It's Going To Be Illegal To Fuck 18 yr olds now in California - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

dave90210

Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2007

Posts: 1745
Share

Post
#1

It's Going To Be Illegal To Fuck 18 yr olds now in California

03-29-2012, 01:25 PM

According to some new law it's going to be illegal only in California to have sex with anyone over the age of 18 when you have authority over them. So that's a teacher, employer, photographer, preacher, police officer etc. It's going to be a felony to have sex with an 18 and up female if you have authority over them.

So if this law passes California will have the highest age of consent in the country. They want to make this law on a teacher student relationship that happened in Modesto and guess what the girl was of legal age.

If you shoot porn in California I wouldn't doubt if they go after you guys too since you have authority over the adult woman that your shooting.

What's next changing the age of consent to 40?

More info here
http://abcnews.go.com/US/mom-califor...5#.T3TTBcz-tFo

Last edited by dave90210; 03-29-2012, 01:37 PM.
Tags: None
Due

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2001

Posts: 3620
Share

Post
#2

03-29-2012, 01:31 PM

Technically you can't have authority over someone of age unless they are locked up, you are an officer of the law or you are their guardian of some kind.

Else the person that is 18 and up will always be in a position where they can leave if they wanted to

I buy plugs
Skype: Due_Global
/Due
Comment
$5 submissions

I help you SUCCEED

Join Date: Nov 2003

Posts: 32189
Share

Post
#3

03-29-2012, 01:32 PM

Originally posted by Due

Technically you can't have authority over someone of age unless they are locked up, you are an officer of the law or you are their guardian of some kind.

Else the person that is 18 and up will always be in a position where they can leave if they wanted to

Makes sense actually. Custodial power versus free consent.

Need a NON-ADULT income stream? We build your YOUTUBE CHANNEL for only $20 per video!

For Hire: $3/hour or $400 per month Marketing Specialist Virtual Assistants
Comment
brassmonkey

Pay It Forward

Join Date: Sep 2005

Posts: 77390
Share

Post
#4

03-29-2012, 01:34 PM

sounds ok to me

TRUMP 2026 KEKAW!!! - The Laken Riley Act Is Law!
DACA ENDED - SUPPORT AZ HCR 2060 52R - email: brassballz-at-techie.com
Comment
L-Pink

working on my tan

Join Date: Mar 2005

Posts: 39151
Share

Post
#5

03-29-2012, 01:34 PM

So a 21 year old girl bangs her 22 year old shift manager at Burger King and it's a felony offense? Sexual felony at that?

.
Comment
Jim_Gunn

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2003

Posts: 5702
Share

Post
#6

03-29-2012, 01:39 PM

The reading comprehension level on this board is astonishing. The article says that some woman is pushing for a new law. This law, if it were to be passed, would apply to teachers, presumably only public school teachers and high school students. It doesn't mention any other people. WTF are you even talking about "authority". No one has such authority over other adults except in some particular circumstances like a police officer working on the job or dealing with mentally handicapped people or such things.
Comment
InfoGuy

80/20 Rule

Join Date: Apr 2010

Posts: 3052
Share

Post
#7

03-29-2012, 01:41 PM

Never mind, I didn't read the article.

Last edited by InfoGuy; 03-29-2012, 01:42 PM.

Support American Heroes | How Bad is My Batch? | Vaccine Deaths & Adverse Reactions | Free Speech Coalition | <WARNING> ePayService / Guerra Capital, INC / MTACC payments | Flirt4Free Fucks their Affiliates | Don't do business with piece of shit Andy Alvarez from Webmaster Central / VR3000, who said:
"If it was up to me, they would have shot all 30,000 of those country loving shitheads"
Comment
L-Pink

working on my tan

Join Date: Mar 2005

Posts: 39151
Share

Post
#8

03-29-2012, 01:42 PM

Originally posted by Jim_Gunn

The reading comprehension level on this board is astonishing. The article says that some woman is pushing for a new law. This law, if it were to be passed, would apply to teachers, presumably only public school teachers and high school students. It doesn't mention any other people. WTF are you even talking about "authority". No one has such authority over other adults except in some particular circumstances like a police officer working on the job or dealing with mentally handicapped people or such things.

You read the link without posting first?

.
Comment
96ukssob

So Fucking Banananananas

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 12991
Share

Post
#9

03-29-2012, 01:49 PM

what about marriage? isnt that authority?

Email: Clicky on Me
Comment
KillerK

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2008

Posts: 3406
Share

Post
#10

03-29-2012, 02:28 PM

People need to read the article.

LOL
Comment
ottopottomouse

She is ugly, bad luck.

Join Date: Jan 2010

Posts: 13177
Share

Post
#11

03-29-2012, 02:36 PM

There's already something similar here but I don't know the full scope of it.

↑ see post ↑
13101
Comment
mafia_man

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2005

Posts: 1965
Share

Post
#12

03-29-2012, 02:42 PM

I'm out.
Comment
2012

So Fucking What

Join Date: Jul 2006

Posts: 17189
Share

Post
#13

03-29-2012, 02:49 PM

damn, that's fucked .............. there goes all my plans

best host: Webair | best sponsor: Kink | best coder: 688218966 | Go Fuck Yourself
Comment
19teenporn

Confirmed User

Join Date: Apr 2011

Posts: 3034
Share

Post
#14

03-29-2012, 02:51 PM

Let's move to fuck 19 years old sluts then...
Comment
2012

So Fucking What

Join Date: Jul 2006

Posts: 17189
Share

Post
#15

03-29-2012, 02:52 PM

Get out of our pants please

best host: Webair | best sponsor: Kink | best coder: 688218966 | Go Fuck Yourself
Comment
Grapesoda

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 46234
Share

Post
#16

03-29-2012, 03:05 PM

Originally posted by Jim_Gunn

The reading comprehension level on this board is astonishing. The article says that some woman is pushing for a new law. This law, if it were to be passed, would apply to teachers, presumably only public school teachers and high school students. It doesn't mention any other people. WTF are you even talking about "authority". No one has such authority over other adults except in some particular circumstances like a police officer working on the job or dealing with mentally handicapped people or such things.

thank you Jim
Comment
2012

So Fucking What

Join Date: Jul 2006

Posts: 17189
Share

Post
#17

03-29-2012, 03:06 PM

I'm so glad they got that covered man. that HAD TO BE THE TOP FUCKING PRIORITY for everyone . I swear when I left the house I could hear everyone talking about this particular issue everywhere ..........

best host: Webair | best sponsor: Kink | best coder: 688218966 | Go Fuck Yourself
Comment
xxxdesign-net

My hips don't lie

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 10129
Share

Post
#18

03-29-2012, 08:57 PM

while it's true that if a law is passed making it illegal for a teacher to have a relationship with say a 23yo student, because one supposedly has authority over the other, it will open the door to making a boss/employee relationship illegal based on the same pretext... that being said, the thread starter could be a little bit more honest next time he makes a thread...

Last edited by xxxdesign-net; 03-29-2012, 08:59 PM.
Comment
lucas131

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Join Date: Aug 2004

Posts: 11475
Share

Post
#19

03-29-2012, 08:59 PM

i vote for 40+, it will sure produce clever people
Comment
CHMOD

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2003

Posts: 1697
Share

Post
#20

03-29-2012, 11:09 PM

USA is becoming a more and more fucked up society every day.

Instead of focussing on sex, it would be a good idea to fight violent crimes and drug/weapon traffic.

Sell our Silicone Dolls and make big money!

Our website:
https://www.sexdolls-shop.com/

Signup:
http://www.sexdollscash.com/sliiing/registration.php

Contact:
[email protected]
Comment
PornoMonster

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 2257
Share

Post
#21

03-29-2012, 11:26 PM

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net

while it's true that if a law is passed making it illegal for a teacher to have a relationship with say a 23yo student, because one supposedly has authority over the other, it will open the door to making a boss/employee relationship illegal based on the same pretext... that being said, the thread starter could be a little bit more honest next time he makes a thread...

Several companies have this as a company policy anyway.....

$6 a Month 4 Blade Razors, 4 Cartridges, Includes shipping!

Domains 4 Sale CashForVideos.com - Pussy.biz - FootPorn.com - SoloMovie.com - CollegeGirlCams.com - AmateurCamGirls.com - PR3 4 Letter Domain
Comment
alextokyo

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Sep 2011

Posts: 975
Share

Post
#22

03-30-2012, 12:13 AM

If it's all the same, I guess I'll just stick to 11 year olds.

If she's old enough to count, she's old enough to mount.
Comment
$5 submissions

I help you SUCCEED

Join Date: Nov 2003

Posts: 32189
Share

Post
#23

03-30-2012, 12:26 AM

Originally posted by L-Pink

You read the link without posting first?

.

Need a NON-ADULT income stream? We build your YOUTUBE CHANNEL for only $20 per video!

For Hire: $3/hour or $400 per month Marketing Specialist Virtual Assistants
Comment
DamianJ

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Jul 2006

Posts: 15808
Share

Post
#24

03-30-2012, 01:46 AM

Maybe someone watched Girl With The Dragon Tattoo?
Comment
ruff

I have a plan B

Join Date: Aug 2004

Posts: 5499
Share

Post
#25

03-30-2012, 02:35 AM

We need still more ways to lock up people in this country. The USA must look to the rest of the world the way we look at California. Just plain nuts.

CryptoFeeds
Comment
travs

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 1631
Share

Post
#26

03-30-2012, 04:14 AM

that's just fucked up
Comment
Rochard

Jägermeister Test Pilot

Join Date: Dec 2001

Posts: 75768
Share

Post
#27

03-30-2012, 07:18 AM

Originally posted by Jim_Gunn

The reading comprehension level on this board is astonishing. The article says that some woman is pushing for a new law. This law, if it were to be passed, would apply to teachers, presumably only public school teachers and high school students. It doesn't mention any other people. WTF are you even talking about "authority". No one has such authority over other adults except in some particular circumstances like a police officer working on the job or dealing with mentally handicapped people or such things.

The problem is the terms used are too vague. What it does it mean to have "authority" over someone? Does that mean someone is a prisoner, a student, or an employee? Does a manager at Wendy's have "authority" over one of their employees. I would think yes. Companies and the US military already has rules and laws in place about this.

One hand, the teacher who is banging his eighteen year old student has done nothing wrong. He's having sex with another adult. On the other hand, I have a daughter in school, and if I found out her teacher was having sex with her - no matter her age - the least of his concerns would be tossing the salad in prison.

Herschel Savage
Brooklyn, NY
Comment
dev777

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2005

Posts: 366
Share

Post
#28

03-30-2012, 07:22 AM

wont pass. period.
Comment
L-Pink

working on my tan

Join Date: Mar 2005

Posts: 39151
Share

Post
#29

03-30-2012, 07:24 AM

Originally posted by ruff

We need still more ways to lock up people in this country. The USA must look to the rest of the world the way we look at California. Just plain nuts.

Unfortunately what happens in California, trends/legislation, tends to spread to the rest of the nation.

.
Comment
xxxdesign-net

My hips don't lie

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 10129
Share

Post
#30

03-30-2012, 08:38 AM

Originally posted by PornoMonster

Several companies have this as a company policy anyway.....

so? big difference between being a company policy and being a government enforced law...
Comment
xxxdesign-net

My hips don't lie

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 10129
Share

Post
#31

03-30-2012, 08:40 AM

Originally posted by dev777

wont pass. period.

what makes you believe that? 23 states already have such a law
Comment
Quentin

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2002

Posts: 1280
Share

Post
#32

03-30-2012, 08:45 AM

For those interested, here's the actual text of the bill (AB 1861):

SECTION 1.
Section 1243.5 is added to the Government Code, to read:

1243.5.
(a) If a teacher or school employee is convicted of a violation of Section 288.6 of the Penal Code, he or she shall forfeit all accrued rights and benefits in any public retirement system in which he or she is a member, effective on the date of the conviction.
(b) Any contributions to the public retirement system made by the teacher or school employee described in subdivision (a) shall be returned, without interest, to the teacher or school employee, in a manner conforming with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code.
(c) The school district that employs a teacher or school employee described in subdivision (a) shall notify the public retirement system in which the person is a member of the person?s conviction.

SEC. 2.
Section 288.6 is added to the Penal Code, to read:

288.6.
(a) Any teacher or employee at a public elementary or secondary school who engages in a sexual relationship or in excess and inappropriate communication with a pupil of any age who is enrolled in the school is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment in a county jail pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170.
(b) For purposes of this section, ?excess and inappropriate communication? means any communication by a school employee to a pupil, regardless of who initiated the communication, that may be viewed as derogatory, sexual, lewd, threatening, harassing, discriminatory, or suggestive in nature.
(c) In addition to the penalties provided by this section, a person who is convicted of a violation of this section shall, pursuant to Section 1243.5 of the Government Code, forfeit his or her rights and benefits in any public retirement system in which he or she is a member.

SEC. 3.
No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.

I can see a couple places where the bill could be treading into some questionable territory from a First Amendment perspective (mostly within the statutory definition of "excess and inappropriate communication" it provides) but I have no idea how a court would interpret that language, or whether a successful First Amendment based challenge could be mounted against the bill on that basis, should it ever become law.

There are already laws regulating the relationships between teachers/students on the books of some other states, btw, along with similar laws that make it a crime for people like psychiatrists/psychologists to have sex with their patients (or even ex-patients), including some that even cover professions like dental hygienists.

Q. Boyer
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...