Gallery opinions, please. - GoFuckYourself.com

SpaceAce · 02-08-2003, 05:55 PM

This gallery
http://www.innocentass.com/galleries...ts/enuts1.html
is using my original GIF images with very little optimization. The total size of my custom images is 58.8KB.

This gallery
http://www.innocentass.com/galleries...nuts1-opt.html
is using images that I did some heavier optimization to. The total file sizes add up to 31.2KB

I am wondering if the drop in filesize is worth the loss in quality. I did my best to reduce the damaging effects during optimization, but I am still a little paranoid about it. Please have a look and let me know if the optimized images hold up OK.

General comments on the layout are welcome, too. This gallery is a pretty radical departure from my usual work.

Thanks,
SpaceAce

421Fill · 02-08-2003, 05:58 PM

What loss in quality? Seriously, I can't really tell, so used the optimized versions.

SpaceAce · 02-08-2003, 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by turbo
What loss in quality? Seriously, I can't really tell, so used the optimized versions.

Thanks. I need some neutral eyes to tell me what they see. I know what I did to the images and I might just be seeing things that aren't there

SpaceAce

Sly_RJ · 02-08-2003, 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by turbo
What loss in quality? Seriously, I can't really tell, so used the optimized versions.

Yep.

Scott McD · 02-08-2003, 06:09 PM

Use the force..

Your eyes can decieve you, don't trust them...

stevo · 02-08-2003, 06:14 PM

Looks good here, I had to focus in just to tell the difference... There is some minor pixelation, but it looks good!

SpaceAce · 02-08-2003, 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stevo
Looks good here, I had to focus in just to tell the difference... There is some minor pixelation, but it looks good!

Cool!

Thanks for all the replies, guys.

SpaceAce

EscortBiz · 02-08-2003, 08:53 PM

its nice

02-08-2003, 05:55 PM	#1
SpaceAce Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Magrathea Posts: 6,493	Gallery opinions, please. This gallery http://www.innocentass.com/galleries...ts/enuts1.html is using my original GIF images with very little optimization. The total size of my custom images is 58.8KB. This gallery http://www.innocentass.com/galleries...nuts1-opt.html is using images that I did some heavier optimization to. The total file sizes add up to 31.2KB I am wondering if the drop in filesize is worth the loss in quality. I did my best to reduce the damaging effects during optimization, but I am still a little paranoid about it. Please have a look and let me know if the optimized images hold up OK. General comments on the layout are welcome, too. This gallery is a pretty radical departure from my usual work. Thanks, SpaceAce

02-08-2003, 05:58 PM	#2
421Fill Super Mario Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Swenson's Avatar Posts: 19,410	What loss in quality? Seriously, I can't really tell, so used the optimized versions. __________________ RELEASE THE EPSTEIN FILES!!!

02-08-2003, 06:09 PM	#5
Scott McD Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Glasgow, Scotland Posts: 67,795	Use the force.. Your eyes can decieve you, don't trust them... __________________ I Buy My High Quality Traffic Here, You Should Too!

02-08-2003, 08:53 PM	#8
EscortBiz Fuck Checks, CASH only! Join Date: May 2002 Location: New York City Posts: 19,422	its nice __________________ Spanking, Medical Fetish, Sleeping, Strap-on Anal Lesbians, Girls Fucking Guys, Handjob site REAL HOT, Shemales, Anal and Ass Licking sites 100% Real EXCLUSIVE with amazing retention, ccbill payouts, lots of content FREE FTP HOSTING Promote the largest and oldest member paid escort site, Converts 10 times better then any dating site, CCBill payouts ICQ# 158802076

02-08-2003, 06:14 PM	#6
stevo Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Orlando, Florida Posts: 2,051	Looks good here, I had to focus in just to tell the difference... There is some minor pixelation, but it looks good!