TATU article - Get a load of this
 

Just read this piece on TATU's manager... lots of dirt on the group and the psychology behind it.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2003061831,00.html

Man, this guy makes everyone in our business look Mormon by comparison... well, some of us... LOL.

Interesting read...

the guy is fucked up!

it cant be for real :eek2

In tabloids we trust.

It's a marketing plan that's working I guess. They had to do something to spread their 15 minutesof fame out a bit longer because those girls have the most grating and annoying voices in the world. If they have another hit song I'll eat Sleazy's hat. They REALLY suck.

That page you linked to (thesun.co.uk) shows a pcture of a topless 16/17 year old.

So a large newspaper is allowed to show young girls topless on the net? Wouldn't that be child porn if the picture appeared on a porn site?

self confessed pedo

Should be OK in the UK... page 3 girls are 16 or 17 as well, no?

Yeah but I didn't know that applied online as well.

So I can go and create a site with topless 16/17 year olds?

I don't think I'd be allowed to do that.

The Sun is UK based. In the UK, over-16 is okay for topless, over-18 okay for nude. I imagine they can get away with it.

I must admit that it shocked the shit out of me when I first saw the video to their song. Two very young looking girls in school uniforms kissing ~ the immediate reaction was that all the pedo's will be sitting there knocking one out :(

And 16 is legal for topless in the UK.

I'm off to create topless16yearolds.co.uk

Who wants to promote it?

lol

i think it has something to do with the posters' intentions - you know that bullshit when you can post pictures of underage girls as a work of art ?

How did Private used to get away with its sites of Euro-legal teens a few years back?

I remember that stupid Superteen shit used to be all over the newsgroups. That was freaky porn - it looked like a Mentos commercial headbands and all.

I didn't even think about that pic link when posting the link...

Yeah, all those art-porn sites out there... LOL

who the fuck is TATU?

UK No. 1
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/chart/top40/index.shtml

ahhh.....ive heard that before. that song is gay. and it's #1 there? :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I believe the way they get away with it is because there is a fine line between nudity and pornography. Pornography is any act implying sexual actions/implications, while nudity, is simply that.

Examples:

If a mom takes a picture of their naked 3 year old daughter/son/asexual child taking a bath, that is nudity.

And on the extreme of pornography, if you photograph/video two 17 year olds having intercourse, then that is child pornography- because by law they are children, and in a sexual act/implying a sexual act.

The problem arises when you get close to the fine line. Is a naked asexual baby that happens to have their legs spread open considered nudity or child pornography? It all really depends on who's looking at it I suppose, which is why there's a fine line.

Cheers,
Matt

Where are you Bigfrog ?

It's either gonna be No 1 there or will be soon likely...

:glugglug

Pennsylvania.

I wouldnt be suprised if it did end up being #1 here.....with the crap they play on the radio today that wouldnt suprise me at all.

I was watching an interesting TV thing on page 3 girls. It seems they can't be in sexually suggestive poses. Daft because people only look at them to get a kick, but it seems to be part of the very vague and undefined UK 'law'. Arty 16/17 topless is fine but doing something like suggestively eating a banana while topless and 16/17 is a no no.

People get confused about CP anyway IMO. A 16 year old is hardly a 'child' and while I totally agree with 18 being the min. age for girls to start fucking on film (below that is far too young to make the sort of decision that will affect the rest of your life so severley and it's far too easy to exploit 'girls' the younger they are) pics of 16/17 yr olds are hardly CP. Illegal depending on the activity yes but hardly CP.

True pedo scum don't wanna look at anything 14+. They like 'em young and innocent so they can really screw them up in every sense of the word :(

I'm upset now, I went and clicked and read before I read what you guys posted. Wish I hadn't. It's sad to exploit young people like that. I , for one, love Tatu and thier music (All the things she said) But that freakin pedo is using them to his sexual advantage. What a perv. He should be locked up. Why would the paper have her bare chested? Shouldn't they have at least blurred it out? It's too late now. Another case of Innocence stolen.
Well, also, the girls of Tatu aren't even lesbians. I read somewhere else that it's just an image. They had a quote with one of them saying, people think they are lesbians, but they just really love each other. That loser manager is capitilzing off of it! What a fucking pussy.

NWM

ALL THAT IS IN THE TABLOIDS IS TRUE

THEY NEVER TWIST THE FACTS

THEY NEVER AIM FOR SENSATION

THEY ARE ALWAYS RIGHT

<small>just because it's in writing doesn't mean it's true</small>

Of course. ESPECIALLY The Sun.

The really scary thing is it's the UK's biggest selling paper and you can bet whatever the story many of the readers don't have the intelligence to question the stuff they read.

Another bunch of Russian cheaters driven by a business with kiddie porn links.

You know the types, fuck your kids in front of a polaroid and make a few bucks.

Are you jealous ?
:Graucho :Graucho :Graucho