TATU article - Get a load of this - GoFuckYourself.com

AOLGuy · 02-16-2003, 06:29 AM

Just read this piece on TATU's manager... lots of dirt on the group and the psychology behind it.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2003061831,00.html

Man, this guy makes everyone in our business look Mormon by comparison... well, some of us... LOL.

J B · 02-16-2003, 06:45 AM

Interesting read...

Kray · 02-16-2003, 06:48 AM

the guy is fucked up!

DarkJedi · 02-16-2003, 06:50 AM

it cant be for real

Libertine · 02-16-2003, 06:52 AM

In tabloids we trust.

Pornwolf · 02-16-2003, 06:55 AM

It's a marketing plan that's working I guess. They had to do something to spread their 15 minutesof fame out a bit longer because those girls have the most grating and annoying voices in the world. If they have another hit song I'll eat Sleazy's hat. They REALLY suck.

Scott McD · 02-16-2003, 06:58 AM

That page you linked to (thesun.co.uk) shows a pcture of a topless 16/17 year old.

So a large newspaper is allowed to show young girls topless on the net? Wouldn't that be child porn if the picture appeared on a porn site?

Living For Today · 02-16-2003, 06:58 AM

self confessed pedo

J B · 02-16-2003, 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Scott McD
That page you linked to (thesun.co.uk) shows a pcture of a topless 16/17 year old.

So a large newspaper is allowed to show young girls topless on the net? Wouldn't that be child porn if the picture appeared on a porn site?

Should be OK in the UK... page 3 girls are 16 or 17 as well, no?

Scott McD · 02-16-2003, 07:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by J B

Should be OK in the UK... page 3 girls are 16 or 17 as well, no?

Yeah but I didn't know that applied online as well.

So I can go and create a site with topless 16/17 year olds?

I don't think I'd be allowed to do that.

gothweb · 02-16-2003, 07:11 AM

The Sun is UK based. In the UK, over-16 is okay for topless, over-18 okay for nude. I imagine they can get away with it.

Lee · 02-16-2003, 07:12 AM

I must admit that it shocked the shit out of me when I first saw the video to their song. Two very young looking girls in school uniforms kissing ~ the immediate reaction was that all the pedo's will be sitting there knocking one out

And 16 is legal for topless in the UK.

Scott McD · 02-16-2003, 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by gothweb
I imagine they can get away with it.

I'm off to create topless16yearolds.co.uk

Who wants to promote it?

lol

DarkJedi · 02-16-2003, 07:28 AM

i think it has something to do with the posters' intentions - you know that bullshit when you can post pictures of underage girls as a work of art ?

AOLGuy · 02-16-2003, 07:29 AM

How did Private used to get away with its sites of Euro-legal teens a few years back?

I remember that stupid Superteen shit used to be all over the newsgroups. That was freaky porn - it looked like a Mentos commercial headbands and all.

AOLGuy · 02-16-2003, 08:51 AM

I didn't even think about that pic link when posting the link...

Yeah, all those art-porn sites out there... LOL

BigFrog · 02-16-2003, 08:53 AM

who the fuck is TATU?

mazafaka · 02-16-2003, 09:04 AM

UK No. 1
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/chart/top40/index.shtml

BigFrog · 02-16-2003, 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by mazafaka
UK No. 1
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/chart/top40/index.shtml

ahhh.....ive heard that before. that song is gay. and it's #1 there?

Nysus · 02-16-2003, 09:16 AM

I believe the way they get away with it is because there is a fine line between nudity and pornography. Pornography is any act implying sexual actions/implications, while nudity, is simply that.

Examples:

If a mom takes a picture of their naked 3 year old daughter/son/asexual child taking a bath, that is nudity.

And on the extreme of pornography, if you photograph/video two 17 year olds having intercourse, then that is child pornography- because by law they are children, and in a sexual act/implying a sexual act.

The problem arises when you get close to the fine line. Is a naked asexual baby that happens to have their legs spread open considered nudity or child pornography? It all really depends on who's looking at it I suppose, which is why there's a fine line.

Cheers,
Matt

Scott McD · 02-16-2003, 09:17 AM

Where are you Bigfrog ?

It's either gonna be No 1 there or will be soon likely...

BigFrog · 02-16-2003, 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Scott McD
Where are you Bigfrog ?

It's either gonna be No 1 there or will be soon likely...

Pennsylvania.

I wouldnt be suprised if it did end up being #1 here.....with the crap they play on the radio today that wouldnt suprise me at all.

Tipsy · 02-16-2003, 09:34 AM

I was watching an interesting TV thing on page 3 girls. It seems they can't be in sexually suggestive poses. Daft because people only look at them to get a kick, but it seems to be part of the very vague and undefined UK 'law'. Arty 16/17 topless is fine but doing something like suggestively eating a banana while topless and 16/17 is a no no.

People get confused about CP anyway IMO. A 16 year old is hardly a 'child' and while I totally agree with 18 being the min. age for girls to start fucking on film (below that is far too young to make the sort of decision that will affect the rest of your life so severley and it's far too easy to exploit 'girls' the younger they are) pics of 16/17 yr olds are hardly CP. Illegal depending on the activity yes but hardly CP.

True pedo scum don't wanna look at anything 14+. They like 'em young and innocent so they can really screw them up in every sense of the word

newbiewebmistress · 02-16-2003, 09:40 AM

I'm upset now, I went and clicked and read before I read what you guys posted. Wish I hadn't. It's sad to exploit young people like that. I , for one, love Tatu and thier music (All the things she said) But that freakin pedo is using them to his sexual advantage. What a perv. He should be locked up. Why would the paper have her bare chested? Shouldn't they have at least blurred it out? It's too late now. Another case of Innocence stolen.
Well, also, the girls of Tatu aren't even lesbians. I read somewhere else that it's just an image. They had a quote with one of them saying, people think they are lesbians, but they just really love each other. That loser manager is capitilzing off of it! What a fucking pussy.

NWM

Libertine · 02-16-2003, 09:57 AM

ALL THAT IS IN THE TABLOIDS IS TRUE

THEY NEVER TWIST THE FACTS

THEY NEVER AIM FOR SENSATION

THEY ARE ALWAYS RIGHT

<small>just because it's in writing doesn't mean it's true</small>

Tipsy · 02-16-2003, 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld
ALL THAT IS IN THE TABLOIDS IS TRUE

THEY NEVER TWIST THE FACTS

THEY NEVER AIM FOR SENSATION

THEY ARE ALWAYS RIGHT

Of course. ESPECIALLY The Sun.

The really scary thing is it's the UK's biggest selling paper and you can bet whatever the story many of the readers don't have the intelligence to question the stuff they read.

Dopy · 02-16-2003, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by BigFrog
who the fuck is TATU?

Another bunch of Russian cheaters driven by a business with kiddie porn links.

You know the types, fuck your kids in front of a polaroid and make a few bucks.

mazafaka · 02-16-2003, 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Dopy

Another bunch of Russian cheaters driven by a business with kiddie porn links.

You know the types, fuck your kids in front of a polaroid and make a few bucks.

Are you jealous ?

02-16-2003, 06:45 AM	#2
J B Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: StatsRemote.com Posts: 1,804	Interesting read... __________________ A HUGE TIME SAVER FOR LESS THAN $1 PER DAY! Contact: support A\|T statsremote D\|O\|T com

02-16-2003, 06:52 AM	#5
Libertine sex dwarf Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 17,860	In tabloids we trust. __________________ /(bb\|[^b]{2})/

02-16-2003, 06:55 AM	#6
Pornwolf Drunk and Unruly Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Hollywood Posts: 22,712	It's a marketing plan that's working I guess. They had to do something to spread their 15 minutesof fame out a bit longer because those girls have the most grating and annoying voices in the world. If they have another hit song I'll eat Sleazy's hat. They REALLY suck. __________________ I've trusted my sites to them for over a decade... Webair, bitches.

02-16-2003, 06:58 AM	#7
Scott McD Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Glasgow, Scotland Posts: 67,795	That page you linked to (thesun.co.uk) shows a pcture of a topless 16/17 year old. So a large newspaper is allowed to show young girls topless on the net? Wouldn't that be child porn if the picture appeared on a porn site? __________________ I Buy My High Quality Traffic Here, You Should Too!

02-16-2003, 07:11 AM	#11
gothweb Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Back in the USSA Posts: 8,849	The Sun is UK based. In the UK, over-16 is okay for topless, over-18 okay for nude. I imagine they can get away with it. __________________ Photos by Ian X.: Distinctive photos of goth babes. Blood Money:Your traffic, my sites, our money. MojoHost: Still the best.

02-16-2003, 06:29 AM	#1
AOLGuy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Nebraska Posts: 1,261	TATU article - Get a load of this Just read this piece on TATU's manager... lots of dirt on the group and the psychology behind it. http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2003061831,00.html Man, this guy makes everyone in our business look Mormon by comparison... well, some of us... LOL.

02-16-2003, 06:48 AM	#3
Kray Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Dialers Suck Posts: 296	the guy is fucked up!

02-16-2003, 06:50 AM	#4
DarkJedi No Refunds Issued. Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: GFY Posts: 28,300	it cant be for real

02-16-2003, 06:58 AM	#8
Living For Today Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Brisbane, Australia Posts: 3,970	self confessed pedo

02-16-2003, 07:12 AM	#12
Lee Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Kernow Posts: 2,977	I must admit that it shocked the shit out of me when I first saw the video to their song. Two very young looking girls in school uniforms kissing ~ the immediate reaction was that all the pedo's will be sitting there knocking one out And 16 is legal for topless in the UK.

02-16-2003, 07:28 AM	#14
DarkJedi No Refunds Issued. Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: GFY Posts: 28,300	i think it has something to do with the posters' intentions - you know that bullshit when you can post pictures of underage girls as a work of art ?

02-16-2003, 07:29 AM	#15
AOLGuy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Nebraska Posts: 1,261	How did Private used to get away with its sites of Euro-legal teens a few years back? I remember that stupid Superteen shit used to be all over the newsgroups. That was freaky porn - it looked like a Mentos commercial headbands and all.

02-16-2003, 08:51 AM	#16
AOLGuy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Nebraska Posts: 1,261	I didn't even think about that pic link when posting the link... Yeah, all those art-porn sites out there... LOL

02-16-2003, 08:53 AM	#17
BigFrog Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 2,057	who the fuck is TATU?

02-16-2003, 09:04 AM	#18
mazafaka Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 148	UK No. 1 http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/chart/top40/index.shtml

02-16-2003, 09:16 AM	#20
Nysus Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 7,817	I believe the way they get away with it is because there is a fine line between nudity and pornography. Pornography is any act implying sexual actions/implications, while nudity, is simply that. Examples: If a mom takes a picture of their naked 3 year old daughter/son/asexual child taking a bath, that is nudity. And on the extreme of pornography, if you photograph/video two 17 year olds having intercourse, then that is child pornography- because by law they are children, and in a sexual act/implying a sexual act. The problem arises when you get close to the fine line. Is a naked asexual baby that happens to have their legs spread open considered nudity or child pornography? It all really depends on who's looking at it I suppose, which is why there's a fine line. Cheers, Matt

02-16-2003, 09:17 AM	#21
Scott McD Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Glasgow, Scotland Posts: 67,795	Where are you Bigfrog ? It's either gonna be No 1 there or will be soon likely... __________________ I Buy My High Quality Traffic Here, You Should Too!

02-16-2003, 09:34 AM	#23
Tipsy Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: See sig Posts: 6,989	I was watching an interesting TV thing on page 3 girls. It seems they can't be in sexually suggestive poses. Daft because people only look at them to get a kick, but it seems to be part of the very vague and undefined UK 'law'. Arty 16/17 topless is fine but doing something like suggestively eating a banana while topless and 16/17 is a no no. People get confused about CP anyway IMO. A 16 year old is hardly a 'child' and while I totally agree with 18 being the min. age for girls to start fucking on film (below that is far too young to make the sort of decision that will affect the rest of your life so severley and it's far too easy to exploit 'girls' the younger they are) pics of 16/17 yr olds are hardly CP. Illegal depending on the activity yes but hardly CP. True pedo scum don't wanna look at anything 14+. They like 'em young and innocent so they can really screw them up in every sense of the word

02-16-2003, 09:40 AM	#24
newbiewebmistress Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 162	I'm upset now, I went and clicked and read before I read what you guys posted. Wish I hadn't. It's sad to exploit young people like that. I , for one, love Tatu and thier music (All the things she said) But that freakin pedo is using them to his sexual advantage. What a perv. He should be locked up. Why would the paper have her bare chested? Shouldn't they have at least blurred it out? It's too late now. Another case of Innocence stolen. Well, also, the girls of Tatu aren't even lesbians. I read somewhere else that it's just an image. They had a quote with one of them saying, people think they are lesbians, but they just really love each other. That loser manager is capitilzing off of it! What a fucking pussy. NWM

02-16-2003, 09:57 AM	#25
Libertine sex dwarf Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 17,860	ALL THAT IS IN THE TABLOIDS IS TRUE THEY NEVER TWIST THE FACTS THEY NEVER AIM FOR SENSATION THEY ARE ALWAYS RIGHT <small>just because it's in writing doesn't mean it's true</small> __________________ /(bb\|[^b]{2})/