassing their people, they need to be stopped ASAP.

I wouldn't want to be the one having to make these calls. You lose either way.

[Emil]

[seeandsee]

And he used chem weapon just to usa attack him, lol

[Barry-xlovecam]

Sounds to me like the "veiled threats" are a bluff. What's next "military parades?"

There are only 100,000 dead in 2 years -- what is the rush?

[winter_]

just blow washington d.c. to damnation, the united states government needs reform and for it to happen the whole establishment needs to be destroyed, just wiped out, just blotted out of existance with a big bomb.

extreme, but i really see nothing changing otherwise without that happening and it will be poetic justice for nagasaki and hiroshima. they could even name the bomb like they did all those years ago and call it bird bitch or something.

[nico-t]

US interfering with yet another country because there's oil in the ground. Surprise surprise.

[winter_]

end all war, destroy the united states government by completely levelling the capital. i think those who should leave will, as in innocent people, leaving all the left and right television pundits, think tank gordons, military and intelligence officers, left and right american politicians, just smash the system, totally devastate this world for the greater good.

washington d.c. shouldn't represent almost any american, either my extreme theory or group up and overthrow in a violent coup, just rush and storm the establishment and overthrow it absolutely.

i think there are many americans who see it this way.

[Choopa_Pardo]

support our Predator Drones

[tony286]

There is no reason for us to go in.

[DWB]

Originally Posted by tony286

There is no reason for us to go in.

This is true. Germany and England have already said they are going and both are able to handle the situation. The US can sit this one out, but they won't, because the Empire must expand and there is oil in them thar Syrian hills.

[bronco67]

Russia just does not look good supporting a government that would gas and commit other atrocities against their own people -- but it would be pretty much par for the course with them.

Honestly, what the fuck are they gonna do about it if we shoot some cruise missiles at Syrian military installations?

[dyna mo]

syria produces less oil than thailand and most of that goes to europe.

how much oil does bosnia produce? usa invaded there too i guess.

[femdomdestiny]

this not about oil (like it was not in Bosnia). It is making region problematic and establishing military presence and taking markets (selling wapons,controlling and using them). Syria is only obstacle before attacking Iran. That's it. When you are mentioning Bosnia, newly created islamic state , read this: http://www.todayszaman.com/news-3189...in-somun-.html Same is with Kosovo, all those are NATO (USA) created muslim states that can be activated anytime , in the middle of the europe.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=2Ffcf6H-WbE

[Grapesoda]

Originally Posted by baddog

From what I can figure out, it is all about entitlement. "We want to speak French in an English speaking country, so deal with it. Mandate all signs be in both languages."

like Spanish here in the US?????

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by femdomdestiny

this not about oil (like it was not in Bosnia). It is making region problematic and establishing military presence and taking markets (selling wapons,controlling and using them). Syria is only obstacle before attacking Iran. That's it. When you are mentioning Bosnia, newly created islamic state , read this: http://www.todayszaman.com/news-3189...in-somun-.html Same is with Kosovo, all those are NATO (USA) created muslim states that can be activated anytime , in the middle of the europe.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=2Ffcf6H-WbE

wait, so there was no genocide in bosnia? that was fake lunar landing shit made up as an excuse to go in there and set it up as nato/usa created muslim state with an on/off button?

jtfc.

[PR_Glen]

its' a good thing that countries aren't run by the children who like to post idiotic solutions and scenarios on message boards..

fear on, your lives will still mean nothing before and after any of this shit...

[femdomdestiny]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

wait, so there was no genocide in bosnia? that was fake lunar landing shit made up as an excuse to go in there and set it up as nato/usa created muslim state with an on/off button?

jtfc.

I will just copy paste wikipedia resources as easiest way to get your attention. First massacre on Markale market: 1

Although the Bosnian-Serbs are widely blamed for the massacre, some international officials have alleged that "the Bosnian government had the most to gain from the massacre." [8] They allege that the Bosnian army shelled its own people to garner Western sympathy and draw NATO into a war with the Serbs.[9]
The Galic Trial Chamber also noted that "Evidence to the effect that ABiH forces attacked their own civilians was adduced at trial. UN representatives stationed in Sarajevo testified that, during the conflict, information had been gathered indicating that elements sympathetic or belonging to the ABiH may have shelled on occasions the Muslim population of Sarajevo. More generally, such elements would have engaged in behaviour objectively putting civilians in ABiH-controlled territory at risk in order to draw international sympathy

Same market same scenario that led to NATO attack:

The former commander of UN Forces in Sarajevo, Russian colonel Andrei Demurenko, asserted that UNPROFOR's research was flawed, as it began from the conclusion that the shells were fired from Bosnian Serb positions and didn't test any other hypothesis; and that he, immediately visiting the supposed mortar locations found that neither of them could be used to fire the shells. He concludes that Bosnian Serb forces were falsely blamed for the attack in order to justify NATO attacks against the Serbs.

Same was done in Racak in Kosovo, and same is done in Syria now, and there are still people that simply accept what was told on news. Crazy and stupid. Especially after brutal lie in Iraq about WMD.

Do you know who refused peace talks in Bosnia and when? Let me save you time: Alija Izetbegovic, Muslim leder (mujaheedin suporter), that first accepted but then rejected peace talks once he came back from USA and got instructions how and what to do and involve NATO. Historical fact.

[CyberHustler]

Originally Posted by directfiesta

one day, your wish will be granted :

war and misery on US soil .... and please , do not call 9/11 a war .

We are a nation armed to the teeth. Our inner cities are full of serial-killing kids without fear who have free access to more guns than the cops. And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

We have cities with higher murder rates than war torn countries, Aint nobody tryin to bring shit over here...

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by femdomdestiny

I will just copy paste wikipedia resources as easiest way to get your attention. First massacre on Markale market: 1

Although the Bosnian-Serbs are widely blamed for the massacre, some international officials have alleged that "the Bosnian government had the most to gain from the massacre." [8] They allege that the Bosnian army shelled its own people to garner Western sympathy and draw NATO into a war with the Serbs.[9]
The Galic Trial Chamber also noted that "Evidence to the effect that ABiH forces attacked their own civilians was adduced at trial. UN representatives stationed in Sarajevo testified that, during the conflict, information had been gathered indicating that elements sympathetic or belonging to the ABiH may have shelled on occasions the Muslim population of Sarajevo. More generally, such elements would have engaged in behaviour objectively putting civilians in ABiH-controlled territory at risk in order to draw international sympathy

Same market same scenario that led to NATO attack:

The former commander of UN Forces in Sarajevo, Russian colonel Andrei Demurenko, asserted that UNPROFOR's research was flawed, as it began from the conclusion that the shells were fired from Bosnian Serb positions and didn't test any other hypothesis; and that he, immediately visiting the supposed mortar locations found that neither of them could be used to fire the shells. He concludes that Bosnian Serb forces were falsely blamed for the attack in order to justify NATO attacks against the Serbs.

Same was done in Racak in Kosovo, and same is done in Syria now, and there are still people that simply accept what was told on news. Crazy and stupid. Especially after brutal lie in Iraq about WMD.

Do you know who refused peace talks in Bosnia and when? Let me save you time: Alija Izetbegovic, Muslim leder (mujaheedin suporter), that first accepted but then rejected peace talks once he came back from USA and got instructions how and what to do and involve NATO. Historical fact.

dodge and deflect,

it's a simple yes or no question, was there genocide in bosnia or was that all made-up murders of muslims all planned by usa/nato to create a muslim state they can turn on at will?

[Tom_PM]

Have we struck yet? I'd be expecting it if I were them. And thanks as usual for the support, Russia. Weird policies there, but lots of vodka.

[femdomdestiny]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

dodge and deflect,

it's a simple yes or no question, was there genocide in bosnia or was that all made-up murders of muslims all planned by usa/nato to create a muslim state they can turn on at will?

It is not dodge and deflect. you can see it like that only if you don't have capability to get more info at the same and make conclusion. This kind of people is easiest to manipulate like it is just happening right now in Syria.

To answer your question and avoid confusion, some people will tell you that there were no genocide and some will say opposite.It depends on what side in war you were. In this moment there is process against general Mladic about Srebrenica that you are probably talking about and it is not finished yet. Is there a need to mention that he is on trial of those that were fighting against him?Will that make difference?

Now, about Muslims there , I hope you will explain me what these guys are doing in the Europe: https://youtube.com/watch?v=vFsfCD4Z_RQ , and that is years before Srebrenica.

I can see you want things simplified and then start with this: "The Kravica attack was a surprise attack against the Bosnian Serb village of Kravica by the Army of Bosnia and Herzegovina (ARBiH) on Orthodox Christmas Day, 7 January 1993. As many as 49 Bosnian Serbs, including civilians, were killed, 80 were injured and property was destroyed on a large scale.[1] The civilian casualties in the village led to allegations by Serbia that Bosniak forces had carried out a massacre, and in 2006 the Bosniak commander, Naser Orić, was put on trial by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) for this and other offences. He was acquitted of the charges relating to the killings, and later acquitted of all charges on appeal. "

that was just one of the first massacres by Muslims ins Srebrenica region., years before Serbs organized and retaliated.

Now,please tell me , were there genocide in Iraq by allies toward people there? We are not talking about several k killed people but about hundred thousands violent deaths.

[Jman]

Originally Posted by Rochard

The only thing worse than being French is... Being French Canadian. I mean, I love Canadians over all, but I don't get the French Canadians.

It's ok, we are use to inferior people/countries NOT getting us

[_Richard_]

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis

McCain, the guy who never saw a war he didnt like.

funny, there was a small scandal of his taking pics with war criminals in syria.. and it wasn't the government

[Phoenix]

you guys poking fun at french canadians should wise up

they are owning your ass in the porn business right now.

[_Richard_]

Originally Posted by Phoenix

you guys poking fun at french canadians should wise up

they are owning your ass in the porn business right now.

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by femdomdestiny

It is not dodge and deflect. you can see it like that only if you don't have capability to get more info at the same and make conclusion. This kind of people is easiest to manipulate like it is just happening right now in Syria.

To answer your question and avoid confusion, some people will tell you that there were no genocide and some will say opposite.It depends on what side in war you were. In this moment there is process against general Mladic about Srebrenica that you are probably talking about and it is not finished yet. Is there a need to mention that he is on trial of those that were fighting against him?Will that make difference?

Now, about Muslims there , I hope you will explain me what these guys are doing in the Europe: https://youtube.com/watch?v=vFsfCD4Z_RQ , and that is years before Srebrenica.

I can see you want things simplified and then start with this: "The Kravica attack was a surprise attack against the Bosnian Serb village of Kravica by the Army of Bosnia and Herzegovina (ARBiH) on Orthodox Christmas Day, 7 January 1993. As many as 49 Bosnian Serbs, including civilians, were killed, 80 were injured and property was destroyed on a large scale.[1] The civilian casualties in the village led to allegations by Serbia that Bosniak forces had carried out a massacre, and in 2006 the Bosniak commander, Naser Orić, was put on trial by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) for this and other offences. He was acquitted of the charges relating to the killings, and later acquitted of all charges on appeal. "

that was just one of the first massacres by Muslims ins Srebrenica region., years before Serbs organized and retaliated.

Now,please tell me , were there genocide in Iraq by allies toward people there? We are not talking about several k killed people but about hundred thousands violent deaths.

yes, i get it, the problem is that i am a simpleton, if only i got it right, then you would be right and the usa is pure evil.

regardless of whether i can't get your fantasyland war views, you made the comment below, so let's try and stick to that and not about my simple-mindedness.

again, in your complicated fantasy, usa created a muslim puppet state with an on/off switch in europe after faking a bunch of genocide.

Originally Posted by femdomdestiny

this not about oil (like it was not in Bosnia). It is making region problematic and establishing military presence and taking markets (selling wapons,controlling and using them). Syria is only obstacle before attacking Iran. That's it. When you are mentioning Bosnia, newly created islamic state , read this: http://www.todayszaman.com/news-3189...in-somun-.html Same is with Kosovo, all those are NATO (USA) created muslim states that can be activated anytime , in the middle of the europe.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=2Ffcf6H-WbE

[baddog]

Originally Posted by Grapesoda

like Spanish here in the US?????

Not even close to the same

[winter_]

the president of the united states is contradicting himself when he wants to negotiate with iran but orchestrate the violent overthrow of all the other countries surrounding it. please don't tell me that arab spring or muslim revolt, egypt, libya, mali... wasn't all the action in the bigger scheme of things for total world domination by world police america.

you know what my country will probably be the very few in the world without a united states base of any kind, except just an embassy or a consulate that is so wide open to attack it is laughable.

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by winter_

the president of the united states is contradicting himself when he wants to negotiate with iran but orchestrate the violent overthrow of all the other countries surrounding it. please don't tell me that arab spring or muslim revolt, egypt, libya, mali... wasn't all the action in the bigger scheme of things for total world domination by world police america.

you know what my country will probably be the very few in the world without a united states base of any kind, except just an embassy or a consulate that is so wide open to attack it is laughable.

you can thank chelsea manning for each and every arab spring, they all lead back to the intel he revealed being the catalyst for them all.

so what you are saying then, is by design, the usa had manning steal sensitive data, leak all that to wiki leaks, knowing full well that would lead to arab uprisings in several countries, all the countries we need it to, all so we can police those countries.


got it.

[Phoenix]

dont click this link without warning.
it is a father screaming for his two dead daughters to wake up.

i erased the link..trust me it is horrible

i dont know what the hell is going on over there.
i just am saddened by it all, im glad i am not involved and would need to make a decision
safe for us to argue here on a message board.
Some kids we know will probably have to go there and do horrible things, or see their best friend blown up.
What the world really needs is some unifying event to end this bullshit money/power/religion issue going on. Reagan was onto something.

[femdomdestiny]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

yes, i get it, the problem is that i am a simpleton, if only i got it right, then you would be right and the usa is pure evil.

regardless of whether i can't get your fantasyland war views, you made the comment below, so let's try and stick to that and not about my simple-mindedness.

again, in your complicated fantasy, usa created a muslim puppet state with an on/off switch in europe after faking a bunch of genocide.

you are simply not having enough info about things happening since it is far away from you. No one is stupid enough to understand them once they are presented. I can ask you at least 10 questions here and now that are relevant and crucial for theme we are talking about, and I can bet you don't know answer to any of them if you don't consult SE. And yet, you are making simplified decisions. ...anyway, can you answer to questions about Iraq? ( I did for Bosnia when you asked). thank you.