![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
The problem with these two idiots is they don't have a fucking clue about the real world. What they don't consider is how a government take over, would take effect. It would be a popular movement, much like what happened in Germany and other places. Convince a sizeable proportion of the public, if not the majority, the new way is the best way, then take over. It's happened so many times it's amazing they didn't think of it. The best and only way for the the majority of the public to fight the Government isn't with armed rebellion against a vastly superior fighting force. It's the way it's been done many times before. Like how the Vietnam war was stopped, Martin Luther King, Gandhi, etc. Withdraw your labour and watch the Government listen. If there ever was this ridiculous scenario of the US going the route of Libya the only thing that will save them is the Army switching side and a massive intervention as happened in Libya. While Assad has the army on his side, the armed rebels don't stand a chance. It's amazing how little respect these two have for the abilities of their army. |
Paul, When it comes to door to door warfare the Army has never experienced the firepower and bad attitude the average US city would throw their way.
. |
Quote:
Likewise, the US Government wasn't fighting for its own survival in Vietnam, but it would be against a domestic insurgency. The Government has everything on its side, firepower, intelligence, surveillance, propaganda. Timothy McVeigh isn't considered a patriot by most Americans, is he? A revolution wouldn't stand a chance without mass defections from the military, and even then it would be a long drawn out civil war that would take the US back to the stone age. There aren't many Americans who'd want to do that, and understandably so. The Second Amendment has nothing to do with defending against tyranny, and everything to do with maintaining profits for gun companies. |
Thinking about it in greater depth, it becomes obvious how right Scotty and Buzzard are. Because without them on guard imagine what could happen in the US.
A small minority elite could take over the Government by donating massive funds to politicians for campaigning to the public, putting on grand shows that fool the electorate into voting for their selected men. Then bribing politicians to make sure the laws they want get passed, or when a bad one slips through to look after all the citizens, people cry out against it. Usually supporting the businesses of the elite. Then getting politicians to run up massive debts for the citizens, their children, grandchildren and maybe even their great grandchildren will have to repay. A massive slice of the debt would be used to fund wars, all supported by the hardware they supply, in countries where the elite's business need to have power or influence. While letting the public have their toys and illusion of power. That would never happen in the US, with the highly educated, logical and sensible armed guards looking after the people. So an elite majority don't take over the country. Not while these guys are on guard. http://orri.blog.is/users/49/orri/im...ller_sheep.jpg Problem with sheep is they don't know shit. |
Quote:
Funny thing about retarded people and NRA lying fuckheads, they don't realize treaties cannot override the US Constitution. |
Truthers are pathetic people. They supposedly know the truth and then do nothing about it. A bunch of losers that can't accomplish shit.
Kind of embarrassing to be a holder of the truth |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Truthers think they possess an intelligence others lack. They can see how everybody is being manipulated.
If they're so smart about manipulation how come they cannot manipulate others to see the truth? All of that supposed intelligence going to waste. Or most likely they lack it in the first place. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's ok to feel the way you feel..I'm not judging you...carry on |
Quote:
|
If anything, the IlluminatiworldorderMasons want as many firearms as possible on the streets so as many dumb fucks as possible carry on killing each other. Less people = less fighters for the reptilian army to worry about when the time comes. Or something like that.
|
Simon is quickly turning into a second Johnnyclips. Soon he'll be starting conspiracy threads all fucking day.
It isn't surprising really. We all know he is dumb as hell. Smart people don't suddenly turn into truthers. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
. |
Quote:
|
There is a better chance of auto related death by texter where is the outrage there?
. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
there..was that clear enough for your country ass |
Quote:
You're...weak, angry, lonely..gfy is your outlet, your connection to life..hope you find happiness out there somewhere instead of hand-fucking yourself to sleep to hide your pain, while using your tears as lube |
Quote:
Lies are what's up. :thumbsup The Truth is for suckas. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Here is a logical thought. People have known that they were going to sign it anyway and there was no outrage. This incident brought it to the forefront. If they were already going to sign it and nobody cared, why an event?
|
we'll see what if anything really changes after this is signed but i think the fact that this guy ordered so much crazy shit and was never flagged is something that needs to change. people ordering an arsenal of guns and gear should be checked into to make sure they aren't up to anything.
and i've yet to see this incident be used as a reason to pass this. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Have you noticed how many times NBC has been caught for editing videos shown on the news to fit their story with in the last couple months?
They lost the last shred of credibility they had left with that. News should be cut and dry truth not propaganda. |
Quote:
|
look at this ok big brother has some plans.
When the treaty was originally proposed by the United Nations in 2006, the U.S. voted against the resolution, but the Obama Administration and several U.S. representatives revived it in 2010. Advocates for gun control believe that by regulating and restricting the right to possess a firearm, violence will be reduced - that fewer guns will mean less crime. In fact, the opposite has been shown to be true. In 2008, our nation?s capital was ordered to lift a thirty year ban on handguns after a federal court tossed out the prohibition. Soon after the ruling was announced, Mayor Adrian Fenty held a press conference where he declared, ?More guns very simply lead to more violence.? But according to FBI statistics, since Washington D.C.?s gun ban was implemented, the murder rate for the district increased while the nation?s murder rate declined. After the injunction against handguns was lifted, from 2008 to 2009, murders in the district fell twenty-five percent. full article... |
the NWO is moving fast
wake up |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
SHHHHHHHH!!!!! (people don't want to hear facts like these! It's much easier to paint rhetorical illusions...) . |
Quote:
|
Can one of the conspiracy theorist tell us what the conspiracy is, we should all fear. And then tell us what the US Government would have to do, to make them take up arms?
Because from what I can see they already own your asses and have little else to gain. |
It's strange that some people say the US government wants more gun control when under Obama the only thing passed on guns is to allow them to be carried in national parks.
|
Quote:
It's probably a thought crime to suggest that Timothy McVeigh was a patriot, but he's classed as a terrorist for standing up against Government aggression and murder. Most ordinary people probably think of him as a terrorist or a nut, likewise militias, perhaps because of the children that were killed at Oklahoma. And yet the US Government killed more kids at Waco, and many people think that was just the Government dealing with a bunch of crazies who deserved what they got. Ordinary people can be very fascistic. So the only man to stand up to the Government is deemed a terrorist, the Government walks all over the people, and yet all these brave patriots keep saying is what they'll do "if" the Government does something. While the Government just laughs and carries on doing whatever it likes, because it knows nobody actually has the courage of their convictions to do anything to stop it. |
Quote:
|
helterskelter808 is right on most things. OK on Timothy McVeigh and the militia he's wrong.
Yet he's spot on about the US Government eroding right and Americans sitting back and taking it. So again, what would it take for the US public mostly all to take up arms? Waco, children were kept in by their parents. Oklahoma no one was given the choice. Waco was the fault of David Koresh and his flock of sheep. Militias are men playing soldiers, they wouldn't last long in a real conflict. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
As long as the U.S. remains a Democratic Republic there will never be a need to take up weapons against the Government as the power of governance remains in the hands of the people...they get the Government the majority either wants or that they deserve for not doing their due diligence in exercising their role in "for the people and by the people". |
Quote:
Under the US system, voters considered electing an old man who's a cancer survivor with a running mate who's as dumb as shit? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123