GFY Conspiracy Theorists, Where are the Tracks? - Page 3 - GoFuckYourself.com

Dirty F · 10-29-2012, 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

ha...thanks man...but as you know im only in this thread to fuck around.

mission accomplished

I noticed how you have this same excuse for quite a while now. And it's total bullshit.
You are just another dumb fucking conspiracy theorist who always shows up in threads like this to give your imbecile 2 cents. Adding a quick disclaimer that you are just fucking around won't fool anybody, believe me.

The nonsense posted in this thread once again shows what a retarded group of losers conspiracy nutters are. And ofcourse as always not proof whatsoever. This is the one thing that will never change in these threads.

Sly · 10-29-2012, 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VenusBlogger

These are not conspiracy anymore, THEY ARE FACTS NOW.

1) JFK was killed by CIA+FBI

2) Man never landed on Moon, it was filmed in Hollywood Studios. That answers the question: "Why haven't we go back to the moon" -> You can't go "BACK" to a place where you have never been before.

3) World Trade Center was demolished by BUSH Administration, as clearly displayed on Oliver Stone movie.

Of course, to see the TRUTH, you need Let your USA Patriotic Sentiment on a side, otherwise, you would think that someone is trying to hit your reputation and you will react. Something that probably people like ROBBIE or Some Hippie from California, will never understand.

PAIRIOD.

I like how #2 destroys the credibility of #3.

Puriodd.

Phoenix · 10-29-2012, 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

I noticed how you have this same excuse for quite a while now. And it's total bullshit.
You are just another dumb fucking conspiracy theorist who always shows up in threads like this to give your imbecile 2 cents. Adding a quick disclaimer that you are just fucking around won't fool anybody, believe me.

The nonsense posted in this thread once again shows what a retarded group of losers conspiracy nutters are. And ofcourse as always not proof whatsoever. This is the one thing that will never change in these threads.

frank people who actually know me, know im fucking around.
i have met you once....you were sleeping on the floor of someones room, juicys i believe, i came in, saw what you looked like, enjoyed a chuckle and left.

happy to avoid you...as you have nothing of value to add to anything.

i feel sorry for you actually...because i think this is the most attention you get in life
here on this board.

enjoy it man..soak it in.

Phoenix · 10-29-2012, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

I like how #2 destroys the credibility of #3.

Puriodd.

i dont follow you?

what does his point #2 have to do with point #3??

Dirty F · 10-29-2012, 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

frank people who actually know me, know im fucking around.
i have met you once....you were sleeping on the floor of someones room, juicys i believe, i came in, saw what you looked like, enjoyed a chuckle and left.

happy to avoid you...as you have nothing of value to add to anything.

i feel sorry for you actually...because i think this is the most attention you get in life
here on this board.

enjoy it man..soak it in.

Was that before or after the dinner you invited me to?

Full of shit, as always.

Minte · 10-29-2012, 07:44 PM

I have to wonder how NASA convinced the Russians to keep their mouths shut. Or maybe they just took the US governments word on the whole event?

Phoenix · 10-29-2012, 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

Was that before or after the dinner you invited me to?

Full of shit, as always.

there there frank

i give you attention

i am sorry you didnt get enough when you needed it

Sly · 10-29-2012, 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

i dont follow you?

what does his point #2 have to do with point #3??

If Hollywood was used to fake a moon landing, why should they be believed when they blame Bush for one of the biggest terrorist attacks ever?

#2 They are liars.

#3 They are truth speakers.

Phoenix · 10-29-2012, 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

If Hollywood was used to fake a moon landing, why should they be believed when they blame Bush for one of the biggest terrorist attacks ever?

#2 They are liars.

#3 They are truth speakers.

ah i get your reasoning.
now..at the risk of frank screaming at me from his tiny one bedroom dimly lit apartment i will nonetheless weigh in a little more.

now....to be clear....i don't believe this, however there is a rumour that Stanley Kubrick
was in on the filming, and he got a new type of camera technology out of the deal.
then he hid out in france in a castle as he was afraid of being assassinated.

when i write things this way....explaining that i dont believe, but there is rumour stating these things, it is not as fun as just saying it.
because now frank cant jump up and down and scream at his monitor

SilentKnight · 10-29-2012, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

i feel sorry for you actually...because i think this is the most attention you get in life
here on this board.

Astute observation - and probably very, very close to the mark.

Dirty F · 10-29-2012, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilentKnight

Astute observation - and probably very, very close to the mark.

Aaaaw look who is still upset because i laughed at him for believing in ghosts

Max Potential · 10-29-2012, 08:20 PM

North Korea's space program will capture the moon and bring it home, a feat no Western nation could accomplish.

Dirty F · 10-29-2012, 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

now....to be clear....i don't believe this, however there is a rumour that Stanley Kubrick
was in on the filming

Jesus christ! You're so full of shit it's almost dripping out of my screen.

What did i just tell you? Skip the disclaimers because nobody believes you. It just makes you look like a bigger nutjob.

Quote:

Originally Posted by candyflip

My friends are writing a screenplay about Stanley Kubrick and the rumor that he directed the fake moon landing.

There is some interesting info to support the theory, but the movie will be entirely fictional.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

he 100% shot the film...the reasons behind it are unclear though

Fucking loser.

Dirty F · 10-29-2012, 08:24 PM

Phoenix, can you try and make one post without talking complete bullshit? Is that even possible?

Phoenix · 10-29-2012, 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

Jesus christ! You're so full of shit it's almost dripping out of my screen.

What did i just tell you? Skip the disclaimers because nobody believes you. It just makes you look like a bigger nutjob.

Fucking loser.

you are about the dumbest motherfucker i have ever met
enjoy your day frank...i have shit to do...so i wont be able to hit 30k posts with you today

Dirty F · 10-29-2012, 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

now....to be clear....i don't believe this, however there is a rumour that Stanley Kubrick
was in on the filming

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

the moon landing was kubrick....he filmed the whole thing...while i do believe they went there....they didnt get any footage as their cameras were not treated for space radiation..they wouldnto h ave had one piece of filme evidence.

I hope they went..or we are a truly pathetic species.

You of all people should understand the puppet strings going on in the governement...fuck explain how half the so called 9/11 terrorists are alive and well..hell one even works for an airline.

........

Dirty F · 10-29-2012, 08:27 PM

And ofcourse this gem. But remember people, he is just "fucking around".

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

i firmly believe we never went to the moon

we didnt even know about the radiation that would have killed the astronauts

suck it up...believe what the government tells you and do as you are told

stanley kubrick hid in his home for years fearing the us governement would kill him as he was the one that filmed the fake landings

Dirty F · 10-29-2012, 08:29 PM

Now think hard before you reply, dumb nutter. Because i will make you look like the idiot you are over and over again. And it's so easy, i could do it in my sleep.

DBS.US · 10-29-2012, 08:29 PM

Phoenix · 10-29-2012, 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

Now think hard before you reply, dumb nutter. Because i will make you look like the idiot you are over and over again. And it's so easy, i could do it in my sleep.

i feel like a band leader

dance bitch dance

you seem to be the only one i have power over though...sadly everyone else has caught on

keep looking for quotes...im sure i have posted many many things

i mean i have almost 30k posts

you have almost 60k? i bet 90% of yours are hatred filled garbage

seek help frank before you slip the knot around your neck

Phoenix · 10-29-2012, 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBS.US

nice this is good to know

notime · 10-30-2012, 03:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by halfpint

lmao is that even real looks like tin foil wrapping

Thin foil must be the strongest material in the multiverse then

PAR · 10-30-2012, 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

Ofcourse they have a testing area. Every idiot knows that.

Well then it would seem like you asked the question that every idiot knows the answer to...

2012 · 11-04-2012, 12:48 PM

Penny24Seven · 11-04-2012, 12:53 PM

back to the thread, have any of you even watched the rover drive on the moon? It throws up so much fucking dirt it covers its own tracks. Watch the damn thing drive around with tires that look like a screen and you wonder why there are not that many tracks lol,

helterskelter808 · 11-04-2012, 01:23 PM

And yet on the LRO pics, there are tracks all over.

Sly · 11-04-2012, 01:32 PM

VenusBlogger · 11-04-2012, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Max Potential

That is certainly a theory has has been proposed a lot. One question then would be why lie about it to begin with?

COLD WAR, dude...

BTW, the moon landing was FAKE, and filmed in a STUDIO. That's a FACT.

Why haven't you go back to the moon since 1969 with the Exponential increase in technology we have today?

Simple. You cannot go back to a place where you have never been before.

PIRIOD.

Dirty F · 11-04-2012, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAR

Well then it would seem like you asked the question that every idiot knows the answer to...

What the fuck are you talking about?

Dirty F · 11-04-2012, 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VenusBlogger

COLD WAR, dude...

BTW, the moon landing was FAKE, and filmed in a STUDIO. That's a FACT.

Why haven't you go back to the moon since 1969 with the Exponential increase in technology we have today?

Simple. You cannot go back to a place where you have never been before.

PIRIOD.

I hope you are just trolling. You can't be this stupid.

VenusBlogger · 11-04-2012, 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2012

VenusBlogger · 11-04-2012, 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

I hope you are just trolling. You can't be this stupid.

I think exactly the same about people who believe in that BIG SCAM...

Dirty F · 11-04-2012, 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VenusBlogger

I think exactly the same about people who believe in that BIG SCAM...

God, you are serious. So all the moon landings were faked? Is that correct?

helterskelter808 · 11-04-2012, 06:59 PM

Not only has NASA not gone "back" for 40 years, ESA (European Space Agency) hasn't tried it, the Soviet Union didn't try it, or Russia, or China or India. Why not?

The usual reason is that "why would they bother when the USA already did it?".

In that case, why did we go "back", if we already did it? Even after the Apollo 13 near disaster, we still went "back"!

Why did we bother to put Alan Shepard in space after Gagarin had got there first? Why did the Soviets bother with unmanned missions after we'd already put men on the moon?

Why don't the Soviets or Russians or Chinese or Europeans or Indians plant their flag on the moon? What, they don't have technology as good as ours was half a century ago? Because that's apparently all you need to land men the Moon.

Of course, one thing we've always lead the world in is movie special effects.

devilspost · 11-04-2012, 09:21 PM

buzzard · 11-04-2012, 09:29 PM

More Important than the tracks, where are the stars?

The stars should be overwhelming in an atmosphere free environment.

Dirty F · 11-04-2012, 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buzzard

More Important than the tracks, where are the stars?

The stars should be overwhelming in an atmosphere free environment.

You can find out the very simple answer to this within 5 seconds using google. Why instead do you truther prefer to look like complete fucking idiots instead? Explain that to me.

Dirty F · 11-04-2012, 10:26 PM

Venusblogger, let me ask you again. All 6 moon landings were faked?

Dirty F · 11-05-2012, 04:50 AM

Bump for Venusblogger.

hineken · 11-05-2012, 05:03 AM

what he said

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude · 11-05-2012, 07:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

i have met you once....you were sleeping on the floor of someones room, juicys i believe, i came in, saw what you looked like, enjoyed a chuckle and left.

Proof or Ban!!!

Nevermind...

ADG

helterskelter808 · 11-05-2012, 09:09 AM

Next month will be a big date for NASA, 40 years since the final manned mission to the moon.

People who flatly refuse to accept the possibility that 'men on the moon' was faked, why have we not landed men on the moon since? Why has no other country?

10-29-2012, 08:20 PM	#112
Max Potential Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 1,045	North Korea's space program will capture the moon and bring it home, a feat no Western nation could accomplish. __________________

10-29-2012, 08:29 PM	#119
DBS.US Geo Cities Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: North Captiva Island, Florida USA Posts: 11,835	__________________ Make a Free Chaturbate White Label site in 34 minutes and be making money tonight

11-04-2012, 12:48 PM	#124
2012 So Fucking What Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 17,189	__________________ best host: Webair \| best sponsor: Kink \| best coder: 688218966 \| Go Fuck Yourself

11-04-2012, 12:53 PM	#125
Penny24Seven So Fucking What Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: USA Posts: 6,287	back to the thread, have any of you even watched the rover drive on the moon? It throws up so much fucking dirt it covers its own tracks. Watch the damn thing drive around with tires that look like a screen and you wonder why there are not that many tracks lol, __________________ Our site is coming soon. It will be one of the best ever! I know so. Brian and Penny

11-04-2012, 01:32 PM	#127
Sly Let's do some business! Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 31,339	__________________ Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted Windows VPS now available Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc. Click here for more details.

10-29-2012, 07:44 PM	#106
Minte Babemeister Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Madison Posts: 7,081	I have to wonder how NASA convinced the Russians to keep their mouths shut. Or maybe they just took the US governments word on the whole event?

10-29-2012, 08:24 PM	#114
Dirty F Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 59,204	Phoenix, can you try and make one post without talking complete bullshit? Is that even possible?

10-29-2012, 08:29 PM	#118
Dirty F Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 59,204	Now think hard before you reply, dumb nutter. Because i will make you look like the idiot you are over and over again. And it's so easy, i could do it in my sleep.

11-04-2012, 01:23 PM	#126
helterskelter808 So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 3,405	And yet on the LRO pics, there are tracks all over.

11-04-2012, 06:59 PM	#134
helterskelter808 So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 3,405	Not only has NASA not gone "back" for 40 years, ESA (European Space Agency) hasn't tried it, the Soviet Union didn't try it, or Russia, or China or India. Why not? The usual reason is that "why would they bother when the USA already did it?". In that case, why did we go "back", if we already did it? Even after the Apollo 13 near disaster, we still went "back"! Why did we bother to put Alan Shepard in space after Gagarin had got there first? Why did the Soviets bother with unmanned missions after we'd already put men on the moon? Why don't the Soviets or Russians or Chinese or Europeans or Indians plant their flag on the moon? What, they don't have technology as good as ours was half a century ago? Because that's apparently all you need to land men the Moon. Of course, one thing we've always lead the world in is movie special effects. Last edited by helterskelter808; 11-04-2012 at 07:04 PM..

11-04-2012, 09:21 PM	#135
devilspost Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Tampa yomebe -at- hotmail Posts: 3,980	__________________ Brothels and Escorts Worldwide.

11-04-2012, 09:29 PM	#136
buzzard Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Midwest Posts: 1,276	More Important than the tracks, where are the stars? The stars should be overwhelming in an atmosphere free environment. __________________

11-04-2012, 10:26 PM	#138
Dirty F Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 59,204	Venusblogger, let me ask you again. All 6 moon landings were faked?

11-05-2012, 04:50 AM	#139
Dirty F Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 59,204	Bump for Venusblogger.

11-05-2012, 05:03 AM	#140
hineken So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: gfy school Posts: 207	what he said

11-05-2012, 09:09 AM	#142
helterskelter808 So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 3,405	Next month will be a big date for NASA, 40 years since the final manned mission to the moon. People who flatly refuse to accept the possibility that 'men on the moon' was faked, why have we not landed men on the moon since? Why has no other country?