Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar Mark Forums Read
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 04-22-2013, 08:50 AM   #1
Yanks_Todd
Confirmed User
 
Yanks_Todd's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Valencia
Posts: 2,490
Hilarious Gun Debate video

The end is just epic.

http://vimeo.com/64432171#
__________________
Todd Spaits - Co-founder -YanksCash
Premium ad-packages available - Skype for details - tmspaits

Last edited by Yanks_Todd; 04-22-2013 at 08:53 AM..
Yanks_Todd is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 09:58 AM   #2
Tom_PM
Porn Meister
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 16,443
Gun lobby. Slip in some facts and it shits itself.

The 2nd amendment contains the words "well regulated" but don't try to slip that fact into a debate.
__________________
43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.
Tom_PM is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 10:03 AM   #3
sperbonzo
I'd rather be on my boat.
 
sperbonzo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 9,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by PR_Tom View Post
Gun lobby. Slip in some facts and it shits itself.

The 2nd amendment contains the words "well regulated" but don't try to slip that fact into a debate.
I suppose those "facts" could include the actual Supreme court precedence on what the second amendment actually means.... rather than the opinion of some guy with an anti-second amendment agenda... but maybe I"m going out on a limb here.

If you are at all interested, you could look at "Heller v D.C." and "Chicago v Mcdonald"


There are always idiots you can find on every side, of every debate.




.
__________________
Michael Sperber / Acella Financial LLC/ Online Payment Processing

[email protected] / http://Acellafinancial.com/

ICQ 177961090 / Tel +1 909 NET BILL / Skype msperber

Last edited by sperbonzo; 04-22-2013 at 10:05 AM..
sperbonzo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 10:07 AM   #4
bronco67
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
bronco67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,032
Shut down...so funny.
__________________
bronco67 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 10:08 AM   #5
bronco67
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
bronco67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,032
Quote:
Originally Posted by sperbonzo View Post
I suppose those "facts" could include the actual Supreme court precedence on what the second amendment actually means.... rather than the opinion of some guy with an anti-second amendment agenda... but maybe I"m going out on a limb here.

If you are at all interested, you could look at "Heller v D.C." and "Chicago v Mcdonald"


There are always idiots you can find on every side, of every debate.




.
A background check at a gun show isn't anti-second amendment. It's common sense.
__________________
bronco67 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 10:14 AM   #6
Rochard
Jägermeister Test Pilot
 
Rochard's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 74,027
Quote:
Originally Posted by sperbonzo View Post
I suppose those "facts" could include the actual Supreme court precedence on what the second amendment actually means.... rather than the opinion of some guy with an anti-second amendment agenda... but maybe I"m going out on a limb here.

If you are at all interested, you could look at "Heller v D.C." and "Chicago v Mcdonald"


There are always idiots you can find on every side, of every debate.

.
This is what I love about debates - you can twist facts and figures all day long.

Last year Chicago had some 500 firearm deaths and the gun nuts were up in arms saying this proof that gun laws don't work. At the same time, firearm deaths are down in Chicago are going down over a twenty year period. 500 deaths is a lot better than 1500. Just depends on what side you are on.
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.”
- Sarah Huckabee Sanders

YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION
Rochard is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 10:19 AM   #7
SuckOnThis
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In my head
Posts: 6,844
Whoop de fucking do!
SuckOnThis is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 11:02 AM   #8
Yanks_Todd
Confirmed User
 
Yanks_Todd's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Valencia
Posts: 2,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by sperbonzo View Post
.. rather than the opinion of some guy with an anti-second amendment agenda... but maybe I"m going out on a limb here.

If you are at all interested, you could look at "Heller v D.C." and "Chicago v Mcdonald"
PR_Tom hates freedom...and probably kittens to
__________________
Todd Spaits - Co-founder -YanksCash
Premium ad-packages available - Skype for details - tmspaits
Yanks_Todd is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 11:08 AM   #9
AaronM
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
AaronM's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ┌∩┐ ◣_◢ ┌∩┐
Posts: 46,909
Quote:
Originally Posted by bronco67 View Post
A background check at a gun show isn't anti-second amendment. It's common sense.

It's also currently required by Federal law.

The only time a gun purchase is not required to go through a background check is when it's a private seller. Regulate private sales at the gun shows and that will end. All the gun shows around my area do this already, without additional laws.

Last edited by AaronM; 04-22-2013 at 11:09 AM..
AaronM is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 11:21 AM   #10
Rochard
Jägermeister Test Pilot
 
Rochard's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 74,027
Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronM View Post
It's also currently required by Federal law.

The only time a gun purchase is not required to go through a background check is when it's a private seller. Regulate private sales at the gun shows and that will end. All the gun shows around my area do this already, without additional laws.
But is it a universal background check? I mean, if I've convicted of assault in California, can I still buy a gun in Florida?
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.”
- Sarah Huckabee Sanders

YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION
Rochard is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 12:03 PM   #11
AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn
 
AsianDivaGirlsWebDude's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 38,323




ADG
AsianDivaGirlsWebDude is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 12:07 PM   #12
TheFootMan5
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 645
No one is really into gun control without talking about the fact that the government has all the guns and bullets and bombs in the world...or do they somehow not count??
TheFootMan5 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 12:46 PM   #13
2MuchMark
Videochat Solutions
 
2MuchMark's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 49,290
Saw this the other night. The Gun lobby is so full of shit.
__________________

Custom Coding | Videochat Solutions | Age Verification | IT Help & Support
www.2Much.net
2MuchMark is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 07:14 PM   #14
AaronM
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
AaronM's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ┌∩┐ ◣_◢ ┌∩┐
Posts: 46,909
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
But is it a universal background check? I mean, if I've convicted of assault in California, can I still buy a gun in Florida?

It's a Nation wide Federal database.

National Instant Criminal Background Check System. Also knowns as NICS.

"Mandated by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993 and launched by the FBI on November 30, 1998"

People need to quit listening to the fucking media.

Last edited by AaronM; 04-22-2013 at 07:20 PM..
AaronM is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 07:30 PM   #15
AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn
 
AsianDivaGirlsWebDude's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 38,323






ADG
AsianDivaGirlsWebDude is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 07:41 PM   #16
AaronM
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
AaronM's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ┌∩┐ ◣_◢ ┌∩┐
Posts: 46,909
To clarify...

3 of the major traveling gun shows on the west coast are The Rocky Mountain Gun Show, Collectors West, & Crossroads of the West. All 3 shows allow non FFL's to have tables where they can buy and sell. I've attended the Rocky Mountain shows in Utah, Nevada, & California. The Crossroads shows in Arizona, Utah, & Nevada. And the Collectors West shows in Oregon and Washington.

Every show I have been to in the past 6+ years has had a table specifically for the private collectors and out of State FFL's to run NICS checks. When you register for a table at any of these shows, you sign an agreement that requires you to use these services.

That being said....If "Bob" walks into the show with his rifle over his should and a for sale sign hanging out of the barrel, he can legally sell it to anybody without a NICS check because he is not associated with the show nor is he an FFL holder. THIS is where the "Universal" part comes in and it really has nothing to do with any kind of "gun show loophole." "Bob" could easily place an ad on Backpage and find his buyer there instead. Where you are introduced to the buyer has nothing to do with the "Universal" part but the media wants you to think it's about gun shows.

There is no way to effectively implement a "Universal Background Check" system these days simply because there are so many guns that are already unregistered. The only way to do it would be similar to what they did with the 1934 National Firearms Act. This would require full gun registration for EVERY SINGLE gun in the country and that is never going to happen in the United States. Even today, 79 years after they passed the NFA, there are still "machine guns" that were never added to the registry or destroyed.
AaronM is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 07:49 PM   #17
TheFootMan5
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 645
How come the government can have all the guns in the world?

Can anyone answer this?
TheFootMan5 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 07:55 PM   #18
Joe Obenberger
Confirmed User
 
Joe Obenberger's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 466
I think that it's time to require background checks and a 72 hour cooling off period before the sale of any pressure cookers. And convicted felons and those under indictment and those who've been convicted of domestic battery, of course, should be prohibited from acquiring them. All sales should go through licensed cookware dealers - who, at the same time can do the background checks on anyone seeking to buy knives longer than, say three inches. Ditto for sales of gasoline, bleach, cotton, nitric acid, bleach, BBs, ball bearings, chainsaws, and - well, what other weapons of mass destruction or constituent parts of them have I left off? That will, by analogy to what I've been hearing about guns, bring about the Millennium, peace on earth, and the end of mayhem, because, of course, criminals only acquire these things by buying them at retail in places that charge sales tax. I'm sort of amazed that I have not heard this suggestion about pressure cookers - a much easier sell, I'd think, because the Founders neglected to establish a constitutional right to canning in a well-regulated circle of fruit and vegetable preservationists. With no Bill of Rights protection, I suspect the Pelosi's and Obamas of this world would feel not the slightest restraint from regulating pressure cookers as they see fit, perhaps even confiscating them in the interest of creating a nation of angels.

No, I seriously don't believe in regulating pressure cookers. But I think that regulating them will reduce violent, terrorist attacks just as effectively as further regulating guns would, and just as effectively as Prohibition ended alcoholism and just as effectively as drug laws have ended addiction and the other ills that stem from drug abuse.
__________________


Extremism in the defense of Liberty is no vice. . . Restraint in the pursuit of Justice is no virtue.
Senator Barry Goldwater, 1964
Joe Obenberger is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 08:00 PM   #19
TheFootMan5
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Obenberger View Post
I think that it's time to require background checks and a 72 hour cooling off period before the sale of any pressure cookers. And convicted felons and those under indictment and those who've been convicted of domestic battery, of course, should be prohibited from acquiring them. All sales should go through licensed cookware dealers - who, at the same time can do the background checks on anyone seeking to buy knives longer than, say three inches. Ditto for sales of gasoline, bleach, cotton, nitric acid, bleach, BBs, ball bearings, chainsaws, and - well, what other weapons of mass destruction or constituent parts of them have I left off? That will, by analogy to what I've been hearing about guns, bring about the Millennium, peace on earth, and the end of mayhem, because, of course, criminals only acquire these things by buying them at retail in places that charge sales tax. I'm sort of amazed that I have not heard this suggestion about pressure cookers - a much easier sell, I'd think, because the Founders neglected to establish a constitutional right to canning in a well-regulated circle of fruit and vegetable preservationists. With no Bill of Rights protection, I suspect the Pelosi's and Obamas of this world would feel not the slightest restraint from regulating pressure cookers as they see fit, perhaps even confiscating them in the interest of creating a nation of angels.

No, I seriously don't believe in regulating pressure cookers. But I think that regulating them will reduce violent, terrorist attacks just as effectively as further regulating guns would, and just as effectively as Prohibition ended alcoholism and just as effectively as drug laws have ended addiction and the other ills that stem from drug abuse.
And what about the government?
TheFootMan5 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 08:02 PM   #20
TheFootMan5
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yanks_Todd View Post
The end is just epic.

http://vimeo.com/64432171#
Wow, listening to the audience and the guy doing the interview shows how immature the human species really is. Unbelievable how DUMB humans are as a collective...unreal!
TheFootMan5 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 08:09 PM   #21
Joe Obenberger
Confirmed User
 
Joe Obenberger's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 466
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFootMan5 View Post
And what about the government?
Sure, only law enforcement, the National Guard, the Armed Forces and the CIA should have access to pressure cookers. Why not? It's just as loony as any of the arguments I've heard about AR15's and clips that can hold more than three BBs.

There is a certain disconnect from reality in the arguments of those who suppose that crazy people and drug-dealing gang members will stop murdering people if only we regulate the acquisition of guns at normal retail. Common sense gun regulation? No, that thinking is delusional and cooked up by do-gooders who have not the slightest clue about how guns actually move around in the twilight zone subcultures.

The proposed regulations will only stop those already predisposed to obeying the law from acquiring what any criminal worth his salt can scrounge up in a day or so. When something terrible happens, legislators at every level cook up a law. When your only tool is a hammer, all the problems look like nails. That's how 2257 emerged from the Tracy Lords debacle, even though she had a legitimate California ID issued to her by using an adult's birth certificate and 2257 would not have slowed her down by a second. Same idea here. Background checks won't stop one murder.
__________________


Extremism in the defense of Liberty is no vice. . . Restraint in the pursuit of Justice is no virtue.
Senator Barry Goldwater, 1964
Joe Obenberger is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 08:13 PM   #22
TheFootMan5
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Obenberger View Post
Sure, only law enforcement, the National Guard, the Armed Forces and the CIA should have access to pressure cookers. Why not? It's just as loony as any of the arguments I've heard about AR15's and clips that can hold more than three BBs.

There is a certain disconnect from reality in the arguments of those who suppose that crazy people and drug-dealing gang members will stop murdering people if only we regulate the acquisition of guns at normal retail. Common sense gun regulation? No, that thinking is delusional and cooked up by do-gooders who have not the slightest clue about how guns actually move around in the twilight zone subcultures.

The proposed regulations will only stop those already predisposed to obeying the law from acquiring what any criminal worth his salt can scrounge up in a day or so. When something terrible happens, legislators at every level cook up a law. When your only tool is a hammer, all the problems look like nails. That's how 2257 emerged from the Tracy Lords debacle, even though she had a legitimate California ID issued to her by using an adult's birth certificate and 2257 would not have slowed her down by a second. Same idea here. Background checks won't stop one murder.
If you are really for gun control and not gun redistribution, as most are, then the first group of people you'd want to regulate is the government...but it's the opposite when it comes to gun control. Everyone wants to go after joe citizen while the government has all the guns and bullets and bombs in the world
TheFootMan5 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 09:07 PM   #23
Relentless
www.EngineFood.com
 
Relentless's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,697
Local Gun shows are not the problem. They were the problem 5 years ago
Right now the problem is Armslist.com and similar sites
In 5 years the problem will be 3D printed firearms

Regulations will require much more than background checks, registries and gun tracking.
It will happen, the first time some loon mounts a 9MM on a DIY drone you can get online for a few hundred dollars and shoots up a football stadium or Times Square.
__________________


Website Secure | Engine Food
ICQ# 266-942-896
Relentless is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks
Thread Tools



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.