Do you support a war with Iraq? - Page 3 - GoFuckYourself.com

jimmyf · 02-15-2003, 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr.Fiction

Let me guess - long time listener, first time caller?

Not talk radio again..............PLEASE say no........

jimmyf · 02-15-2003, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rooster
Lets cut the spin.

cbs, nbc, abc are highly liberal. Brokaw, Rather, Jennings are diehard democrats. Anyone that denies this needs help.

The major newspapers are run by liberals.

CNN is pro government and seem content to just pitch softball questions and not rock the boat.

The only place to find a right wing opinion is fox news and talk radio.

There is a reason fox news is kicking cnn and msnbc's ass in the ratings. Because they reflect the views of middle america.

Please tell Mr.Fiction, he's behind times, or I should say on a sinking ship. I did read today in the San Francisco Chronicle, MSNBC is going 2 have a TV show with That Savage guy. My 1st thought was god from one end of the spectrum 2 the other.

And yes the major newspapers are run by liberals, use 2 be (Years Ago) the Editors were Conservative no longer.

Mr.Fiction · 02-15-2003, 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jimmyf
Not talk radio again..............PLEASE say no........

I can usually pick out a talk radio listener on GFY in 3 posts or less.

They all say the exact same catchphrases and code words that they hear on the radio.

You can deny it, but we both know the truth. A very large percentage of this country is brainwashed by talk radio, CNN, Fox, etc.

Rush alone claims 20 million drones listen to him everyday. That's a lot of people who prefer right wing propaganda to facts.

Arguing with talk radio listeners is nearly pointless, so I mostly just point them out when I see them.

I think I see one!

jimmyf · 02-15-2003, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr.Fiction

I can usually pick out a talk radio listener on GFY in 3 posts or less.

They all say the exact same catchphrases and code words that they hear on the radio.

You can deny it, but we both know the truth. A very large percentage of this country is brainwashed by talk radio, CNN, Fox, etc.

Rush alone claims 20 million drones listen to him everyday. That's a lot of people who prefer right wing propaganda to facts.

Arguing with talk radio listeners is nearly pointless, so I mostly just point them out when I see them.

I think I see one!

I done told you me no listen 2 talk radio's.

20 million is 1 hell of a lot of drones. if one guy has 20 million all combined could be pushing 100 million. drones drones drones drones all over the place

Mr.Fiction · 02-15-2003, 05:24 PM

By the way, here are some numbers on which candidate most U.S. newspapers endorsed in the 2000 election:

http://www.tipponline.com/articles/00/E&p112.htm

At the same time, the survey revealed that the nation's newspapers have endorsed Bush over Gore by a better than 2-1 margin.

The Editor & Publisher/TIPP poll also asked who the editors and publishers plan to vote for themselves next week. In another surprise, those willing to reveal their vote named Bush by a 2-1 margin. Publishers will vote for Bush at a 3-1 ratio, with editors favoring the Texas Governor by a narrow margin.

tony286 · 02-15-2003, 05:32 PM

We knew about Pearl Habor before it happened. It was our excuse to get into the war. We had to get into the war but back then we didnt attack until attacked apon. As crazy as Saddam is he is not Hitler and the Nazi's , he will also never raise to that level he has a suckful army unlike Hitler had.Also Hitler had the support of the German people for the most part, people dont like to talk about that. Saddams people are there only because he wont let them out lol. Also he was doing all this evil shit 12 yrs ago and W's father kept him in power.

Read the book

At Dawn We Slept: The Untold Story of Pearl Harbor Considered the most complete work on the subject.

.:Frog:. · 02-15-2003, 05:33 PM

NO!
Notice most people agree.

rooster · 02-15-2003, 05:37 PM

yea, gfy is a great barometer for anything. Half the people on the board hate america. The other half are diehard liberals that think conservatives will end porn even though there was more obsenity busts in the clinton years.

Mr.Fiction · 02-15-2003, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rooster
yea, gfy is a great barometer for anything. Half the people on the board hate america. The other half are diehard liberals that think conservatives will end porn even though there was more obsenity busts in the clinton years.

You are comparing the first 2 years of Bush to 8 years of Clinton? Instead, why don't you think back to when Reagan and the first Bush were in office for 12 years and compare that to Clinton?

Here is an article from some right wing site that might wake you up:

http://www.moralityinmedia.org/index...lintonporn.htm

During the first six years of the Clinton administration, federal obscenity law enforcement declined by over eighty percent. In fiscal year 1997, there were only six prosecutions in which the lead charge was a violation of federal obscenity laws. In fiscal year 1998, the number was eight.

During the Reagan and Bush administrations,the Justice Department successfully prosecuted child pornographers and large-scale purveyors of obscenity; and, in the process of effectively enforcing the obscenity laws, collected millions of dollars in fines and forfeitures to offset the costs of enforcement.

rooster · 02-15-2003, 06:03 PM

can you answer any question without completely spinning ?

Mr.Fiction · 02-15-2003, 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rooster
can you answer any question without completely spinning ?

Maybe you missed this part of my response:

During the first six years of the Clinton administration, federal obscenity law enforcement declined by over eighty percent.

Joe Sixpack · 02-15-2003, 06:11 PM

No, I think he's just ignoring it.

rooster · 02-15-2003, 06:12 PM

and that is spin. The issue at hand is obsenity under gwb vs clinton.

I don't even think obsenity busts are a bad thing. But the calling card from many pornographers for months ahead of the election is how internet porn would be in hot water under bush. That has not been the case. Far from it. And the obsenity and censorship has been in europe and canada.

MaxDent · 02-15-2003, 07:15 PM

This is like a fucking good looking chick.

IT MUST BE DONE!

Joe Sixpack · 02-16-2003, 02:11 AM

44% for war
56% against

Anyone else?

View Poll Results: Do you support a war with Iraq?
Yes	57	43.18%
No	75	56.82%
Voters: 132. You may not vote on this poll

02-15-2003, 05:33 PM	#107
.:Frog:. Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: ~ C A N A D A ~ Posts: 2,123	NO! Notice most people agree. __________________ <a href="http://www.pornopayouts.com/?rid=pp3076">PornoPayouts</a> Tons of Hosted Galleries.

02-15-2003, 05:24 PM	#105
Mr.Fiction Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Free Speech Land Posts: 9,484	By the way, here are some numbers on which candidate most U.S. newspapers endorsed in the 2000 election: http://www.tipponline.com/articles/00/E&p112.htm At the same time, the survey revealed that the nation's newspapers have endorsed Bush over Gore by a better than 2-1 margin. The Editor & Publisher/TIPP poll also asked who the editors and publishers plan to vote for themselves next week. In another surprise, those willing to reveal their vote named Bush by a 2-1 margin. Publishers will vote for Bush at a 3-1 ratio, with editors favoring the Texas Governor by a narrow margin.

02-15-2003, 05:32 PM	#106
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	We knew about Pearl Habor before it happened. It was our excuse to get into the war. We had to get into the war but back then we didnt attack until attacked apon. As crazy as Saddam is he is not Hitler and the Nazi's , he will also never raise to that level he has a suckful army unlike Hitler had.Also Hitler had the support of the German people for the most part, people dont like to talk about that. Saddams people are there only because he wont let them out lol. Also he was doing all this evil shit 12 yrs ago and W's father kept him in power. Read the book At Dawn We Slept: The Untold Story of Pearl Harbor Considered the most complete work on the subject.

02-15-2003, 05:37 PM	#108
rooster Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 2,384	yea, gfy is a great barometer for anything. Half the people on the board hate america. The other half are diehard liberals that think conservatives will end porn even though there was more obsenity busts in the clinton years.

02-15-2003, 06:03 PM	#110
rooster Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 2,384	can you answer any question without completely spinning ?

02-15-2003, 06:11 PM	#112
Joe Sixpack So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Australia Posts: 3,793	No, I think he's just ignoring it.

02-15-2003, 06:12 PM	#113
rooster Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 2,384	and that is spin. The issue at hand is obsenity under gwb vs clinton. I don't even think obsenity busts are a bad thing. But the calling card from many pornographers for months ahead of the election is how internet porn would be in hot water under bush. That has not been the case. Far from it. And the obsenity and censorship has been in europe and canada.

02-15-2003, 07:15 PM	#114
MaxDent Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: San Francisco Posts: 851	This is like a fucking good looking chick. IT MUST BE DONE!

02-16-2003, 02:11 AM	#115
Joe Sixpack So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Australia Posts: 3,793	44% for war 56% against Anyone else?