GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Do you think this is OK or not? (video of Watertown home raid) (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1107251)

ninavain 04-22-2013 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 19592302)
Clips with no context are useless...

Watch a mushroom cloud from WWII with no context and you'd say wow that's overkill too.
Put it in context and the exact same video becomes a lot more reasonable.

no mushroom cloud at anytime is reasonable
http://0.media.collegehumor.cvcdn.co...-glitch-15.gif

Robbie 04-22-2013 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 19592302)
Clips with no context are useless...

Watch a mushroom cloud from WWII with no context and you'd say wow that's overkill too.
Put it in context and the exact same video becomes a lot more reasonable.

Going off the subject here...but NO! Dropping atomic bombs on two cities in Japan and killing innocent men, women, and children by the tens of thousands is NEVER "reasonable".

It was an atrocity that history will look on very badly.

Robbie 04-22-2013 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheFootMan5 (Post 19592365)
I hope someone sues for violation of every right known to man

If they did that to me and my family I'd get the most famous lawyer in the country and sue every one of those agencies involved for millions of dollars. Especially with that video footage right there as evidence.

epitome 04-22-2013 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19591879)
That is as disgusting and anti-American piece of "police work" as I've ever seen.

I can't believe that people say that is "okay".

Definitely not the country I grew up in. That video looks like it could have been shot in 1950's Soviet Union.

Yeah, man, this shit is completely new!

http://baltimorecitypolicehistory.co...HER_Raid_2.jpg

Relentless 04-22-2013 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ninavain (Post 19592382)
no mushroom cloud at anytime is reasonable

If a nuke kills many less people in a much more humane way than no nuke... a mushroom cloud becomes very reasonable.
The same way choking someone to death is bad, but choking a gunman in a school to death is very reasonable,

Relentless 04-22-2013 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19592389)
Going off the subject here...but NO! Dropping atomic bombs on two cities in Japan and killing innocent men, women, and children by the tens of thousands is NEVER "reasonable".It was an atrocity that history will look on very badly.

It shortened the way by years, greatly reduced the number of casualties that would have results if the bombs were not dropped and allowed the US to wrap things up before the axis had similar destructive capabilities. The error was allowing the war to begin in the first place, not ending it in the fastest least deadly way possible.

Robbie 04-22-2013 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome (Post 19592392)
Yeah, man, this shit is completely new!

Sorry Jesse, but that looks nothing like the paramilitary shit I just saw (complete with machine guns) laying siege to a citizen's home and bringing them out like criminals, patting them down, and then going through their private residence.

I don't know how you can even think that is the same.

Yes, if there is a shootout or a criminal holed up and the police are trying to get him out...then yes they would use the force in your picture. A few cops with normal guns.

NOT what appeared to be about 20 guys in military fatigues with automatic weapons raised and pointed at a citizen as the people are being forcibly taken from their homes and searched for absolutely nothing.

Ron Paul was right. He said after he was unable to win the nomination for President: "I had no idea it would be this hard to sell FREEDOM to the American people"

It's a disgrace. And so is the "it's okay" attitude that you and others have towards it.

Rochard 04-22-2013 09:00 PM

The cops in that video were doing their job.

They were looking for a criminal for had killed three and hurt dozens with a bomb, shot and killed a police officer, kidnapped someone at gun point and stolen an SUV. The entire nation was holding it's breath. The police officers went door to door with weapons drawn.

I don't understand why people fear the police so much. If this shit happens in my hometown, I want my house to be the fucking police forward headquarters. Last year my hometown was evacuated due to the propane fire on a train, and one of the checkpoints was a few hundred feet from my house. I kid you not we bought doughnuts and made them coffee all night long, multiple nights. In fact, they weren't even police officers - they were unpaid volunteer "community service officers" from a neighboring city.

When this shit happens you bend over backwards for those who are trying to protect you. When your hometown has mad man running around in it and the police are banging on your door with their firearms drawn you had best do what they say.

Rochard 04-22-2013 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 19592271)
For me, the entire issue is having guns pointed at them, forced from their home, told to put their hands over their head, yelling at one of them, then patted them down like they were suspects, and the overall aggressive attitude.

Those people were clearly not the suspect. They were in their home minding their own business and got pulled out like that. Maybe this is the only house this happened to, or many 100s had this happen, we don't know, but I can't help but think how terrifying this would be for children.

But they were suspect. You just assume they aren't. You assume they are local citizens minding their own business. The police have just seen dozens killed and wounded by a bomb, a police officer shot, and someone kidnapped. They don't know if these people are local citizens or if they the bomber's friend hiding them or a terrorist cell or what they are walking into.

Robbie 04-22-2013 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 19592411)
It shortened the way by years, greatly reduced the number of casualties that would have results if the bombs were not dropped and allowed the US to wrap things up before the axis had similar destructive capabilities. The error was allowing the war to begin in the first place, not ending it in the fastest least deadly way possible.

That has already been proven to not be true. The generals in charge of the war are on record saying the war was already over. The Russians were coming in from the other side and the Japanese were scared of them and were offering to surrender.

Do some research. Some of this stuff just became declassified about the surrender of Japan in the last few years. It's pretty outrageous what our govt. did.

Rochard 04-22-2013 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 19592406)
If a nuke kills many less people in a much more humane way than no nuke... a mushroom cloud becomes very reasonable.
The same way choking someone to death is bad, but choking a gunman in a school to death is very reasonable,

Firebombing killed a lot more people really.

The reason the nuke stands out is because one nuke killed fifty thousand, where with the firebombing it took much more effort - 300 planes dropping hundreds of tons of bombs. In one such attack 100k were killed and another 100k wounded. Two hundred and eighty thousand (280,000) buildings were destroyed in one firebombing attack.

Yet all we talk about is the nuke.

epitome 04-22-2013 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19592412)
Sorry Jesse, but that looks nothing like the paramilitary shit I just saw (complete with machine guns) laying siege to a citizen's home and bringing them out like criminals, patting them down, and then going through their private residence.

I don't know how you can even think that is the same.

Yes, if there is a shootout or a criminal holed up and the police are trying to get him out...then yes they would use the force in your picture. A few cops with normal guns.

NOT what appeared to be about 20 guys in military fatigues with automatic weapons raised and pointed at a citizen as the people are being forcibly taken from their homes and searched for absolutely nothing.

Ron Paul was right. He said after he was unable to win the nomination for President: "I had no idea it would be this hard to sell FREEDOM to the American people"

It's a disgrace. And so is the "it's okay" attitude that you and others have towards it.

Please show me videos from Boston of people being forcefully taken from their homes and personally searched and not just homes being searched and cleared in search of domestic terrorists that terrorized a city for multiple days.

Also, please point me to the people who were arrested because they had their homes searched and the police found something other than a bombing suspect.

All of that militarization has also existed for decades. It's called SWAT. The equipment list just expanded when cities were handed billions in grants thanks to post-9/11 hysteria. Blame the Bush administration and Congress for that. I believe close to $100 billion was doled out to local police forces in the years immediately following 9/11.

Last time I checked, even though my own city has similar equipment, I never see it out roaming the streets. You don't see it in Vegas, either. Boston citizens didn't see it until last week.

I would expect to see it out roaming the streets if people were setting off bombs in the city.

TheFootMan5 04-22-2013 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19592419)
The cops in that video were doing their job.

They were looking for a criminal for had killed three and hurt dozens with a bomb, shot and killed a police officer, kidnapped someone at gun point and stolen an SUV. The entire nation was holding it's breath. The police officers went door to door with weapons drawn.

I don't understand why people fear the police so much. If this shit happens in my hometown, I want my house to be the fucking police forward headquarters. Last year my hometown was evacuated due to the propane fire on a train, and one of the checkpoints was a few hundred feet from my house. I kid you not we bought doughnuts and made them coffee all night long, multiple nights. In fact, they weren't even police officers - they were unpaid volunteer "community service officers" from a neighboring city.

When this shit happens you bend over backwards for those who are trying to protect you. When your hometown has mad man running around in it and the police are banging on your door with their firearms drawn you had best do what they say.

Nazis were just "doing their job" as well

Robbie 04-22-2013 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome (Post 19592447)
Please show me videos from Boston of people being forcefully taken from their homes and personally searched and not just homes being searched and cleared in search of domestic terrorists that terrorized a city for multiple days..

It doesn't matter what knee-jerk reaction was going on to an incident.

You DON"T do that in the United States of America (at least you're not supposed to).

This is the kind of thing I was taught in school that "Bad" countries did. Not the U.S.A.

But go ahead and think the way you do. I will continue to think that it was total and complete bullshit, just like being searched like a criminal at the airport is. I don't like living that way and I think it's un-American. Just my personal opinion.

TheFootMan5 04-22-2013 09:23 PM

The cops weren't even the ones who found the suspect! :1orglaugh

epitome 04-22-2013 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19592456)
It doesn't matter what knee-jerk reaction was going on to an incident.

You DON"T do that in the United States of America (at least you're not supposed to).

This is the kind of thing I was taught in school that "Bad" countries did. Not the U.S.A.

But go ahead and think the way you do. I will continue to think that it was total and complete bullshit, just like being searched like a criminal at the airport is. I don't like living that way and I think it's un-American. Just my personal opinion.

Hey, I'm still trying to figure out why we have to take off our shoes at the airport because one guy had a failed bomb, but there have been dozen of school shootings in the same time period and nothing has changed.

I also read that they are delaying people being able to carry pocketknives on planes again. Last time I checked we've had fortified cockpit doors for close to a decade.

So don't take me as a freedom hater. I just happen to believe that the world isn't black and white and there are different responses to different situations.

Now if I start hearing stories about people who had their homes searched getting arrested two weeks later because their house smelled like weed during the search... or they had some lines of coke laid out on the coffee table, or anything else, then I will call BS on everything.

dyna mo 04-22-2013 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19592431)
That has already been proven to not be true. The generals in charge of the war are on record saying the war was already over. The Russians were coming in from the other side and the Japanese were scared of them and were offering to surrender.

Do some research. Some of this stuff just became declassified about the surrender of Japan in the last few years. It's pretty outrageous what our govt. did.

this is not correct at all.

japan went to russia to try for a conditional surrender, russia blew them off because of the alliance we had with russia, japs tried to weasle away from being the aggressors in the pacific, thatand their aggression is why we demanded unconditional surrender.


our generals never ever said the war was over until that surrender was signed. what they did say was that the japanese had lost every battle but still had not and would not surrender.

epitome 04-22-2013 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheFootMan5 (Post 19592459)
The cops weren't even the ones who found the suspect! :1orglaugh

I am only going to entertain your thoughts this one time...

But I do have to wonder if while they were busy searching houses they were also busy searching the areas around houses... things like oh, I don't know, boats with tarps...

dyna mo 04-22-2013 09:33 PM

and the nuclear bombs most certainly shortened the war, we were merely months away from an invasion of mainland japan.
\

operation downfall was the plan.

TheFootMan5 04-22-2013 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome (Post 19592468)
I am only going to entertain your thoughts this one time...

But I do have to wonder if while they were busy searching houses they were also busy searching the areas around houses... things like oh, I don't know, boats with tarps...

lol yea...embarrassing...

Robbie 04-22-2013 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19592466)
this is not correct at all.

japan went to russia to try for a conditional surrender, russia blew them off because of the alliance we had with russia, japs tried to weasle away from being the aggressors in the pacific, thatand their aggression is why we demanded unconditional surrender.


our generals never ever said the war was over until that surrender was signed. what they did say was that the japanese had lost every battle but still had not and would not surrender.

You're wrong. I watched a special on Showtime just a few weeks ago showing archived footage of the Generals in their own words saying that the bomb was not needed.
Truman wanted to drop it to prove a point.

Do some research. Don't believe what we were taught in school about it.

theking 04-23-2013 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19592390)
If they did that to me and my family I'd get the most famous lawyer in the country and sue every one of those agencies involved for millions of dollars. Especially with that video footage right there as evidence.

Evidence of...just what exactly...Police Officers doing a job in the way they are trained to do?

Captain Kawaii 04-23-2013 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19592028)
while we arm chair debate?

why do we have any laws at all? why was there these fine laws saying 'police are unable to enter a residence without a warrant'?

obviously the logic of 'if you have nothing to hide' applied just the same when the law was written as it does today

if it was so important, why does the law exist.

Land of Laws? Laughable. US is a country of expediences and necessities these days.

theking 04-23-2013 01:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19592575)
You're wrong. I watched a special on Showtime just a few weeks ago showing archived footage of the Generals in their own words saying that the bomb was not needed.
Truman wanted to drop it to prove a point.

Do some research. Don't believe what we were taught in school about it.

The Japanese were showing zero signs of surrendering at the time the bomb was dropped and we were preparing to invade Japan and up to 1,000,000 casualties was predicted for us and millions more for the Japanese. The bomb saved lives and BTW the A Bomb did not kill as many people as our fire bombings had killed in Japan and in Germany.

Captain Kawaii 04-23-2013 01:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 19592630)
The Japanese were showing zero signs of surrendering at the time the bomb was dropped and we were preparing to invade Japan and up to 1,000,000 casualties was predicted for us and millions more for the Japanese. The bomb saved lives and BTW the A Bomb did not kill as many people as our fire bombings had killed in Japan and in Germany.

We can always count on US leadership for one despicable act after another. And people wonder why we are the object of attacks for so long.

Russian ships have moved into Iranian southern ports. China has taken off the gloves. Obama has given Israel the greenlight for Iran. Night everyone.

DWB 04-23-2013 01:49 AM

If nukes can save lives and end wars, why were they never used again? Funny how that works.

"Saving" 1,000,000 blood thirsty American soldiers was not worth what was done to a few hundred thousand innocent civilians in Japan. You are completely delusional and totally propagandized to even try to justify that.

Dying is an occupational hazard when you're a soldier. It should not be when you're a civilian.

Some of you are honestly disgusting human beings, and I use the term "human beings" loosely.

dyna mo 04-23-2013 03:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19592575)
You're wrong. I watched a special on Showtime just a few weeks ago showing archived footage of the Generals in their own words saying that the bomb was not needed.
Truman wanted to drop it to prove a point.

Do some research. Don't believe what we were taught in school about it.

lol, you watch a showtime special and tell me to do research?

please, i have a degree in military history from one of the top colleges on the planet and you're suggesting a showtime television show is more valid?

here, i don't read japanese and i am sure you don't either, but here's the emporer's words in english re: the bomb

Quote:

On the following morning, August 8, Foreign Minister Togo Shigenori went to the imperial palace for an audience with the emperor. According to Asada, using the American and British broadcasts ?to buttress his case,? Togo urged the emperor to agree to end the war as quickly as possible ?on condition, of course, that the emperor system be retained.? Hirohito concurred and replied:

Now that such a new weapon has appeared, it has become less and less possible to continue the war. We must not miss a chance to terminate the war by bargaining [with the Allied powers, Asada adds] for more favorable conditions now. Besides, however much we consult about [surrender, Asada adds] terms we desire, we shall not be able to come to an agreement. So my wish is to make such arrangements as will end the war as soon as possible.


russia THEN invaded manchuria day later

i can really go on & on with reams of facts on this.

a direct nuclear assault on the mainland v. an indirect assault on manchuria and showtime thinks the bomb didn't amount to anything-

don't let revisionist history shows on television try and change history for tv ratings.

also, read truman's autobiography, he goes into detail about his decision.

:)

dyna mo 04-23-2013 03:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 19592658)
If nukes can save lives and end wars, why were they never used again? Funny how that works.

"Saving" 1,000,000 blood thirsty American soldiers was not worth what was done to a few hundred thousand innocent civilians in Japan. You are completely delusional and totally propagandized to even try to justify that.

Dying is an occupational hazard when you're a soldier. It should not be when you're a civilian.

Some of you are honestly disgusting human beings, and I use the term "human beings" loosely.

that's not what happened. hindsight is 20-20, you are making the honest mistake junior historians make, you are looking at the past through rose colored glasses of the current.

proper recounting of history requires you look at the events in the light of the times of the event. and the fact is civilian targets were fair game in ww2. we tried it the other way when we 1st entered the war, but that didn't work. we didn't start it, we weren't the only ones, all sides did it.

GAH 04-23-2013 03:35 AM

I have to congratulate the US forces for their speedy apprehension of those two terrorists, that having surveillance cameras everywhere is a great thing, however intrusive it seems to be. To be able to identify those two within 24 hours was brilliant. Lessons have to be learnt each time anything like this happens, lots of good and bad things can be worked on. What saddened me after the final terrorist was captured, was the world news coverage showing thousands [of mainly youngsters] out on the street, shouting USA, USA, like it was a Ryder Cup victory (remember them?!), turning a grave situation into it a carnival atmosphere, police cars roaming, honking their horns in appreciation. This also seemed to be explained by the fact it was 420 day, they were all stoned ? cops too.

The American reaction to such events tends to be different from anywhere else around the world, the National Guard on the streets, a no-fly zone, that every senator claimed their post contained Ricin, Louisiana closed down highways and harbours because someone accidentally left a briefcase near a post office. Obama desperate to appear on tv to petrify a nation as if aliens had landed and nuked New York. After Twin Towers idiot Bush told the word America was at war. The whole point of terrorism is to terrify, and America is brilliant at being that. And having most of the population armed didn't do much good, that should shut a lot of pro-gunners up.

Those who read that British ex-Prime Minister Thatcher died the other week, should note how she reacted when the IRA attempted to kill her in 1994, they blew up the hotel, five died, many injured, and she was very lucky to escape the blast. Next morning, 9.30am, she strode out and acted as if nothing had happened. Again, when the IRA bombed the City of London, enormous destruction, yet 36 hours later the whole area was opened for business as usual. These things need to be played down when they can, or the terrorists really are winning [in America].

Treat Tsarnaev as a criminal, not a terrorist, throw him in with the rapists, killers and not very nice people, don't make him special, by putting him in a quasii-prisoner of war detention camp, or killing him and making him and his brother martyrs.

Relentless 04-23-2013 03:46 AM

Robbie,

Stick to your arguments about the modern police state, I disagree with you about them but they do have some validity. Your arguments about how WWII ended are totally invalid (even if you saw them in a Showtime special), anyone who has done a fair amount of reading about the war, lived through it or spoken extensively with people who did has come away with the same conclusion.... The bombs were horrific weapons and that is precisely why they ended the war years before it would have ended otherwise.

Germany was in the process of developing equally sinister weapons including long range gas weapons, nukes and biological weapons. Japan had zero interest in surrender and Germany was using Japan as a buffer to buy time for their R&D. It almost worked. They made the tragic mistake of losing many of the worlds best scientists simply because they happened to be Jews and that is primarily the reason we reached the nuclear age before Germany did. That lead to the quick surrender of Japan, isolation of Germany and end of the war.

Killing 60,000 people at once in a big blast is much better than killing hundreds of thousands via hand to hand combat and drowning over the course of a few years. The same logic applies to Watertown. Inconveniencing a whole town for a day is far better than cleaning up body parts for the next several years. The message is simple. Bomb anything and we will capture or kill you in 48 hours. It's a much better message than the one we used to use, bomb something and we will invade a country that had nothing to do with it.

xholly 04-23-2013 04:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19592725)
that's not what happened. hindsight is 20-20, you are making the honest mistake junior historians make, you are looking at the past through rose colored glasses of the current.

proper recounting of history requires you look at the events in the light of the times of the event. and the fact is civilian targets were fair game in ww2. we tried it the other way when we 1st entered the war, but that didn't work. we didn't start it, we weren't the only ones, all sides did it.

Just curious if you have seen the series by Nial Ferguson "war of the worlds"? its a 6 part series so is a little long but since you have a degree in military history and have an interest in it I wonder what you make of it, he goes over many of your points. If you haven't seen it It's a good watch on the nature of the 20th century conflicts.

heres a link to the youtube playlist if your looking for something to watch.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=q5AbQ...6CE7D51E1F77B5

slapass 04-23-2013 04:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GAH (Post 19592743)
I have to congratulate the US forces for their speedy apprehension of those two terrorists, that having surveillance cameras everywhere is a great thing, however intrusive it seems to be. To be able to identify those two within 24 hours was brilliant. Lessons have to be learnt each time anything like this happens, lots of good and bad things can be worked on. What saddened me after the final terrorist was captured, was the world news coverage showing thousands [of mainly youngsters] out on the street, shouting USA, USA, like it was a Ryder Cup victory (remember them?!), turning a grave situation into it a carnival atmosphere, police cars roaming, honking their horns in appreciation. This also seemed to be explained by the fact it was 420 day, they were all stoned ? cops too.

The American reaction to such events tends to be different from anywhere else around the world, the National Guard on the streets, a no-fly zone, that every senator claimed their post contained Ricin, Louisiana closed down highways and harbours because someone accidentally left a briefcase near a post office. Obama desperate to appear on tv to petrify a nation as if aliens had landed and nuked New York. After Twin Towers idiot Bush told the word America was at war. The whole point of terrorism is to terrify, and America is brilliant at being that. And having most of the population armed didn't do much good, that should shut a lot of pro-gunners up.

Those who read that British ex-Prime Minister Thatcher died the other week, should note how she reacted when the IRA attempted to kill her in 1994, they blew up the hotel, five died, many injured, and she was very lucky to escape the blast. Next morning, 9.30am, she strode out and acted as if nothing had happened. Again, when the IRA bombed the City of London, enormous destruction, yet 36 hours later the whole area was opened for business as usual. These things need to be played down when they can, or the terrorists really are winning [in America].

Treat Tsarnaev as a criminal, not a terrorist, throw him in with the rapists, killers and not very nice people, don't make him special, by putting him in a quasii-prisoner of war detention camp, or killing him and making him and his brother martyrs.

I agree with this. Every news station was all over this for the next few days and still is. The UK had a ban on terrorist news. Sort of hurts that freedom of speech thing but overall it is a great idea. Why let the next nutbag get all jonesed over how he is going to be famous.

tony286 04-23-2013 04:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 19592630)
The Japanese were showing zero signs of surrendering at the time the bomb was dropped and we were preparing to invade Japan and up to 1,000,000 casualties was predicted for us and millions more for the Japanese. The bomb saved lives and BTW the A Bomb did not kill as many people as our fire bombings had killed in Japan and in Germany.

Robbie is right, I'm learning about it in history class right now. They knew Japan was going to fold but Truman wanted to bomb them anyway to send a message to Stalin.

tony286 04-23-2013 04:44 AM

I dont know, it really is the best way to handle the situation. Stop everything like after 911, they grounded all planes very quickly so nothing was in the sky.

grumpy 04-23-2013 04:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 19591482)


Do you find how they treat the residents acceptable or disturbing?

If you think it is acceptable, do you also think it is acceptable to enter their home without a warrant?

Yes and yes

Jel 04-23-2013 05:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GAH (Post 19592743)
I have to congratulate the US forces for their speedy apprehension of those two terrorists, that having surveillance cameras everywhere is a great thing, however intrusive it seems to be. To be able to identify those two within 24 hours was brilliant. Lessons have to be learnt each time anything like this happens, lots of good and bad things can be worked on. What saddened me after the final terrorist was captured, was the world news coverage showing thousands [of mainly youngsters] out on the street, shouting USA, USA, like it was a Ryder Cup victory (remember them?!), turning a grave situation into it a carnival atmosphere, police cars roaming, honking their horns in appreciation. This also seemed to be explained by the fact it was 420 day, they were all stoned ? cops too.

The American reaction to such events tends to be different from anywhere else around the world, the National Guard on the streets, a no-fly zone, that every senator claimed their post contained Ricin, Louisiana closed down highways and harbours because someone accidentally left a briefcase near a post office. Obama desperate to appear on tv to petrify a nation as if aliens had landed and nuked New York. After Twin Towers idiot Bush told the word America was at war. The whole point of terrorism is to terrify, and America is brilliant at being that. And having most of the population armed didn't do much good, that should shut a lot of pro-gunners up.

Those who read that British ex-Prime Minister Thatcher died the other week, should note how she reacted when the IRA attempted to kill her in 1994, they blew up the hotel, five died, many injured, and she was very lucky to escape the blast. Next morning, 9.30am, she strode out and acted as if nothing had happened. Again, when the IRA bombed the City of London, enormous destruction, yet 36 hours later the whole area was opened for business as usual. These things need to be played down when they can, or the terrorists really are winning [in America].

Treat Tsarnaev as a criminal, not a terrorist, throw him in with the rapists, killers and not very nice people, don't make him special, by putting him in a quasii-prisoner of war detention camp, or killing him and making him and his brother martyrs.

Good post, and really does explain the 'problem' I have with people here saying it's ok, it's just the police's job etc. I'm not from the US (UK here) so haven't experienced the environment that makes it natural for me to roll over and believe that patting down civilians and barking at them when they are clearly NOT the suspects the police are looking for is perfectly acceptable behaviour. 'rolling over' being my interpretation, based on what I'd put up with, not an insult to those with a different POV.

Maybe that's why I was called on being a keyboard 'tough guy' for stating how I see it, but yeah, environment sets your belief system, and having the police here in the UK act the way they do sometimes is bad enough that it gets my back right up, hence my 'shock' at seeing the procedure in that video, and inability to grasp why some people think it's acceptable.

Either way there's fuck all I can do about a past event, and I believe that everyone is free to believe what they choose to, so I'm gonna practice what I preach - or attempt to anyway, and read but not post :winkwink:

DWB 04-23-2013 05:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19592725)
that's not what happened. hindsight is 20-20, you are making the honest mistake junior historians make, you are looking at the past through rose colored glasses of the current.

proper recounting of history requires you look at the events in the light of the times of the event. and the fact is civilian targets were fair game in ww2. we tried it the other way when we 1st entered the war, but that didn't work. we didn't start it, we weren't the only ones, all sides did it.

None of that makes it acceptable. Dropping atomic bombs on civilians is not acceptable no matter how someone tries to spin it or write it in the history books.

Man will always find a way to justify his horrific actions and senseless murder of others.

DWB 04-23-2013 05:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GAH (Post 19592743)
I have to congratulate the US forces for their speedy apprehension of those two terrorists, that having surveillance cameras everywhere is a great thing, however intrusive it seems to be. To be able to identify those two within 24 hours was brilliant. Lessons have to be learnt each time anything like this happens, lots of good and bad things can be worked on. What saddened me after the final terrorist was captured, was the world news coverage showing thousands [of mainly youngsters] out on the street, shouting USA, USA, like it was a Ryder Cup victory (remember them?!), turning a grave situation into it a carnival atmosphere, police cars roaming, honking their horns in appreciation. This also seemed to be explained by the fact it was 420 day, they were all stoned ? cops too.

The American reaction to such events tends to be different from anywhere else around the world, the National Guard on the streets, a no-fly zone, that every senator claimed their post contained Ricin, Louisiana closed down highways and harbours because someone accidentally left a briefcase near a post office. Obama desperate to appear on tv to petrify a nation as if aliens had landed and nuked New York. After Twin Towers idiot Bush told the word America was at war. The whole point of terrorism is to terrify, and America is brilliant at being that. And having most of the population armed didn't do much good, that should shut a lot of pro-gunners up.

Those who read that British ex-Prime Minister Thatcher died the other week, should note how she reacted when the IRA attempted to kill her in 1994, they blew up the hotel, five died, many injured, and she was very lucky to escape the blast. Next morning, 9.30am, she strode out and acted as if nothing had happened. Again, when the IRA bombed the City of London, enormous destruction, yet 36 hours later the whole area was opened for business as usual. These things need to be played down when they can, or the terrorists really are winning [in America].

Treat Tsarnaev as a criminal, not a terrorist, throw him in with the rapists, killers and not very nice people, don't make him special, by putting him in a quasii-prisoner of war detention camp, or killing him and making him and his brother martyrs.

Solid post. :2 cents:

dyna mo 04-23-2013 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xholly (Post 19592773)
Just curious if you have seen the series by Nial Ferguson "war of the worlds"? its a 6 part series so is a little long but since you have a degree in military history and have an interest in it I wonder what you make of it, he goes over many of your points. If you haven't seen it It's a good watch on the nature of the 20th century conflicts.

heres a link to the youtube playlist if your looking for something to watch.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=q5AbQ...6CE7D51E1F77B5


i will certainly tune in to this, thank you, no i have not seen it.

dyna mo 04-23-2013 07:24 AM

there is a lot of controversy right now surrounding this view on the surrender.

did you know who came up with this view? oliver stone.

Quote:

Not in this writer?s lifetime has a book challenging the central accepted tenets of U.S. history received so much publicity as Oliver Stone and Peter Kuznick?s The Untold History of the United States,....

One can hear a full exposition of that thesis in Showtime?s ?Episode 3: The Bomb.? Their central conclusion is that the real reason for the Japanese surrender is that, virtually simultaneous with the dropping of the second atomic bomb on Nagasaki on August 9, 1945, the Soviet Union broke its neutrality treaty with Japan that had been observed by both parties throughout the war and began a massive attack on Japanese forces in Manchuria. At this point, the Japanese knew that the game was up. A subordinate argument is that the atomic bombs then didn?t even serve a military purpose and that their use was opposed by various key military and political leaders in the U.S. government at the time and later. The contemplated costly invasion of the Japanese mainland would not have been necessary. The main reason the bombs were dropped, per Stone and Kuznick, was as a signal from the militarists in our government to the Soviet Union that we would not hesitate to use this new terror weapon to achieve our military and political objectives. It was, in effect, our firing of the first shot in the Cold War. Still more subordinate is the authors? claim that if only Franklin Roosevelt?s hugely popular Vice President during his third term of office (1940-44), Henry Wallace, had not been replaced by Harry Truman, those unnecessary and reprehensible bombs would not have been dropped and, furthermore, there would have been no Cold War.

In support of their main conclusion, the authors point out that horrific bombing of Japanese cities, including Tokyo, had been going on for months causing massive civilian casualties. The fact that the Japanese government did not react in any way after the Hiroshima attack shows that they regarded it as simply more of the same, only a bit worse. Only the day after the second bomb was dropped?which also was the day after the Soviet entry into the war?did the Japanese send out a radio message suggesting that they were ready to surrender.

as i pointed out above, the emperor DID react to the bomb, in fact, he said enough, we will sign the surrender


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123