Let's just step back and take a breather here.

How many of those posting have open, legit and accurate info on Whois? Yes that would catch a few out. Many hide behind domain sellers who keep info and I'll bet many register false addresses and false phone numbers, ever tried phoning some of the numbers given?

How many here really knows who owns most of the big programs? We think we know, we're told who owns it. That's not knowing and try using that info in court.

Billions are being taken online with a few or more being very shady and until someone comes in with a sledge hammer to crack this rock it will continue.

http://www.insuranceage.co.uk/IMG/92...g%3F1259851533

This needs detectives with very powerful magnifying glasses. :1orglaugh

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I've done my part and sent out the info to a couple dozen media contacts. At the very least there should be a few more eyes looking out. I doubt I can tell the government anything they don't already know at this point. My own gut feeling is that there is a lot going on behind the scenes it's just hard to provide concrete evidence for it. Obviously whoever owns Filesonic right now feels they have a lot to lose-- whoever they might be.

To say that there is no connection to Manwin at all is in my opinion inaccurate. There most certainly is a connection at least in the fact that Brazzers/Mansef was connected to Filesonic and Manwin purchased Mansef. It seems strange to ban people for speaking the truth. When you purchase a company that creates a connection in some sense of the definition.

It seems to me that someone wanted desperately to initially hide the fact that Filesonic was once connected to Brazzers/Mansef at all. The proper response from an innocent party in my opinion would have been to clarify as the Manwin employee did in this thread. This was not done in the press release initially nor when the previous thread with the whois data was deleted.

We never asked for the original thread to be deleted. We have nothing to hide.
Just clarifying that Manwin has no affiliation to FileSonic or any other filesharing site.

Do any of Manwin's parent companies or subsidiaries have or had business deals with FileSonic?

LOL Adult never does ANYTHING... other then dig it's own hole years ago!!!!

Does a bear shit in the woods?

"In light of the above, Manwin requests GFY look into the thread started by ?bbm? and request the user prove their claim, or face immediate banning?as per the message board?s policy."

http://news.avn.com/articles/Manwin-...te-462485.html

Sure. But Manwin is a Canadian business entity and there will be a legal clusterfuck to deal with them. Furthermore, this isn't retard Kim Shits the Feds will be dealing with, this is a well-organized company, who very likely has quite a few legal muscles on retainer. Furthermore, this is a company primarily dealing in online porn, which is far from the top priority for the Feds to deal with.

Besides, if the Feds had a case, don't you think they would've nailed Fabian's ass while he was in Vegas?

The best bet would be if they could somehow be linked to the some US politicians, ideally higher-ups, as there's a GOP primary going on and a presidential election coming up later this fall. If something like that can be dug up and forwarded to the mainstream media to pick up, then you got things moving.

I remember when they said they didn't own tubes.

Then I remember them saying they can't control what goes on their site. Something Fabian has repeated. Yet at least at once time, they did. Considering people may load child, beast or rape porn, one can only assume they still have to. Otherwise there is no telling what would get uploaded.

A business built on lies is exactly that.

I like where you're going with this, but if that screenshot is a fake and you're wrong, don't be surprised if you get slapped with a lawsuit. Those are some pretty strong allegations.

brazzersleaks dot com for sale!:2 cents::2 cents::2 cents::2 cents:

You can sue anyone for anything. Winning is a different manner. In every message I've written I have been careful to specify that it is an alleged screen shot of the whois data and that they need to verify it. But they can try if they'd like. I would almost welcome it because then the relationship between Manwin and Mansef would become a documented legal issue as would the nature of any relationship between Mansef (and Manwin, if applicable) and Filesonic. It would be great press.

I didn't fake the screenshot. The whois history for Filesonic on DomainTools.com has been unavailable for close to a year now because of what that one record cache said.

The poster of the first thread, bbm, ended up with the same info from a different source.

how long have you been at manwin?

Yes welcome to GFY! First two posts in this thread. I kind of miss Fabian himself handling these matters but I can see where that might be dangerous.