To what extend does Google already (or in the future) treat duplicate images as duplicate content?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • B.Barnato
    So Fucking Banned
    • Nov 2010
    • 3618
    #1

    To what extend does Google already (or in the future) treat duplicate images as duplicate content?

    With the advent of Google reverse image search and sites such as tineye a while back, does Google already take into account image duplicates on the web and categorize accordingly?

    If not, do you expect this to happen in the near future, to what extent will this change future google updates and what impact will this have?

    What options are there to change the image data to make it seem unique and thus immune to this technology?

    Discussings.
    Tags: None
    • ottopottomouse
      She is ugly, bad luck.
      • Jan 2010
      • 13177
      #2
      http://translate.google.co.uk/?hl=en&tab=wT#en/es/

      ↑ see post ↑
      13101

        Comment

        • B.Barnato
          So Fucking Banned
          • Nov 2010
          • 3618
          #3
          Con el advenimiento de la búsqueda de imágenes de Google inversa y sitios como TinEye hace un tiempo, hace Google ya toman en cuenta los duplicados imagen en la web y clasificar en consecuencia?

          Si no es así, ¿espera que esto suceda en un futuro cercano, ¿hasta qué punto este cambio de futuras actualizaciones de google y qué impacto tendrá esto?

          ¿Qué opciones hay para cambiar los datos de la imagen para que parezca único y por lo tanto inmune a esta tecnología?

          Discussings.

            Comment

            • B.Barnato
              So Fucking Banned
              • Nov 2010
              • 3618
              #4
              What next?

                Comment

                • B.Barnato
                  So Fucking Banned
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 3618
                  #5
                  Thanks for the hat btw.

                    Comment

                    • ottopottomouse
                      She is ugly, bad luck.
                      • Jan 2010
                      • 13177
                      #6
                      http://translate.google.co.uk/?hl=en&tab=wT#en/es/aus/

                      ↑ see post ↑
                      13101

                        Comment

                        • ottopottomouse
                          She is ugly, bad luck.
                          • Jan 2010
                          • 13177
                          #7
                          http://translate.google.co.uk/?hl=en.../aus/minstrel/



                          Unfortunately as image translation is in it's infancy there are errors leading to an accumulation of changes. Once you go through Spanish for example the sombrero stays even when further translated to Australian.
                          ↑ see post ↑
                          13101

                            Comment

                            • DamageX
                              Marketing & Strategy
                              • Jun 2001
                              • 14293
                              #8
                              I'll tell you on ICQ. :D
                              Whitehat is for chumps

                              If you don't do it, somebody else will - true story!

                                Comment

                                • Stephen
                                  Consigliere
                                  • Feb 2003
                                  • 1771
                                  #9
                                  Originally posted by B.Barnato
                                  With the advent of Google reverse image search and sites such as tineye a while back, does Google already take into account image duplicates on the web and categorize accordingly?
                                  If YOU ran Google and valued unique content, would YOU add this metric to your algo?

                                  Google is smart, too.

                                  Originally posted by B.Barnato
                                  What options are there to change the image data to make it seem unique and thus immune to this technology?
                                  From hash tag analysis to facial recognition and other measures, you're not going to be able to resize and "flip canvas horizontal" and think you'll skate past the all-seeing eye.

                                  New tools for online child protection, copyright (and other law) enforcement and other uses are far more advanced today than the ability of most ham-handed attempts to thwart them.

                                    Comment

                                    • B.Barnato
                                      So Fucking Banned
                                      • Nov 2010
                                      • 3618
                                      #10
                                      Originally posted by ottopottomouse
                                      http://translate.google.co.uk/?hl=en&tab=wT#en/es/aus/

                                      Originally posted by ottopottomouse
                                      http://translate.google.co.uk/?hl=en.../aus/minstrel/



                                      Unfortunately as image translation is in it's infancy there are errors leading to an accumulation of changes. Once you go through Spanish for example the sombrero stays even when further translated to Australian.

                                        Comment

                                        • B.Barnato
                                          So Fucking Banned
                                          • Nov 2010
                                          • 3618
                                          #11
                                          Originally posted by DamageX
                                          I'll tell you on ICQ. :D
                                          Coolio :D

                                            Comment

                                            • B.Barnato
                                              So Fucking Banned
                                              • Nov 2010
                                              • 3618
                                              #12
                                              Originally posted by Stephen
                                              If YOU ran Google and valued unique content, would YOU add this metric to your algo?

                                              Google is smart, too.



                                              From hash tag analysis to facial recognition and other measures, you're not going to be able to resize and "flip canvas horizontal" and think you'll skate past the all-seeing eye.

                                              New tools for online child protection, copyright (and other law) enforcement and other uses are far more advanced today than the ability of most ham-handed attempts to thwart them.
                                              Thanks for your input. That does make sense.

                                                Comment

                                                • B.Barnato
                                                  So Fucking Banned
                                                  • Nov 2010
                                                  • 3618
                                                  #13
                                                  I would like to apologize for mistakenly writing extend instead of extent in the thread title.

                                                    Comment

                                                    Previous template Next
                                                    Working...