To what extend does Google already (or in the future) treat duplicate images as duplicate content?

[B.Barnato]

With the advent of Google reverse image search and sites such as tineye a while back, does Google already take into account image duplicates on the web and categorize accordingly?

If not, do you expect this to happen in the near future, to what extent will this change future google updates and what impact will this have?

What options are there to change the image data to make it seem unique and thus immune to this technology?

Discussings.

[ottopottomouse]

http://translate.google.co.uk/?hl=en&tab=wT#en/es/

[B.Barnato]

Con el advenimiento de la búsqueda de imágenes de Google inversa y sitios como TinEye hace un tiempo, hace Google ya toman en cuenta los duplicados imagen en la web y clasificar en consecuencia?

Si no es así, ¿espera que esto suceda en un futuro cercano, ¿hasta qué punto este cambio de futuras actualizaciones de google y qué impacto tendrá esto?

¿Qué opciones hay para cambiar los datos de la imagen para que parezca único y por lo tanto inmune a esta tecnología?

Discussings.

[B.Barnato]

What next?

[B.Barnato]

Thanks for the hat btw.

[ottopottomouse]

http://translate.google.co.uk/?hl=en&tab=wT#en/es/aus/

[ottopottomouse]

http://translate.google.co.uk/?hl=en.../aus/minstrel/



Unfortunately as image translation is in it's infancy there are errors leading to an accumulation of changes. Once you go through Spanish for example the sombrero stays even when further translated to Australian.

[DamageX]

I'll tell you on ICQ. :D

[Stephen]

Originally Posted by B.Barnato

With the advent of Google reverse image search and sites such as tineye a while back, does Google already take into account image duplicates on the web and categorize accordingly?

If YOU ran Google and valued unique content, would YOU add this metric to your algo?

Google is smart, too.

Originally Posted by B.Barnato

What options are there to change the image data to make it seem unique and thus immune to this technology?

From hash tag analysis to facial recognition and other measures, you're not going to be able to resize and "flip canvas horizontal" and think you'll skate past the all-seeing eye.

New tools for online child protection, copyright (and other law) enforcement and other uses are far more advanced today than the ability of most ham-handed attempts to thwart them.

[B.Barnato]

Originally Posted by ottopottomouse

http://translate.google.co.uk/?hl=en&tab=wT#en/es/aus/

Originally Posted by ottopottomouse

http://translate.google.co.uk/?hl=en.../aus/minstrel/



Unfortunately as image translation is in it's infancy there are errors leading to an accumulation of changes. Once you go through Spanish for example the sombrero stays even when further translated to Australian.

[B.Barnato]

Originally Posted by DamageX

I'll tell you on ICQ. :D

Coolio :D

[B.Barnato]

Originally Posted by Stephen

If YOU ran Google and valued unique content, would YOU add this metric to your algo?

Google is smart, too.



From hash tag analysis to facial recognition and other measures, you're not going to be able to resize and "flip canvas horizontal" and think you'll skate past the all-seeing eye.

New tools for online child protection, copyright (and other law) enforcement and other uses are far more advanced today than the ability of most ham-handed attempts to thwart them.

Thanks for your input. That does make sense.

[B.Barnato]

I would like to apologize for mistakenly writing extend instead of extent in the thread title.