AWE WL's - ??????? - Page 5 - GoFuckYourself.com

helterskelter808 · 05-04-2013, 09:16 AM

Apparently they did it to troll a broke-ass Romanian faggot into crying about it forever. Seems to have worked.

Fat Panda · 05-04-2013, 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by helterskelter808

Apparently they did it to troll a broke-ass Romanian faggot into crying about it forever. Seems to have worked.

is that really true?

helterskelter808 · 05-04-2013, 09:42 AM

CEO of "Goaaagoagle" confirmed it to me an hour ago. They didn't say "faggot" though, I believe their exact words were "spamming fuckwit loser".

Badmaash · 05-04-2013, 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by helterskelter808

CEO of "Goaaagoagle" confirmed it to me an hour ago. They didn't say "faggot" though, I believe their exact words were "spamming fuckwit loser".

Fight, fight, fight....................!

2013 · 05-04-2013, 05:33 PM

awe has no answers

Badmaash · 05-05-2013, 01:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2013

awe has no answers

Tell me more about your thoughts on this...............

adultmobile · 05-05-2013, 09:44 AM

This is an ancient thread.

2intense · 05-05-2013, 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by helterskelter808

Apparently they did it to troll a broke-ass Romanian faggot into crying about it forever. Seems to have worked.

not going to waste my time with a broke loser.

2intense · 05-05-2013, 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MainstreamGuy

why do you keep writing goagle?..

It's google.

Do you think Google will ban you for talking about them, and thus you write goagle?

i like goagle more than gogle cos i keep fucking goagle everyday

Badmaash · 05-06-2013, 01:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adultmobile

This is an ancient thread.

Define old............. thx

EranG · 05-06-2013, 05:02 AM

is this still relevant?
does anyone finding it hard to rank AWE's WL sites?

Guido-Centro · 05-10-2013, 02:58 AM

Hello everybody,

First of all I apologize for the slow response....

This is what came out from our Google experts:

WHAT HAPPENED

The drops in Google rankings are not caused by anything fishy we did. A penalty hasbeen applied by Google due to the very nature of all whitelabel networks in the industry.

Any whitelabel network may be hit in the future, too. Only Google?s search engineers would know when and what penalties will be assigned to which network.

Indentifying harmful techniques of the WL Network is subject of an operation in May.

WHAT WE DO

We are developing unique content creation mechanisms for improved SEO performance.

These changes may require more editing of the sites' content and/or structure, but they will also make your sites more future proof against any
further penalties.

Once the changes are in place, we will submit a blanket Reconsideration Request to Google on behalf of the entire network.

These systemwide changes will not fix any penalties you might have individually received from e.g. having built spammy backlinks.

WHAT?S NOT RECOMMENDED FOR WEBMASTER

Please don?t submit Reconsideration Request individually will be done through one unique process for the whole network

WHAT?S AHEAD US

Expect a minimal timeframe of several months, although we cannot make any commitments on behalf of Google.

The goal is to provide hasslefree creation of unique and compelling content that we will support with systemwide changes to be announced later.

It?s important to understand Google?s view which is about added value. Added value in Google?s eye results in rankings, there is no pure technical way to get through this axiome.

ctggls · 05-10-2013, 05:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guido-AWE

Hello everybody,

First of all I apologize for the slow response....

This is what came out from our Google experts:

WHAT HAPPENED

The drops in Google rankings are not caused by anything fishy we did. A penalty hasbeen applied by Google due to the very nature of all whitelabel networks in the industry.

Any whitelabel network may be hit in the future, too. Only Google?s search engineers would know when and what penalties will be assigned to which network.

Indentifying harmful techniques of the WL Network is subject of an operation in May.

WHAT WE DO

We are developing unique content creation mechanisms for improved SEO performance.

These changes may require more editing of the sites' content and/or structure, but they will also make your sites more future proof against any
further penalties.

Once the changes are in place, we will submit a blanket Reconsideration Request to Google on behalf of the entire network.

These systemwide changes will not fix any penalties you might have individually received from e.g. having built spammy backlinks.

WHAT?S NOT RECOMMENDED FOR WEBMASTER

Please don?t submit Reconsideration Request individually will be done through one unique process for the whole network

WHAT?S AHEAD US

Expect a minimal timeframe of several months, although we cannot make any commitments on behalf of Google.

The goal is to provide hasslefree creation of unique and compelling content that we will support with systemwide changes to be announced later.

It?s important to understand Google?s view which is about added value. Added value in Google?s eye results in rankings, there is no pure technical way to get through this axiome.

Thanks for answer Guido!

2intense · 05-10-2013, 06:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guido-AWE

Hello everybody,

First of all I apologize for the slow response....

This is what came out from our Google experts:

WHAT HAPPENED

The drops in Google rankings are not caused by anything fishy we did. A penalty hasbeen applied by Google due to the very nature of all whitelabel networks in the industry.

Any whitelabel network may be hit in the future, too. Only Google?s search engineers would know when and what penalties will be assigned to which network.

Indentifying harmful techniques of the WL Network is subject of an operation in May.

WHAT WE DO

We are developing unique content creation mechanisms for improved SEO performance.

These changes may require more editing of the sites' content and/or structure, but they will also make your sites more future proof against any
further penalties.

Once the changes are in place, we will submit a blanket Reconsideration Request to Google on behalf of the entire network.

These systemwide changes will not fix any penalties you might have individually received from e.g. having built spammy backlinks.

WHAT?S NOT RECOMMENDED FOR WEBMASTER

Please don?t submit Reconsideration Request individually will be done through one unique process for the whole network

WHAT?S AHEAD US

Expect a minimal timeframe of several months, although we cannot make any commitments on behalf of Google.

The goal is to provide hasslefree creation of unique and compelling content that we will support with systemwide changes to be announced later.

It?s important to understand Google?s view which is about added value. Added value in Google?s eye results in rankings, there is no pure technical way to get through this axiome.

hope this will really be done as soon as possible

adultmobile · 05-10-2013, 07:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guido-AWE

A penalty has been applied by Google due to the very nature of all whitelabel networks in the industry.
Any whitelabel network may be hit in the future, too. Only Google?s search engineers would know when and what penalties will be assigned to which network.

So Google was explicit in declare they will give penalty to all of the whitelabel-looking sites from any network...

Stephen · 05-10-2013, 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adultmobile

So Google was explicit in declare they will give penalty to all of the whitelabel-looking sites from any network...

Google has explicitly stated that for years as part of its webmaster guidelines

They're just now doing what they said they would do all along

Fat Panda · 05-10-2013, 07:36 AM

ROFL give it up people Google is done supporting MILLIONS of DUPLICATE identical sites pushed by black hat backlink spam and other methods. Google turned off your money machine months ago stop fucking crying about it!

Stephen · 05-10-2013, 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAC

Google turned off your money machine months ago

So stop relying on Google...

I just put up an AWE WL in hopes that many other WL operators will give up or move to other platforms over this (and other) issues, thinning the herd of me-too competitors -- but I'm also not trying to take the typical lazy webmaster route to using it and have some different implementation ideas.

Having said that, what Google thinks of my WL is the least of my problems with it

Fat Panda · 05-10-2013, 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen

So stop relying on Google...

I just put up an AWE WL in hopes that many other WL operators will give up or move to other platforms over this (and other) issues, thinning the herd of me-too competitors -- but I'm also not trying to take the typical lazy webmaster route to using it and have some different implementation ideas.

Having said that, what Google thinks of my WL is the least of my problems with it

I agree and I personally don't rely on Google to survive. That being said people that put all their eggs in one basket relying on Google for a huge % of revenue then bitch all over the boards when G changes their algos or penalizes their shitty duplicate backlink spam sites makes me ROFL

teomaxxx · 07-13-2013, 12:14 PM

ha, ha, ha...so now I am ranking well in google (around 700 hits a day) with a old domain which is redirecting to my AWE whitelabel which got sandboxed recently.

who said here something about Google algo being smart?

teomaxxx · 07-14-2013, 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teomaxxx

ha, ha, ha...so now I am ranking well in google (around 700 hits a day) with a old domain which is redirecting to my AWE whitelabel which got sandboxed recently.

who said here something about Google algo being smart?

1.4k a day yesterday. i know it wont last, but hey its plain php redirect to sandboxed site and google isnt even able to figure it out.

lagcam · 07-14-2013, 12:49 AM

Clearly those whitelabels were taking up positions that would be better occupied by tubes.

05-05-2013, 09:44 AM	#207
adultmobile No, I am not banned Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: ChatGF.com Posts: 5,345	This is an ancient thread. __________________ TubeCamGirl.com

05-06-2013, 05:02 AM	#211
EranG Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Cyprus Posts: 200	is this still relevant? does anyone finding it hard to rank AWE's WL sites? __________________ PerfectCPM.com Eran [at] PerfectCPM.com Skype: Eran.Gan

07-14-2013, 12:49 AM	#222
lagcam Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 2,892	Clearly those whitelabels were taking up positions that would be better occupied by tubes. __________________ Working Cam site for sale - NOT affiliate.

05-04-2013, 09:16 AM	#201
helterskelter808 So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 3,405	Apparently they did it to troll a broke-ass Romanian faggot into crying about it forever. Seems to have worked.

05-04-2013, 09:42 AM	#203
helterskelter808 So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 3,405	CEO of "Goaaagoagle" confirmed it to me an hour ago. They didn't say "faggot" though, I believe their exact words were "spamming fuckwit loser".

05-04-2013, 05:33 PM	#205
2013 So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: lollling Posts: 4,390	awe has no answers

05-10-2013, 02:58 AM	#212
Guido-Centro Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2013 Posts: 239	Hello everybody, First of all I apologize for the slow response.... This is what came out from our Google experts: WHAT HAPPENED The drops in Google rankings are not caused by anything fishy we did. A penalty hasbeen applied by Google due to the very nature of all whitelabel networks in the industry. Any whitelabel network may be hit in the future, too. Only Google?s search engineers would know when and what penalties will be assigned to which network. Indentifying harmful techniques of the WL Network is subject of an operation in May. WHAT WE DO We are developing unique content creation mechanisms for improved SEO performance. These changes may require more editing of the sites' content and/or structure, but they will also make your sites more future proof against any further penalties. Once the changes are in place, we will submit a blanket Reconsideration Request to Google on behalf of the entire network. These systemwide changes will not fix any penalties you might have individually received from e.g. having built spammy backlinks. WHAT?S NOT RECOMMENDED FOR WEBMASTER Please don?t submit Reconsideration Request individually will be done through one unique process for the whole network WHAT?S AHEAD US Expect a minimal timeframe of several months, although we cannot make any commitments on behalf of Google. The goal is to provide hasslefree creation of unique and compelling content that we will support with systemwide changes to be announced later. It?s important to understand Google?s view which is about added value. Added value in Google?s eye results in rankings, there is no pure technical way to get through this axiome.

05-10-2013, 07:36 AM	#217
Fat Panda Porn is Dead. Move along. Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 13,295	ROFL give it up people Google is done supporting MILLIONS of DUPLICATE identical sites pushed by black hat backlink spam and other methods. Google turned off your money machine months ago stop fucking crying about it!

07-13-2013, 12:14 PM	#220
teomaxxx Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 2,734	ha, ha, ha...so now I am ranking well in google (around 700 hits a day) with a old domain which is redirecting to my AWE whitelabel which got sandboxed recently. who said here something about Google algo being smart?