The term "conspiracy theorist" was coined when people claimed someone was a "conspiracy theorist" if they believed that la costra nostra existed...when of course they did exist, and they had judges and people in the system working for them...typical

Can... You.... Write.... A... Proper.... Sentence?.....

What I meant by that is the chemtrail images that get posted, could be weather alteration at work, and be harmless. Do some research, there is plenty of evidence to debunk many conspiracy theories about contrails/chemtrails.

not an hour ago you were posting about being willing to bet there is some 'truth in weather alteration', and now its fact?

once again, grammar only matters if you try and insult someone

so:

Can... You.... Write.... A... Proper.... Sentence?.....

is an insult, and incorrectly structured, but we'll let this one pass as it was so pithy.

I think you'll find people were talking about JFK and the moon landings for quite some time before someone invented Youtube and crank blogs.

And feel free to show me where I posted the words "I know what happened to JFK" or anything even remotely like it.

Any old crazy can put up a webpage or a Youtube video. That you think they in any way constitute "proof" of anything shows just how far removed from reality you are. All I'm doing is applying the same standards to you that you apply to "conspiracy nuts".

You (and dyna_mo) think nothing of posting links to other people's shit because you don't have a clue yourself, yet when "conspiracy nuts" do the same thing, you use it against them.

You demand "proof" from conspiracy nuts to back up their claims, but when challenged to prove your own beliefs you pathetically come back with "I don't care". The novels you've written in this thread would suggest otherwise.

There he goes again, talking about shit that nobody else is talking about in the thread. :1orglaugh What a k00k.

exactly my point. that's why i prefaced it saying i'll use a conspiracist's mentality.

derail a thread talking about random shit that makes no sense.

:1orglaugh

Totally pathetic, I'll use an helter skelter arguement here. Where did I say it's (not its ) fact?

Anyone can make a blog or youtube video, sure...just like any authority figure can just make stuff up

Bin Laden orchestrated 9/11 :1orglaugh
WMDs in Iraq :1orglaugh
Gulf of Tonkin
Etc.

Those things are only made up in your stupid...stupid...stupid...sick...sick...sick mind.

8char

.

I see loads of bots here with _Richard_ :upsidedow

he really doesn't get the whole insulting thing

none of em do

That's what they say to keep us coming back

This thread has been setup as a honey trap for us :winkwink:

so why are we sitting here slapping each other on the back?

True, we're here, so it worked, the GFY-Bots got the better of us :helpme

meh, all good fun

Indeed, helps me get some late night work done at the same time :1orglaugh :thumbsup

Proof I never used the word "fact". Well done to you.

go away

8chgar

hah, you 2 guys crack me up. in all honesty, i like y'all, hell, i even remember telling whp that years ago, back when i was still sorting out on which side of the matter i fall. i think _richard_ is up for the truth, you just happen to fall on the other side of it all than i do. i get that and the fact i *think* you are open to the truth makes me respect that. could be wrong, hard to say across the gfy.

whp i said the same thing to a long time ago, i think you've progressed further into the genre? since then though, although you are pretty clever in how you go about it, which makes me wonder if you aren't doing it because of the views such topics garner. easy to do and a big payoff, so i get that too.

either way, these debates and threads like this are played hardball as we all know. hardball is fun, i come to play. :)

As I was saying, you distort and generalize and ignore information to create an argument that suits what you need to believe. Earlier, you were aggressively downplaying the idea that "conspiracy" means "government conspiracy" within the context of "conspiracy theorist" and the discussion... yet it didn't take you long to fall back into your familiar pattern of railing against government and pointing out government conspiracies.

At the core of almost all of your arguments, statements and attacks are over-generalizations. You rely VERY heavily on unreasonable generalizations.

The language you rely on, speaking in absolutes such as "always", "every time...", "no one believes...", "never", "every one believes" etc. are direct indicators of the extent to which you are distorting things in your own mind.

wait till he gets here later today, he's going to have a field day derailing all the threads.

Personally, I look forward to at least 30 more instances of invoking "The Gulf of Tonkin" as if it's relevant to anything. :)

:thumbsup:thumbsup:pimp