Originally Posted by sperbonzo

I suppose those "facts" could include the actual Supreme court precedence on what the second amendment actually means.... rather than the opinion of some guy with an anti-second amendment agenda... but maybe I"m going out on a limb here.

If you are at all interested, you could look at "Heller v D.C." and "Chicago v Mcdonald"


There are always idiots you can find on every side, of every debate.




.