Totemcash, for real?
Collapse
X
-
you know, it takes time to clean the web, especially for VirtuaGirl, set almost everywhere...
thx for the links anyway
Comment
-
I thought "According to the agreement, If it is terminated because you have violated its terms you are not eligible to receive any commission payments, even for commissions earned prior to the date of termination." was a bit strong to be honest...Hey, we've been sued by the two models and have no other choice than to contact our affiliates and ask for the removal of set or else.
I understand not everyone keeps a database of published content but I could not send photos of the two models as it's the very thing we've been sued for, using their pictures with no authorization.
We are not scammers, we've been around since 1998, are proud of our good reputation in the biz.
The idea of affiliates keeping some sort of DB of images, videos and model names that you you have used over 15 years or more in some cases is ridiculous - I very much doubt Harmon has one either.....
As for the comment about 2257 docs, affiliates don't have those in general. For many others 2257 is not even applicable...
If we find a pic, your account can be closed - Goodbye money - That's very aggressive.....
I like Totem and recommend everyone have at least one banner on their sites - However, this is not cool...

Comment
-
Wait, you used their images without authorization, yet you are good peoples?Hey, we've been sued by the two models and have no other choice than to contact our affiliates and ask for the removal of set or else.
I understand not everyone keeps a database of published content but I could not send photos of the two models as it's the very thing we've been sued for, using their pictures with no authorization.
We are not scammers, we've been around since 1998, are proud of our good reputation in the biz.
GGW called and wanted their MO back
TripleXPrint on Megan Fox
"I would STILL suck her pussy until her face caved in. And then blow her up and do it again!"Comment
-
Is this why they want to collect all affiliates ID's all of a sudden? WTF is this?
In order to maintain the highest level of security, we require all our affiliates to provide us with certain documentation in order to verify their accounts.
Why do I need to provide documentation?
There are several reasons. We believe knowing our customers is one of the keys for overcoming fraud. Fraudsters repeatedly change their IDs and use numerous accounts with small transaction volumes, making them less likely to arouse suspicion. Once the scam is discovered they "disappear". Worse, those fraudsters come back and repeat their scam over and over again. Scammers love anonymity, and anonymity attracts them in drove. At the end, the more we loose because of Scammers, the less we can afford to pay our trusted affiliates or invest in production.
Secondly, our payment processors require that our policies are in line with international banking standards. A proven business relationship with each and every affiliate is mandatory for the protection of all parties. Our licensing agreement also obliges us to comply with this.
Finally, by ensuring that your account details are absolutely correct, the inconvenience of 'missing payments' can be avoided. It can take weeks (and sometimes months) to trace, recall and resend using the correct information.
What documents do I need to provide?
For the reasons described above, we require the following personal information to become a Verified Member: Photo ID such as a passport or Driver's License is preferred. If you don't have either of these, certain other official identification cards may be permissible. These will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. We also need proof of the address on your account with us. A utility bill (water, electricity, cable, cell phone) in your name is best, but a bank statement or credit card statement is also acceptable.
When do I need to provide these documents?
We greatly appreciate your cooperation in providing these at your earliest possible convenience to avoid any delays in processing your payments.
How can I send you these documents?
Please scan your documents, or take a high quality digital camera picture, save the images as jpegs, then upload the files using our secure form in your profile. The attachment or attachments should not exceed 5MB in total and ideally should be much smaller.See avatarComment
-
The info in post #8 referencing the set numbers to remove would have been more helpful than just the model's names.Hey, we've been sued by the two models and have no other choice than to contact our affiliates and ask for the removal of set or else.
I understand not everyone keeps a database of published content but I could not send photos of the two models as it's the very thing we've been sued for, using their pictures with no authorization.
Not everyone who values their privacy should be treated like a scammer. Likewise, established affiliates (either individuals or companies) should be excluded from this verification process.
From a different perspective, how can TotemCash assure affiliates that they will protect their sensitive information? Just look at what happened with *************. Performers thought their private info would remain safe and secure, but now it is everywhere.Support American Heroes | How Bad is My Batch? | Vaccine Deaths & Adverse Reactions | Free Speech Coalition | <WARNING> ePayService / Guerra Capital, INC / MTACC payments | Flirt4Free Fucks their Affiliates | Don't do business with piece of shit Andy Alvarez from Webmaster Central / VR3000, who said:
"If it was up to me, they would have shot all 30,000 of those country loving shitheads"Comment
-
sorry to hear man. content shooters ass always on the frontlineComment
-
I can't go too much into details as the case is still in court, but the two models have been filmed the same way we filmed over 1200 others since 1998, they got paid, signed a contract. Today they want to erase all their images from the net and are suying everyone. A juge decided we needed to pull the images and that's what we're doing.
WWW.ISTRIPPER.COM Unique Desktop Strippers since 1998, 20+ Millions users, 3000+ Girls to choose from, All UHD Exclusive Content.Comment
-
The KYC rule has been enforced to new affiliates and guess what, no new scammers sinceThe info in post #8 referencing the set numbers to remove would have been more helpful than just the model's names.
Not everyone who values their privacy should be treated like a scammer. Likewise, established affiliates (either individuals or companies) should be excluded from this verification process.
From a different perspective, how can TotemCash assure affiliates that they will protect their sensitive information? Just look at what happened with *************. Performers thought their private info would remain safe and secure, but now it is everywhere.
That's for the benefit of everyone, us and all honest affiliates.
We asked current affiliate to provide their documents but there is no consequences for thoses who don't comply. As for security, all files are encrypted.
WWW.ISTRIPPER.COM Unique Desktop Strippers since 1998, 20+ Millions users, 3000+ Girls to choose from, All UHD Exclusive Content.Comment
-
Shit happens, especially when dealing with women. I just hope this image never leaves the internet...
Comment
-
I do. All my content is labeled under a model, which is labeled under a pay site, which is labeled under a sponsor. Totem sends me an email saying Camilla has sued and wants her images removed, I go into my control panel, select Totem from my sponsors, get a list of all models and content associated with that sponsor, find "camilla" and hit "delete model" and all her stuff is now gone.Comment
-
This sounds very fishy. First of all most models or former models are broke and don't have enough money to actually sue anyone. Even if they threaten to sue via telephone or email , they almost never follow through on it. Even if they do have an attorney contact you, it almost never goes beyond a form letter which is sent solely in the hopes that the producer or company that owns their images immediately caves in to their bullshit demands. Even fewer still actually go beyond the point of having an attorney send a letter and file a real lawsuit- again hoping that the company caves in- and fewer still would actually have an attorney show up for an initial hearing in a civil court which makes this real.I can't go too much into details as the case is still in court, but the two models have been filmed the same way we filmed over 1200 others since 1998, they got paid, signed a contract. Today they want to erase all their images from the net and are suying everyone. A judge decided we needed to pull the images and that's what we're doing.
So not only would all those unlikely events have to happen by not one but two models, but the company would have a pretty open and shut case if the model got paid and the releases and paperwork was in order. I don't know what country or jurisdiction you are in, but do you expect affiliates to actually believe that not one but TWO cases were filed by two different models, that they both went all the way through trial and that you were represented by an attorney twice and you lost both cases when as you say "a judge decided you need to pull all images"? By the way did the judge make a decision yet as you claim or is it "still in court"? Aren't those mutually exclusive?
Frankly, it seems much more likely that you guys just caved in to two models' requests to take their images down because A- you don't have the proper IDs, releases or documentation on file in order to defend yourselves; or B- you figure it's easier and cheaper to just give up immediately and shift the burden and hassle of removing the content to your affiliates.
You better hope your 1200 other models don't get wind of this in either case- whether you caved in twice or lost two lawsuits- because it could lead to an avalanche of other take down requests by former models. If I was an affiliate I would think twice before promoting a company that pulled content like this.Last edited by Jim_Gunn; 06-26-2013, 10:55 AM.Comment
-
If you had contract that states that you own the material and can publish it how come judge decided otherwise?I can't go too much into details as the case is still in court, but the two models have been filmed the same way we filmed over 1200 others since 1998, they got paid, signed a contract. Today they want to erase all their images from the net and are suying everyone. A juge decided we needed to pull the images and that's what we're doing.
That would be one ridiculously stupid precedent
Comment
-
Hey Jim,
I know this is different from what you see in the US, but laws are often made different in other countries.
We're operating from France, where you can get a lawyer paid by the state if your income is low enough and that's what the two models did.This sounds very fishy. First of all most models or former models are broke and don't have enough money to actually sue anyone. Even if they threaten to sue via telephone or email , they almost never follow through on it. Even if they do have an attorney contact you, it almost never goes beyond a form letter which is sent solely in the hopes that the producer or company that owns their images immediately caves in to their bullshit demands. Even fewer still actually go beyond the point of having an attorney send a letter and file a real lawsuit- again hoping that the company caves in- and fewer still would actually have an attorney show up for an initial hearing in a civil court which makes this real.
Both models did an interim relief procedure asking for the images to be removed and a juge granted them that while waiting for the final trial where we'll know who was right or wrong.So not only would all those unlikely events have to happen by not one but two models, but the company would have a pretty open and shut case if the model got paid and the releases and paperwork was in order. I don't know what country or jurisdiction you are in, but do you expect affiliates to actually believe that not one but TWO cases were filed by two different models, that they both went all the way through trial and that you were represented by an attorney twice and you lost both cases when as you say "a judge decided you need to pull all images"? By the way did the judge make a decision yet as you claim or is it "still in court"? Aren't those mutually exclusive?
Frankly, if I could have saved myself from all the bashing because we've been forced to ask affiliates to cease to use the images, believe me I would have done it.Frankly, it seems much more likely that you guys just caved in to two models' requests to take their images down because A- you don't have the proper IDs, releases or documentation on file in order to defend yourselves; or B- you figure it's easier and cheaper to just give up immediately and shift the burden and hassle of removing the content to your affiliates.
WWW.ISTRIPPER.COM Unique Desktop Strippers since 1998, 20+ Millions users, 3000+ Girls to choose from, All UHD Exclusive Content.Comment


Comment