So Snowden lied about pretty much eveything? - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

mikesouth · 06-13-2013, 01:29 PM

Oh and of course they will discredit him...I mean look what they did to Bin Laden on the porn angle nobody with half a brain bought that

but theres LOTS of Americans with less than half a brain...and most of em listen to sean Hannity

dyna mo · 06-13-2013, 01:41 PM

i think it's a generational thing too, i brought this up with my ~70 year old mom and it was entirely a non-issue in her eyes. she's not dumb per se, but i think has more of a patriotic view? maybe. something from growing up in her generation that creates an entirely different viewpoint. i figured she prolly represents most senior citizens on something like this.

PhoneSexKing · 06-13-2013, 05:25 PM

Interesting. There is definately a generation gap at play here.

I once had an elderly bank teller tell me that she was glad that the naked body scanners existed and that the governments spy on the phones/internet because it would keep her grandkids safe from terrorists that sew C4 under their skin - no joke.

I couldn't help but just laugh at her and she started screaming at me about terrorists. Her supervisor watched from a distance.

Mutt · 06-13-2013, 06:09 PM

the only certainty is that we will never know the full story, that's the state of the world. the best you can do is read and listen, consider the sources and the circumstances and decide for yourself knowing and accepting you may be wrong. conspiracy kooks aren't interested in the truth, they are interested in conspiracies only.

conspiracy kooks and people in general give government agencies and politicians way too much credit - they're incapable of putting together most of what they're accused of, often what looks like conspiracies, things that don't look right or add up is just pure ineptitude and incompetence inside government agencies.

PhoneSexKing · 06-13-2013, 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt

pure ineptitude and incompetence inside government agencies

Or that's just what they want you to think... *evil dog eyes*

Dcat · 06-13-2013, 06:24 PM

Some VERY good points raised by former NSA telling it like it is..

The Future of the NSA

Jim Stone, June 10 2013, updated June 11

Forget the B.S. stories about Snowden, there is only ONE that applies and you will not hear about it in the press, which has protected the NSA with a great big white wash. Snowden worked out at Kunia. He had an extensive training program he had to go through before being allowed in. He HAD TO have been 99th percentile, the story about high school drop out is B.S, and so is the rest of the washing of his background. After hearing his conscience out at Kunia, he left Hawaii, defected, and told the truth.

There is also a rumor that Snowden worked for a contractor for $122,000 a year. I doubt that seriously because the NSA is so secretive it is extremely wary of contractors, and during my time with the NSA, I saw only 2 people EVER that were contractors, and they were never out on the operations floor. So yeah, I buy $122,000 a year, but NOT with a contractor. People who get to see enough to reveal what Snowden did have million dollar background checks, involving interviews with practically everyone in their past, and the interviewers do not identify themselves, they just talk as friends over a beer or whatever. So no one knows when they are being asked questions about someone the NSA intends to hire. These background checks take a year or so to complete and contractors can't afford to do that, the FED does. What Snowden revealed proves through emperical evidence that he was not employed by a contractor, he was just straight up NSA. The entire High School drop out story is pure B.S., because if during one of these checks any of the secret questioners comes up with even a little whiff of something wrong with your past, YOU ARE OUT.

Unlike the CIA, which has over a million spooks, the NSA is so secretive that very few people break the barrier to entry, which limits the size of the NSA to below 50,000 people total, a majority of which are highly talented super geeks. The expense of the background investigations alone seriously limits the number of people the NSA can hire.
Don't expect anything that is now claimed to be said by Snowden as actually coming from him. They are whitewashing this as fast as possible, while making false posts and statements to the web and media that claim to be from him. By now he has been replaced with the public image of someone else. For starters, it is ERIC SNOWDEN, not EDWARD as we are now told and this subtle name change will be used to deflect meaningful search into his past.

My own experience in the NSA is enough to prove what little I have said about Snowden to be true. There is ONE OPTION - Snowden was BRILLIANT, had extensive back ground searches done on him, went through a very difficult school, got assigned to Kunia where he lived in the same location as many other NSA people who have families do, drove to Kunia daily, and finally could not take what he was seeing there anymore and ratted them out. THAT IS THE ONLY STORY. Snowden did not have a girlfriend. He had a wife, and any reference to him "leaving his girlfriend behind" is another lie. You cannot live where Snowden did and have a "girlfriend", the NSA will not put you in the premium government family housing in Waipahu for only a "girlfriend". Furthermore, stories about the house being sold now are B.S., because Snowden was in government housing the same as all lower level NSA people are given. Unless you are an outside contractor (and those are very few in number), The NSA does not leave it's people to run with the general public, they all get assigned a living area where like minded people are. And from these few mistakes the press made, we can assume that the entire background they are presenting on Snowden is a lie. The house he was in was never owned by him and DID NOT get sold.

To see a long list of B.S. my own experience proves to be lies, just google "where snowden lived"

Furthermore, the "leaked documents from anonymous" are PURE B.S. and are all readily available public documents. I see this as an attempt to muddy the waters with regard to Snowden's legitimate leak.

Watch for story creep in the mainstream and portions of the alternative press regarding what I have said here, since I am former NSA telling it like it is I have noticed that the story keeps getting regular tweaks to counteract what I say here, the latest being "it was his girlfriend's house". Don't buy into the tweaks, what is above is a truthfully rational assessment of HOW IT HAD TO BE, from someone who simply knows how things are. Granted, when I was with the NSA they were not spying on Americans, but their procedures and methods were anchored in stone and for what I have said above to not weigh out now would mean something massive regarding hiring policy, housing policy, contractor policy and other things changed there, which I doubt, especially if this is the first big leak and Kunia is still misrepresented on Google maps, with the real entry obscured by a cloud.

continued ..lots more here

zipppy · 06-13-2013, 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

They seem to focusing on Hawaii and when he left - and why. Seems his landlord was kicking him out and wanted him out by the 1st.

Obfuscation and Deflection. It's built into the Booz twitter troll bots why not use it in this case?

Captain Kawaii · 06-13-2013, 08:26 PM

Thanks for the post. Interesting website. Forum has a few bombs in it too.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dcat

Some VERY good points raised by former NSA telling it like it is..

The Future of the NSA

Jim Stone, June 10 2013, updated June 11

Forget the B.S. stories about Snowden, there is only ONE that applies and you will not hear about it in the press, which has protected the NSA with a great big white wash. Snowden worked out at Kunia. He had an extensive training program he had to go through before being allowed in. He HAD TO have been 99th percentile, the story about high school drop out is B.S, and so is the rest of the washing of his background. After hearing his conscience out at Kunia, he left Hawaii, defected, and told the truth.

There is also a rumor that Snowden worked for a contractor for $122,000 a year. I doubt that seriously because the NSA is so secretive it is extremely wary of contractors, and during my time with the NSA, I saw only 2 people EVER that were contractors, and they were never out on the operations floor. So yeah, I buy $122,000 a year, but NOT with a contractor. People who get to see enough to reveal what Snowden did have million dollar background checks, involving interviews with practically everyone in their past, and the interviewers do not identify themselves, they just talk as friends over a beer or whatever. So no one knows when they are being asked questions about someone the NSA intends to hire. These background checks take a year or so to complete and contractors can't afford to do that, the FED does. What Snowden revealed proves through emperical evidence that he was not employed by a contractor, he was just straight up NSA. The entire High School drop out story is pure B.S., because if during one of these checks any of the secret questioners comes up with even a little whiff of something wrong with your past, YOU ARE OUT.

Unlike the CIA, which has over a million spooks, the NSA is so secretive that very few people break the barrier to entry, which limits the size of the NSA to below 50,000 people total, a majority of which are highly talented super geeks. The expense of the background investigations alone seriously limits the number of people the NSA can hire.
Don't expect anything that is now claimed to be said by Snowden as actually coming from him. They are whitewashing this as fast as possible, while making false posts and statements to the web and media that claim to be from him. By now he has been replaced with the public image of someone else. For starters, it is ERIC SNOWDEN, not EDWARD as we are now told and this subtle name change will be used to deflect meaningful search into his past.

My own experience in the NSA is enough to prove what little I have said about Snowden to be true. There is ONE OPTION - Snowden was BRILLIANT, had extensive back ground searches done on him, went through a very difficult school, got assigned to Kunia where he lived in the same location as many other NSA people who have families do, drove to Kunia daily, and finally could not take what he was seeing there anymore and ratted them out. THAT IS THE ONLY STORY. Snowden did not have a girlfriend. He had a wife, and any reference to him "leaving his girlfriend behind" is another lie. You cannot live where Snowden did and have a "girlfriend", the NSA will not put you in the premium government family housing in Waipahu for only a "girlfriend". Furthermore, stories about the house being sold now are B.S., because Snowden was in government housing the same as all lower level NSA people are given. Unless you are an outside contractor (and those are very few in number), The NSA does not leave it's people to run with the general public, they all get assigned a living area where like minded people are. And from these few mistakes the press made, we can assume that the entire background they are presenting on Snowden is a lie. The house he was in was never owned by him and DID NOT get sold.

To see a long list of B.S. my own experience proves to be lies, just google "where snowden lived"

Furthermore, the "leaked documents from anonymous" are PURE B.S. and are all readily available public documents. I see this as an attempt to muddy the waters with regard to Snowden's legitimate leak.

Watch for story creep in the mainstream and portions of the alternative press regarding what I have said here, since I am former NSA telling it like it is I have noticed that the story keeps getting regular tweaks to counteract what I say here, the latest being "it was his girlfriend's house". Don't buy into the tweaks, what is above is a truthfully rational assessment of HOW IT HAD TO BE, from someone who simply knows how things are. Granted, when I was with the NSA they were not spying on Americans, but their procedures and methods were anchored in stone and for what I have said above to not weigh out now would mean something massive regarding hiring policy, housing policy, contractor policy and other things changed there, which I doubt, especially if this is the first big leak and Kunia is still misrepresented on Google maps, with the real entry obscured by a cloud.

continued ..lots more here

epitome · 06-13-2013, 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dcat

Some VERY good points raised by former NSA telling it like it is..

The Future of the NSA

Jim Stone, June 10 2013, updated June 11

Forget the B.S. stories about Snowden, there is only ONE that applies and you will not hear about it in the press, which has protected the NSA with a great big white wash. Snowden worked out at Kunia. He had an extensive training program he had to go through before being allowed in. He HAD TO have been 99th percentile, the story about high school drop out is B.S, and so is the rest of the washing of his background. After hearing his conscience out at Kunia, he left Hawaii, defected, and told the truth.

There is also a rumor that Snowden worked for a contractor for $122,000 a year. I doubt that seriously because the NSA is so secretive it is extremely wary of contractors, and during my time with the NSA, I saw only 2 people EVER that were contractors, and they were never out on the operations floor. So yeah, I buy $122,000 a year, but NOT with a contractor. People who get to see enough to reveal what Snowden did have million dollar background checks, involving interviews with practically everyone in their past, and the interviewers do not identify themselves, they just talk as friends over a beer or whatever. So no one knows when they are being asked questions about someone the NSA intends to hire. These background checks take a year or so to complete and contractors can't afford to do that, the FED does. What Snowden revealed proves through emperical evidence that he was not employed by a contractor, he was just straight up NSA. The entire High School drop out story is pure B.S., because if during one of these checks any of the secret questioners comes up with even a little whiff of something wrong with your past, YOU ARE OUT.

Unlike the CIA, which has over a million spooks, the NSA is so secretive that very few people break the barrier to entry, which limits the size of the NSA to below 50,000 people total, a majority of which are highly talented super geeks. The expense of the background investigations alone seriously limits the number of people the NSA can hire.
Don't expect anything that is now claimed to be said by Snowden as actually coming from him. They are whitewashing this as fast as possible, while making false posts and statements to the web and media that claim to be from him. By now he has been replaced with the public image of someone else. For starters, it is ERIC SNOWDEN, not EDWARD as we are now told and this subtle name change will be used to deflect meaningful search into his past.

My own experience in the NSA is enough to prove what little I have said about Snowden to be true. There is ONE OPTION - Snowden was BRILLIANT, had extensive back ground searches done on him, went through a very difficult school, got assigned to Kunia where he lived in the same location as many other NSA people who have families do, drove to Kunia daily, and finally could not take what he was seeing there anymore and ratted them out. THAT IS THE ONLY STORY. Snowden did not have a girlfriend. He had a wife, and any reference to him "leaving his girlfriend behind" is another lie. You cannot live where Snowden did and have a "girlfriend", the NSA will not put you in the premium government family housing in Waipahu for only a "girlfriend". Furthermore, stories about the house being sold now are B.S., because Snowden was in government housing the same as all lower level NSA people are given. Unless you are an outside contractor (and those are very few in number), The NSA does not leave it's people to run with the general public, they all get assigned a living area where like minded people are. And from these few mistakes the press made, we can assume that the entire background they are presenting on Snowden is a lie. The house he was in was never owned by him and DID NOT get sold.

To see a long list of B.S. my own experience proves to be lies, just google "where snowden lived"

Furthermore, the "leaked documents from anonymous" are PURE B.S. and are all readily available public documents. I see this as an attempt to muddy the waters with regard to Snowden's legitimate leak.

Watch for story creep in the mainstream and portions of the alternative press regarding what I have said here, since I am former NSA telling it like it is I have noticed that the story keeps getting regular tweaks to counteract what I say here, the latest being "it was his girlfriend's house". Don't buy into the tweaks, what is above is a truthfully rational assessment of HOW IT HAD TO BE, from someone who simply knows how things are. Granted, when I was with the NSA they were not spying on Americans, but their procedures and methods were anchored in stone and for what I have said above to not weigh out now would mean something massive regarding hiring policy, housing policy, contractor policy and other things changed there, which I doubt, especially if this is the first big leak and Kunia is still misrepresented on Google maps, with the real entry obscured by a cloud.

continued ..lots more here

I know firsthand that half of what this guy says is fantasy bullshit. I'm sure there are plenty of people that believe it though.

Mutt · 06-13-2013, 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dcat

Some VERY good points raised by former NSA telling it like it is..

The Future of the NSA

Jim Stone, June 10 2013, updated June 11

Forget the B.S. stories about Snowden, there is only ONE that applies and you will not hear about it in the press, which has protected the NSA with a great big white wash. Snowden worked out at Kunia. He had an extensive training program he had to go through before being allowed in. He HAD TO have been 99th percentile, the story about high school drop out is B.S, and so is the rest of the washing of his background. After hearing his conscience out at Kunia, he left Hawaii, defected, and told the truth.

There is also a rumor that Snowden worked for a contractor for $122,000 a year. I doubt that seriously because the NSA is so secretive it is extremely wary of contractors, and during my time with the NSA, I saw only 2 people EVER that were contractors, and they were never out on the operations floor. So yeah, I buy $122,000 a year, but NOT with a contractor. People who get to see enough to reveal what Snowden did have million dollar background checks, involving interviews with practically everyone in their past, and the interviewers do not identify themselves, they just talk as friends over a beer or whatever. So no one knows when they are being asked questions about someone the NSA intends to hire. These background checks take a year or so to complete and contractors can't afford to do that, the FED does. What Snowden revealed proves through emperical evidence that he was not employed by a contractor, he was just straight up NSA. The entire High School drop out story is pure B.S., because if during one of these checks any of the secret questioners comes up with even a little whiff of something wrong with your past, YOU ARE OUT.

Unlike the CIA, which has over a million spooks, the NSA is so secretive that very few people break the barrier to entry, which limits the size of the NSA to below 50,000 people total, a majority of which are highly talented super geeks. The expense of the background investigations alone seriously limits the number of people the NSA can hire.
Don't expect anything that is now claimed to be said by Snowden as actually coming from him. They are whitewashing this as fast as possible, while making false posts and statements to the web and media that claim to be from him. By now he has been replaced with the public image of someone else. For starters, it is ERIC SNOWDEN, not EDWARD as we are now told and this subtle name change will be used to deflect meaningful search into his past.

My own experience in the NSA is enough to prove what little I have said about Snowden to be true. There is ONE OPTION - Snowden was BRILLIANT, had extensive back ground searches done on him, went through a very difficult school, got assigned to Kunia where he lived in the same location as many other NSA people who have families do, drove to Kunia daily, and finally could not take what he was seeing there anymore and ratted them out. THAT IS THE ONLY STORY. Snowden did not have a girlfriend. He had a wife, and any reference to him "leaving his girlfriend behind" is another lie. You cannot live where Snowden did and have a "girlfriend", the NSA will not put you in the premium government family housing in Waipahu for only a "girlfriend". Furthermore, stories about the house being sold now are B.S., because Snowden was in government housing the same as all lower level NSA people are given. Unless you are an outside contractor (and those are very few in number), The NSA does not leave it's people to run with the general public, they all get assigned a living area where like minded people are. And from these few mistakes the press made, we can assume that the entire background they are presenting on Snowden is a lie. The house he was in was never owned by him and DID NOT get sold.

To see a long list of B.S. my own experience proves to be lies, just google "where snowden lived"

Furthermore, the "leaked documents from anonymous" are PURE B.S. and are all readily available public documents. I see this as an attempt to muddy the waters with regard to Snowden's legitimate leak.

Watch for story creep in the mainstream and portions of the alternative press regarding what I have said here, since I am former NSA telling it like it is I have noticed that the story keeps getting regular tweaks to counteract what I say here, the latest being "it was his girlfriend's house". Don't buy into the tweaks, what is above is a truthfully rational assessment of HOW IT HAD TO BE, from someone who simply knows how things are. Granted, when I was with the NSA they were not spying on Americans, but their procedures and methods were anchored in stone and for what I have said above to not weigh out now would mean something massive regarding hiring policy, housing policy, contractor policy and other things changed there, which I doubt, especially if this is the first big leak and Kunia is still misrepresented on Google maps, with the real entry obscured by a cloud.

continued ..lots more here

This guy writes/sounds like a kook. He uncategorically asserts that the high school dropout story is BS and he has to have had a college degree. Um........so why hasn't this guy or anybody from any college popped up and said 'I went to (name of school) with Eric Snowdown'?

Rochard · 06-13-2013, 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

i think it's a generational thing too, i brought this up with my ~70 year old mom and it was entirely a non-issue in her eyes. she's not dumb per se, but i think has more of a patriotic view? maybe. something from growing up in her generation that creates an entirely different viewpoint. i figured she prolly represents most senior citizens on something like this.

Your mother was born during WWII, and grew up in the 1950s. This was when our "greatest generation" - meaning our military - came back from war, went to work, and built the nation into what it was. She grew up in a society that has a lot of respect for the military, and also the government.

I just don't fear our government. I don't live in fear of the local police blowing down my door in the near future and hassling me for no reason. I'm 44 years old; They've never hassled me before. I don't care if the government knows where I eat every night for the past six years...

As for Snowden... So far the only laws that have been broken were by him, so that take for what's worth.

Rochard · 06-13-2013, 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dcat

He had an extensive training program he had to go through before being allowed in. He HAD TO have been 99th percentile, the story about high school drop out is B.S, and so is the rest of the washing of his background. After hearing his conscience out at Kunia, he left Hawaii, defected, and told the truth.

Just because someone didn't go to high school or graduate from college doesn't make them stupid. I didn't graduate from high school myself (although I did get my GED and eventually go on to college).

Verifying graduations from high school or colleges is really easy to do, and I am guessing even the NSA cannot locate and destroy hundreds of high school year books.... Someone would have come forward by now and said "this isn't true".

PhoneSexKing · 06-13-2013, 09:54 PM

I'll just put this here...

http://www.itwire.com/it-policy-news...prism-facility

Sunny Day · 06-13-2013, 10:42 PM

Read the book "The Falcon and the Snowman" (it's also a movie). At 21 Christopher Boyce was hired by TRW and had the highest security clearance there is. Couple of years later he becomes a Soviet spy. Sentenced to federal prison for 40 years he managed to escape.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Boyce

dyna mo · 06-13-2013, 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome

I know firsthand that half of what this guy says is fantasy bullshit. I'm sure there are plenty of people that believe it though.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt

This guy writes/sounds like a kook. He uncategorically asserts that the high school dropout story is BS and he has to have had a college degree. Um........so why hasn't this guy or anybody from any college popped up and said 'I went to (name of school) with Eric Snowdown'?

moreover, he says categorically that the nsa is afraid of contract labor. it's well-documented they spend 80% of their budget on contract labor.

that fully discounts his view imo.

dyna mo · 06-13-2013, 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PhoneSexKing

I'll just put this here...

http://www.itwire.com/it-policy-news...prism-facility

canada too eh.

Captain Kawaii · 06-14-2013, 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Your mother was born during WWII, and grew up in the 1950s. This was when our "greatest generation" - meaning our military - came back from war, went to work, and built the nation into what it was. She grew up in a society that has a lot of respect for the military, and also the government.

I just don't fear our government. I don't live in fear of the local police blowing down my door in the near future and hassling me for no reason. I'm 44 years old; They've never hassled me before. I don't care if the government knows where I eat every night for the past six years...

As for Snowden... So far the only laws that have been broken were by him, so that take for what's worth.

Say you have the xbox, the roku and the plasma going. Your wife comes in and tells you your daughter became a woman today and started her first period. A minute later ads start popping up for feminine hygiene products on various devices...will you be scared then?

Captain Kawaii · 06-14-2013, 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

moreover, he says categorically that the nsa is afraid of contract labor. it's well-documented they spend 80% of their budget on contract labor.

that fully discounts his view imo.

There are dozens of agencies that work under the NSA. Bush admitted he did not know all of them. Just sayin.

Show the documentation for the NSA budget. This I gotta see.

Captain Kawaii · 06-14-2013, 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PhoneSexKing

I'll just put this here...

http://www.itwire.com/it-policy-news...prism-facility

That does not exist...

xenigo · 06-14-2013, 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arock10

That's the thing.... its NOT illegal, that's the surprising part

It's a violation of the 4th Amendment, making it unconstitutional. Warrantless surveillance is illegal.

The NSA doesn't have the largest datacenter in the world for harvesting only phone metadata. Do you know how small phone metadata is? It's tiny. It's nothing.

They have it for harvesting everything we're doing online.

And if it was something "the people" agreed with, it wouldn't be something they want to hide from "the people".

RummyBoy · 06-14-2013, 05:05 AM

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-0...-on-china.html

They want to find out if he has a china tie:

http://rlv.zcache.com.au/chinese_sym...0en71g_216.jpg

dyna mo · 06-14-2013, 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Kawaii

There are dozens of agencies that work under the NSA. Bush admitted he did not know all of them. Just sayin.

Show the documentation for the NSA budget. This I gotta see.

what is it you want me to provide you here?

Rochard · 06-14-2013, 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Kawaii

Say you have the xbox, the roku and the plasma going. Your wife comes in and tells you your daughter became a woman today and started her first period. A minute later ads start popping up for feminine hygiene products on various devices...will you be scared then?

But that's already happening. The Internet has figured out that I owned a Jaguar and went to Hawaii. What the Internet hasn't figured out is that I sold the Jaguar, bought a new Jeep, and I'm looking to go to Italy.

Rochard · 06-14-2013, 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xenigo

It's a violation of the 4th Amendment, making it unconstitutional. Warrantless surveillance is illegal.

But that's just it - Snowden hasn't said the US Government is doing warrantless surveillance on US citizens. What he has said is....

The N.S.A. has built an infrastructure that allows it to intercept almost everything. With this capability, the vast majority of human communications are automatically ingested without targeting. If I wanted to see your e-mails or your wife?s phone, all I have to do is use intercepts. I can get your e-mails, passwords, phone records, credit cards.

Well, yes. In order to access that information, you have to have a warrant. Snowden claims he could "do this from his desk". Well, maybe he could. At the end of the line, when a warrant is issued, someone has to have the ability to pull this information or data - but only in the event that a warrant has been issued.

If the US Government is getting such data we might have a huge issue. Then again, we might not - anyone can buy some of this data from customers.

Rochard · 06-14-2013, 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Kawaii

Show the documentation for the NSA budget. This I gotta see.

It's estimated to be $10 billion a year. However, it's entirely possible it's twenty times that and hidden from the public.... We just don't know.

mikesouth · 06-14-2013, 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sunny Day

Read the book "The Falcon and the Snowman" (it's also a movie). At 21 Christopher Boyce was hired by TRW and had the highest security clearance there is. Couple of years later he becomes a Soviet spy. Sentenced to federal prison for 40 years he managed to escape.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Boyce

Thats actually a pretty good book (dreadful movie though) and I have a direct connection. Boyce was a customer contact for TRW when I worked as an analyst for a company called Chromatics here in Atlanta. I spoke with him many times before that whole thing went down also spoke with Andrew Lee.

small world I reckon....

tony286 · 06-14-2013, 08:44 AM

its not blowing a whistle when they have been doing since 1975 and you can find it in a simple google search. Back then it was telegrams also.

In the fall of 1975, when a Senate select committee chaired by Frank Church and a House committee chaired by Otis Pike were investigating abuses of power by the CIA and FBI, Congresswoman Bella Abzug, the loaded pistol from New York (she had introduced a resolution to impeach Richard Nixon on her first day in office in 1971) dared turned her own House Subcommittee on Government Information and Individual Rights to a new subject: the National Security Agency, and two twin government surveillance projects she had learned about codenamed ?SHAMROCK? and ?MINARET.? They had monitored both the phone calls and telegrams of American citizens for decades.
http://www.thenation.com/blog/174722...#axzz2WCq1iTqc
Read more: The NSA Doppelganger | The Nation http://www.thenation.com/blog/174722...#ixzz2WCq6is6y
Follow us: @thenation on Twitter | TheNationMagazine on Facebook

dyna mo · 06-14-2013, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286

its not blowing a whistle when they have been doing since 1975 and you can find it in a simple google search. Back then it was telegrams also.

In the fall of 1975, when a Senate select committee chaired by Frank Church and a House committee chaired by Otis Pike were investigating abuses of power by the CIA and FBI, Congresswoman Bella Abzug, the loaded pistol from New York (she had introduced a resolution to impeach Richard Nixon on her first day in office in 1971) dared turned her own House Subcommittee on Government Information and Individual Rights to a new subject: the National Security Agency, and two twin government surveillance projects she had learned about codenamed ?SHAMROCK? and ?MINARET.? They had monitored both the phone calls and telegrams of American citizens for decades.
http://www.thenation.com/blog/174722...#axzz2WCq1iTqc
Read more: The NSA Doppelganger | The Nation http://www.thenation.com/blog/174722...#ixzz2WCq6is6y
Follow us: @thenation on Twitter | TheNationMagazine on Facebook

you are arguing semantics why?

so we should all just walk away from this because it's been going on? that's the logic here?

tony286 · 06-14-2013, 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

you are arguing semantics why?

so we should all just walk away from this because it's been going on? that's the logic here?

I arguing nothing , my point is this isnt new and it isnt going to change. As long as there are nukes in the world.

dyna mo · 06-14-2013, 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286

I arguing nothing , my point is this isnt new and it isnt going to change. As long as there are nukes in the world.

i guess i misread that you wrote this is not whistle blowing.

but from the article you cited, things did in fact change

Quote:

Why? The Washington Post had recently suggested that after the serial outrages of the Vietnam, the My Lai, the secret bombing of Cambodia, Watergate, the energy crisis and all the rest, the public was suffering ?a kind of deadening of moral nerve-ends, a near inability to be surprised, let alone disturbed.?

And yet, for all that, Congress acted. In 1978 it passed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, a bipartisan law (one of its sponsors was Strom Thurmond) banning surveillance without a court order that involved acquiring ?the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party.? Though it was pretty soft soap, for all that: judicial authorization was only required within seventy-two hours after the surveillance began.

tony286 · 06-14-2013, 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

i guess i misread that you wrote this is not whistle blowing.

but from the article you cited, things did in fact change

No then they changed it again with the patriot act. its all the same.

dyna mo · 06-14-2013, 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286

No then they changed it again with the patriot act. its all the same.

and that's why it is important again now.

PhoneSexKing · 06-14-2013, 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

canada too eh.

Yeah, the CSE...

Rob · 06-14-2013, 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_

character properly assassinated?

guess they're saving the homosexual tranny binge for later

Bingo! That was exactly my thought. Pass him off as a low level no body and take away his credibility.

Captain Kawaii · 06-14-2013, 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

moreover, he says categorically that the nsa is afraid of contract labor. it's well-documented they spend 80% of their budget on contract labor.

that fully discounts his view imo.

Captain Kawaii · 06-14-2013, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

But that's already happening. The Internet has figured out that I owned a Jaguar and went to Hawaii. What the Internet hasn't figured out is that I sold the Jaguar, bought a new Jeep, and I'm looking to go to Italy.

Watch your back. You just told the interwebs...

I hear you. However, so does the NSA and many more organizations we know nothing about.
I want to go to Italy too.

pornguy · 06-14-2013, 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_

character properly assassinated?

guess they're saving the homosexual tranny binge for later

Nahhh. Im releasing those videos soon.

_Richard_ · 06-14-2013, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornguy

Nahhh. Im releasing those videos soon.

Uncle Sam wants to seeee

dyna mo · 06-14-2013, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Kawaii

you usually don't do drive-by posts like this.

not sure what you are up to so i don't know how to reply, but hey, enjoy yourself!

stinkyfingers · 06-14-2013, 03:04 PM

Joe Obenberger · 06-14-2013, 04:17 PM

The Yahoo piece linked above reads like any classic smear. It's largely opinion, scarcely a hard fact in the article. It's tone is "likely" vs. "unlikely". An employer mentions a different salary amount - still hefty - and is silent about whether bonuses and incentives were also paid. Can't say that seems to amount to any slam-dunk impugning of Snowden. The article attempts to derail interest in what Snowden reveals and put the train into a track that implies more than it can actually say to damage him. Meanwhile, there are no official denials of anything he's told us. He's been interviewed at length and one gets an impression of substantial character and credibility.

Those in the high circles of power are afraid of Snowden and every part of their reaction to him tends to underline it. Snowden looks like the real deal. An honest, accurate, bright, and sincere man, a real Mr. Smith Goes To Washington kind of guy.

Seldom has American history pivoted more about one man than in these days.

What happens next will tell more about the character of the American people than it will about Snowden. My best guess is that a very large and significant part the Americans is in the mood for a real, genuine hero, that Snoweden inspires them, and that there will now come a reckoning like the FBI and IRS were put through in the wake of the Nixon presidency - and on a larger scale. It will become politically expedient for Congressmen and Senators to take the position that government intrusion has gone too far. Jim Sensenbrenner, a significant author of the Patriot Act - who occupies a very safe Republican seat in Wisconsin - is already there. (Remember also, he was axed as Chairman of the Judiciary Committee for asking too many questions and making too many waves for the Bush administration. Before you conclude he's any hero, though, remember that he was the chief agitator to get Section 2257 enforced and put the most pressure on John Ashcroft to start inspections and make annual compliance reports. After he lost his chairmanship, DOJ never filed another 2257 report as mandated by law.) The Europeans can be expected to keep the pressure on - for a long time they've considered the US to be out of control on privacy. A hard rain's going to fall.

livexxx · 06-14-2013, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dcat

especially if this is the first big leak and Kunia is still misrepresented on Google maps, with the real entry obscured by a cloud.

Try Bing, if that is the same place, it has no cloud covering like the google map and everything is crystal clear. Guess it must be underground as there are far too many cars for those small buildings

http://binged.it/11G1H3O

No doubt he will end up locking himself inside a sports bag in the bath having kinky sex with himself alone....

regardless of his personal background , life history etc. no-one has disputed the powerpoint slides and there are still too many left to be presented. No doubt some newspapers are getting their balls felt at the moment as they haven't come out yet.

Joe Obenberger · 06-14-2013, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by livexxx

Try Bing, if that is the same place, it has no cloud covering like the google map and everything is crystal clear. Guess it must be underground as there are far too many cars for those small buildings

http://binged.it/11G1H3O

No doubt he will end up locking himself inside a sports bag in the bath having kinky sex with himself alone....

regardless of his personal background , life history etc. no-one has disputed the powerpoint slides and there are still too many left to be presented. No doubt some newspapers are getting their balls felt at the moment as they haven't come out yet.

Actually, there have been comments addressed to the powerpoint slide show, claiming that real, authentic classified briefings don't include corporate logos in the heading. I have no idea whether that's true, but just set it out so that you know the attack on Snowden, quiet for now, is aimed at all bases.

dyna mo · 06-14-2013, 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Obenberger

The Yahoo piece linked above reads like any classic smear. It's largely opinion, scarcely a hard fact in the article. It's tone is "likely" vs. "unlikely". An employer mentions a different salary amount - still hefty - and is silent about whether bonuses and incentives were also paid. Can't say that seems to amount to any slam-dunk impugning of Snowden. The article attempts to derail interest in what Snowden reveals and put the train into a track that implies more than it can actually say to damage him. Meanwhile, there are no official denials of anything he's told us. He's been interviewed at length and one gets an impression of substantial character and credibility.

Those in the high circles of power are afraid of Snowden and every part of their reaction to him tends to underline it. Snowden looks like the real deal. An honest, accurate, bright, and sincere man, a real Mr. Smith Goes To Washington kind of guy.

Seldom has American history pivoted more about one man than in these days.

What happens next will tell more about the character of the American people than it will about Snowden. My best guess is that a very large and significant part the Americans is in the mood for a real, genuine hero, that Snoweden inspires them, and that there will now come a reckoning like the FBI and IRS were put through in the wake of the Nixon presidency - and on a larger scale. It will become politically expedient for Congressmen and Senators to take the position that government intrusion has gone too far. Jim Sensenbrenner, a significant author of the Patriot Act - who occupies a very safe Republican seat in Wisconsin - is already there. (Remember also, he was axed as Chairman of the Judiciary Committee for asking too many questions and making too many waves for the Bush administration. Before you conclude he's any hero, though, remember that he was the chief agitator to get Section 2257 enforced and put the most pressure on John Ashcroft to start inspections and make annual compliance reports. After he lost his chairmanship, DOJ never filed another 2257 report as mandated by law.) The Europeans can be expected to keep the pressure on - for a long time they've considered the US to be out of control on privacy. A hard rain's going to fall.

i see a lot of this too. i do think it is important to separate the man from the revealed information

not sure he is a hero.

PhoneSexKing · 06-14-2013, 05:01 PM

How to break out of PRISM... you can safely toss your soap on a rope

http://prism-break.org/

livexxx · 06-14-2013, 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Obenberger

Actually, there have been comments addressed to the powerpoint slide show, claiming that real, authentic classified briefings don't include corporate logos in the heading. I have no idea whether that's true, but just set it out so that you know the attack on Snowden, quiet for now, is aimed at all bases.

I would have thought the easiest route would have been
"and we state that the powerpoint presentation and all the information within it is fantasy"

Just counted 850+ cars at that car park as well, and the tunnel entrance is top left on birds eye view, call me paranoid, but it looks just like stargate

_Richard_ · 06-14-2013, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Obenberger

The Yahoo piece linked above reads like any classic smear. It's largely opinion, scarcely a hard fact in the article. It's tone is "likely" vs. "unlikely". An employer mentions a different salary amount - still hefty - and is silent about whether bonuses and incentives were also paid. Can't say that seems to amount to any slam-dunk impugning of Snowden. The article attempts to derail interest in what Snowden reveals and put the train into a track that implies more than it can actually say to damage him. Meanwhile, there are no official denials of anything he's told us. He's been interviewed at length and one gets an impression of substantial character and credibility.

Those in the high circles of power are afraid of Snowden and every part of their reaction to him tends to underline it. Snowden looks like the real deal. An honest, accurate, bright, and sincere man, a real Mr. Smith Goes To Washington kind of guy.

Seldom has American history pivoted more about one man than in these days.

What happens next will tell more about the character of the American people than it will about Snowden. My best guess is that a very large and significant part the Americans is in the mood for a real, genuine hero, that Snoweden inspires them, and that there will now come a reckoning like the FBI and IRS were put through in the wake of the Nixon presidency - and on a larger scale. It will become politically expedient for Congressmen and Senators to take the position that government intrusion has gone too far. Jim Sensenbrenner, a significant author of the Patriot Act - who occupies a very safe Republican seat in Wisconsin - is already there. (Remember also, he was axed as Chairman of the Judiciary Committee for asking too many questions and making too many waves for the Bush administration. Before you conclude he's any hero, though, remember that he was the chief agitator to get Section 2257 enforced and put the most pressure on John Ashcroft to start inspections and make annual compliance reports. After he lost his chairmanship, DOJ never filed another 2257 report as mandated by law.) The Europeans can be expected to keep the pressure on - for a long time they've considered the US to be out of control on privacy. A hard rain's going to fall.

yea was reading about the German angle in all this

should be interesting to see what comes up on the undernews

directfiesta · 06-14-2013, 05:11 PM

Beware of the 3 letters agencies .....

ICE, DEA, IRS, CIA, NSA, DOD, FBI, NRO, DHS, DOE, CID, ....

sarettah · 06-14-2013, 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

Beware of the 3 letters agencies .....

ICE, DEA, IRS, CIA, NSA, DOD, FBI, NRO, DHS, DOE, CID, ....

.

Rochard · 06-14-2013, 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286

its not blowing a whistle when they have been doing since 1975 and you can find it in a simple google search. Back then it was telegrams also.

In the fall of 1975, when a Senate select committee chaired by Frank Church and a House committee chaired by Otis Pike were investigating abuses of power by the CIA and FBI, Congresswoman Bella Abzug, the loaded pistol from New York (she had introduced a resolution to impeach Richard Nixon on her first day in office in 1971) dared turned her own House Subcommittee on Government Information and Individual Rights to a new subject: the National Security Agency, and two twin government surveillance projects she had learned about codenamed ?SHAMROCK? and ?MINARET.? They had monitored both the phone calls and telegrams of American citizens for decades.
http://www.thenation.com/blog/174722...#axzz2WCq1iTqc
Read more: The NSA Doppelganger | The Nation http://www.thenation.com/blog/174722...#ixzz2WCq6is6y
Follow us: @thenation on Twitter | TheNationMagazine on Facebook

But you are missing the most important two facts here... Warrants are required, and none of this is targeting US citizens.

06-13-2013, 01:29 PM	#51
mikesouth Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: My High Horse Posts: 6,334	Oh and of course they will discredit him...I mean look what they did to Bin Laden on the porn angle nobody with half a brain bought that but theres LOTS of Americans with less than half a brain...and most of em listen to sean Hannity __________________ Mike South It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.

06-13-2013, 06:09 PM	#54
Mutt Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 34,431	the only certainty is that we will never know the full story, that's the state of the world. the best you can do is read and listen, consider the sources and the circumstances and decide for yourself knowing and accepting you may be wrong. conspiracy kooks aren't interested in the truth, they are interested in conspiracies only. conspiracy kooks and people in general give government agencies and politicians way too much credit - they're incapable of putting together most of what they're accused of, often what looks like conspiracies, things that don't look right or add up is just pure ineptitude and incompetence inside government agencies. __________________ I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

06-13-2013, 10:42 PM	#64
Sunny Day Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 1,406	Anybody can get security clearance Read the book "The Falcon and the Snowman" (it's also a movie). At 21 Christopher Boyce was hired by TRW and had the highest security clearance there is. Couple of years later he becomes a Soviet spy. Sentenced to federal prison for 40 years he managed to escape. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Boyce

06-14-2013, 05:05 AM	#71
RummyBoy Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 2,157	http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-0...-on-china.html They want to find out if he has a china tie: http://rlv.zcache.com.au/chinese_sym...0en71g_216.jpg Last edited by RummyBoy; 06-14-2013 at 05:11 AM..

06-14-2013, 03:04 PM	#90
stinkyfingers Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Canada Posts: 657	__________________ how can i help you today ?

06-13-2013, 01:41 PM	#52
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 64,736	i think it's a generational thing too, i brought this up with my ~70 year old mom and it was entirely a non-issue in her eyes. she's not dumb per se, but i think has more of a patriotic view? maybe. something from growing up in her generation that creates an entirely different viewpoint. i figured she prolly represents most senior citizens on something like this.

06-13-2013, 05:25 PM	#53
PhoneSexKing Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: a frozen wasteland Posts: 190	Interesting. There is definately a generation gap at play here. I once had an elderly bank teller tell me that she was glad that the naked body scanners existed and that the governments spy on the phones/internet because it would keep her grandkids safe from terrorists that sew C4 under their skin - no joke. I couldn't help but just laugh at her and she started screaming at me about terrorists. Her supervisor watched from a distance.

06-13-2013, 06:24 PM	#56
Dcat Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Mexico Posts: 1,607	Some VERY good points raised by former NSA telling it like it is.. The Future of the NSA Jim Stone, June 10 2013, updated June 11 Forget the B.S. stories about Snowden, there is only ONE that applies and you will not hear about it in the press, which has protected the NSA with a great big white wash. Snowden worked out at Kunia. He had an extensive training program he had to go through before being allowed in. He HAD TO have been 99th percentile, the story about high school drop out is B.S, and so is the rest of the washing of his background. After hearing his conscience out at Kunia, he left Hawaii, defected, and told the truth. There is also a rumor that Snowden worked for a contractor for $122,000 a year. I doubt that seriously because the NSA is so secretive it is extremely wary of contractors, and during my time with the NSA, I saw only 2 people EVER that were contractors, and they were never out on the operations floor. So yeah, I buy $122,000 a year, but NOT with a contractor. People who get to see enough to reveal what Snowden did have million dollar background checks, involving interviews with practically everyone in their past, and the interviewers do not identify themselves, they just talk as friends over a beer or whatever. So no one knows when they are being asked questions about someone the NSA intends to hire. These background checks take a year or so to complete and contractors can't afford to do that, the FED does. What Snowden revealed proves through emperical evidence that he was not employed by a contractor, he was just straight up NSA. The entire High School drop out story is pure B.S., because if during one of these checks any of the secret questioners comes up with even a little whiff of something wrong with your past, YOU ARE OUT. Unlike the CIA, which has over a million spooks, the NSA is so secretive that very few people break the barrier to entry, which limits the size of the NSA to below 50,000 people total, a majority of which are highly talented super geeks. The expense of the background investigations alone seriously limits the number of people the NSA can hire. Don't expect anything that is now claimed to be said by Snowden as actually coming from him. They are whitewashing this as fast as possible, while making false posts and statements to the web and media that claim to be from him. By now he has been replaced with the public image of someone else. For starters, it is ERIC SNOWDEN, not EDWARD as we are now told and this subtle name change will be used to deflect meaningful search into his past. My own experience in the NSA is enough to prove what little I have said about Snowden to be true. There is ONE OPTION - Snowden was BRILLIANT, had extensive back ground searches done on him, went through a very difficult school, got assigned to Kunia where he lived in the same location as many other NSA people who have families do, drove to Kunia daily, and finally could not take what he was seeing there anymore and ratted them out. THAT IS THE ONLY STORY. Snowden did not have a girlfriend. He had a wife, and any reference to him "leaving his girlfriend behind" is another lie. You cannot live where Snowden did and have a "girlfriend", the NSA will not put you in the premium government family housing in Waipahu for only a "girlfriend". Furthermore, stories about the house being sold now are B.S., because Snowden was in government housing the same as all lower level NSA people are given. Unless you are an outside contractor (and those are very few in number), The NSA does not leave it's people to run with the general public, they all get assigned a living area where like minded people are. And from these few mistakes the press made, we can assume that the entire background they are presenting on Snowden is a lie. The house he was in was never owned by him and DID NOT get sold. To see a long list of B.S. my own experience proves to be lies, just google "where snowden lived" Furthermore, the "leaked documents from anonymous" are PURE B.S. and are all readily available public documents. I see this as an attempt to muddy the waters with regard to Snowden's legitimate leak. Watch for story creep in the mainstream and portions of the alternative press regarding what I have said here, since I am former NSA telling it like it is I have noticed that the story keeps getting regular tweaks to counteract what I say here, the latest being "it was his girlfriend's house". Don't buy into the tweaks, what is above is a truthfully rational assessment of HOW IT HAD TO BE, from someone who simply knows how things are. Granted, when I was with the NSA they were not spying on Americans, but their procedures and methods were anchored in stone and for what I have said above to not weigh out now would mean something massive regarding hiring policy, housing policy, contractor policy and other things changed there, which I doubt, especially if this is the first big leak and Kunia is still misrepresented on Google maps, with the real entry obscured by a cloud. continued ..lots more here

06-13-2013, 09:54 PM	#63
PhoneSexKing Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: a frozen wasteland Posts: 190	I'll just put this here... http://www.itwire.com/it-policy-news...prism-facility

06-14-2013, 08:44 AM	#77
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	its not blowing a whistle when they have been doing since 1975 and you can find it in a simple google search. Back then it was telegrams also. In the fall of 1975, when a Senate select committee chaired by Frank Church and a House committee chaired by Otis Pike were investigating abuses of power by the CIA and FBI, Congresswoman Bella Abzug, the loaded pistol from New York (she had introduced a resolution to impeach Richard Nixon on her first day in office in 1971) dared turned her own House Subcommittee on Government Information and Individual Rights to a new subject: the National Security Agency, and two twin government surveillance projects she had learned about codenamed ?SHAMROCK? and ?MINARET.? They had monitored both the phone calls and telegrams of American citizens for decades. http://www.thenation.com/blog/174722...#axzz2WCq1iTqc Read more: The NSA Doppelganger \| The Nation http://www.thenation.com/blog/174722...#ixzz2WCq6is6y Follow us: @thenation on Twitter \| TheNationMagazine on Facebook

06-14-2013, 04:17 PM	#91
Joe Obenberger Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Location: Chicago Posts: 466	The Yahoo piece linked above reads like any classic smear. It's largely opinion, scarcely a hard fact in the article. It's tone is "likely" vs. "unlikely". An employer mentions a different salary amount - still hefty - and is silent about whether bonuses and incentives were also paid. Can't say that seems to amount to any slam-dunk impugning of Snowden. The article attempts to derail interest in what Snowden reveals and put the train into a track that implies more than it can actually say to damage him. Meanwhile, there are no official denials of anything he's told us. He's been interviewed at length and one gets an impression of substantial character and credibility. Those in the high circles of power are afraid of Snowden and every part of their reaction to him tends to underline it. Snowden looks like the real deal. An honest, accurate, bright, and sincere man, a real Mr. Smith Goes To Washington kind of guy. Seldom has American history pivoted more about one man than in these days. What happens next will tell more about the character of the American people than it will about Snowden. My best guess is that a very large and significant part the Americans is in the mood for a real, genuine hero, that Snoweden inspires them, and that there will now come a reckoning like the FBI and IRS were put through in the wake of the Nixon presidency - and on a larger scale. It will become politically expedient for Congressmen and Senators to take the position that government intrusion has gone too far. Jim Sensenbrenner, a significant author of the Patriot Act - who occupies a very safe Republican seat in Wisconsin - is already there. (Remember also, he was axed as Chairman of the Judiciary Committee for asking too many questions and making too many waves for the Bush administration. Before you conclude he's any hero, though, remember that he was the chief agitator to get Section 2257 enforced and put the most pressure on John Ashcroft to start inspections and make annual compliance reports. After he lost his chairmanship, DOJ never filed another 2257 report as mandated by law.) The Europeans can be expected to keep the pressure on - for a long time they've considered the US to be out of control on privacy. A hard rain's going to fall. __________________ Extremism in the defense of Liberty is no vice. . . Restraint in the pursuit of Justice is no virtue. Senator Barry Goldwater, 1964 Last edited by Joe Obenberger; 06-14-2013 at 04:18 PM..

06-14-2013, 05:01 PM	#95
PhoneSexKing Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: a frozen wasteland Posts: 190	How to break out of PRISM... you can safely toss your soap on a rope http://prism-break.org/

06-14-2013, 05:11 PM	#98
directfiesta Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Punta Cana, DR Posts: 29,589	Beware of the 3 letters agencies ..... ICE, DEA, IRS, CIA, NSA, DOD, FBI, NRO, DHS, DOE, CID, .... __________________ I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT ! But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....