not the forum to discuss these

[DVTimes]

'Children as young as 11 are performing sex acts on rows of boys as online porn turns children into sex attackers,' ministers are warned in shocking report

[Phoenix]

why are you posting that here?

[DWB]

Not surprised. Any kid unsupervised can find hardcore porn in 2 seconds of being online, even if he's only looking for GI Joe.

[DamianJ]

http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/toys/dailymail/

[Harmon]

Maybe in your neck of the woods...

[TheSwed]

MPs, charities and this paper want a new ?opt-in? system ? where access to porn is normally blocked by the internet service provider, unless parents specifically request otherwise. Miss Berelowitz told MPs this move would be the right way to make a ?start?.

will soon be like that, I think

[Paul Markham]

Originally Posted by TheSwed

will soon be like that, I think

And so it should be.

As a Father of a 10 year old girl I'm amazed at how advanced she is compared with my youth and Eva says with hers.

We have taught her to come to us for information, we will talk and discuss it, yes she has an idea what we did as a living and knows not to go into the office unless told to and not to use my computer under any circumstances.

Yet when a 10 year old asks for a book about sex, because her friends have one and they talk about it.

When I make risque joke and understands.

She knows when two people of the same sex kiss, they are gay.

And other things.

I know it's impossible to protect them on your own and in your home. Because they go to school and have friends.

Opt in will only reduce the exposure. Still it's a start.

[tony286]

I think its worse now because kids grow up much faster and there are alot of latch key kids. Parents treat the internet likes its a vcr and it isnt. You also have single parent households or both parents work. So they come home from school and no one is there. Its a road map for trouble.

[v4 media]

Fuck me, enough with the dailymail links..

Can't this become a bannable offense?

[Paul Markham]

Originally Posted by tony286

I think its worse now because kids grow up much faster and there are alot of latch key kids. Parents treat the internet likes its a vcr and it isnt. You also have single parent households or both parents work. So they come home from school and no one is there. Its a road map for trouble.

Yes. Our daughter has friends who come around here. Because their parents are out at work. Here is ironically the safest place from being exposed to this stuff.

Our daughter is starting to read magazines full of 15 year old girls and boys. Pictures of them looking at each other and about to kiss. Seems like like yesterday she was in a cot and wearing nappies.

[Slappin Fish]

Usual sensationalist crap from the dailymail

[BlackCrayon]

sounds like BS to try and get laws passed.

[Paul Markham]

Originally Posted by Slappin Fish

Usual sensationalist crap from the dailymail

And what ages are your children?

Goes for BlackCrayon also.

[MediaGuy]

Originally Posted by DVTimes

'Children as young as 11 are performing sex acts on rows of boys as online porn turns children into sex attackers,' ministers are warned in shocking report

A heap of unsubstantiated claims parading as journalism once again trying to link porn to child exploitation and (let's call it what it is) rape.

This crap makes all sorts of references which, from the words the paper is using, are unverified and cannot be until "the report comes out in September". Will they be verifiable there? Will we find a causative link between adult content and child rape at that point? I highly doubt it.

I don't doubt that many of the things described and reported by "an officer" and others have happened. The world is full of sick fucks.

But their causative agent is falsely modelled. If eleven year-old boys are raping, then investigate the parents, the siblings, the households and families. You'll find "the problem" there.

Online porn doesn't magically transform well-raised children and even badly raised children into sex-abusive monsters unless maybe they're already abused.

And even then, you have to look into the abusers. Not material they might come across while surfing...

Originally Posted by DWB

Not surprised. Any kid unsupervised can find hardcore porn in 2 seconds of being online, even if he's only looking for GI Joe.

I looked for GI Joe on Google, did ten pages, "Safe Search" off, both links and images, couldn't find a thing...

Originally Posted by v4 media

Fuck me, enough with the dailymail links..

Can't this become a bannable offense?

lol now that would be against principles.

As bad as the "anti-porn" wanna-bans, no?

I've run history and deeper searches on my kids' computers and found nothing. I *was* worried about all the claims that porn is easy to find, comes in via spam, is communicated via Facebook, yaddayadda, but I'm not anymore.

My children haven't come across WhoreAbuse or Kink or Wasteland in any kind of search, apparently, even when unsupervised for hours at their machines.

I get spam for penis pills, fake Rolexes viagra, fake Vuiton purses, even the friggin' White House, but not from porn producers - not even from those Czech beastiality people (I did once but now I don't).

And I work in the industry? Shouldn't I expect more bad porn crap?

I think this sensationalistic shit is just that, and worth paying attention to only insofar as it should be objected to, fought, and not made to provoke bad laws.

I'm venting here because I have always ignored it and now am bugged by such a ridiculous article and claim by such a huge source of "news"....

:D

[DamianJ]

Originally Posted by MediaGuy

I'm venting here because I have always ignored it and now am bugged by such a ridiculous article and claim by such a huge source of "news"....

:D

The Daily Mail is a comic read by idiots. There is no "news" in it. Their sensationalist reporters, and I use the word loosely, never have sources, citations, evidence or proof.

They just make shit up.

And fucksticks believe it.

[Cherry7]

Originally Posted by DamianJ

The Daily Mail is a comic read by idiots. There is no "news" in it. Their sensationalist reporters, and I use the word loosely, never have sources, citations, evidence or proof.

They just make shit up.

And fucksticks believe it.

Not only that it is the paper of choice of British porn webmasters and is campaigning to put them out of business.

[Cherry7]

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

And so it should be.

As a Father of a 10 year old girl I'm amazed at how advanced she is compared with my youth and Eva says with hers.

We have taught her to come to us for information, we will talk and discuss it, yes she has an idea what we did as a living and knows not to go into the office unless told to and not to use my computer under any circumstances.

Yet when a 10 year old asks for a book about sex, because her friends have one and they talk about it.

When I make risque joke and understands.

She knows when two people of the same sex kiss, they are gay.

And other things.

I know it's impossible to protect them on your own and in your home. Because they go to school and have friends.

Opt in will only reduce the exposure. Still it's a start.

What does she need protecting from?

If you think the content on your computer could damage her, what about us?

Just because we are over 18 does not mean we are immune from disturbing images.

How do you think sex damages people?

[BlackCrayon]

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

And what ages are your children?

Goes for BlackCrayon also.

Did you even read the article? If so you wouldn't be comparing your daughter knowing what sex is at 10 to what they describe in the article. by the time a child is 12 years old they've witnessed tens of thousands of murders on tv, yet very few go on to be murderers.

[SomeCreep]

[garce]

I just want to say that I don't search for this stuff, don't post this stuff, and will not argue about this stuff.

Its one thing for a newspaper - and I've never read the Daily Mail (so I don't even know if its a "real" newspaper) - to write a story. Its a whole different thing when it comes to discussing this shit at GFY - and posting links and opinions.

All this shit should just be gone. Wrong forum in which to debate this topic. But its from cut and fail DVTimes, so I should not expect anything less.

This topic should be left to real news organizations and the authorities. It takes a true idiot to fucking discuss it at GFY.

I AM an idiot, but everyone who posted above me is even worse. Delete this shit already. This is no place to discuss this topic.

[EukerVoorn]

Originally Posted by DVTimes

'Children as young as 11 are performing sex acts on rows of boys as online porn turns children into sex attackers,' ministers are warned in shocking report

And when they turn 18 they become prostitutes or porn models and you and I hire them.

Where do you think porn models come from? What kind of childhood did they have, you think?

There's things I don't like about this industry and this is one of them. Basically we're exploiting fucked up vulnerable people. I remember this thread on www.net-model.com where a model asked for advice on how to become a porn model, and an adult photographer replied: "the best advice I can give you is: forget about it, don't do it, because it will fuck you up and one day you'll regret all the things you did".

But in the meantime tomorrow I'll be working with the next model telling me about her shitty childhood during the coffee break and when she finished her coffee I get my camera and tell her to shove the dildo back into her ass.

Hard to digest food for thoughts for most retards on here probably.

And it wasn't any better before the internet days, kids are just more open about it now and will take it to the police quicker because there's less taboos on sexuality and abuse, so there are more reports but I'm totally sure it was the same or even worse in the past, but back then nobody had the guts to speak about it.

[papill0n]

can we finally get rid of this fucking parasite please

why is he posting stories about kids sucking each other off here?

youve seen the wedding dress shit right ?

youve read his other posts about incest and other fucked up shit right ?

you know hes the perfect profile for some sort of horrendous sicko crime right ?

[L-Pink]

.

[Diomed]

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon

sounds like BS to try and get laws passed.

Agreed....

[ShoeBox]

nothing against OP , no problem with you here , but why post this shit? why post this on an adult forum.. makes no since to me.

[papill0n]

Originally Posted by ShoeBox

nothing against OP , no problem with you here , but why post this shit? why post this on an adult forum.. makes no since to me.

this should help

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1068796

[papill0n]

watch that video of dvtimes aka adam blake wearing a dress and clown make-up and then process the fact that its the same guy who is posting threads about kids being sucked off