Question for the SEO guys - GoFuckYourself.com

newB · 06-15-2013, 09:10 AM

So, with the latest panda update or whatever it was, my site has taken a hit and I've been cleaning up my backlinks, which got me thinking.

Suppose you have a lot of backlinks pointing to www YOURDOMAIN but you have canonical links set to just YOURDOMAIN (without the www) Since the two are perceived by the search engines as being distinctly separate, does the www version pass PR/linkjuice to the canonical version?

If so, wouldn't it make sense to adjust your linkbuilding accordingly?

nexcom28 · 06-15-2013, 09:39 AM

Well in my opinion you shouldn't concentrate on link building.

Matt Cutts says that SEOs spend too much time concentrating on building links for the search engines instead of surfers.
He recommends concentrating on building your audience through social media instead.

suesheboy · 06-15-2013, 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by newB

Suppose you have a lot of backlinks pointing to www YOURDOMAIN but you have canonical links set to just YOURDOMAIN (without the www) Since the two are perceived by the search engines as being distinctly separate, does the www version pass PR/linkjuice to the canonical version?

It should not make a difference anymore but I have always put in the WWW and have htaccess rewrite to www anyhow.

Hope that helps

newB · 06-16-2013, 09:45 AM

I guess I need to clarify the question:
Do inbound links pointing to the non-canonical version of a page pass PR/linkjuice to the canonical version?

Zeiss · 06-16-2013, 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by newB

I guess I need to clarify the question:
Do inbound links pointing to the non-canonical version of a page pass PR/linkjuice to the canonical version?

Think of it as 301 redirect. Got your answer now?

suesheboy · 06-16-2013, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zealotry

Think of it as 301 redirect. Got your answer now?

I would not say that.

Google says that they take conical as a suggestion and don't always follow it. I would not take the chance that it would pass all juice.

newB · 06-16-2013, 11:37 AM

Found a video with Matt Cutts discussing it - the correct answer, at least for the time being, is 'yes'.

Zeiss · 06-16-2013, 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suesheboy

I would not say that.

Google says that they take conical as a suggestion and don't always follow it. I would not take the chance that it would pass all juice.

We're talking generic redirect to either www or non-www here. Not what the difference between 301 redirect and rel-canonical is. You would use the latter when the first is not possible.

icymelon · 06-16-2013, 01:03 PM

you need link diversity. Looks more like PR quality and related content is working better and better.

simoviciflorin · 01-03-2014, 09:26 AM

so untill you will not put a permanent redirect in your google webmastertools the version without www will be a "clean" version. u can start with a website from 0 with that. i made this thing 1 year ago whit one ofg mi sites...he went down in serp but after 4-5 moths he turned to do some good traffic..whitout linkbuilding

simoviciflorin · 01-03-2014, 09:27 AM

to be more explicit.. in the original version i was making something around 20k of traffic..even more..in the new version i am making 5-6k now.

FlowerKid · 01-03-2014, 12:35 PM

Fuck the Google

VinceRuth · 01-03-2014, 04:40 PM

You need backlinks diversity.Good luck.

06-15-2013, 09:10 AM	#1
newB Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Somewhere between reality and total ape-shit bonkers. Posts: 2,870	Question for the SEO guys So, with the latest panda update or whatever it was, my site has taken a hit and I've been cleaning up my backlinks, which got me thinking. Suppose you have a lot of backlinks pointing to www YOURDOMAIN but you have canonical links set to just YOURDOMAIN (without the www) Since the two are perceived by the search engines as being distinctly separate, does the www version pass PR/linkjuice to the canonical version? If so, wouldn't it make sense to adjust your linkbuilding accordingly? __________________ The best Adult Affiliate Programs reviewed and indexed by niche and feature. Easily find the sponsors that suit your needs. Last edited by newB; 06-15-2013 at 09:11 AM..

06-16-2013, 09:45 AM	#4
newB Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Somewhere between reality and total ape-shit bonkers. Posts: 2,870	I guess I need to clarify the question: Do inbound links pointing to the non-canonical version of a page pass PR/linkjuice to the canonical version? __________________ The best Adult Affiliate Programs reviewed and indexed by niche and feature. Easily find the sponsors that suit your needs.

06-16-2013, 11:37 AM	#7
newB Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Somewhere between reality and total ape-shit bonkers. Posts: 2,870	Found a video with Matt Cutts discussing it - the correct answer, at least for the time being, is 'yes'. __________________ The best Adult Affiliate Programs reviewed and indexed by niche and feature. Easily find the sponsors that suit your needs.

06-16-2013, 01:03 PM	#9
icymelon Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Las Vegas Posts: 3,220	you need link diversity. Looks more like PR quality and related content is working better and better. __________________ Network Of Adult Blogs With Hardlink Rentals Available

01-03-2014, 09:26 AM	#10
simoviciflorin Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Romania Posts: 30	so untill you will not put a permanent redirect in your google webmastertools the version without www will be a "clean" version. u can start with a website from 0 with that. i made this thing 1 year ago whit one ofg mi sites...he went down in serp but after 4-5 moths he turned to do some good traffic..whitout linkbuilding __________________ Skype: Simoviciflorin Telegram: SimoviciFlorin TrafficManager.com - Affiliate Tracking Platform for Affiliate Programs and Affiliate Networks

06-15-2013, 09:39 AM	#2
nexcom28 So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 3,716	Well in my opinion you shouldn't concentrate on link building. Matt Cutts says that SEOs spend too much time concentrating on building links for the search engines instead of surfers. He recommends concentrating on building your audience through social media instead.

01-03-2014, 09:27 AM	#11
simoviciflorin Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Romania Posts: 30	to be more explicit.. in the original version i was making something around 20k of traffic..even more..in the new version i am making 5-6k now. __________________ Skype: Simoviciflorin Telegram: SimoviciFlorin TrafficManager.com - Affiliate Tracking Platform for Affiliate Programs and Affiliate Networks

01-03-2014, 12:35 PM	#12
FlowerKid Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Zurich Posts: 1,045	Fuck the Google __________________

01-03-2014, 04:40 PM	#13
VinceRuth Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2013 Posts: 789	You need backlinks diversity.Good luck. __________________ Sex Xxx Free Porn Pictures Free