Oh wow..

Eric, inside for a moment please. Why are you covering for pirates?
 

Curious why you deleted public info and public photos in my post after I outed one of the biggest pirates in the pirate world, S-i-m-o-n K-e-y.

I did everything within the rules for GFY, every name listed is involved deeply in serious piracy, and now you're covering for this shit bag pirate and even removed his name from the post. What gives man? Is that the mystery owner who has been hiding behind your corporate front man all this time?

Only two names get removed from this board, one of them is the old Mansef owner, and the other is this guy.

Don't bother..

http://www.bangitout.com/uploads/12jew-jitsu.jpg

So you can't start a thread?

I've got a couple on the go, we don't want to get greedy.

But no thread about Kaktuz? I was looking forward to that one.

I wonder what is his legal name? Are the addresses provided legit?

Isn't it illegal to provide fictitious whois info? Can't you lose domains if you provide bad info?

Looks like he owns http://adyea.com/ also - dont think i saw that in your list

This is more than one person involved.

It's not illegal per se to enter false whois information however if you are committing a crime, as we allege these people are, then it's an aggravating factor. It's certainly a violation of ICANN policies.

kaktuzx also owns

http://www.gayheaven.org/

I took it as Simon Leht / Simon Vega / Simon Key are the same person using different names.

One thing I noticed. Although all of my domains have registration privacy, if you do an ip look up, all my info is displayed just like whois info. I assume this info comes from my host rather than registrar.

IP Privacy isn't really that private, when you serve a subpoena on a registrar they cough up the information really quick.

I only post information that has been publicly available in this thread and on StopFileLockers.com - we have a order of magnitude more information on our targets than we ever post.

edit****

It can all go on the Stop File Lockers site.

It's also recorded over here for posterity.

Don't you think this is going a little overboard? One thing is fighting the business and another is to post private information of people on public forums. This is wrong on so many levels, not to mention that whoever that Simon person is, he's not the only one in the photos.

If you do this, may be you should post your own pictures and family pictures up and complete them with your home address and do the same for your employees, donors and whoever else is involved. That would only be fare. You have turned your activity into a business and if you have nothing to hide or not afraid of anything, go ahead post that info up.

I think you guys as a community should investigate why moderators did what they did, but that has to be done privately. Is this Simon person their friend? Did he pay them? Did he send a legal notice? Those questions should be answered.

Right now it looks like double standards. I remember when people allegedly tracked down info about one of the largest file host being owned by GFY owners all that was quickly, folks got banned or blocked out.

P.S. This is my first post, hope it's not going to be last.

Just out of interest, which piracy outfit, file locker, or other targeted site are you involved with ?

This thread turned out to be shit. :321GFY good job AK

We haven't even started yet.

Well the direction it took isn't the right one.

You mean focusing on people like Kaktuz and their piracy networks, or something else ?

Look at it this way, if they went into my house and stole the same content on a hard drive, I would shoot and kill them in my living room and legally get away with it.

Secondly, none of this information currently posted is private. It is 100% all public information. The info gathered on these people would boggle your mind.

Thirdly, don't give a shit either way when it comes to pirates, just like they don't give a shit who they steal from. They are thieving fucks who deserve whatever wrecking ball that is about to come through their life. Gloves are always off when dealing with people like this and everyone in their life is fair game. Don't like it, don't be a pirate. Otherwise, you have to deal with the eventual consequences when you're number is finally called.

What you should be worried about is what wasn't posted here. It's just been foreplay so far.

I'd like to add one thing. On this page of the thread there is what I consider to be a racist image. I don't approve of it, I don't like it, I don't think it's funny and I would prefer images like that were not posted in this thread.

You just shot yourself in the leg with this dumb sentence.

Why AK the gloves are off? let it slide man let it slide.
burn them all.

In which direction should it go?

Qestion is..

Is this a business thread which was great with the amazing work AK's done so far.
Or is it a personal crusade.

since it turned out to be a personal crusade with racist remarks in it and postings of personal images and information and postings of none connected people like family, friends etc etc..., in my opinion this isn't the right direction.

Awwwww, are we going to have a pity party for pirates now?

Yigal, I can't control what other people post. I do not approve of the image, I think it's actually reprehensible.

I also do not believe that the gloves are off in this fight, however everyone has their own opinion and is entitled to it. I have been progressing this issue on a fairly matter of fact basis and have refrained from personal attack. However the information about Kaktuz that I have posted is not what I consider to be personal attack, it's simply outing someone who for too long has been ripping off rights holders and then serving them back traffic generated from stolen content.

Kaktuz is going to find out the error of his ways soon enough, however documenting these matters is important to progress the cause. I personally do not condone anyone being the subject of unwarranted personal attack, I receive enough of it myself. Only today I have received serious threats to my safety, not the first and not the last. It goes with the territory and I will wear that.

I'd like this thread to remain a documentary thread tracking the progress of our work and investigations. I'd like it not to descend into a personal, vitriolic campaign without boundary.

I think your mistaken, your mistaken with me and someone who wants to have a conversation with you.

LOL, you think that posting my name gives you a higher level, in my eyes the fact that you know my name is enough big brotherish for me, and just makes me dislike you more and your actions and ways.

Fact is the minute I've seen my name in your post, I didn't even want to read what you wrote. but keep going with this, you will lose at the end.

How do you know his family is not involved in the business? How do you know everyone posted about is not deeply involved? Why do you even care what happens to them?

See above, the part that I wrote that your mistaken.

I'm sorry, I didn't think your name was a secret here, I was trying to give you a personal reply empathetic to your view which I was actually agreeing with in part.

The thing is you don't decide whats secret and whats not. Anyways I don't care anymore, good luck with your crusade.

:321GFY

I am happy to see this reply from you. You have done an amazing job and as you say it shoudnt descend into a personal vitriolic campaign.

From what I understood above, Eric deleted the photo DWB posted that was showing other people that had probably nothing to do with all this...

Nobody deleted the name or other public info, nor will delete the info you are posting about whois and domains and you documentate the case with facts....

I personally lost plenty of $ with the epassporte case, but i wasnt proud when info of family and kids of mallic were posted and I think its totally wrong to do such things. Simple as that

I'm at one with everything you've espoused above. I don't see the need to drag families, race or anything else into what I would like to remain a documentary thread. I have tried throughout to remain as balanced as possible, providing documentary evidence to every claim made.

Unfortunately for the people who wake up every day and see their latest content being shared on piracy sites or people who have a stake in the piracy business it's easy to get emotional about the issues.

We have a long way to go in this project and it would be a shame to see the thread derailed by off the cuff or unnecessary vitriol. I think it's amazing that it's come this far, almost 4000 posts since June, without descending into a free for all. Hopefully we can keep it on track and focussed on the issue at hand.

This is incorrect, Eric deleted Simon Key's name and photo, who is at the head of this entire operation.

Secondly, how does anyone at AVN know anything about who is involved in what, and who are you guys to make the call of who "probably" has nothing to do with any of this?

DWB the name is written many times in this thread and nobody is deleting it....Photo was and I personally agree with Eric for doing it(I explained above why I think this is the correct thing to do, apart from legal implications). I hope you understand, AK does and I am happy.

Then I'm living in the twilight zone because his NAME was deleted from my post along with his photo.

Yet you left the photo and name of the other pirate. You don't care about the legal implications from him. You don't care about it being the correct thing to do with him. Yet for Simon Key, there are possible legal implications and it was the correct thing to do. Where is the logic in that?

Since you have decided to take this public now... I removed images of family members and kids. The rules are clear to leave family out of this.

This is NOT a debate.

Are you sure?
I purchased traffic from adyea in past, it was israel people but not remember any link with sites of kaktuz.

In planetsuzy I don't see any adyea ads, I would expect to see if was same owner?
Planetsuzy is just full of livejasmin, myfreecams and punishtube/exposedwebcams ads. And link to kaktuz com. Who in turn is full of same ads and no adyea again.

Sorry that YOU made the choice to break the rules and I tried to be nice and send you an email instead of just banning you for posting images of family members and children. If some other information was removed while trying to clean up YOUR bullshit, oh fucking well. We have supports AdultKing in this effort from day one.

For now, I suggest you shut your fucking mouth or I will just go ahead and give you that 3 month vacation that would have saved me this headache.

Please enlighten me and show me what images of "kids" I posted, because there were none. Go back and look for yourself. I didn't post images of "kids" and frankly you should be ashamed of yourself for even implying I posted photos of children on any adult site, because we both know, as everyone does who say the post, that is not true.

Saying I posted photos of children is a lie and you know it, so does everyone else who saw the photo. THERE WERE NO IMAGES OF CHILDREN POSTED! I posted a montage image of Simon Key and that is what you deleted along with his name. And so be it, but don't say I posted images of kids. I don't even know why you would say that.

English please :helpme

You are right the image had no kids, but you mentioned them in the text of your message. That is why the text was removed.

How about we just keep this focused upon the individual that you can 100% say is at fault here, and, as stated, leave family out of this. A broad stroke of well they may be invovled doesn't work here.

Thanks for clearing that up. And I also want to note the names listed were adults. No minors. That's not how I roll.

That is fine. Simon Key is 100% directly involved. He is also listed in AK's post where the proper due diligence was done before posting.

No problem at all, the whole family thing just pushed my buttons.


Yes and that will stay, I have no problem with calling these guys out in anyway shape or form. No problem with you guys calling out their associates or partners in crime. Just, please, leave the innocents out of it.

Stand-up guys.

:sarcasm

We are very keen to start cleaning up what's left of the file locker industry, however to do this we need the support of rights holders. Only by going in to battle with a good number of rights holders being infringed will we be able to knock over the remaining large sites.

We scrupulously use every possible means to impact and disrupt pirates, forcing them into a continual process of moving hosts, payment providers and monetization methods until they run out of options and can no longer operate.

IP Rights Holders can now become represented by us (Copy Control) so we can help you mitigate piracy of your content.

Representation by Copy Control is not a replacement for your current DMCA arrangements, rather it's complimentary to them.

What we do is actively enforce your rights by working with web hosting companies, payment processing companies, banks, card associations, advertising networks and other service providers to have them stop working with the pirates and their sites.

Where organisations are un-cooperative we have a number of legal strategies that we employ to gain compliance.

We also liaise with law enforcement agencies and other government agencies to mitigate piracy on your behalf.

To get your company , brand or content represented by Copy Control we ask that you fill out this simple form.

http://copycontrol.org/get-represented/

once you fill out this form I will send you a copy of our rights-holder representation agreement for you to sign and return back to us.

you can also read about what representation will do for you at

http://copycontrol.org/services/

We work on a cost recovery basis so the fees for representation are quite low and if you can't afford them we'll work with you to come up with a fee which suits your budget. Small rights holders would pay around $500 per year (or $50 per month), Mid sized rights holder companies would pay around $1000 per year (or $100 per month) and large rights holders would pay around $3500 per year or ($350 per month).

This is very expensive and labor intensive work, we need to charge fees to recover the costs of what we are doing.

Representation is non exclusive. Becoming represented by Copy Control should not impact any other relationships you have with DMCA agents, legal services, attorneys or investigators. We are a complimentary service to all of these types of organisations.

If you have any questions about becoming represented by us please email me at members -at- copycontrol.org