Evidence of Aliens on the Moon - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

Mutt · 12-13-2012, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

No logical explanation given, the conspiracy theory is far more logical

LOL the conspiracy theory only seems more logical to wackjobs - amazing how the conspiracy theory is never more logical to people who actually have years of specialized education and have become leading authorities in their fields.

And if the moon landing were faked why didn't we hear it from the leading scientists in the Soviet space program? The Soviets were in on the conspiracy? Hmmm........... could it be the entire Cold War was actually a ruse masterminded by Jewish bankers who have always played both ends against the middle!?!?!

1. In some photos, crosshairs seem to be behind objects. The cameras were fitted with a reseau plate (a clear glass plate with crosshairs etched on), making it impossible for any photographed object to appear "in front" of the grid. This suggests that objects have been "pasted" over them.

This only appears in copied and scanned photos, not the originals. It is caused by overexposure: the bright white areas of the emulsion "bleed" over the thin black crosshairs. The crosshairs are only about 0.004 inch thick (0.1 mm) and emulsion would only have to bleed about half that much to fully obscure it. Furthermore, there are many photos where the middle of the crosshair is "washed-out" but the rest is intact. In some photos of the American flag, parts of one crosshair appear on the red stripes, but parts of the same crosshair are faded or invisible on the white stripes. There would have been no reason to "paste" white stripes onto the flag.[60

Dirty F · 12-13-2012, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt

LOL the conspiracy theory only seems more logical to wackjobs - amazing how the conspiracy theory is never more logical to people who actually have years of specialized education and have become leading authorities in their fields.

And if the moon landing were faked why didn't we hear it from the leading scientists in the Soviet space program? The Soviets were in on the conspiracy? Hmmm........... could it be the entire Cold War was actually a ruse masterminded by Jewish bankers who have always played both ends against the middle!?!?!

1. In some photos, crosshairs seem to be behind objects. The cameras were fitted with a reseau plate (a clear glass plate with crosshairs etched on), making it impossible for any photographed object to appear "in front" of the grid. This suggests that objects have been "pasted" over them.

This only appears in copied and scanned photos, not the originals. It is caused by overexposure: the bright white areas of the emulsion "bleed" over the thin black crosshairs. The crosshairs are only about 0.004 inch thick (0.1 mm) and emulsion would only have to bleed about half that much to fully obscure it. Furthermore, there are many photos where the middle of the crosshair is "washed-out" but the rest is intact. In some photos of the American flag, parts of one crosshair appear on the red stripes, but parts of the same crosshair are faded or invisible on the white stripes. There would have been no reason to "paste" white stripes onto the flag.[60

The retard will ignore facts like this. It doesn't fit his believe.
All these conspiracies are debunked over and over again. But they don't care. It's very sad group of people.

Dirty F · 12-13-2012, 05:52 PM

Richard, you are gonna answer me, right?

biskoppen · 12-13-2012, 05:59 PM

One of the biggest mistakes I see is that when you hear them talk to the guys in the lander which is almost touching down there's not a sound from the roaring rocket engine just beneath them.. and in later interviews the astronauts mention that the noise from the very same engine was very very loud..

Dirty F · 12-13-2012, 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by biskoppen

One of the biggest mistakes I see is that when you hear them talk to the guys in the lander which is almost touching down there's not a sound from the roaring rocket engine just beneath them.. and in later interviews the astronauts mention that the noise from the very same engine was very very loud..

Yup, you solved it. Every moon landing must've been a hoax.

biskoppen · 12-13-2012, 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

Yup, you solved it. Every moon landing must've been a hoax.

The funny thing is that you don't even question it.. everything daddy tells you must be true, no need to think for yourself..

Going to bed

Dirty F · 12-13-2012, 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by biskoppen

The funny thing is that you don't even question it.. everything daddy tells you must be true, no need to think for yourself..

Going to bed

The typical truther answer. You forgot to add slave though.

Dirty F · 12-13-2012, 06:20 PM

Truly amazing how more and more people here turn out to be conspiracy idiots.

Dirty F · 12-13-2012, 06:29 PM

Richard is not going to answer my question. And we all know why. Because then he has to admit believing all 6 moon landings were faked. Including all the footage. Which even he realizes is insane. This would make him a crazy conspiracy idiot. So the best thing he can do is just ignore my questions.

wehateporn · 12-13-2012, 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

Facts, lets ignore them. As any conspiracy nutter does. Who needs facts. Believing in retarded conspiracies is way more fun, right?

wehateporn · 12-13-2012, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

Richard is not going to answer my question. And we all know why. Because then he has to admit believing all 6 moon landings were faked. Including all the footage. Which even he realizes is insane. This would make him a crazy conspiracy idiot. So the best thing he can do is just ignore my questions.

Of course they were all faked, they can't even go there now even after decades of exponential technological advance

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude · 12-13-2012, 06:49 PM

Arguing with a conspiracy theory nutjob is like throwing rocks at the moon.

ADG

_Richard_ · 12-13-2012, 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

Richard is not going to answer my question. And we all know why. Because then he has to admit believing all 6 moon landings were faked. Including all the footage. Which even he realizes is insane. This would make him a crazy conspiracy idiot. So the best thing he can do is just ignore my questions.

actually i was driving home from work

that's a whole lotta messages

Do i believe the moon landings were faked? I believe it is possible.

Do i find trying to discuss it extremely hilarious?

you bet your ass.

travs · 12-13-2012, 08:20 PM

calm down...

Dirty F · 12-13-2012, 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_

actually i was driving home from work

that's a whole lotta messages

Do i believe the moon landings were faked? I believe it is possible.

Do i find trying to discuss it extremely hilarious?

you bet your ass.

You "believe it's possible".
That's odd. Earlier in the thread you made it clear going to the moon is impossible:

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_

all serious aside, for any confusion on moon landings all one has to do is look at the Soviets failure to get through the Van Allen Belt

What's the problem Richard? Why do you simply refuse to say what you really believe in? Just say it man. You believe all 6 moon landings were faked. All the footage was faked. Everybody who read this thread has come to that conclusion by now so you can stop hiding the fact that you are just another conspiracy theorist.

_Richard_ · 12-13-2012, 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

You "believe it's possible".
That's odd. Earlier in the thread you made it clear going to the moon is impossible:

What's the problem Richard? Why do you simply refuse to say what you really believe in? Just say it man. You believe all 6 moon landings were faked. All the footage was faked. Everybody who read this thread has come to that conclusion by now so you can stop hiding the fact that you are just another conspiracy theorist.

all serious aside Franck.. all serious aside

DBS.US · 12-13-2012, 11:53 PM

Was Gilligan really on a island in the pacific or was he in a movie set in Hollywood?
Conspiracy nutters say he was just an actor

Why would they fake it?

Gilligans car left no tracks! Must have been faked

2MuchMark · 12-13-2012, 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

No, he's just expressing the anger that such stupidity can bring about. That van allen bullshit has been debunked 100 times over, lay off the bong hits and get back to the fuckin books...

BEST.
ADVICE.
EVER.

Jakke PNG · 12-14-2012, 12:02 AM

What is wrong with you people? Yes. you.

just a punk · 12-14-2012, 04:28 AM

sperbonzo · 12-14-2012, 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_

from what i read it was the protons/electrons being extremely oversized that wreaked a great deal of havoc on computer systems and the like

if our technology today can't seem to manage this, how was brand new technology 40 years ago no problem?

not so cut and dry, eh?

My point about the in the article it talks about the amount of time spent within the van allen belts. Today's satellites have problems because they spend months and years within the radiation, rather then just a few hours, as in the case of the moon shots.

Also, in many ways, the simple mechanical gauges, valves, and verniers that made up the computers in those moon shots were much more robust in their resistance to radiation than today's electronics. They didn't have much in the way of micro processors, or RAM or hard drives.

.

.

ZeroHero · 12-14-2012, 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CamBoss

look i'm am fly and i almost land on the moon

_Richard_ · 12-14-2012, 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

My point about the in the article it talks about the amount of time spent within the van allen belts. Today's satellites have problems because they spend months and years within the radiation, rather then just a few hours, as in the case of the moon shots.

Also, in many ways, the simple mechanical gauges, valves, and verniers that made up the computers in those moon shots were much more robust in their resistance to radiation than today's electronics. They didn't have much in the way of micro processors, or RAM or hard drives.

.

.

definitely, it's just interesting how this conspiracy theory gets looped into 'radiation' sickness. Its also interesting how fanatical people get about simple discussion on the topic. There is obviously three parties regarding these landings, and those parties became rather defined when the Europeans found all the water

The other thought about this theory is the fact the Van Allen Belt is a shield for radiation, solar flares etc one of the Russian attempts had all the astronauts coming back black lol

Tom_PM · 12-14-2012, 08:58 AM

Talked about wash out effect in the last thread on this cross hair thing.

"I want to believe" should be "I want to believe only the things that I want to believe."

dyna mo · 12-14-2012, 10:36 AM

that's james van allen in the center, clearly his belt is not causing issue with the rocket.

DBS.US · 12-14-2012, 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

that's james van allen in the center, clearly his belt is not causing issue with the rocket.

and his belt hasn't affected the camera film at all.

_Richard_ · 12-14-2012, 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

that's james van allen in the center, clearly his belt is not causing issue with the rocket.

Frank21 · 12-14-2012, 10:41 AM

Conspiracy theory looks like a weatherbaloon to me.

wehateporn · 12-14-2012, 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

that's james van allen in the center, clearly his belt is not causing issue with the rocket.

You're alive Dyna Mo

Penny24Seven · 12-14-2012, 10:48 AM

now I understand why some people are the way they are by reading this thread haha. They are just that fucking stupid, I get it now

Dirty F · 12-14-2012, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frank21

Conspiracy theory looks like a weatherbaloon to me.

Where do all you idiots come from? I never seen you before and suddenly you are in every conspiracy post talking complete fucking shit.
Did i miss the memo or something? Why is gfy attracting so many of you idiots lately?
And why do you imbeciles insist on posting here? Can't you just piss off to the Icke forums?

Frank21 · 12-14-2012, 11:19 AM

Dirty F · 12-14-2012, 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frank21

No, i just think you are goddamn fucking imbecile and wish you morons would fuck off.

12-13-2012, 06:49 PM	#62
AsianDivaGirlsWebDude Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: San Francisco Bay Area Posts: 38,323	Arguing with a conspiracy theory nutjob is like throwing rocks at the moon. ADG __________________ Asian Diva Girls - Exclusive Photos and Videos Asian Diva Girls Affiliate Program (50% ccBill Revshare)

12-13-2012, 11:53 PM	#67
DBS.US Geo Cities Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: North Captiva Island, Florida USA Posts: 11,830	Was Gilligan really on a island in the pacific or was he in a movie set in Hollywood? Conspiracy nutters say he was just an actor Why would they fake it? Gilligans car left no tracks! Must have been faked __________________ Make a Free Chaturbate White Label site in 34 minutes and be making money tonight Last edited by DBS.US; 12-13-2012 at 11:57 PM..

12-14-2012, 12:02 AM	#69
Jakke PNG ex-TeenGodFather Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Suomi Finland Perkele Posts: 20,306	What is wrong with you people? Yes. you. __________________ ..and I'm off.

12-14-2012, 04:28 AM	#70
just a punk So fuckin' bored Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 32,383	__________________ Obey the Cowgod

12-14-2012, 08:58 AM	#74
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	Talked about wash out effect in the last thread on this cross hair thing. "I want to believe" should be "I want to believe only the things that I want to believe." __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

12-13-2012, 05:52 PM	#53
Dirty F Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 59,204	Richard, you are gonna answer me, right?

12-13-2012, 05:59 PM	#54
biskoppen Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Very small penis Posts: 5,809	One of the biggest mistakes I see is that when you hear them talk to the guys in the lander which is almost touching down there's not a sound from the roaring rocket engine just beneath them.. and in later interviews the astronauts mention that the noise from the very same engine was very very loud..

12-13-2012, 06:20 PM	#58
Dirty F Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 59,204	Truly amazing how more and more people here turn out to be conspiracy idiots.

12-13-2012, 06:29 PM	#59
Dirty F Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 59,204	Richard is not going to answer my question. And we all know why. Because then he has to admit believing all 6 moon landings were faked. Including all the footage. Which even he realizes is insane. This would make him a crazy conspiracy idiot. So the best thing he can do is just ignore my questions.

12-13-2012, 08:20 PM	#64
travs Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 1,631	calm down...

12-14-2012, 10:36 AM	#75
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 64,736	that's james van allen in the center, clearly his belt is not causing issue with the rocket.

12-14-2012, 10:41 AM	#78
Frank21 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 733	Conspiracy theory looks like a weatherbaloon to me. __________________ www.Rate-My-Pussylips.com - FuckingFetish.com - for sale!!! - ExxGfs.com icq#: 598425939

12-14-2012, 10:48 AM	#80
Penny24Seven So Fucking What Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: USA Posts: 6,287	now I understand why some people are the way they are by reading this thread haha. They are just that fucking stupid, I get it now __________________ Our site is coming soon. It will be one of the best ever! I know so. Brian and Penny

12-14-2012, 11:19 AM	#82
Frank21 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 733	__________________ www.Rate-My-Pussylips.com - FuckingFetish.com - for sale!!! - ExxGfs.com icq#: 598425939